TorrentFreak

The place where breaking news, BitTorrent and copyright collide

BitTorrent Pirate Ordered to Pay $1.5 Million Damages For Sharing 10 Movies

A federal court in Illinois has handed down the largest ever damages award in a BitTorrent case. In a default judgment defendant Kywan Fisher from Hampton, Virginia is ordered to pay $1,500,000 to adult entertainment company Flava Works for sharing 10 of their movies on BitTorrent. The huge total was reached through penalties of $150,000 per movie, the maximum possible statutory damages under U.S. copyright law. It’s expected that the verdict will be used to motivate other BitTorrent defendants to settle their cases.

pirateSince early 2010, hundreds of thousands of people in the U.S. have been sued for downloading and sharing copyrighted content on BitTorrent.

Nearly all of these cases end up dismissed or settled, but one involving Kywan Fisher from Hampton, Virginia, has turned into a financial disaster.

In 2011 Fisher and several other defendants were sued by adult entertainment company Flava Works. The case in question differs from the so-called “John Doe” lawsuits as the copyright holder had detailed information on the defendants who had paid accounts on the company’s movie portal.

For Fisher the trouble started when instead of just viewing the films for personal entertainment, he allegedly went on to share copies on BitTorrent. These illicit copies were traced directly back to his account through a code embedded in the videos.

“Plaintiff has proprietary software that assigns a unique encrypted code to each member of Plaintiff’s paid websites. In this case, every time the Defendant downloaded a copy of a copyrighted video from Plaintiff’s website, it inserts an encrypted code that is only assigned to Defendant. In this case, the encrypted code for Defendant is: ‘xvyynuxl’,” Flava informed the court.

Copying films was expressly forbidden in the user agreement Fisher signed with the video portal, allowing Flava to claim willful copyright infringement for 10 titles.

According to Flava the copies uploaded to BitTorrent by Fisher went on to be downloaded thousands of times.

“Defendant’s conduct was willful to the extent that he copied or distributed Flava Works, Inc.’ intellectual property at least 10 times and caused the videos to be infringed or downloaded at least 3,449 times.”

Because Fisher failed to defend himself Judge John Lee had little choice but to find Fisher guilty.

This week the Judge handed down the largest ever damages award in a BitTorrent case, 10 times the maximum statutory damages for willful infringement, totaling $1,500,000.

“Given the materials submitted by Plaintiff in support of its motion and in light of the absence of any objection by Defendant, Plaintiff’s motion for entry of default against defendant 11 is granted. Judgment is entered in favor of the Plaintiff Flava Works, Inc., and against the Defendant Kywan Fisher in the amount of One Million Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($1,500,000.00),” the judgment reads.


The order

The verdict will be welcomed by Flava and the many other copyright holders involved in BitTorrent lawsuits in the United States. DieTrollDie, a close follower and critic of these cases, points out that it will be widely cited in settlement letters to other defendants, but that the case itself is notably different.

“This was not the normal Copyright Troll case – there was some actual evidence beyond a public IP address. Not a smoking gun by far, but certainly enough to show a preponderance of evidence,” DTD writes.

Fisher has a few options to respond according to attorney Blair Chintella.

“The most common way is the “collaterally” attack the judgment by arguing that there was some jurisdictional defect in the lawsuit. For example, that service of process was improper or that the Court lacked personal jurisdiction,” Chintella told TorrentFreak.

While the guilty verdict is no surprise considering the failure of Fisher to appear before court, the $150,000 in damages per movie, which translates to $435 per alleged download, definitely raises eyebrows.

Related Posts

Previous Post | Next Post

  • Huanith Meon
  • 2broke2payAttention

    Winning a damage award is one thing. Collecting is another. Sue me all you want, there is nothing left to collect from…………..

    • /a/non

      I’m broke as well and I pirate a majority of my stuff. If I find I like it I’ll buy it when I have some spare cash laying around which is not often.

      The guy was dumb enough not to strip out any notifiers that could point back to ‘em. He deserved to be busted for not taking the necessary measures to ensure his privacy before sharing. Stripping the EXIF, DRM, or encryption should be second nature by now for anyone who regularly uploads and shares content.

      My two cents.

      • -ekb-

        Why bother to strip out notifiers when they traced the files back through Kywan Fisher’s stolen credit card account?

    • PelouzeTF

      Good plan lol. Ruin your credit and have this as an embellishment for the rest of your life on just about any report with your name on it.

      Wont matter to the those who are to lazy to do anything with their life, but anyone else, not really a masterstroke.

      • Scary_Devil_Monastery

        Really?

        Because what I see is the entire world waking up to the fact that filesharing is being handled as if it were a worse crime than manslaughter or grand larceny. 10 movies = 1,5 million USD?

