Anti-Piracy Outfit to Spy On Usenet, Punish Legitimate Purchasers
Written by enigmax on June 08, 2007It’s normal these days for anti-piracy companies to target P2P protocols and applications such as BitTorrent, LimeWire and eDonkey. Targeting the newsgroups or Usenet is fairly unusual but add that to the fact that one particular company isn’t going after pirates but the original content purchaser, this approach seems relatively unique.
In a recent article we introduced Usenet or newsgroups as they are sometimes known. Without doubt, Usenet is one of the most secure ways to download and share material and although it costs a little money to access a premium Usenet provider each month, many consider it’s worth it - especially considering the blisteringly fast download speeds, massive range of content and no RIAA or MPAA looking over one’s shoulder.
However, a ‘new’ anti-piracy technology is claimed to have arrived in town, one which will not focus on traditional file-sharing networks but will target Usenet. The makers of the system acknowledge that trying to shut down Usenet in the way that BitTorrent and eDonkey sites have been shut down in the past, is totally not an option. There are thousands of newsgroups with millions of people sharing content with others almost anonymously and even the anti-piracy company says that Usenet is virtually impossible to regulate. Not a good environment for anti-piracy enforcement. So how does it work?
Apparently, TriMark is a “state-of-the-art one of a kind encryption technology” which will be used to track content made available on Usenet. It’s believed it’s a type of digital fingerprint embedded in files which can uniquely identify the original purchaser of the content, usually audio tracks. The claim is that the identification code maintains it’s integrity, despite copying or ripping. TriMark will then scan newsgroups for content that contains these embedded security codes. It will then supposedly identify the original purchaser of the material who will be pursued for damages relating to the claimed lost sales from every illegal copy spawned from his officially purchased copy.
Just this week it was revealed that some iTunes tracks contain the personal details of the person who downloaded the track, prompting privacy concerns. Fred von Lohmann, senior staff attorney at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, said, “At a minimum, many would have appreciated it if Apple had notified them in some conspicuous way. Even after the recent media attention, it’s safe to assume that the vast majority of iTunes customers still have no idea that their names and email addresses are embedded in these files.” It’s unclear if people purchasing TriMark ‘protected’ tracks will be informed that their details are included in material they purchase.
The system is destined to roll out in 2008 when it is expected to make zero impact on the amount or type of material shared on Usenet.
Previously: Steal This Film II Needs Your Help
Next: Wyzo: The BitTorrent Browser
13 Responses
Rule No 1. We don’t talk about USENET.
Rule No 2. Refer to Rule No. 1
“destined to roll out in 2008 when it is expected to make zero impact on the amount or type of material shared on Usenet.”
Why do they even bother?
Fuck em cause you Fucking IDIOTS at TriMark will NEVER be able to SHUT down the usenet it existed before the internet did assholes and I will continue to upload to the usenet and you fuckers will NEVER stop me!!!
digital fingerprint embedded in files which can uniquely identify the original purchaser of the content, usually audio tracks”
Let me get this straight. Since zero content on usenet is actually digitally download, I buy a dvd or cd at wal-mart with cash. De-crypt it, re-encode, and upload it encrypted. A few weeks later the FBI is pounding at my door…right. Lets not even get to recording shows off the air.
This has to be the biggest waste of time and money outside of the the US government.
If this does somehow become a big deal…guess what is going to happen?
Some freelance programmer that is all for P2P and usenet is going to develop a program that removes all digital fingerprints with the click of a button. This will all be produced for free of course and once that is up and running you can bet more people are going to join his cause.
These efforts are pointless. Whatever companies try to do to regulate piracy, we all know that there is always a way to program around the security features. For the most part, those that know enough to utilize Usenet have some computer skills. Many may be part of the Open Source community which is known for its ability to hack its way around problems.
Lets face it, it’s the elite of the computer industry that support Usenet. There is always a way to hack around it, and the community will inevitably find it.
I can just see how this is going to look. Guy goes to store and buys a cd . Guy runs out of money and sell it to a pawn shop. Guy 2 gets off the pawn shop and puts it online. Guy 1 is now charged?
Way to many flaws in this system.
torrents and tracers? common, to stop the acts of piracy one would have to be able to controle information on the net all together… its just not possible, welcome to the real world TriMark, the pirates have already won.
To clarify: Only digitally purchased & downloaded music/video files can be marked as the article describes.
People who rip from mass-market retail CD/DVD’s don’t need to worry about this.
If their Usenet server records the IP of an uploader, then they might have something to worry about.
4 references to this post
Responses are closed
All remaining responses will continue to be archived. Use the TorrentFreak forums if you want to discuss something.