Anti-Piracy Outfit Threatens ShareConnector Admin at his Front Door

Written by enigmax on November 14, 2007 

Having failed to encourage massive punishment against the administrator of eDonkey link site ‘ShareConnector’ in a criminal trial, anti-piracy outfit BREIN has once more resorted to traditional bully tactics - by turning up on his doorstep and threatening him, face to face.

ShareConnectorBack in 2004, ShareConnector was an eDonkey force to be reckoned with. As purely a link site (like the vast majority of BitTorrent sites), ShareConnector carried no copyright materials. However, this didn’t stop Dutch anti-piracy outfit BREIN from pressurizing the FIOD-ECD - Fiscal Investigation Unit of the Dutch Police - to investigate and eventually shut down ShareConnector.

Initially, ShareConnector’s host had refused to shut down the site stating correctly that offering links is not a crime. However December 2004 saw ShareConnector and another site, Releases4U, raided by the FIOD-ECD, resulting in the seizure of equipment and the arrest of 8 people. At the time, BREIN director Tim Kuik explained they were done waiting: “Our patience was up, after which we went to the authorities” he said.

According to P2PNet, Kuik, going for the jugular, asserted that the ShareConnector admin, Adi, should get up to 4 years in jail as he hid behind ‘false reasoning that illegal files are actually hosted on different servers and that the actual exchange doesn’t take place on their own servers’, which is, of course, a completely and utterly false assertion on Kuik’s part.

Eventually, after taking nearly 2 years to come to court, the result for BREIN and the FIOD-ECD was a disaster. The admin of ShareConnector was found completely innocent and just a couple of small fines of approximately $350 were handed out to the admins of Releases4U for uploading copyright material. The FIOD-ECD failed to provide any evidence to prove ShareConnector was involved in copyright infringement nor enough to prove that either organization was criminal in nature.

December 19th 2006 saw the triumphant return of ShareConnector, around 2 years after it was shuttered by the police but the return was not to be permanent. Not content with accepting that a criminal trial had taken place at which Adi and ShareConnector were found to be completely legal, BREIN resorted to the tactics it knows best and has had most success with - common bullying.

On Monday November 5th 2007, representatives from BREIN knocked on Adi’s door and threatened him face to face with potentially financially punishing civil action. On November 12th 2007, ShareConnector shut down for good.

The sad message on the site’s homepage now reads:

Last Monday the guys from BREIN visited me at home to convince me to close ShareConnector or else they will start a civil proceeding with a claim. Of course, this does not mean I agree with their point of view, it’s just that I can’t afford taking any risks.

As of today, November 12, 2007 I decided to close down. If there is anything new to report, you will be informed.

Thank you for all your support and understanding.

Next on the FIOD-ECD hitlist are OiNK’s seized servers. They’re likely to find that the situation is exactly the same as it was with ShareConnector, i.e no copyright materials were stored on it, so it’s not easy to see where they will succeed against OiNK where they previously failed. There is no offense of ‘facilitation’ under UK copyright law.

Previously: Most Popular DVDrips on BitTorrent (wk45)

Next: Comcast Sued Over BitTorrent Traffic Interference

59 Responses

1 Nov 14, 2007 at 15:22 by octave

why do they keep going after people with no evidence, surely they must know by now… or, are people really that daft? it must cost them tons of money doing all these raids etc, going to court. what’s the point. maybe they just hope that “this time we’ll get lucky and put one guy behind bars and that will scare the rest of the worlds p2p users?”

why dont they join oink and live the good life instead! tards.:D

2 Nov 14, 2007 at 15:23 by chris

thanks for the morning news

3 Nov 14, 2007 at 15:42 by ahem

Interesting Google keyword whoring with the “hitlist”.

4 Nov 14, 2007 at 16:03 by Fransw

This is f*cked up, the dutch law explicitly stated that ShareConnector is legal. BREIN should know better than to disrespect the law.

Talking about hypocrisy, BREIN itself wants P2P-sites to obey the law (in their opinion: to stop the spread of NONCOPYRIGHTED metadata-files), but they themselves don’t respect the law.