        So yea, you nabbed one pirate out of five hundred million, none of whom has stopped filesharing over this. At the same time providing the general man in the street with a more realistic view of how bad the copyright industry really is.

        This is, once again, our win, just as EVERY large case you’ve managed to haul home has been.

        • Gonebon

          yeah, he should be able to attach to someone else’s achievement and get a free ride right? what’s with this law stuff?

      • Peloser is a loser

        “”Ruin your credit”" ….. not really a bad thing.

        “”an embellishment for the rest of your life”" ….. or a badge of pride for us plebs.

        “”not really a masterstroke”" …. LOL, shit don’t backfire where you come from ?

        • PelouzeTF

          If you’re going nowhere in life its a risk your free to take. Ask Odwyer at the age of 24 whether its been worth it so far.

        • baconbits

          spoken like a true ace. bravo.

        • realestnigga

          ruining your credit is a good thing? normal people want convictions on their record? wow, you’re such a badass internet thug and i’m sure a huge rebel in your safe white neighborhood. i wonder if you’ll be this edgy when mom kicks you out of her basement lol no seriously i can’t wait for you to actually have responsibilities in life :D

      • Jgggggggggg

        yeah Employers are going to turn you down because you shared a XXX movie.

        • PelouzeTF

          Not exactly simpleton. They might however want to have nothing to do with you when your record shows you have been prosecuted and have court ordered liens against you. Never mind a loan when you’ve actually grown up and want a house or business funding. Try filling in an app form when you have liens and see what the background check throws back.

          So say “yeah” all you like – the uploaders life is really best suited for those that as usual, don’t have many real world friends and need the pats on the backs from online anons so they feel worthwhile in their sad little rented apartments.

          Its your life bud, i dont give a crap about it.

        • false1

          employers will use any excuse to turn you down. all most HR workers want to do is whittle down the pile of hundreds of applications for the two jobs they have to offer.

    • Wilder125

      Sadly the only way for that to work is never work again. A few states can take 60 percent out of a paycheck before it enters your bank, to pay off a garnishment.

    • xmichaelx

      This is why a decision like this isn’t a deterrent for me. If it were $5000, I’d say, “Wow! I don’t want to have to pay that much!” But at over a million dollars, I just say, “Ha!! I couldn’t pay that EVER so fuck you!!”

      If anything, this makes me care even less about the consequences of piracy.

    • Anonymous

      They don’t want the money. They want to destroy the individual so utterly that no one else dares to do what they did. There is no chance in hell that any average Joe can pay 1.5M in his lifetime, so it’s either poverty, jail, or exile for him.

      • Dyck

        There’s bankrupcy. Hide your valuables, hide your money with a friend, and they can’t take certain stuff.

        • No

          can bankruptcy clear this kind of stuff?

  • Who

    “It’s expected that the verdict will be used to motivate other BitTorrent defendants to settle their cases”

    nope wont happen. I don’t care if it is porn or or what ever. I WILL NOT GIVE IN TO ANY KIND OF TERRORISM!! and btw pron or any other file sharing is NOT subjective to copy right infringement! LOOK UP REAL COPYRIGHT LAW!! *the web is not looking up true copyright law btw*

    “thousands of people in the U.S. have been sued for downloading and sharing copyrighted content on BitTorrent” BULL SHIT THEY HAVE!

    I would like to see some HARD CORE evidence relating to people that are NOT tied directly to the entertainment industry that are getting or have been sued.

    • Daniel

      Yes it is. If you take a picture of your own cock you have a copyright to that picture.

      • Daniel

        I know that it doesn’t make sense, and that pr0n is not what copyright is supposed to be for, but you own the copyright to pretty much anything you film.

        • Who

          ok if you look in to actual copy right law. when you SELL your works, or if you freely distribute the works you WAIVE ALL rights to the COPY’S that you make. but NOT the ORIGINAL works. in other words….you can ONLY claim copy rights on the MASTER copy and ONLY if some has been CLAIMED ownership of that works besides the copyright owner.

          when the pOrn studios or movie or even the music studios sell copy’s of there works and some one shares it. with say there neighbor or say over the web, they CAN NOT claim ANY copyright on it.

          I am well aware of the FACT that the WEB says that according to copy right law that it don’t matter but in reality it does. and that’s Y they are so pissed off and threatening to go after people.

      • Scary_Devil_Monastery

        If you distribute the picture afterwards you don’t have any rights to claim…

        Except by the same sort of law which allowed the catholic church in the 16th century exclusive monopoly to quote the bible.

        Take a picture of your cock if you want – but if you publish that picture? Count on it being shared. And adjust the law to allow it.

