TorrentFreak

The place where breaking news, BitTorrent and copyright collide

4Shared Sued To Reveal Identify of Infringing Users

4Shared, the largest file-sharing website on the Internet, has been sued in an attempt to reveal the identities of the person or persons who uploaded copyrighted files. The case was filed at a US federal court by Modulo Security Solutions, who are trying to identify the alleged uploader of confidential documents belonging to the company. If successful, the case may have implications for others who share copyrighted files on cyberlockers.

4sharedWith 10 million registered users and more than 2.5 billion page views each month, 4Shared is believed to be the largest file-sharing website.

Needless to say, a site of this size can’t possible avoid some of its users occasionally uploading copyrighted files. In common with most websites that deal with user uploaded content, 4Shared allows rightsholders to send takedown notices to remove copyrighted files that are posted without permission, but for some this is not enough.

Modulo Security Solutions has filed a lawsuit at a federal court in New Jersey in an attempt to reveal the identities of the person or persons who uploaded confidential documents to 4Shared. The security company told the court that it plans to take civil action against the alleged uploader(s) for copyright infringement related offenses, but that it can only do so if 4Shared hands over their personal details.

In the complaint Modulo states that while 4Shared took swift action to remove the infringing files from their website, it refused to give up any information on their users without a court order. This claim is backed up by a copy of an email 4Shared sent Modulo early December.

4shared

Interestingly, the lawsuit was filed “ex parte,” meaning that 4Shared will not be notified about the legal proceedings. Modulo says it chose to do so because it fears that the cyberlocker may destroy the information when they become aware of the suit.

“Petitioner submits this petition on an ex parte basis because the information that it seeks from Respondent is highly susceptible to deletion or otherwise may be destroyed, either intentionally or inadvertently,” the complaint reads.

Modulo further cites several paragraphs from the 4Shared site which indicate that the data they are after may be destroyed if the case is delayed significantly. Among other things, the 4Shared’s terms of service state that free accounts will be deleted 180 days after they were last accessed.

The cyberlocker also notes that it reserves the right to “disable or remove the accounts of users who infringe the intellectual property rights of others or may expose 4shared to civil or criminal liability.”

While the nature of the case is different from traditional media piracy, its outcome will be watched closely by copyright holders currently suing BitTorrent users. After all, if 4Shared is ordered to hand over customer information including names and IP-addresses, there is no reason why others shouldn’t try the same tactic.

In their complaint Modulo is only asking 4Shared to identify the uploader(s) of the files, not those who have downloaded them. This would make it harder to sue large groups of people as is currently the case with BitTorrent lawsuits, but it’s not unthinkable that other companies will cast a wider net.

At this point it’s unclear what type of information and logs 4Shared has of up- and downloaders, and perhaps more importantly, for how long this data is stored. TorrentFreak contacted 4Shared with a request to comment on their logging policy, and we will add a response as soon as it comes in.

Update: 4Shared comment

“We take our Privacy Policy very seriously and protect the rights of legal copyright owners, as well as personal data of our users. Here’s a snippet, concerning the protection of the users information:

“… We will make no public release of any personal information that is collected through our proprietary file sharing tool. All client-specific information gathered through 4shared will be the property of the user.”

Personal information that is collected includes users IP, the exact time and date of the login and upload process. The reason for disclosure of such data can occur only if a crime took place and after appropriate decision of the court. We don’t provide our users info if someone just say so without a legal reason for that.”

Related Posts

Previous Post | Next Post

  • goofytime

    Everyone delete your 4shared account and support SOPA! Or the world will end and the moon will turn blue!

    • GOD

      MoDildo Insecurity Solutions = a tool of the devil. Repent, sinners!

  • Pingback: 4Shared Sued To Reveal Identify of Infringing Users | Droid Universe

  • Anon

    Did you know?
    4shared has a corporate designed site, but have you ever searched information about the company on that website? No? Do so!
    Anyone putting files on that site is just crazy. (Except you give shit what happens to them)

  • FUCK-MODULO

    4shared should have gotten their lawyers to answer this sort of request. Dohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh. 4shared lawyers would have bit the tongue off Modulo.