BREIN, go screw yourself. And rid us of your stupidity.

~Fransw

5 Nov 14, 2007 at 16:22 by Anonymous

Its funny how they can take away your life and work for 2-3 years just because a private lobby states something and demands a raid..

6 Nov 14, 2007 at 16:30 by Interested

Under “German Law” this could be considered “Nötigung.” Do the Dutch have a similair law? This is hardly the normal way to state you are filing a civil complaint. After what I can only assume is years of legal correspondence, Brein must know who Adi’s attorney is.

7 Nov 14, 2007 at 16:46 by slash

when will they learn..

8 Nov 14, 2007 at 17:01 by Grendel

He should have answered his door with a shotgun.[quote comment="213219"]when will they learn..[/quote]

When people come to the door armed.

9 Nov 14, 2007 at 17:47 by brein is a joke

Maybe we should go pay Tim Kuyk a visit at home, let’s see how he likes to be threatened face to face.

I wonder where he lives, does anybody know?

10 Nov 14, 2007 at 18:00 by TookieTookie

He Kuik … shall i turm myself in ?
I am in for a trial.

P2PISHERETOSTAY@LIVE.NL

11 Nov 14, 2007 at 18:00 by TookieTookie

turm = turn

12 Nov 14, 2007 at 18:07 by Balls

Damnit some of these geeks need to get ball checks performed, to shut down over threats is just like saying OK, i’m guilty, I’ll shut it down…

13 Nov 14, 2007 at 18:37 by Barse

When can we get a European wide law to stop this bullying? It seems that any organisation with loads of cash can do this.

Perhaps BREIN can be taken to court and charged with intimidation? Any Dutch lawyers prepared to offer their services for free?

14 Nov 14, 2007 at 18:48 by Me

A site has shut down? Go do your work, hydra.

15 Nov 14, 2007 at 18:50 by Anonymous

[quote comment="213264"]Maybe we should go pay Tim Kuyk a visit at home, let’s see how he likes to be threatened face to face.

I wonder where he lives, does anybody know?[/quote]

Good idea, shouldn’t be too hard to find him on Google Maps/Earth.

16 Nov 14, 2007 at 18:54 by Anonymous1

[quote comment="213323"]When can we get a European wide law to stop this bullying? It seems that any organization with loads of cash can do this.

Perhaps BREIN can be taken to court and charged with intimidation? Any Dutch lawyers prepared to offer their services for free?[/quote]

Intimidation, no won’t fly, but harassment may be pursued… even thought its a civil matter as what most of these trials are.

17 Nov 14, 2007 at 18:56 by Anonymous1

[quote comment="213341"][quote comment="213264"]Maybe we should go pay Tim Kuyk a visit at home, let’s see how he likes to be threatened face to face.

I wonder where he lives, does anybody know?[/quote]

Good idea, shouldn’t be too hard to find him on Google Maps/Earth.[/quote]

Posting it would be grand but keep in mind… posting it here …. oh fuck it… post that assholes address VIA LINK

18 Nov 14, 2007 at 18:57 by Paco420

I really wish people like this would knock at my door, and hopefully they are well built… I’m running low on fresh meat.

Blood juice anyone?

19 Nov 14, 2007 at 19:09 by Anonymous

[quote comment="213345"]I really wish people like this would knock at my door, and hopefully they are well built… I’m running low on fresh meat.

Blood juice anyone?[/quote]

What happens if you can’t get up the basement stairs fast enough and your mother answers the door, tough guy?

20 Nov 14, 2007 at 19:14 by Roflcer of the Lawl

Pretty simple answer to this, just start visiting those guys at home and punch them in the kidneys. Then tell them next time they bother someone they will get kicked in the throat.

21 Nov 14, 2007 at 19:15 by Ty

What would have happened if he chose not to answer the door?

22 Nov 14, 2007 at 19:31 by anonymous

Well, there’s only one good way to counter bully-tactics.