        • Anon

          “If you distribute the picture afterwards you don’t have any rights to claim…”

          Where’d you come up with an outright lie like this?

          That’s not what the law has said for 200 years. lol
          moron.

        • Fredrika

          > “Where’d you come up with an outright lie like this?

          > That’s not what the law has said for 200 years. lol
          moron.”

          Wouldn’t the real moron be the ignorant idiot who apparently lacked basic reading comprehension, which resulted in him not being able to understand the meaning of the second sentence, which started with the word except..?

          We know you’re afraid and desperate because the Mafiaa has finally been correctly identified as a con artist collective that can’t do anything about piracy, but at least try to read at the level of a 13 year old before you make a fool of yourself responding to an imaginary straw-man?

          Or have your obsession with imaginary property finally gone to your head, so you see imaginary things all over the place?

        • Scary_Devil_Monastery

          @Anon

          The law also stated quite emphatically that Rosa Parks should sit down at the back of the bus and that Apartheid was a good and decent system of government.

          In reality, no one gives that law any weight and rightly so.

      • Wilder125

        Or you can hurt your brain with the following.

        “2 halves conceived you. Which half owns your penis?”

    • xmichaelx

      While I agree with your sentiment, this post and the one below shows that you have no clue how intellectual property law actually works.

  • fappy

    i luv c0ck too

  • Ophelia Millais

    Don’t ignore a summons. This happens way past the point where your ISP is the middleman; now the troll has your identity and is taking you, personally, to court. If you get one, protect yourself; talk to a lawyer immediately, or ask the court to help you find one. You can’t just hope that it will go away. See DieTrollDie for more.

    • Lol

      nah, dont show up. They get a judgement against you that means nothing. Been served be4, didnt show up, default judgement of 4500 awarded. Now 8 years later, how much did I pay? 0, what happened? I just get collection letters and some phone messages but If I moved and changed my phone number then I would not get them. Also since I do not answer the phone, it means nothing, and since I open about 2 letters a year, the rest get recycled. :-) Do it right folks…

      • Yourawasteofskin

        Sounds like your life is really going places.

        Really aimed high, didn’t you.

        Loser.

        • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_IXEXH64S34XF2A2OHGO5C2IWII Timothy

          Wow, what a judgmental douchebag.

        • Guest

          Douchebag? Hardly.

          He’s just an edgy little one who still can’t tell the difference between your and you’re.

          He’s too autistic to be a douchebag.

        • lawl

          ahem… he used your correctly bro lol

      • Ophelia Millais

        So in other words, you’re just waiting for them to start garnishing your wages or bank account. In the meantime, I’m guessing you haven’t bought any vehicles or real estate, or applied for credit in the last 8 years, or if you did, you’re paying sky-high APR. Probably higher insurance rates as well. Sounds great.

        • Guest

          You realize there’s a big wide world outside of your tiny little town.

          Your debts don’t follow you to certain countries.

  • Guest32

    So the defendant was stupid. Never share anything without cleaning the watermarks, or have good plausible deniability. All this aside, the case is concerning because the underlying fingerprinting technology is not subject to public review, and if any copyright holder/troll selling oh. you don’t own anything

  • Pingback: BitTorrent Pirate Ordered to Pay $1.5 Million Damages For Sharing 10 Movies | Best Seedbox

  • Guest

    Yeah, this will deter filesharers just like the Jamie Thomas verdict!

    Oh wait, that didn’t do shit and neither will this.

    They’ll never collect $1.5 million dollars, either. So the result of this is… What, exactly?

    • Violated0

      They will sure not get $1.5 million out of him and being a civil case they may not see a single dime if he knows how to handle/annoy bailiffs and to put funds and property outside their reach.

      Getting a court ruling against you is only the first step when they still have to collect and with some skill and luck the bailiff months later may just report to the court that no funds could be recovered.

      It is all about using the law to fight them such as banning strangers (like the bailiff) from stepping on your property through a notice declaring the removal of public access rights. If the bailiff steps on your property the law is broken and you can then fairly fine them and invoice them. What they stick through your door stating date and time of visit is proof that they broke the law.

      All about annoying them so much they give up. They try to collect funds from you while you aim to do the same to them. One key point is to never allow a bailiff to step inside your home. Like with vampires once they have been welcomed they can then return at any time (like when you are out) to seize your property.

      I am mostly talking about UK law here but US law is much alike.

      • Wilder125

        It depends on how much percentage of each paycheck that the government allows them to take out of the check before it ever enters the employee’s hands

  • Lawnstone

    “unique encrypted code”

    http://dietrolldie.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/analysis_01888il.pdf

    That is hilarious. It’s just a string tacked on to the end of the file.

