<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple Bans BitTorrent Software</title>
	<atom:link href="http://torrentfreak.com/apple-bans-bittorrent-software-090511/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://torrentfreak.com/apple-bans-bittorrent-software-090511/</link>
	<description>Torrent News, Torrent Sites and the latest Scoops</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 10:07:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.3</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Claudio Marforio</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/apple-bans-bittorrent-software-090511/#comment-562181</link>
		<dc:creator>Claudio Marforio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 04:03:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=13033#comment-562181</guid>
		<description>I have had a similar situation with my application, to monitor uTorrent, here is the whole story:

http://www.cloudgoessocial.net/2009/05/19/µmonitor-rejected/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have had a similar situation with my application, to monitor uTorrent, here is the whole story:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cloudgoessocial.net/2009/05/19/µmonitor-rejected/" rel="nofollow">http://www.cloudgoessocial.net/2009/05/19/µmonitor-rejected/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mac+ &#187; Apple não autoriza app para controlar BitTorrent a partir do iPhone</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/apple-bans-bittorrent-software-090511/#comment-561148</link>
		<dc:creator>Mac+ &#187; Apple não autoriza app para controlar BitTorrent a partir do iPhone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 13:35:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=13033#comment-561148</guid>
		<description>[...] o Transmission, um cliente BitTorrent para Mac, foi rejeitada pela App Store, como informou o blog TorrentFreak. A Apple justificou o veto comentando que este tipo de aplicação é frequentemente usada para [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] o Transmission, um cliente BitTorrent para Mac, foi rejeitada pela App Store, como informou o blog TorrentFreak. A Apple justificou o veto comentando que este tipo de aplicação é frequentemente usada para [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: normalblog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; recent delicious bookmarks, May 3 through May 15</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/apple-bans-bittorrent-software-090511/#comment-561082</link>
		<dc:creator>normalblog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; recent delicious bookmarks, May 3 through May 15</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 10:24:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=13033#comment-561082</guid>
		<description>[...] Apple Bans BitTorrent Software &#124; TorrentFreak - Next, Apple plans to ban computers from being used, for anything. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Apple Bans BitTorrent Software | TorrentFreak &#8211; Next, Apple plans to ban computers from being used, for anything. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The AppStore fiascos of late and the iPhone-conundrum &#171; Barbed Wire Bytecode Bacon Burger</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/apple-bans-bittorrent-software-090511/#comment-561018</link>
		<dc:creator>The AppStore fiascos of late and the iPhone-conundrum &#171; Barbed Wire Bytecode Bacon Burger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 06:14:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=13033#comment-561018</guid>
		<description>[...] another app has been rejected for the most moronic reason. As reported by Torrentfreak.com a remote control app for the popular cross-platform BitTorrent-client Transmission has been [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] another app has been rejected for the most moronic reason. As reported by Torrentfreak.com a remote control app for the popular cross-platform BitTorrent-client Transmission has been [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Apple bans iPhone P2P-TorrentFreak &#171; FACT &#8211; Freedom Against Censorship Thailand</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/apple-bans-bittorrent-software-090511/#comment-560816</link>
		<dc:creator>Apple bans iPhone P2P-TorrentFreak &#171; FACT &#8211; Freedom Against Censorship Thailand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 09:43:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=13033#comment-560816</guid>
		<description>[...] http://torrentfreak.com/apple-bans-bittorrent-software-090511/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://torrentfreak.com/apple-bans-bittorrent-software-090511/" rel="nofollow">http://torrentfreak.com/apple-bans-bittorrent-software-090511/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/apple-bans-bittorrent-software-090511/#comment-560810</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 09:05:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=13033#comment-560810</guid>
		<description>Are there actually people using an iPhone unjailbreaked?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are there actually people using an iPhone unjailbreaked?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Apple Bans BitTorrent Software - UB:UK</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/apple-bans-bittorrent-software-090511/#comment-560428</link>
		<dc:creator>Apple Bans BitTorrent Software - UB:UK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 08:32:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=13033#comment-560428</guid>
		<description>[...] copyrights, so therefore the company has decided not to allow such software on the App store.    Apple Bans BitTorrent Software &#124; TorrentFreak   __________________ i HATE man utd  now leave it alone [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] copyrights, so therefore the company has decided not to allow such software on the App store.    Apple Bans BitTorrent Software | TorrentFreak   __________________ i HATE man utd  now leave it alone [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Apple denies bittorrent remote control app &#171; N3T.ir - Web Resources, Web Design News &#38; Tips, Open Source</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/apple-bans-bittorrent-software-090511/#comment-560407</link>
		<dc:creator>Apple denies bittorrent remote control app &#171; N3T.ir - Web Resources, Web Design News &#38; Tips, Open Source</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 07:09:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=13033#comment-560407</guid>
		<description>[...] [via Torrent Freak] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] [via Torrent Freak] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris -- Your Ever Friendly Neighbor</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/apple-bans-bittorrent-software-090511/#comment-560398</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris -- Your Ever Friendly Neighbor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 06:45:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=13033#comment-560398</guid>
		<description>Apple.  Who need them? It is for incompetent idiots.  By the way, Transmission is not just a BitTorrent, but it also contain a web-ui and console terminal.  What you can do is set up a port forward and no-ip.org (so you remember your domain name instead of numbers) and use any browsers for your torrent including the one on your Android. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple.  Who need them? It is for incompetent idiots.  By the way, Transmission is not just a BitTorrent, but it also contain a web-ui and console terminal.  What you can do is set up a port forward and no-ip.org (so you remember your domain name instead of numbers) and use any browsers for your torrent including the one on your Android. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JinX</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/apple-bans-bittorrent-software-090511/#comment-560317</link>
		<dc:creator>JinX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 23:26:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=13033#comment-560317</guid>
		<description>@10  You nailed it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@10  You nailed it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wonderwhy-er</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/apple-bans-bittorrent-software-090511/#comment-560242</link>
		<dc:creator>wonderwhy-er</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 18:48:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=13033#comment-560242</guid>
		<description>@78 and @84