  • http://www.twitter.com/echoman74 echoman

    4who?

  • Jimbo

    of course 4shared will lose the case. the entertainment industries will make sure of that and will then jump all over the ruling to get it applied to every other cyberlocker on the planet! it will simply be another step towards the complete internet control that these industries have been after from the beginning!

  • http://torrentfreak.com/ Rob8urcakes

    Again, it’s like asking a highway builder to keep and provide logs on every vehicle plate that used the highway they built.

    This is a pointless exercise that simply highlights how stupid our current CopyWrong and Patent laws are, as well as the BAD ATTITUDE of many agencies and businesses.

    It’s another attack on our basic Human & Civil Rights – all for the sake of protecting that which should be open and accessible to all.

    • http://www.twitter.com/echoman74 echoman

      Amen i couldn’t agree with you more.

    • Looking

      “It’s like asking a highway builder to keep and provide logs for all eternity on every vehicle plate that used the highway they built, along with how many individuals were in each car, what each of their names are, where they live, what their age and sex are, everything they did while driving between point A and point B, the period of time this all happened, and how long their trip took.”

      There, fixed it for ya. ;-)

      • Floppy Copy

        Stupid effing e-mail requirement. Because I typed in looking@the.laser.will.blind.you, it changed my name from “Floppy Copy” to “Looking” lol.

      • http://torrentfreak.com/ Rob8urcakes

        lol, but so damned true – AND so damned scary too :o
        Please accept my sincere thanks for the fix.

  • Momo

    Copyright is being used to discover and punish a whistleblower?

    Big Fucking Surprise™

    • http://www.twitter.com/echoman74 echoman

      I’ve been studying allot about copyright laws, public domain, creative commons trademarking etc etc etc and fair use. If i begin to tell you how much the industry breaks the rules in copyright i could write a book. Yet the industries seem to think everything is dandy and the public are the ones to blame. Guess what the industry breaks copyright all the time.

      • http://joshesforchange.wordpress.com/ Josh C

        You should make it a book ;D

        • http://www.twitter.com/echoman74 echoman

          i’m working on it i have quite a few examples, lol.

        • Bobbyjcoulter

          also be aware of cases such as Bittersweet Symphony by the Verve. The Rolling Stones sued the hell out of them claiming that it was their song when infact it sounds nothing like their song (which they did infact rip off of an old blues song (which was itself an interpretation of a slaves cotton field work song)) the closest the stones had to this song was a string quartet that covered their song. The major labels used this as a stepping stone to sue. The corporations essential steal then claim it was stolen from them

  • Anonymous

    Oh yeah wow, that makes a lot of sense dude I like the sound of that.
    http://www.Total-Privacy dot US

    • Spam Controller

      Oh yeah wow, that doesn’t make any sense dude I don’t like the sound of spam and I flagged it.

      • IDIOCRACY

        me too hehe

  • Pingback: Notrackingme | Proxy » Blog Archive » 4Shared Sued To Reveal Identify of Infringing Users

  • http://twitter.com/icanhazsake Ninja

    Well, I believe the guy did commit some sort of crime when he disclosed confidential information. And there’s the need to catch real criminals using the services to carry on with their misdeeds. But while I agree that this subpoena should be granted it does establish a dangerous precedent that can and will be abused by the MAFIAA and the US Govt as means of censorship.

    It’s a pretty problematic situation. Gentleman, brace yourselves, Modulo has opened the Pandora’s Box.

    • IDIOCRACY

      It should be very simple: the law is there in the first place to protect the people and in the second place to convict the criminals, if the first rule is met, you can proceed with the second. If not, the criminal walks free and you have to find another way to catch him without breaking the law, that is the real law and rights we have been fighting for hundereds of years ago (magna carta??).