    • http://profiles.google.com/zerianis10 Christopher Kidwell

      And it doesn’t tell if it was him, his wife, his friend, etc. who shared the thing in question.

  • Gacek

    O.o? For gay Porn? :D

    • huehuehuehue

      Flava Works, Inc. headquartered in Miami, Florida, with a satellite office in Chicago, Illinois, is a company that produces gay media featuring black and Latino men.

      lol. that sucks. lotta money for some man on man action.

  • Anon

    Pirates will stop, or pirates will have to hide until they get caught. Then pirates will pay. It’s about damn time.

    • Anon

      You’re delusional. It’s copyright monopoly law that will be stopped. Apart from its moral abhorrence, it’s pretty much mathematically inevitable: The economy simply can’t bear the dead weight loss of free-marked-destroying intellectual monopolies forever and will collapse otherwise. The best the remaining thieving copyrightist scum can hope for is to cash out early. And stop trying to build a global police state, because I will fight to the death – in the real world if necessary – to stop that. I am extremist in defense of liberty, and rightly so. Right to Copy, not Copyright.

      http://levine.sscnet.ucla.edu/general/intellectual/againstfinal.htm

      It is common to argue that intellectual property in the form of copyright and patent is necessary for the innovation and creation of ideas and inventions such as machines, drugs, computer software, books, music, literature and movies. In fact intellectual property is a government grant of a costly and dangerous private monopoly over ideas. We show through theory and example that intellectual monopoly is not necessary for innovation and as a practical matter is damaging to growth, prosperity and liberty.

      • http://profiles.google.com/zerianis10 Christopher Kidwell

        Thank you Anon, you hit all the point I would have raised. It is getting to the point where people are literally afraid of innovating for fear of being sued.

        That should never be the case in the real world.

    • Fredrika

      > “Pirates will stop, or pirates will have to hide until they get caught.”

      No, all several hundred’s of millions of pirates will, as they have every time before, move on to the next generation in filesharing technology every time a current protocol gets to much attention, and the next step be F2F, which can’t be stopped, neither technically or legislatively, and when that happens no pirates will get caught.

      A topic which you see to be desperately afraid of even commenting on.

      > “It’s about damn time.”

      I’d say it’s about time you stop with your ignorant trolling and start accepting reality in your comments, instead of trying to deny what everybody else already knows, including China’s and Iran’s governments, or a technically skilled 13 year old, that the war against piracy was lost long before it even started.

      But maybe we can’t ask to much from someone who lacks the most basic economical knowledge and haven’t got the faintest idea of how business is..

      or someone that can’t keep a creative work apart from a good or a service.

      or someone that doesn’t understand the concept of accountability.

      or someone that doesn’t understand the most fundamental basics about encryption.

      or someone that doesn’t understand global politics, but instead seriously believing that for the first time in history all nations on the planet will come together, sing Cumbaya, and require licensing for VPN’s and encryption, just to protect the profits of some weak failed US entrepreneurs(that deserve no monetary reward whatsoever according to the free market rules), despite the fact that the worlds strongest economy just threw that pathetic idea out the window.

      or someone who’s main argument is because, just like a five year old.

      or someone that believes in imaginary property, and possibly the tooth fairy and Santa Claus.

      I guess some people reach their intellectual limit when they’ve learned spelling, and then they have nothing more to bring to the table, neither honesty, knowledge, arguments nor facts.

      Although trolls must have learned dishonesty, lying, denying reality, and hiding somewhere.. Hhmm, maybe that’s what legislative monopolies does to people?

      • Anon1

        Literally make me your bitch right now. Please.

        • Fredrika

          > “Literally make me your bitch right now. Please.”

          You want me to strap-on and go medieval on your little boy-ass!? Sitting won’t be an option afterwards.. ;)

          When Bubbles is done, only the grass stands!! =P

        • Guest

          That turned me on and I’m not even into that.

      • Scary_Devil_Monastery

        That’s a smackdown hard enough that even I feel compelled to almost muster some sympathy for dear old Baghdad Bob over there…

        Almost.

    • Guest

      Pirates paying? Funny, you posted in on earlier thread that you’re not interested in pirates paying, as customers or otherwise. You’re only interested in being a fascist.

    • Guest

      I think Anon(the MAFIAA one) is panicking because more and more rights-holders are realizing that the MAFIAA is absolutely 100% useless at fighting piracy and bailing on them.

      And they’re also realizing that piracy isn’t even a bad thing and the MAFIAA has been scamming them all this time.

      So that’s why he’s suddenly posting on Torrentfreak way more often, pretending that the MAFIAA is winning and it’s totally over for us pirates. He’s trying depserately to keep the scam alive.

      • Scary_Devil_Monastery

        Don’t be too hard on Baghdad Bob. He finally has a job again, doing what he does best.

