<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Accused of Illegal File-Sharing? Complain to the Government</title>
	<atom:link href="http://torrentfreak.com/accused-of-illegal-file-sharing-complain-to-the-government-081205/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://torrentfreak.com/accused-of-illegal-file-sharing-complain-to-the-government-081205/</link>
	<description>Breaking File-sharing, Copyright and Privacy News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2014 21:09:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nemo</title>
		<link>/accused-of-illegal-file-sharing-complain-to-the-government-081205/#comment-519976</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nemo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 13:19:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=6210#comment-519976</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The High Court Order under which IPs  released names and addresses can be found at:
http://www.digiprotect.org/html/hc_london_300608.html 
The judge who made the order Chief Master Winegarten is highly respected but clearly not IT literate in that he approved an order which states:
AND UPON reading the documents marked in the Court file as having been read and it appearing that there is a prima facie case that each of the subscribers associated with the IP addresses listed in Schedule 1 to this Order have copied the Applicant&#039;s work(s) on to his or her personal or office Computer (the &quot;Work(s)&quot;) without the Applicant&#039;s permission for the purpose of making it available via file sharing Websites for third parties to download, which may give rise to a claim for Copyright infringement;
The order is such utter codswallop that any lawyer could have had it overturned in ten minutes; British IPs did not have it overturned because they are happy to go along with anything that discourages people from using the service that they have paid for.
In the UK IPs are allowed to advertise UNLIMITED downloads, but then put so called fair usage clauses in the small print.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The High Court Order under which IPs  released names and addresses can be found at:<br />
<a href="http://www.digiprotect.org/html/hc_london_300608.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.digiprotect.org/html/hc_london_300608.html</a><br />
The judge who made the order Chief Master Winegarten is highly respected but clearly not IT literate in that he approved an order which states:<br />
AND UPON reading the documents marked in the Court file as having been read and it appearing that there is a prima facie case that each of the subscribers associated with the IP addresses listed in Schedule 1 to this Order have copied the Applicant&#8217;s work(s) on to his or her personal or office Computer (the &#8220;Work(s)&#8221;) without the Applicant&#8217;s permission for the purpose of making it available via file sharing Websites for third parties to download, which may give rise to a claim for Copyright infringement;<br />
The order is such utter codswallop that any lawyer could have had it overturned in ten minutes; British IPs did not have it overturned because they are happy to go along with anything that discourages people from using the service that they have paid for.<br />
In the UK IPs are allowed to advertise UNLIMITED downloads, but then put so called fair usage clauses in the small print.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Užra&#353;ai i&#353; skaitmeninio fronto #10 : nežinau.lt</title>
		<link>/accused-of-illegal-file-sharing-complain-to-the-government-081205/#comment-519535</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Užra&#353;ai i&#353; skaitmeninio fronto #10 : nežinau.lt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 05:33:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=6210#comment-519535</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Karalyst?je žmon?s, kurie buvo neteis?tai apkaltinti nelegaliais fail? mainais, raginami sk?sti pinig? prievartautojus valstyb?s institucijoms. TorrentFreak net skundo šablon? paruoš? tokiems atvejams, kuri?, deja, yra ne vienas ir ne [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Karalyst?je žmon?s, kurie buvo neteis?tai apkaltinti nelegaliais fail? mainais, raginami sk?sti pinig? prievartautojus valstyb?s institucijoms. TorrentFreak net skundo šablon? paruoš? tokiems atvejams, kuri?, deja, yra ne vienas ir ne [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nocomments</title>
		<link>/accused-of-illegal-file-sharing-complain-to-the-government-081205/#comment-519534</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nocomments]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 05:32:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=6210#comment-519534</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[the davenport lyons  your IP:217.29.195.33 was involved in illegal fileshring activities.
nocomments]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the davenport lyons  your IP:217.29.195.33 was involved in illegal fileshring activities.<br />
nocomments</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Davenport Lyons</title>
		<link>/accused-of-illegal-file-sharing-complain-to-the-government-081205/#comment-519532</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Davenport Lyons]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 04:50:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=6210#comment-519532</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We do it for the money and frankly speaking it&#039;s easy and does not involved any hard work.
Davenport Lyons.
30 Old Burlington Street
London W1S 3NL
Tel: (+44) 020 7468 2600
Fax: (+44) 020 7437 8216]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We do it for the money and frankly speaking it&#8217;s easy and does not involved any hard work.<br />
Davenport Lyons.<br />
30 Old Burlington Street<br />
London W1S 3NL<br />
Tel: (+44) 020 7468 2600<br />
Fax: (+44) 020 7437 8216</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Protestas de los internautas británicos poniendo el caso español Promusicae vs. Telefónica como ejemplo</title>
		<link>/accused-of-illegal-file-sharing-complain-to-the-government-081205/#comment-519397</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Protestas de los internautas británicos poniendo el caso español Promusicae vs. Telefónica como ejemplo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 12:09:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=6210#comment-519397</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] ha levantado bastante indignación entre los internautas británicos. Desde TorrentFreak, se ha colgado un modelo de carta de protesta que los afectados están utilizando para pedir la [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ha levantado bastante indignación entre los internautas británicos. Desde TorrentFreak, se ha colgado un modelo de carta de protesta que los afectados están utilizando para pedir la [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>/accused-of-illegal-file-sharing-complain-to-the-government-081205/#comment-519038</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 13:46:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=6210#comment-519038</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[PLS Click: http://www.iHateCandy.de.gp/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PLS Click: <a href="http://www.iHateCandy.de.gp/" rel="nofollow">http://www.iHateCandy.de.gp/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: me</title>
		<link>/accused-of-illegal-file-sharing-complain-to-the-government-081205/#comment-518786</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[me]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 08:24:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=6210#comment-518786</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Davenport lyons now have the attention of bbc watchdog