If only someone would publish the names and addresses of those individuals who showed up at this mans front door, we could pay them back in-kind with interest.

You’d be surprised how quickly tough-guys turn tail after you’ve shown up to their house and given them a ‘tune-up’ when they least expect it (like when they step out of their house to go to work in the morning.)

Drawing the anger of the internet hate machine will turn your life upside down. Unless you have curtains and/or a happy dog.

23 Nov 14, 2007 at 19:59 by Sifor

I can’t understand why he shut down. I mean, they couldn’t do anything to him. I mean, he could have sued them for harassment because the threatened at his own home, right?

24 Nov 14, 2007 at 20:14 by Barse

[quote comment="213343"][quote comment="213323"]When can we get a European wide law to stop this bullying? It seems that any organization with loads of cash can do this.

Perhaps BREIN can be taken to court and charged with intimidation? Any Dutch lawyers prepared to offer their services for free?[/quote]

Intimidation, no won’t fly, but harassment may be pursued… even thought its a civil matter as what most of these trials are.[/quote]

I hope you are talking about Dutch law here. So many ignorant Americans post comments which are only relevant if American law applies. (i.e. only in America).

25 Nov 14, 2007 at 20:31 by Pissed off with chickenshits.

When sSome suit shows up at your front door and threatens to sue your ass off, what do these guys do? They fold. Maybe this guy was just tired of the years of bullshit, but that chickenshit Deimos just caved in for no good reason.

26 Nov 14, 2007 at 20:36 by Greg(USA)

If I get an address… two words; ROAD TRIP

27 Nov 14, 2007 at 20:38 by -.-

[quote]but that chickenshit Deimos just caved in for no good reason.[/quote]

Pffft, YOU try running a torrent site and ignoring legal threats with YOURSELF on the line.

28 Nov 14, 2007 at 20:40 by Ahoy Matey!

The problem with sites like Demonoid, OINK are some of the Admins that ‘Police’ the site, can be tyranical, mad with power handing out warnings kicking people with BS policies. One example: Lots of people were upset with the admins at OINK.
People were forced to dispay a cutsy utsy Avatar of a stuffed animal or be banned from the site. One of their many absurd rules. Being held to a 1 to 1 ratio, which was almost impossible to meet BC you would have seeders, 99% seeding a file and NO leechers. I would have to seed for a month Just for downloading one thing! Or be forced to DL files I didn’t want to make up my ratio. Small gated, backwards, inbred communities like OINK definately had other problems that BREIN. Which is why they must take the heat when its their turn. So maybe they didn’t host any files, but they sure did organize and police their own little inbred community.

29 Nov 14, 2007 at 20:44 by Pissed off with chickenshits.

TO: -.-
A threat is just a threat. 99.999% of the time, some asshole is just trying to blowing smoke up your ass. Try availing yourself of a brain, asshole.

30 Nov 14, 2007 at 20:59 by -.-

[quote]TO: -.-
A threat is just a threat. 99.999% of the time, some asshole is just trying to blowing smoke up your ass. Try availing yourself of a brain, asshole.[/quote]

There is a real threat, actually.

Sure, you can dismiss that threat easily now, but you have to be in the situation of a site owner to really know how real the threat is.

Someone provides you a great site and all you can say back to them is call them a chickenshit. Pathetic.

By the way, Deimos’ hoster was the one to take down Demonoid.

31 Nov 14, 2007 at 21:14 by Pissed off with chickenshits.

TO: -.-
A real threat as opposed to an imaginary threat? A threat is nothing mor tham smoke. I could threaten to find your IP and all sorts of personal information and spam the fuck out of you, but that would just be a threat.(but not necessarily an empty one) I HAVE been in that position, dickweed, that’s why I KNOW threats are threats and nothing more. When some jerk-off slaps me with a writ, then I get pissed off and fight. I have yet to lose. By the way, Deimos is still a chickenshit for the way he cut off Canadians, just because he got a threat. It is you who is pathetic.