        Maybe it doesn’t pay well, or allow him the luxury of a clean conscience…but it’s a job. We should offer him our sympathies. Things must have sucked for the poor man ever since Saddam heroically beat back the invasion from the west…oh, wait…

    • Chooseit40

      you must mean it’s about damned time the legal system accepts the total absence of intellectual property of individuals pointing cameras to record other individuals cavorting the way nature made them for. just because you were made with index fingers able to press the record button of a camera doesn’t make you an owner of anything intellectual. that illinois judge is such a crock he forgot to check about the i in ip.

      • Violated0

        Judge John Lee is not at fault when he only followed the law.

        Kywan Fisher failed to defend himself so the Judge could only set the fine as the maximum allowed under the law. It is not the Judge’s job to try and defend him when he needed to make his own case or at least to hire a lawyer.

        Claiming hacked WIFI would be some defense but this was a password protected service with good linkage proof. As this is civil and not criminal law the case against Kywan Fisher was strong and guilty he would be. His best defense would have been to minimise the damage with claims like his promotion actually boosted their sales and many downloaders would not have purchased anyway.

        • http://profiles.google.com/zerianis10 Christopher Kidwell

          Wrong. It’s going to start changing as people realize that overarching copyright DIMINISHES the value of works and keeps people from innovating.

    • Lol

      fuck you, Im not stopping shit. See my previous post about paying. Nice try troll. Go fuck mafiaa, wait, go fuck yourself since u are mafiaa.

    • Scary_Devil_Monastery

      Oh, yes…like every other time this has happened, over the last 50 years?

      According to you, piracy “died” the firsat time someone faced a penalty over bootlegging a tape.

      I hate to break it to you…but that turned out not to be the case. We will win the same way we always have won.
      Irrespective of your desperate claims, Baghdad Bob.

  • DJ

    It maybe just a string tacked onto the file, But its beyond-shadow-of-a-doubt proof he downloaded and distributed thier works when he signed a disclaimer saying he wouldnt. – although getting him to pay the sum, maybe a little trickier LOL.

    • http://profiles.google.com/zerianis10 Christopher Kidwell

      No, actually it isn’t. Someone coming into his home could have ‘borrowed’ it and shared it without his knowledge. Enough said, reasonable doubt or whatever is used in civil cases, check please!

      • Lawdog

        Reasonable doubt in civil cases? Not so. That’s for criminal cases.

        Preponderance of Evidence is the standard for civil cases. A much lower standard than criminal cases.

        • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_IXEXH64S34XF2A2OHGO5C2IWII Timothy

          But they would still have to prove HE did it, right?

        • Lawdog

          “Prove”…kinda sorta.

          If it’s highly unlikely that anyone else could have done it, and it was known to have been done, he will lose.

    • Lol

      but wait, pirates are your best customers as they advertise for you and spread the word, so being a gay fucker like the guy who initiated the lawsuit, which he will not get 0 out of, clearly is power and financially driven to advertise his porn everywhere as if he wasnt he would not go after others and get this torrent freak piece. by the way, being gay and fucking males/sex however by man on man is a desecration to god so are you glad that you are an abomination? I am not saying that I favor sharing gay porn, but since it is an abomination and not copy writable anyway, you committed perjury by claiming copyrights. When do you get your punishment?

      • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_IXEXH64S34XF2A2OHGO5C2IWII Timothy

        GTFOutta here with your homophobia, poor command of english, and your nonsensical drivel.

  • http://fightcopyrighttrolls.com/ SJD

    Almost missed this pearl from the complaint (an anonymous comment from my blog):

    ——————————————-

    If you want a good laugh, check this out:

    Plaintiff seeks statutory damages for willful infringement of $1,500,000 for the willful infringements of 10 videos that were downloaded 3,449 times. Exhibit “E”. Defendant caused 3,449 infringements of the Plaintiff’s videos. Plaintiff is seeking the maximum statutory damages of $150,000 per infringement. $150,000 times 3,449 infringements is over $517,000,000. Thus, Plaintiff, Flava Works, Inc.’s request for award of $1,500,000 is very reasonable.

    That’s right, $517,000,000. I can just see Huon reading that in the Dr. Evil voice with his pinky to his lip. The reasoning also demonstrates a complete misunderstanding of copyright law and statutory damage awards (i.e., the number of infringements committed during the course of one “transaction”), and statutory damages in a case have been limited to the number of registrations rather than the number of infringements (to say nothing of the fact that the additional infringements were committed by other people). I suppose that’s why they only actually had the balls to ask for one award per work but still funny to see. Great example of why statutory damages are just plain dumb under any circumstances. If there aren’t real damages and they can’t be computed, you don’t deserve them.