So firstly things I bought iPhone then. Mmm well when I bought HTC G1 was not even out yet and there were only rumors about Nokia phone so then there were no clear competitors and now when they are out for few reasons I would say that they are not true competitors tough they are good in their own way. 

Now things why I bought it:
1) Was multi-touch and in that it does not have competitors still as far as I know. You may argue that this is just a toy thing but for me it is future of interfaces as it allows to simulate many input interfaces single-touch/mouse or keyboards just can&#039;t. Of course it is new yet unpolished possibility that is not properly used often but it those cases I was used properly... Damn that felt good :)

2) and 3) eBook reading and video watching. Here iPhone 3.5 inch is not enough but still decent in compariosn to G1, Nokia 5800 and coming PRE... I would actually like 4&#039; or even 5&#039; screen instead to have more pleasure reading eBooks but no Phone has anything like that so far... At least any reasonable phone(saw some crazy Chinese things or something)

4) Another thing is iPhone graphical capabilities. I am computer graphical programmer my self and iPhone has not powerful but video card(rather chip)... At the time of buying it there was aether no such information on other phones or it was known that they do not have it.

5) And finally I read RSS feeds as papers now on a go so Wi-Fi and browser was a must. Flash would be nice but eh...


So in conclusion.
No competitors in 1

Almost no competitors in screen size. iPhone screen is already little it smaller then I want but most other phones in same category have even less(pity Pre has small screen :( ) I agree there are some HTC current;y with better screens tough it is pretty hard to get them here as local operators do not support any of those as of yet.

Not completely shore but as far as I can tell no competitors in 4 aether.

And in 5 plenty of competitors most of which will have Flash soon(while noting is known about that for iPhone) so here iPhone lags and will lag behind...

So my count here in iPhone vs competitors is 
iPhone 2.5 : 1.5 on those topics.

