Comments on: AFACT v iiNet: Day 5 – Anti-Piracy Tech is Secret

By: AFACT v iiNet: Day 7 – Investigators Condoned Infringement? @ blog.idtorrent.org

AFACT v iiNet: Day 7 – Investigators Condoned Infringement? @ blog.idtorrent.org — Sat, 17 Oct 2009 21:59:34 +0000

[...] studios – and Aussie ISP iiNet (earlier coverage of day one, day two, day three, day four , day five and day [...]

By: Borderliner

Borderliner — Fri, 16 Oct 2009 21:35:52 +0000

The problem with PG and friends is that they can´t be relied on. Circumventing the block is trivial (get an unlisted IP), no reason to assume that anti-P2P companies are unwilling to make the neccessary steps. Also, as pointed put in other places – determining that someone is using a blocklist (use listed and unlisted IPs – who connects to all ain´t using, who only connects to unlisted ones is) might, atleast in theory, make that person more interesting for the anti-P2P predators (has more experience and tries to hide him-/herselt = pirates more = more money can be demanded).
Another problem is that the lists tend to contain IPs which might be “questionable” but not neccessarily anti-P2P (Tor operators are a good example – when looking only at the IP they are all “bad”, altough, I suspect, quite a number of ´em have clearly definied exit IPs and everything else that comes from them is the operator´s own traffic).
And in any case: determining a “bad” IP block takes time, even more time might go by before a user´s list gets updated. While the company using that IP block gathers as much data as possible from the unaware users who think that installing one application protects them from anyone and anything…

By: AFACT v iiNet: Day 8 – Anti-Piracy Evidence Lacking | InstantIdiocy

AFACT v iiNet: Day 8 – Anti-Piracy Evidence Lacking | InstantIdiocy — Thu, 15 Oct 2009 17:48:09 +0000

[...] studios – and Aussie ISP iiNet (earlier coverage of day one, day two, day three, day four , day five, day six and day [...]

By: AFACT v iiNet: Day 8 – Anti-Piracy Evidence Lacking | We R Pirates

AFACT v iiNet: Day 8 – Anti-Piracy Evidence Lacking | We R Pirates — Thu, 15 Oct 2009 11:39:07 +0000

[...] studios – and Aussie ISP iiNet (earlier coverage of day one, day two, day three, day four , day five, day six and day [...]

By: Ninja

Ninja — Thu, 15 Oct 2009 02:31:53 +0000

Man, I would rather stay away from people of my own isp to keep my peer list with greater variety…. oh well… they don’t know what they are talking about anyway so why care about the nonsense lol….

PG alone is not a good idea. Like most anti-virus that can’t protect you of 100% of the viruses. But it’s better than nothing.

By: AFACT v iiNet: Day 7 – Investigators Condoned Infringement? | InstantIdiocy

AFACT v iiNet: Day 7 – Investigators Condoned Infringement? | InstantIdiocy — Wed, 14 Oct 2009 19:46:44 +0000

[...] studios – and Aussie ISP iiNet (earlier coverage of day one, day two, day three, day four , day five and day [...]

By: AFACT v iiNet: Day 7 – Investigators Condoned Infringement? – FUCK THE RIAA

Wed, 14 Oct 2009 19:30:01 +0000

[...] studios – and Aussie ISP iiNet (earlier coverage of day one, day two, day three, day four , day five and day [...]

By: AFACT v iiNet: Day 7 – Investigators Condoned Infringement? : Porn Newz - Adult Industry News, Events & Articles

Wed, 14 Oct 2009 17:29:17 +0000

[...] studios – and Aussie ISP iiNet (earlier coverage of day one, day two, day three, day four , day five and day [...]

By: AFACT v iiNet: Day 6 – IP Address Alone Is Not Enough | InstantIdiocy

AFACT v iiNet: Day 6 – IP Address Alone Is Not Enough | InstantIdiocy — Tue, 13 Oct 2009 21:44:32 +0000

[...] AFACT v iiNet: Day 6 – IP Address Alone Is Not Enough Easy AdSense by Unreal It’s day six in the copyright infringement case of AFACT – representing several Hollywood studios – and Aussie ISP iiNet (earlier coverage of day one, day two, day three, day four and day five). [...]

By: John

John — Tue, 13 Oct 2009 20:46:12 +0000

“The ones on this forum telling you not to use poor protection is the ones you should be grateful of”

There. Fixed that for you.