32 Nov 14, 2007 at 21:18 by Kjetil

The problem here seems to be that legal process is so slow. The article states that the legal process for the criminal law took 2 years to go to court - in the meantime, he was probably pretty nervous and didn’t feel too well.

And if they proceed with a civil suit the suit may take YEARS, no matter how good your case is. During this time he has to stand in court personally, wasting his valuable time and money at saying stuff over and over again. I understand well that he didn’t want this.

The fix here is necessary in the legal system: It needs to deliver justice much, much quicker. Currently it favours those who can afford to send endless amounts of minions (lawyers) at their opponents, not he who has the best case.

33 Nov 14, 2007 at 21:18 by Krof

If I was in charge, I would change the legal system so that money didn’t have an effect on the outcome of a trial. Like for example, the state could choose lawyers for the people involved. Without the people involved having to pay anything. If this was the case then the threat of being sued wouldn’t hit nearly as hard as it does today.

34 Nov 14, 2007 at 21:44 by Pissed off with chickenshits.

TO: -.-
regarding: Only he was in the position to judge the validity of that threat.
All that jackass had to do was to publically post it and let the whole world laugh. That would have been the end of it. Take ThePirateBay’s responses, for example. Deimos caved, because he has something to hide. I repeat, deimos is a chickenshit. Your last paragraph is just blowing more smoke mr. -.- . Try using a cogent argument, rather than psychology, which you are woefully inadequate at.

35 Nov 14, 2007 at 21:53 by b

eDonkey links… interesting. I didn’t know a website like this existed. Are similar sites still around?

36 Nov 14, 2007 at 22:02 by #

[quote comment="213484"]TO: -.-
regarding: Only he was in the position to judge the validity of that threat.
All that jackass had to do was to publically post it and let the whole world laugh. That would have been the end of it. Take ThePirateBay’s responses, for example. Deimos caved, because he has something to hide. I repeat, deimos is a chickenshit. Your last paragraph is just blowing more smoke mr. -.- . Try using a cogent argument, rather than psychology, which you are woefully inadequate at.[/quote]

Easy to call someone chicken shit when It’s not your arse on the line.

Why does everyone believe it’s their god given right to download material people worked to create, for free?

37 Nov 14, 2007 at 22:32 by GOD

I give everyone the right to freely download and share all matter of expression.

38 Nov 14, 2007 at 22:35 by Charles

We need a lynch mod and a hit list, updated daily.

If they threaten us, they go on the list to be threatened back.

39 Nov 14, 2007 at 22:40 by Steve Jobs sucks

they do it because they know 99% of the people will pay up or shut down automatically. They actually hate going to court.

40 Nov 14, 2007 at 22:47 by George Brimstein

Dear Copyright Defenders,

I have just dicovered the cure for a major form of cancer! I have applied copyright for this cure and wish to keep it with me for some time.

If someone wants this cure, they MUST pay me $500,000 U.S.

I wish to have this copyright kept in my possesion to each cure from then on I am paid my right of $500,000.

This is how America should be run.

Thank you

41 Nov 14, 2007 at 22:54 by Pissed off with chickenshits.

TO #, regarding: Easy to call someone chicken shit when It’s not your arse on the line.
If you had read earlier posts, you wouldn’t have made that inane comment. My ass has been and IS on the line. I am not a chickenshit quiter like deimos. I’ll fight. And even if I am going to lose, I’m not going down alone. I got sick and tired of being pushed around. So, if someone cyber slaps me, they get a damned good bootfucking.
Who’s Next?

42 Nov 14, 2007 at 23:03 by Core-TX

[quote comment="213323"]When can we get a European wide law to stop this bullying? It seems that any organisation with loads of cash can do this.

Perhaps BREIN can be taken to court and charged with intimidation? Any Dutch lawyers prepared to offer their services for free?[/quote]

Currently , the euro parliament is working on a law wich will abolish p2p.
And criminalize all participants in the complete chain.

There is only one solution, fight for your rights, and join your national Pirate Party.

