Comments on: Anti-Piracy Group Objects To Friend of the Court Application

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sun, 13 Sep 2009 08:53:01 +0000

If the IIA have evidence to help the case I don’t see it as them unfairly biasing the decision of the judge..

Judges in the high court don’t make their way there by being retards…

They are smart enough to look at the IIA objectively… anyone who thinks otherwise is an idiot…

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Thu, 10 Sep 2009 16:54:53 +0000

The law is dead and we will object the 7 major corporations of parasites and terrorists with pest killer.

By: 4nd

4nd — Thu, 10 Sep 2009 06:10:05 +0000

So to sum it up, blatant bias is only allowed when the anti-piracy lobbies do it.

This.

By: A-tox ,d-n-a,a-force,a Cream ,a-eye Set Of 5 Anti Aging | Anti Wrinkle Eye Cream

Thu, 10 Sep 2009 04:13:20 +0000

[...] Anti-Piracy Group Objects To Friend of the Court Application … [...]

By: Garnier Skin Renew Anti Aging Fatigue Eye Cream New!! | Anti Wrinkle Eye Cream

Thu, 10 Sep 2009 04:02:16 +0000

[...] Anti-Piracy Group Objects To Friend of the Court Application … [...]

By: Bliss The Youth As We Know It Anti Aging Eye Cream .5oz | Anti Wrinkle Eye Cream

Wed, 09 Sep 2009 23:02:13 +0000

[...] Anti-Piracy Group Objects To Friend of the Court Application … [...]

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Wed, 09 Sep 2009 16:51:59 +0000

Since is against the MAFIAA I don’t feel like complaining much at this time although it is worrying that this could happen and shows how messed up governments and judicial systems are and then they ask us why we ignore laws and don’t go vote for anyone anymore.

By: Aquila92

Aquila92 — Wed, 09 Sep 2009 15:58:39 +0000

I also would like to say that, as a filesharer and internet freedom advocate, I wouldn’t be happy to let the ISP’s association influence justice, because no private company with its own agenda should be able to dictate justice.

However I recognise that someone here is needed to explain the highly technical parts of this case to the old bastards in charge.

I can also see that neither side is going to be able to agree on who that person is.

By: 16 10 Anonymous 14 27

16 10 Anonymous 14 27 — Wed, 09 Sep 2009 15:10:39 +0000

Actually, Sendaii, I believe “10″ “Anonymous” in so many words said specifically that no company or organisation should be restricted from having the opportunity to influence court proceedings:-> “…no company/organization should not be allowed…”

By: Sendaii

Sendaii — Wed, 09 Sep 2009 14:07:44 +0000

I see now that they begin to worry about someone being impartial when it is used against them. Hypocrites.

However, I agree with 10 Anonymous, no company, whether it is on our side or their side should be able to influence the court. That isn’t justice.