Also I would agree that it is little bit biased as I am software developer with interests in computer graphics and games which makes multi-touch and 3D so important to pick phone based on that. Important experience for the future as I see it :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@78 and @84</p>
<p>So firstly things I bought iPhone then. Mmm well when I bought HTC G1 was not even out yet and there were only rumors about Nokia phone so then there were no clear competitors and now when they are out for few reasons I would say that they are not true competitors tough they are good in their own way. </p>
<p>Now things why I bought it:<br />
1) Was multi-touch and in that it does not have competitors still as far as I know. You may argue that this is just a toy thing but for me it is future of interfaces as it allows to simulate many input interfaces single-touch/mouse or keyboards just can&#8217;t. Of course it is new yet unpolished possibility that is not properly used often but it those cases I was used properly&#8230; Damn that felt good :)</p>
<p>2) and 3) eBook reading and video watching. Here iPhone 3.5 inch is not enough but still decent in compariosn to G1, Nokia 5800 and coming PRE&#8230; I would actually like 4&#8242; or even 5&#8242; screen instead to have more pleasure reading eBooks but no Phone has anything like that so far&#8230; At least any reasonable phone(saw some crazy Chinese things or something)</p>
<p>4) Another thing is iPhone graphical capabilities. I am computer graphical programmer my self and iPhone has not powerful but video card(rather chip)&#8230; At the time of buying it there was aether no such information on other phones or it was known that they do not have it.</p>
<p>5) And finally I read RSS feeds as papers now on a go so Wi-Fi and browser was a must. Flash would be nice but eh&#8230;</p>
<p>So in conclusion.<br />
No competitors in 1</p>
<p>Almost no competitors in screen size. iPhone screen is already little it smaller then I want but most other phones in same category have even less(pity Pre has small screen :( ) I agree there are some HTC current;y with better screens tough it is pretty hard to get them here as local operators do not support any of those as of yet.</p>
<p>Not completely shore but as far as I can tell no competitors in 4 aether.</p>
<p>And in 5 plenty of competitors most of which will have Flash soon(while noting is known about that for iPhone) so here iPhone lags and will lag behind&#8230;</p>
<p>So my count here in iPhone vs competitors is<br />
iPhone 2.5 : 1.5 on those topics.</p>
<p>Also I would agree that it is little bit biased as I am software developer with interests in computer graphics and games which makes multi-touch and 3D so important to pick phone based on that. Important experience for the future as I see it :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/apple-bans-bittorrent-software-090511/#comment-560170</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 16:20:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=13033#comment-560170</guid>
		<description>@CluelessCakes

Windows Mobile? HAHAHAHA!

Microsoft is the single worst DRM monster in the entire tech industry. Trash Apple, fine. But don&#039;t go around suggesting MS as a solution. That&#039;s just embarassing. 

If you want an open platform, go for some variant of Linux.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@CluelessCakes</p>
<p>Windows Mobile? HAHAHAHA!</p>
<p>Microsoft is the single worst DRM monster in the entire tech industry. Trash Apple, fine. But don&#8217;t go around suggesting MS as a solution. That&#8217;s just embarassing. </p>
<p>If you want an open platform, go for some variant of Linux.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why closed, proprietary platforms are to be avoided&#8230; at all costs - Technology</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/apple-bans-bittorrent-software-090511/#comment-560154</link>
		<dc:creator>Why closed, proprietary platforms are to be avoided&#8230; at all costs - Technology</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 15:24:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=13033#comment-560154</guid>
		<description>[...] following article explains what happened to an author who wrote a nice application, and, after some updates of it, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] following article explains what happened to an author who wrote a nice application, and, after some updates of it, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LEM</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/apple-bans-bittorrent-software-090511/#comment-560111</link>
		<dc:creator>LEM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 14:01:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=13033#comment-560111</guid>
		<description>Silly pirates, iphones are for indiekids!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Silly pirates, iphones are for indiekids!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pi</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/apple-bans-bittorrent-software-090511/#comment-560106</link>
		<dc:creator>Pi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 13:52:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=13033#comment-560106</guid>
		<description>Coming soon to a theater near you.

Share Wars : The Counter-Productive Menace

Featuring Apple as Anakin, a future lord Vader on his quest to become the biggest and best jedi ever, only to succumb to the dark side.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Coming soon to a theater near you.</p>
<p>Share Wars : The Counter-Productive Menace</p>
<p>Featuring Apple as Anakin, a future lord Vader on his quest to become the biggest and best jedi ever, only to succumb to the dark side.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TorrentNews.Ru &#187; ?????????? ??????????: BitTorrent-????? ?? ????? ? App Store</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/apple-bans-bittorrent-software-090511/#comment-560061</link>
		<dc:creator>TorrentNews.Ru &#187; ?????????? ??????????: BitTorrent-????? ?? ????? ? App Store</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 12:34:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=13033#comment-560061</guid>
		<description>[...] ?????????? TorrentFreak ? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ?????????? TorrentFreak ? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/apple-bans-bittorrent-software-090511/#comment-560043</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 11:52:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=13033#comment-560043</guid>
		<description>macfags go figure &gt;.&gt;