    • http://profiles.google.com/zerianis10 Christopher Kidwell

      Well, to a certain point. statutory MAXIMUM damages are a good thing as long as there are time when a judge can waive them. I.E. in event of personal injury or something similar.

    • Chooseit40

      $517,000,000 times 1 property times 0.00000000000000000000000 intellectual = 0 $
      because there is no intellect in porn…

      • Guest

        It’s the work as a whole and not just the content you uneducated stranger.

  • Andrew me

    LOL i am not that well of if i have to declare bankruptcy so be it, they cannot take what a person does not have, now if they had sued him and got a judgment for $15 000 that would scare more people as they could be hounded for that for ages and it is not enough for most people to declare bankruptcy over.

    • Lol

      see previous comment by me

  • Guest

    President Obama Executive Order 13575 Rural Councils
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_juUVKKBw-k

  • Guest

    Obama signs Executive Order NDRP Martial Law – Hannity Full News Clip Fox News (Mar 19, 2012)
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nxtGaZrKDvs

  • Guest

    Obama Signs Executive Order To Kill Internethttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q4eLyRXnOp4

  • Guest

    CONFIRMED OBAMA BIRTH CERTICATE IS A FAKE ! MAKE VIRAL !
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jrQp6qSgX_I

  • Guest
  • Guest

    agenda 21 full
    agenda 21 earth summit 1992

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9GykzQWlXJs

  • Heisenberg7

    I like how the troll thinks he won. He “won” by default, i.e. the defendant didn’t bother to defend himself so the court had no choice but to award them the damages. Even still, there’s a snowball’s chance in hell that they’ll see a penny of the damages amount.

  • teer

    A lost lawsuit and outing… what a disaster!!!

  • Pingback: BitTorrent Pirate Ordered to Pay $1.5 Million Damages For Sharing 10 Movies (Ernesto/TorrentFreak) | .

  • http://profiles.google.com/zerianis10 Christopher Kidwell

    Two words: Appeal coming. Enough said. These courts cannot think that these massive statutory damages would stand when taken to the Supreme Court.

    • Anyone

      you mean the supreme court that said corporations are people?

      • ColonelTravis

        The Supreme Court affirmed what the Constitution already granted, which has been precedent for the past 225 years.

        • BJonesTF

          ACtually, the Supreme court has NEVER said they are people. In fact numerous times over the past 200 years they’ve said specifically that they are NOT.

          And the case I think ‘anyone’ is referring to, Citizens United, didn’t say they are people. Worse it said that “money is free speech”

        • ColonelTravis

          BJonesTF – your beef is with the dope above me who said SCOTUS said corporations were people. I didn’t. Read what I said again, and then read the decision and educate yourself about free speech, which applies to corporations because it’s always been applied. If you’d actually read the decision you would have read a meticulous account of this history. Media companies were exempt from this stupid law – did you know that? Of course not. Media can be classified as corporations, genius, so the way the law was written excluded some and not others.

          Money = free speech, which was a precedent set by SCOTUS long before this case. Go look that up, too, because it’s obvious you have no clue what you’re talking about.

        • BJonesTF

          Actually, Corporations were ruled NOT to have free speech rights until about 125 years ago,

          And ‘money=free speech’ was NEVER true until citizens united. Until then, Speech was speech, money was a facilitator to speech, but not actually speech itself.

          I know the laws and history of them pretty well, and not from reading a few partisan blogs either.

      • ColonelTravis

        Holy shit BJonesTF – Buckley v. Valeo. Go look it up, I’m trying to save you from yourself.

  • senvooo

    lol, and I guess the Kangaroo Court expects this dude to click his heels together and conjure up the dough? lol, these kangaroo courts crack me up man!

    e-privacy.tk

  • Rusty Shackelford

    I don’t know what is worse, having to pay $1.5 million or the whole world knowing you supplied and downloaded gay porn.

    • Anon

      i’d be willing to bet that’s exactly the reason he didn’t show up to court. stupid gay nigger probably thought it would all just go away if he ignored it.

    • Guest

      So what? It simply doesn’t matter if the world knows what kind of erotica I like. You must be from Jesusland?

    • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_IXEXH64S34XF2A2OHGO5C2IWII Timothy

      Beats the world knowing you’re an idiotic homophobe, no?

      • Anon

        gay tim u wrong again :)

  • KILLTHEMALL

    1.5 MILLION DOLLARS??????

    And for porn that anyone can do at home?

    Where did this guy is going to find 1.5 MILLION DOLLARS??????

    These people are Flava Works, Inc. are COUCOU!

    A verdict such as these completely discredit the US authorities in general and this judge in particular. After a verdict such as these this crackpot judge can say bye bye to his career.

