Comments on: AFACT v iiNet: Safe Harbor Protection Intact, Says iiNet

By: AFACT v iiNet: Epic BitTorrent Copyright Case Concludes | InstantIdiocy

AFACT v iiNet: Epic BitTorrent Copyright Case Concludes | InstantIdiocy — Fri, 27 Nov 2009 04:53:07 +0000

[...] – and Aussie ISP iiNet (multiple links to all our earlier coverage can be found here, here, here, here and here) is set to conclude [...]

By: AFACT v iiNet: Epic BitTorrent Copyright Case Concludes - P2P Talk?

AFACT v iiNet: Epic BitTorrent Copyright Case Concludes - P2P Talk? — Thu, 26 Nov 2009 11:01:48 +0000

[...] – and Aussie ISP iiNet (multiple links to all our earlier coverage can be found here, here, here, here and here) is set to conclude [...]

By: AFACT v iiNet: Epic BitTorrent Copyright Case Concludes | We R Pirates

AFACT v iiNet: Epic BitTorrent Copyright Case Concludes | We R Pirates — Thu, 26 Nov 2009 10:36:46 +0000

[...] – and Aussie ISP iiNet (multiple links to all our earlier coverage can be found here, here, here, here and here) is set to conclude [...]

By: AFACT v iiNet: Tiny Bits of BitTorrent Transfers Aren’t Illegal @ blog.idtorrent.org

Sun, 22 Nov 2009 22:57:32 +0000

[...] The trial continues in the copyright infringement case of AFACT – representing several Hollywood studios – and Aussie ISP iiNet (multiple links to all our earlier coverage can be found here, here, here and here) [...]

By: MC Hammer: STOP… The Music Piracy Crackdown @ blog.idtorrent.org

MC Hammer: STOP… The Music Piracy Crackdown @ blog.idtorrent.org — Thu, 19 Nov 2009 22:58:05 +0000

[...] ISPs, for enabling their customers to pirate. The most prominent case at the moment is that of AFACT against iiNet, where the anti-piracy group wants the Aussie ISP to disconnect repeat [...]

By: AFACT v iiNet: Tiny Bits of BitTorrent Transfers Aren’t Illegal - P2P Talk?

AFACT v iiNet: Tiny Bits of BitTorrent Transfers Aren’t Illegal - P2P Talk? — Thu, 19 Nov 2009 13:59:43 +0000

[...] by Reese on Nov.19, 2009, under P2P News (No Ratings Yet) Loading … The trial continues in the copyright infringement case of AFACT – representing several Hollywood studios – and Aussie ISP iiNet (multiple links to all our earlier coverage can be found here, here, here and here) [...]

By: anon2

anon2 — Tue, 17 Nov 2009 16:58:11 +0000

so what is the latest news then? no further closing arguments from iiNet? no decision from the court? no release of how much the judge has been bribed with? AFACT lost and managed to stop the info from being released?

By: MC Hammer: STOP… The Music Piracy Crackdown | InstantIdiocy

MC Hammer: STOP… The Music Piracy Crackdown | InstantIdiocy — Tue, 17 Nov 2009 14:13:44 +0000

[...] ISPs, for enabling their customers to pirate. The most prominent case at the moment is that of AFACT against iiNet, where the anti-piracy group wants the Aussie ISP to disconnect repeat [...]

By: MC Hammer: STOP… The Music Piracy Crackdown – FUCK THE RIAA

MC Hammer: STOP… The Music Piracy Crackdown – FUCK THE RIAA — Tue, 17 Nov 2009 00:58:30 +0000

[...] ISPs, for enabling their customers to pirate. The most prominent case at the moment is that of AFACT against iiNet, where the anti-piracy group wants the Aussie ISP to disconnect repeat [...]

By: MC Hammer: STOP… The Music Piracy Crackdown | We R Pirates

MC Hammer: STOP… The Music Piracy Crackdown | We R Pirates — Mon, 16 Nov 2009 23:37:15 +0000

[...] ISPs, for enabling their customers to pirate. The most prominent case at the moment is that of AFACT against iiNet, where the anti-piracy group wants the Aussie ISP to disconnect repeat [...]