43 Nov 14, 2007 at 23:21 by Kelly L.

For BREIN (as it is for so many other groups), the means have become their entire game, they don’t care about copyright anymore, surely not as much as they enjoy “the hunt” and the ever elusive need “to win”. Like always, BREIN illustrates the metaphor of “the Cops” having become just as corrupt and counterproductive as “the criminals”. I commend Adi’s courage and wisdom for opting out of their game and recognizing it for the tic tac toe that it is. Adi can find peace now, while Kuik and his miserable grubs can waste precious life in a frustratingly hopeless, soul-corrupting time-sink. It’s always easier to run around knocking other peoples buildings down than it is to invent and create better solutions. Small, unintelligent people always go for the former, and lead miserable lives because of it. As an artist myself, I understand the evolution of the game and I know if I want to play, I’d better embrace ideas in advancing the monetization and distribution of artistic media instead of joining some thuggery organization under the delusion that they can actually stop technological progress. File sharing is a symptom of the industries complacency and overall laziness. Now they’re just lazy and morally bankrupt.

44 Nov 14, 2007 at 23:26 by James

Well said Kelly.

Although, This Mob is so intrenched into the political system, the criminal Recording industry and Movie industry are pulling the strings.

These guys are the modern day Mafia.

I’m not big on histroy, but how did the days of chicago run by the mob end? ’cause I think the RIAA etc. are just a newer version of this mob.

45 Nov 14, 2007 at 23:38 by gdgd

lol their losing more money raiding than p2p is “causing”

46 Nov 15, 2007 at 02:15 by Core-TX

[quote comment="213565"]lol their losing more money raiding than p2p is “causing”[/quote]

p2p is makeing more money for them.
They should be happy :S

47 Nov 15, 2007 at 03:23 by lev400

bastards. i hope the domain gets sold to and another p2p site starts up in its place.

48 Nov 15, 2007 at 05:11 by Solidus

I would of had a no trespassing sign out front, and waited patiently with a shotgun. >;]

49 Nov 15, 2007 at 09:30 by Peter

BREIN the fukin lowlife. Can someone hire an assassin and kill everyone at BREIN plz.

50 Nov 15, 2007 at 10:45 by James

c’mon, we’ve got some smart geeks in the p2p world, find these people. Out in the street they are no-bodies and on equal ground.

51 Nov 15, 2007 at 14:25 by Ed

According to Tim Kuik they still might pursue a civil-courtcase to get a ban oon the site as they feel that the risk of the admin “reopening for a third time” is too high.

52 Nov 15, 2007 at 15:54 by Anonymous

Tim Kuik’s address is mentioned on these 2 (dutch) sites…

http://www.releases4u.net/forum/index.php?showtopic=2627&pid=24417&mode=threaded&show=&st=&
http://www.security.nl/article/11130/1

53 Nov 15, 2007 at 19:55 by Jim

TO anonymous. Thanks for the address. Now do you have an email address for this jackass?

54 Nov 15, 2007 at 22:49 by James

Naam :Kuik, Timotheus Jacobus
E-mail: tim.kuik@buma.nl

55 Nov 16, 2007 at 13:00 by hiro81

BREIN are total scumbugs. I hope they all DIAF.

56 Nov 16, 2007 at 14:47 by xdustinx

I’m not gonna lie, if some anti-piracy organization, or any non-law enforcement organization, showed up to my door and started threatening and trying to bully me - I would immediately tell them to kindly stop talking, turn around and leave immediately, and if they didn’t comply, or tried to deter from doing so from the first request, I’d beat the shit out of them. Those guys wanna come on my private property, heckle and harass me, then they’re going to learn what happens when they do so. That’s what is wrong with some of these cats, you let them get away with this shit. You let them find out where you live, come to you, and try to tell you how it’s gonna be, take it up the ass, and then fold. SERIOUSLY, FIGHT ME!

