Comments on: Anti-Piracy Group Objects To Friend of the Court Application

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sun, 13 Sep 2009 08:53:01 +0000

If the IIA have evidence to help the case I don’t see it as them unfairly biasing the decision of the judge..

Judges in the high court don’t make their way there by being retards…

They are smart enough to look at the IIA objectively… anyone who thinks otherwise is an idiot…

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Thu, 10 Sep 2009 16:54:53 +0000

The law is dead and we will object the 7 major corporations of parasites and terrorists with pest killer.

By: 4nd

4nd — Thu, 10 Sep 2009 06:10:05 +0000

So to sum it up, blatant bias is only allowed when the anti-piracy lobbies do it.

This.

By: A-tox ,d-n-a,a-force,a Cream ,a-eye Set Of 5 Anti Aging | Anti Wrinkle Eye Cream

Thu, 10 Sep 2009 04:13:20 +0000

[...] Anti-Piracy Group Objects To Friend of the Court Application … [...]

By: Garnier Skin Renew Anti Aging Fatigue Eye Cream New!! | Anti Wrinkle Eye Cream

Thu, 10 Sep 2009 04:02:16 +0000

[...] Anti-Piracy Group Objects To Friend of the Court Application … [...]

By: Bliss The Youth As We Know It Anti Aging Eye Cream .5oz | Anti Wrinkle Eye Cream

Wed, 09 Sep 2009 23:02:13 +0000

[...] Anti-Piracy Group Objects To Friend of the Court Application … [...]

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Wed, 09 Sep 2009 16:51:59 +0000

Since is against the MAFIAA I don’t feel like complaining much at this time although it is worrying that this could happen and shows how messed up governments and judicial systems are and then they ask us why we ignore laws and don’t go vote for anyone anymore.

By: Aquila92

Aquila92 — Wed, 09 Sep 2009 15:58:39 +0000

I also would like to say that, as a filesharer and internet freedom advocate, I wouldn’t be happy to let the ISP’s association influence justice, because no private company with its own agenda should be able to dictate justice.

However I recognise that someone here is needed to explain the highly technical parts of this case to the old bastards in charge.

I can also see that neither side is going to be able to agree on who that person is.

By: 16 10 Anonymous 14 27

16 10 Anonymous 14 27 — Wed, 09 Sep 2009 15:10:39 +0000

Actually, Sendaii, I believe “10″ ”Anonymous” in so many words said specifically that no company or organisation should be restricted from having the opportunity to influence court proceedings:-> “…no company/organization should not be allowed…”

By: Sendaii

Sendaii — Wed, 09 Sep 2009 14:07:44 +0000

I see now that they begin to worry about someone being impartial when it is used against them. Hypocrites.

However, I agree with 10 Anonymous, no company, whether it is on our side or their side should be able to influence the court. That isn’t justice.

By: sugoi monogatari aniki

sugoi monogatari aniki — Wed, 09 Sep 2009 13:56:19 +0000

^^^

By: yoko

yoko — Wed, 09 Sep 2009 13:35:48 +0000

Biased.. really? how so?

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Wed, 09 Sep 2009 13:22:13 +0000

These comments are stupid. You all seem to have the attitude of “hurr IIA can do it because the MAFIA (look at me I’m so cool because I spell it that way) does it.”

The point is that no company/organization should not be allowed to influence court proceedings.

To everyone saying the IIA can be biased and influence court outcomes because the antipiracy groups do, really needs to grow up. You know what? AFACT is right the IIA is completely biased towards iinets favour (with good reason) and shouldnt be allowed to be a friend of the court

By: Jack Sprat

Jack Sprat — Wed, 09 Sep 2009 13:08:22 +0000

All things being equal, the only way AFACT could win the trial is if they hide truth. However, not all things are equal.

By: haha

haha — Wed, 09 Sep 2009 13:07:22 +0000

ohh NOWW your worried about ‘impartiality..’

funny.. i don’t recall anyone being concerned about this except TPB crew in there trial..

hmm..

oh well. pirate for life. f*ck you.

By: greylion

greylion — Wed, 09 Sep 2009 12:35:20 +0000

Reminds me of the movie where Jim Carrey is a lawyer, who can’t lie for 24 hours.
In court, at some point he cries out:
“I object. This will hurt my case.”

By: down with theghostbay

down with theghostbay — Wed, 09 Sep 2009 12:16:29 +0000

Can someone please DOS this ghostbay site?

I would rather be eating dirt than going to your
trash site

By: Pirate

Pirate — Wed, 09 Sep 2009 12:12:14 +0000

More bs from these anti filesharing retards. They will probably force more ISP’s to block access to great sites like what happened where i live. Heres a great proxy though i use all the time, no spammy ads or anything, pretty fast aswell!

http://www.piratebayproxy.org/

By: DeathStalker

DeathStalker — Wed, 09 Sep 2009 11:43:18 +0000

“AFACT went further with its accusations of non-impartiality by claiming that IIA had been working with iiNet on the background of the current case.”

Hmmm, you mean like AFACT has been “working” with the politicians buying them off …. excuse me, making “political contributions to them”? And probably the judges too?

Again, an examination of the money trail would be in order, I think.

By: www.eZee.se

www.eZee.se — Wed, 09 Sep 2009 11:14:56 +0000

Having biased judges in Sweden who work with and are friends with the lawyers of the industry are fine, the same judges can be high ranking members in organizations that want stronger copyright… thats fine too, but if another organization wants to explain how things work and it can have a negative impact on your case… not fine at all.

After all, they might expose that anti-piracy methods use voodoo,witchcraft and dragon powder mixed with a unicorn’s horn as their main ingredients to track down pirates.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Wed, 09 Sep 2009 10:18:34 +0000

So to sum it up, blatant bias is only allowed when the anti-piracy lobbies do it.
I guess it falls under the same double meaning definition of “stealing” that they have, it’s perfectly fine when they do it.

By: Ruffneck

Ruffneck — Wed, 09 Sep 2009 10:16:58 +0000

I hope it Will work out