    I mean come on! Porn is not creative. Recording people fucking is not creative. Sorry but porn is not copyrightable, period.

    Also these copyright laws were intended to punish a for profit corporations with potentially million of dollars in revenue not individuals just downloading stuff!

    HELLOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!

    You know the more they do crap like these the more likely they are to end up at the end of a rope. I have a feeling that these corporate fools do not realize that.

    I have a message for them:

    KEEP DIGGING YOUR GRAVES MORONS!

    • Chillinfart

      is gay porn dude

      • KILLTHEMALL

        Gay porn, Animal porn martian porn. . .

        So what? All these corporate parasites and criminals globalists are going to end up hanging high any way.

        So what’s your point?

        • broooooo

          you’re weird bro lol

    • Violated0

      Judge John Lee is not at fault when he only followed the law.

      Kywan Fisher failed to defend himself so the Judge could only set the fine as the maximum allowed under the law. It is not the Judge’s job to try and defend him when he needed to make his own case or at least to hire a lawyer.

      Claiming hacked WIFI would be some defense but this was a password protected service with good linkage proof. As this is civil and not criminal law the case against Kywan Fisher was strong and guilty he would be. His best defense would have been to minimise the damage with claims like his promotion actually boosted their sales and many downloaders would not have purchased anyway.

      • Steve-O

        You know what he needs to do? Hire a troll lawyer to help him extort the 3500 other people that downloaded what he put up…since he has to foot the entire bill that seems only fair.

      • KILLTHEMALL

        Judge John Lee is breaking the law and should be hanged. Period. Last time I checked they were still an amendment on the US constitution forbidding excessive fine.

        HELOOOOOOOOOOO!

  • Pingback: Illegal file-sharer gets slapped with $1.5 million in damages | WestPenn Journal

  • Pingback: Illegal file-sharer gets slapped with $1.5 million in damages | Gateway Technologies Ltd

  • Johnlig

    If money is not free speech, the government could ban speech with a nexus to commercial activity,, and a lot of speech cases involving newspapers who are commercial entities would have come out different. Those who argue that corporations have no First Amendment rights have not thought through the implications.

    Money is not literally speech, but it does not mean that the government is free to punish me for solicitating money to print my political propaganda.

    For an excellent analysis of the First Amendment question see The Volokh Conspiracy.

    The poster above is correct. Media corporations were exempt from the regulations in Citizens United, and not even the dissenting justices questioned that a corporation have First Amendment rights. The disagreement in Citizens United was over corporations right to use money in electioneering. Even the dissenters would have rejected the sweeping claim that corporations by virtue of not being natural persons lack First Amendment rights.

    • KILLTHEMALL

      You fucking corporate parasite!

      Corporations have no First Amendment rights since corporation are nobody.

      Otherwise I am going to create a corporation with the primary business will be to murder asshole like you. He! it not me it is the corporation! Arrest the corporation not me. I am not liable.

      Those who claim that “corporations are people my friend” if you know who I mean, have not thought through the implications.

  • LALAMAN

    I swear Flava Works is gay porn?

  • Guest

    ” It’s expected that the verdict will be used to motivate other BitTorrent defendants to settle their cases.”

    More like it motivate other BitTorrent users to use a VPN.

    • KILLTHEMALL

      Ya I will settle the case with my guns.

      Fair enough. This is what we all should be doing since the authorities themselves are breaking the law to the profit of the corporatists.

  • Pingback: GNC #813 Mini Demo | GNC Show Notes

  • Andrew Lee

    Well this case is just a gateway for mass extortion.. They know they’ll never get anywhere near the 1.5 million out of this guy. However the light of this will be some good ammo in their extortion letters.

    Really this case is too fucking convenient if you ask me. It would not surprise me if these fucktards paid him just to do jack shit so they could get the maximum verdict for ammo in the future. Who in the hell in their right mind would not defend themselves at all.. I don’t fucking buy it one bit!

    Even if this is legit “which I highly doubt” who’s to say the files were not leeched. I mean that’s a pretty damn obvious defense especially when they’re asking for damages over a million.. I mean really proving he was sitting at his computer at the time of the uploads is almost impossible to prove short of a full confession.

    So yeah when I think of it like that it makes me say bullshit.

  • Violated0

    What is wrong here is not that he was found guilty but the $1.5 million fine is unconstitutional “cruel & unusual” when dealing with someone who shared media for the enjoyment of others and made no profit out of it.

    As a comparison then here in UK the Government have established a special copyright court to deal with infringement cases where no money was involved. You will sure find no millions in fines here where there would only be small fines to deter. The goal here is to be quick and efficient with the key point being one of control. The court orders an infringer to stop and to not do so would be contempt of court.