57 Nov 16, 2007 at 17:41 by Comcast

[quote comment="215030"]I’m not gonna lie, if some anti-piracy organization, or any non-law enforcement organization, showed up to my door and started threatening and trying to bully me - I would immediately tell them to kindly stop talking, turn around and leave immediately, and if they didn’t comply, or tried to deter from doing so from the first request, I’d beat the shit out of them. Those guys wanna come on my private property, heckle and harass me, then they’re going to learn what happens when they do so. That’s what is wrong with some of these cats, you let them get away with this shit. You let them find out where you live, come to you, and try to tell you how it’s gonna be, take it up the ass, and then fold. SERIOUSLY, FIGHT ME![/quote]

Acting tough huh? Let’s see what happens when your ass gets penetrated by several men. I am sure you will like it.

58 Nov 28, 2007 at 02:33 by fenris

Rats, the mail doesn’t work. Anyone know where else I could send this?

Dear mr. Kuik.

One of my associates had a curious story to tell me the other day. It
was about someone who sued another for what he perceived to be a clear-
cut matter of the accused causing damages for him. Well, to be accurate,
the details of the story suggested the first person had sued the other
after being instructed by a lobbying proxy to find a random target
appropriate for a lawsuit - but let’s not get sidetracked.

The case progresses, albeit slowly. And before the case comes to court,
the property of the accused is taken as evidence. However, no proof of
the crime the accused was sued for was found. No matter, of course - the
damage is done, and the property belonging to the accused is gone for an
indeterminable period of time, and so is the funds the accused would
have available, due to the nature of the charges brought against him.

Time passes, and the accused eventually gets his property returned. His
money too, is freed, and he can at least get on with his life for the
time being. But did the lack of proof for the crimes he was accused of
result in a dismissal of the case? Now, here is where the story truly
starts to become incredible.

What happens is in allegedly that the accuser attempts to equate the
initial accusation with another activity the accused was engaged in.
Even though, as mentioned, no proof of the accused criminal activity was
found. And so, the case enters the court- system, with slim to no hope
for the accuser of ever achieving a victory - bar the possibility of
overturning some centuries of legal practice in the western hemisphere.

And so the trial, two years after the initial raid on false pretenses -
false, as evidently no evidence was available, and what was done to
convince the authorities was an insistence on how one thing was equal to
another, which the trial would soon determine whether was true - the
trial would begin. And so the accuser lost the case - the initial
justification for the raid was false, and no legal argument would be
deemed appropriate to describe how the accused was actually a criminal,
as alleged.

Now, you might think this story is unbelievable at this point, but it is
not yet finished.

In the aftermath of the trial, after the accuser was soundly defeated on
all points, you might wonder what would happen to the accused. Would he
pursue a claim of reparations against the accuser, or indeed against the
police, for causing him serious problems for the only reason of
satisfying the accuser’s wish to try a semantic argument in court?

No, as we draw towards the conclusion of the story, we learn that
instead, the accuser returns to the accused, who has just been
vindicated by a court, to threaten him in person - for the same crime
once more. The same crime which the accused was just excused. One can
only imagine that the reason for this curious behavior was that the
police had the sense to follow the law, and could as such not justify
going in their stead, as previously was the case.

But that leaves us with several questions - what restraints, if any, do
you consider it is legally necessary to abide by when acting on behalf
of your organization? What restraints do you consider applies to your
organization in general? Do you consider yourself and your associates to
be above the law? Or do you believe there is a sound legal basis for
harassing people in their homes, even when there can be no ambiguity
about whether your organization’s “creative” accusations can, or will,
have any traction in court? And if so, what does that legal argument
rest on? And in what way do you consider this argument to still be
undecided in an appropriate court?

I hope you can get back to me, as I’m doing some preliminary
investigation for a newsitem for my university paper, and any help in
this regard would be welcome - even though I must admit I have my
reservations about believing this story, as it sounds rather fanciful
that anyone retaining nominal control over their senses would pay
someone for the services you are alleged to have offered.

Sincerely yours,

59 Jan 12, 2008 at 06:03 by BridgetAnjellla

Feliz ano nuevo

Responses are closed

All remaining responses will continue to be archived. Use the TorrentFreak forums if you want to discuss something.