Comments on: AFACT v iiNet: ISP: “We Should Not Be Doing AFACT’s Work” http://torrentfreak.com/afact-v-iinet-isp-we-should-not-be-doing-afacts-work-091106/ Breaking File-sharing, Copyright and Privacy News Tue, 28 Oct 2014 22:56:13 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2 By: AFACT v iiNet: Tiny Bits of BitTorrent Transfers Aren’t Illegal | We R Pirates /afact-v-iinet-isp-we-should-not-be-doing-afacts-work-091106/#comment-617173 Thu, 19 Nov 2009 14:17:03 +0000 http://torrentfreak.com/?p=18656#comment-617173 [...] Hollywood studios – and Aussie ISP iiNet (multiple links to all our earlier coverage can be found here, here, here and [...]

]]> By: AFACT v iiNet: Tiny Bits of BitTorrent Transfers Aren’t Illegal - P2P Talk? /afact-v-iinet-isp-we-should-not-be-doing-afacts-work-091106/#comment-617167 Thu, 19 Nov 2009 13:58:58 +0000 http://torrentfreak.com/?p=18656#comment-617167 [...] Hollywood studios – and Aussie ISP iiNet (multiple links to all our earlier coverage can be found here, here, here and [...]

]]> By: AFACT v iiNet: Tiny Bits of BitTorrent Transfers Aren’t Illegal | InstantIdiocy /afact-v-iinet-isp-we-should-not-be-doing-afacts-work-091106/#comment-617143 Thu, 19 Nov 2009 12:23:47 +0000 http://torrentfreak.com/?p=18656#comment-617143 [...] Hollywood studios – and Aussie ISP iiNet (multiple links to all our earlier coverage can be found here, here, here and [...]

]]> By: AFACT v iiNet: Safe Harbor Protection Intact, Says iiNet @ blog.idtorrent.org /afact-v-iinet-isp-we-should-not-be-doing-afacts-work-091106/#comment-616252 Mon, 16 Nov 2009 22:57:51 +0000 http://torrentfreak.com/?p=18656#comment-616252 [...] Hollywood studios – and Aussie ISP iiNet (multiple links to all our earlier coverage can be found here and here and [...]

]]> By: AFACT v iiNet: Safe Harbor Protection Intact, Says iiNet – FUCK THE RIAA /afact-v-iinet-isp-we-should-not-be-doing-afacts-work-091106/#comment-615713 Sat, 14 Nov 2009 14:56:13 +0000 http://torrentfreak.com/?p=18656#comment-615713 [...] Hollywood studios – and Aussie ISP iiNet (multiple links to all our earlier coverage can be found here and here and [...]

]]> By: AFACT v iiNet: Safe Harbor Protection Intact, Says iiNet - P2P Talk? /afact-v-iinet-isp-we-should-not-be-doing-afacts-work-091106/#comment-615454 Fri, 13 Nov 2009 12:58:15 +0000 http://torrentfreak.com/?p=18656#comment-615454 [...] Hollywood studios – and Aussie ISP iiNet (multiple links to all our earlier coverage can be found here and here and [...]

]]> By: AFACT v iiNet: Judge Asked To Disregard iiNet Evidence @ blog.idtorrent.org /afact-v-iinet-isp-we-should-not-be-doing-afacts-work-091106/#comment-615278 Thu, 12 Nov 2009 22:57:56 +0000 http://torrentfreak.com/?p=18656#comment-615278 [...] several Hollywood studios – and Aussie ISP iiNet (links to our earlier coverage can be found here) and [...]

]]> By: AFACT v iiNet: Judge Asked To Disregard iiNet Evidence – FUCK THE RIAA /afact-v-iinet-isp-we-should-not-be-doing-afacts-work-091106/#comment-615083 Thu, 12 Nov 2009 04:54:23 +0000 http://torrentfreak.com/?p=18656#comment-615083 [...] several Hollywood studios – and Aussie ISP iiNet (links to our earlier coverage can be found here) and [...]

]]> By: AFACT v iiNet: Barrister Tears Into iiNet Key Witnesses @ blog.idtorrent.org /afact-v-iinet-isp-we-should-not-be-doing-afacts-work-091106/#comment-614979 Wed, 11 Nov 2009 22:57:53 +0000 http://torrentfreak.com/?p=18656#comment-614979 [...] The trial continues in the copyright infringement case of AFACT – representing several Hollywood studios – and Aussie ISP iiNet (links to our earlier coverage can be found here) [...]

]]> By: AFACT v iiNet: Judge Asked To Disregard iiNet Evidence | InstantIdiocy /afact-v-iinet-isp-we-should-not-be-doing-afacts-work-091106/#comment-614923 Wed, 11 Nov 2009 20:00:58 +0000 http://torrentfreak.com/?p=18656#comment-614923 [...] several Hollywood studios – and Aussie ISP iiNet (links to our earlier coverage can be found here) and [...]

]]>