oh well just another reason why they will never achieve more than 25% of the computer market.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>macfags go figure &gt;.&gt;</p>
<p>oh well just another reason why they will never achieve more than 25% of the computer market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LitimtdWarranty</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/apple-bans-bittorrent-software-090511/#comment-560042</link>
		<dc:creator>LitimtdWarranty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 11:39:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=13033#comment-560042</guid>
		<description>Last Time i Check Torrent Sites Are Not Illegal. Torrents Are Used For Good All The Time Is It Not A Moral Wrong Doing To Judge People On A Single Beliefe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last Time i Check Torrent Sites Are Not Illegal. Torrents Are Used For Good All The Time Is It Not A Moral Wrong Doing To Judge People On A Single Beliefe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: djnforce9</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/apple-bans-bittorrent-software-090511/#comment-560041</link>
		<dc:creator>djnforce9</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 11:38:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=13033#comment-560041</guid>
		<description>I guess that means that an app that allowed you to &quot;search Google&quot; could not be allowed because after all, people can find and download warez from the sites they found on Google.

Apple&#039;s rejection of this application makes about as much sense as the above statement I provided. It&#039;s a shame a perfectly good application and technology is very often associated with only ONE of its many uses (and that one just happens to be the illegal type of usage). It&#039;s not like the app had embedded thepiratebay.org or torrent searching capabilities.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess that means that an app that allowed you to &#8220;search Google&#8221; could not be allowed because after all, people can find and download warez from the sites they found on Google.</p>
<p>Apple&#8217;s rejection of this application makes about as much sense as the above statement I provided. It&#8217;s a shame a perfectly good application and technology is very often associated with only ONE of its many uses (and that one just happens to be the illegal type of usage). It&#8217;s not like the app had embedded thepiratebay.org or torrent searching capabilities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Apple Bans BitTorrent Software - Applications - TechEnclave</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/apple-bans-bittorrent-software-090511/#comment-560035</link>
		<dc:creator>Apple Bans BitTorrent Software - Applications - TechEnclave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 11:17:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=13033#comment-560035</guid>
		<description>[...] permalink   An iPhone application designed to remotely-control the Transmission BitTorrent client has been rejected by the Apple App Store. Apple told the developer that this type of application is often used to infringe copyrights, so therefore the company has decided not to allow such software on the App store.  Drivetrain is an iPhone application to remotely control the multi-platform Transmission BitTorrent client via the Internet. According to developer, Maza Digital, Drivetrain ?provides all the details of the web interface in a native iPhone app that?s easy to use.?  Maza Digital submitted Drivetrain to Apple for approval and according to iLounge, received an email in return saying that the review would take longer than expected.  This was followed up by a second email in which Apple rejected the application for inclusion in the App Store, telling Maza Digital;  This category of applications is often used for the purpose of infringing third party rights. We have chosen to not publish this type of application to the App Store.  Of course, not only are all BitTorrent clients absolutely legal (people infringe copyright, not software) but Drivetrain is just an application to control a torrent client and as such goes absolutely nowhere near any copyright infringing material.  Maza Digital told iLounge that Apple ?seems to have decided that any app that has anything to do with BitTorrent (even if the app does not download/upload anything!) is treated as doing something that ?is often used for the purpose of infringing third party rights,? and will therefore likely be rejected.?  A ridiculous move by Apple and a step too far. Quick, ban Safari so no-one can use Clutch.  Source: enigmax [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] permalink   An iPhone application designed to remotely-control the Transmission BitTorrent client has been rejected by the Apple App Store. Apple told the developer that this type of application is often used to infringe copyrights, so therefore the company has decided not to allow such software on the App store.  Drivetrain is an iPhone application to remotely control the multi-platform Transmission BitTorrent client via the Internet. According to developer, Maza Digital, Drivetrain ?provides all the details of the web interface in a native iPhone app that?s easy to use.?  Maza Digital submitted Drivetrain to Apple for approval and according to iLounge, received an email in return saying that the review would take longer than expected.  This was followed up by a second email in which Apple rejected the application for inclusion in the App Store, telling Maza Digital;  This category of applications is often used for the purpose of infringing third party rights. We have chosen to not publish this type of application to the App Store.  Of course, not only are all BitTorrent clients absolutely legal (people infringe copyright, not software) but Drivetrain is just an application to control a torrent client and as such goes absolutely nowhere near any copyright infringing material.  Maza Digital told iLounge that Apple ?seems to have decided that any app that has anything to do with BitTorrent (even if the app does not download/upload anything!) is treated as doing something that ?is often used for the purpose of infringing third party rights,? and will therefore likely be rejected.?  A ridiculous move by Apple and a step too far. Quick, ban Safari so no-one can use Clutch.  Source: enigmax [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