    • Bakapinkuu

      I believe the guy did commit some sort of crime when he disclosed confidential information.
      Not likely. He may have violated company policy or broken the terms of his employment contract, but the odds that he committed a crime are pretty low.

      And there’s the need to catch real criminals using the services to carry on with their misdeeds.
      Pissing off your employer does not make you a “criminal”. It scares the crap out of me how frequently people confuse “corporate policy” with “law” these days. It’s not without some basis in practical reality, but that just makes it even scarier.

      But while I agree that this subpoena should be granted
      Why? Because Modulo said so? He’s very unlikely to be a “criminal”, otherwise they would have reported it to the police.
      Because of “copyright”? Confidential document != copyrighted work, for all the scare language corporate lawyers like to put into emails threatening unintended recipients. They may have an interesting civil argument to make, if they sue “John Doe” for breach of contract and then engage in discovery to find out who he is, but it’s doubtful they have a leg to stand on copyright-wise.

  • Anonymous

    It is very likely that 4shared will lose this case. The user’s hope then is an anonymous proxy upload or 4shared already deleted this info. Better had they uploaded to Wikileaks.

    Most interesting to me is that I recall that New Jersey is one state that usually requires a jury trial before handing over subscriber details (at least at ISP level) which is why NJ is not a target for the copyright trolls. 4shared may want to keep that in mind.

    I can now only wonder what they are trying to hide?

  • Anonymous

    We’ll see what happens… The 4shared Song? XD

    anyway; oh god.

  • Pingback: 4Shared Sued To Reveal Identify of Infringing Users | We R Pirates

  • Gabriel Potkány

    That is not about winning case, that’s to show that nobody can request personal information without court order. That’s standard procedure and i bet 4shared does not give a shit if they have to give these personal information, it’s just symbol that anyone who want these information would have to visit court. If they lost, ok here are they, if not, get the f* out of there. If they don’t reply like this, it means that anybody who want to know identity of uploader can just ask – and that’s bullshit. “Would you like to pack with requested personal information also penis size of our customer, Mr. Anonymous?”

  • chillinfart

    Can i see the compliant from Modulo Security Solutions?

  • Kr0nZ

    Nooo don’t bring 4shared into the light. They have been hiding quietly under the radar.

  • Lube Oil VS John Doe

    4shared is perfectly legal, they don’t even have a earn money system to encourage warez uploaders. Pathetic lowlifes trying to invaid user privacy. I highly doubt anyone considered downloading the infringing file.

    Btw, 4shared is a “New IT Solutions LTD” company… just wondering.. is this company registered in British Virgin Islands? *out of interest ;P *

    • Lube Oil VS John Doe

      I wonder if 4shared is on MPAA’s ‘rogue’ site list… :-

  • Predator

    Modulo Security Solutions?

    Target: http://www.modulo.com/

    ANONYMOUS!!!!!

  • robogo

    So now it turns out basically anyone can sue a filesharing site based company.

    My question is: why?? How?? On what grounds? Do they have something copyrighted that is shared on 4shared? Do they have the rights to something that was shared there?

    So now anybody can bully anybody? What the **** is the cyberspace coming down to?

  • ANON

    BE WARNED AMERICA. WHEN YOU HAVE CLOSED EVERY AMERICAN SITE YOU CAN. OTHER NON-AMERICAN SITES WILL RULE.

    AERICA – THE END OF YOUR RULE IS IN SITE…..AND THANK GOD….YOU CAN NOT BE TRUSTED.

    WE’RE STILL WAITING FOR THOSE WMD’S….LIES AND MORE LIES.

    • Anonymous

      America. The evil of the world rests on your shoulders, America.

  • Pingback: 4Shared Sued To Reveal Identify of Infringing Users | TorrentForce Blog

  • Alyssa Blindy

    Well, it seems 4shared knows about the lawsuit now, doesn’t it say that the security company, however it’s spelled, wanted to make sure 4shared didn’t find out?