http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/watchdog/2008/12/davenport_lyons_threatening_le.html]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Davenport lyons now have the attention of bbc watchdog</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/watchdog/2008/12/davenport_lyons_threatening_le.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/watchdog/2008/12/davenport_lyons_threatening_le.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Accused of Illegal File-Sharing? Complain to the Government &#124; CyberLaw Blog</title>
		<link>/accused-of-illegal-file-sharing-complain-to-the-government-081205/#comment-518767</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Accused of Illegal File-Sharing? Complain to the Government &#124; CyberLaw Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 04:16:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=6210#comment-518767</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Accused of Illegal File-Sharing? Complain to the Government: &#8220; [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Accused of Illegal File-Sharing? Complain to the Government: &#8220; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: penumbra</title>
		<link>/accused-of-illegal-file-sharing-complain-to-the-government-081205/#comment-518604</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[penumbra]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 09:54:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=6210#comment-518604</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@37 
Meh, your &quot;...&quot;s are hiding a wealth of legalese information very pertinent to the argument. And you&#039;re wrong on the waffle front. 

The UK are interpreting their &quot;...&quot;s far more broadly than the 2002 E privacy directive allows. Note that a directive *requires* member states to achieve a particular result, just without dictating the means of achieving that result. The E Privacy directive *requires* governments to legislate proportionately. The UK is not.

Italy, Germany and Spain are interpreting it correctly, as backed up by the EJC. This needs to be fixed in the UK. 

Of course, writing to government never works - there is no true democracy, yaddah yaddah yaddah. We may as well just sit at home and not bother and have all our personal details sold to the highest bidder and not make a squeak about it. 

Or not.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@37<br />
Meh, your &#8220;&#8230;&#8221;s are hiding a wealth of legalese information very pertinent to the argument. And you&#8217;re wrong on the waffle front. </p>
<p>The UK are interpreting their &#8220;&#8230;&#8221;s far more broadly than the 2002 E privacy directive allows. Note that a directive *requires* member states to achieve a particular result, just without dictating the means of achieving that result. The E Privacy directive *requires* governments to legislate proportionately. The UK is not.</p>
<p>Italy, Germany and Spain are interpreting it correctly, as backed up by the EJC. This needs to be fixed in the UK. </p>
<p>Of course, writing to government never works &#8211; there is no true democracy, yaddah yaddah yaddah. We may as well just sit at home and not bother and have all our personal details sold to the highest bidder and not make a squeak about it. </p>
<p>Or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: meh</title>
		<link>/accused-of-illegal-file-sharing-complain-to-the-government-081205/#comment-518300</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[meh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 21:42:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=6210#comment-518300</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So where is it against the DPA?

&quot;UK ISPs were ordered ... by the High Court&quot;
&quot;Personal data are exempt from the non-disclosure provisions where the disclosure is required by ... order of a court.&quot;

Unless the high court stopped being classed as a court, that falls  squarely within the exemptions.

The stuff about the EU is just waffle. Member states are &quot;not obliged&quot; to hand over details in copyright cases, but that is nothing like saying that member states must not hand over the data.

The rest of the text about the EU is non-binding decisions, opinions and &quot;ought to&#039;s&quot;. Hardly enough to make the ICO tell the high court where to stick it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So where is it against the DPA?</p>
<p>&#8220;UK ISPs were ordered &#8230; by the High Court&#8221;<br />
&#8220;Personal data are exempt from the non-disclosure provisions where the disclosure is required by &#8230; order of a court.&#8221;</p>
<p>Unless the high court stopped being classed as a court, that falls  squarely within the exemptions.</p>
<p>The stuff about the EU is just waffle. Member states are &#8220;not obliged&#8221; to hand over details in copyright cases, but that is nothing like saying that member states must not hand over the data.</p>
<p>The rest of the text about the EU is non-binding decisions, opinions and &#8220;ought to&#8217;s&#8221;. Hardly enough to make the ICO tell the high court where to stick it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