  • MD3

    “We shall not disclose any information as well as the IP of the file uploader unless the copyright owner gives us the legal resolution issued by court on this matter, which will be accepted as a subject to our consideration.”

    Balls. 4shared has them.

  • Rekrul

    In their complaint Modulo is only asking 4Shared to identify the uploader(s) of the files, not those who have downloaded them. This would make it harder to sue large groups of people as is currently the case with BitTorrent lawsuits, but it’s not unthinkable that other companies will cast a wider net.

    That’s because, barring modified clients, there’s no such thing as just a BitTorrent downloader. All the people sued in the various BitTorrent cases were accused of uploading the files in question.

    Companies don’t go after people who are strictly downloaders because it’s not economically practical to do so. With an uploader, they can claim that the person caused an unknown amount of harm by re-distributing the file. With a downloader (who didn’t upload) they can’t make that claim. All they can claim is that the person downloaded a single copy. Any monetary reward they would get from suing such a person probably wouldn’t even cover the cost of filing the paperwork.

  • foff

    Nice to see this site fighting although I don’t know who the fuck they are. I have never seen anyone post any links using this cyberlocker so saying they are the biggest is a little exaggeration.

    • http://twitter.com/Blikes Damien

      Well, if you’ve never heard of them, they must not be real!

  • Tintintinny1

    We need to start pushing these filelockers to stop keeping such detailed logs of who does what on their systems.

    There is no legal requirement for them to keep ip logs of uploaders and downloaders for months or years and yet they do it anyway.

  • Pingback: Morning Coffee with David Farrell, January 6

  • Pingback: 4Shared Sued To Reveal Identify of Infringing Users

  • JustARandomPasserby

    Well quite frankly it isn’t 4shared’s entire fault. I mean, there IS a “TERMS OF AGREEMENT” that users HAVE TO supposedly READ but very very few people ever do so and I’m pretty sure that they say something about the “copyright stuff” and the likes. Using 4shared means that YOU do AGREE to those terms. So there.

  • http://arbitrage789.myopenid.com/ arbitrage789

    If the guy who uploaded the document really wanted to cause harm, he wouldn’t need to use a file sharing website. An employee of Modulo Security Solutions (the company at issue) would know who the people are who could benefit from the information; he could just give it to them directly. By the same token, how many people who come to 4shared.com are looking for highly technical documents on security systems?

  • jarze

    Only thing that surprised me, was this “the largest file-sharing website on the Internet”. Never would have guessed, if it’s indeed even true.
    Though I doubt it can’t be true (anymore) because all I get is “You should Sign Up or
    Login to download this file” when trying to download anything there.

  • BTGuard - BitTorrent Anonymously

NewsBits

Even more news...

  • The Pirate Bay Isn’t Down Completely, Just Having a Few Issues

    Twitter and Facebook, not to mention the TorrentFreak inbox, are currently alive with complaints that The...

  • Pirate Bay Founder Gottfrid Svartholm on Freedom of Speech

    Freedom of speech is a highly valued commodity, but should people be allowed to say whatever...

  • Blu-ray Anti-Piracy Tech Stops Discs and Promotes Purchases

    An anti-piracy system present in all official Blu-ray players since 2012 has received a fresh update...

  • Foxtel Breeds Pirates by Locking Up Game of Thrones

    One of the main reasons why people turn to piracy is the lack of legal alternatives....

  • UK Student Admits Breaching Sony Copyrights With Leak of PS3 SDK

    Last year an Internet user known as El Nomeo leaked version 3.70 of Sony’s Playstation3 SDK...

MostDiscussed

Below are TorrentFreak's most discussed articles of the past month. Join the discussion if you like.

CopyQuote

Left Quote

“The Pirate Bay has been one of the most important movements in Sweden for freedom of speech, working against corruption and censorship.

Peter Sunde Left Quote

PopularArticles

A selection of some TorrentFreak's classics dug up from our archives.