    I am not saying the UK system is not painful but it is far removed from the INSANITY that is going on in the United States.

    • Michael

      The American system is at least more honest, in that it does not mask the government’s suppression of non-commercial sharing. We must always keep in perspective, that the moral wrong is that non-commercial sharing is not categorically legal. Any legal system attempting to penalize me for sharing 1s and 0s with my family and friends is evil. So the moral wrong is any punishment for non-commercial sharing.

      • Violated0

        You make a good point but we are talking about two different things. Achieving some rational fairness under the current law system is different from a radical change to the law. My point was in a short term welcomed improvement but you are right that all the time the US handles this in an unreasonable way will there be much anger and desire for a radical change.

        Yes sharing without money involved should be lawful when here we are a decade into Internet piracy and media creation is at an all time high where gross market income is going very well. So what the public want and enjoy should not be unlawful when it is not harmful.

      • HitlersGrandchild

        “The American system is at least more honest’.

        More honest than who? The Mafia maybe?

  • http://www.facebook.com/sabah.elfol.1 Sabah El Fol

    hahahahah yea.. so i should assume now that there have been any reduction in sharing of porn.. lol after all the thousands of lawsuits .. actually stats say that file sharing is on the rise as ppl become more technically contious and as the economic slowdown persist.. RETARDS there are 195 countries unless by a miracle can exert significant control over them you will sitll have massive file sharing.. and pleeaassssse having a “one” chance in 500,000,000 of being caught is pathetic deterrent lol.. thats a classic case of lawyers scamming dome and “not rich anymore” corporation

    • Violated0

      They are not doing this to stop infringement but to make money. Do you think with free porn everywhere that one title would make them $150,000 profit?

      Suing people can make them more money than selling porn does.

  • BobGandson

    The problem is that no one really knows who leaked the movie. The fact that a copyright nazi claims that a customer’s watermark matches a file, is hopefully insufficient.

    Otherwise, I smell another pay up or else scam. Simply set up a site selling cheap access to porn, and install malware proxy on the buyer’s computer. Leak the files from an infected computer, and profit.

    • Hangpirates

      Bob, put up the cash for a lawyer and you can pay for the appeal.

  • Bobgandson

    There is no meaningful diference between the claim that IP address = person, and watermark in leaked file = person. The fact that the access to the watermarked file first requires password is true but irrelevant, unless you can substantiate that all computers controlling access a watermarked file is more secure against malware and unauthorized access than a wireless router.

    IP routing addresses are based on public and open standards, whereas proprietary watermarks is only believable if you take the claimant’s word for granted.
    The argument that watermark = guilty therefore suffers from the same flaw as the argument that IP address = person.
    Both arguments attempts to pin responsibility on *a single* party on the assumption that *ownership* of computer/router = proof.

  • Pingback: Illegal file-sharer gets slapped with $1.5 million in damages | Partners In Sublime

  • townie2

    get yourself fired from your job and go on welfare, they’ll never collect a cent, besides, they’ll garnishee so much of your paycheck you’ll be left with the equivalent of a welfare check anyway.

    • Hangpirates

      Yes this guy is now reduced to poverty for his mistake.

      • Obama

        Yeh.. for the rest of his life for 10 lame porno’s- North Korea??

      • Reverberat.

        Yes, that’s why it’s insane, barbaric and wrong to have a monetary penal system.

  • Pingback: Illegal file-sharer gets slapped with $1.5 million in damages | technical news

  • http://www.twitter.com/Spartz Bas Grasmayer

    What happened to the lawsuit in which the lawyer argued that copyright infringement regarding “adult videos” was invalid due to this clause in the copyright law:

    “To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries.”

    The lawyer argued that pornography does not constitute “the progress of science and useful arts” and thus it cannot fall under the current copyright laws.

    Does anyone know? Seemed like a case with a potentially interesting outcome, especially since some major label businessmen proudly state they’re making products, for entertainment, and are not interested in contributing to culture or arts. Though it might be easier to find a judge that will say porn is not a “useful art” than it is with music that is created for pure entertainment and $ale$ purposes.

  • Pingback: Tech-Critics: How 10 Porn Movie Downloads Cost One Man $1.6 Million By Sam…

  • Pingback: How 10 Porn Movie Downloads Cost One Man $1.6 Million By Sam… | GabsGroup

  • Pingback: How 10 Porn Movie Downloads Cost One Man $1.6 Million By Sam… | News

  • Pingback: How 10 Porn Movie Downloads Cost One Man $1.6 Million By Sam… | Electronics & computer accessories

  • http://twitter.com/GermanysZod Ramsey Mekdaschi

    i can’t believe this, pedophiles and rapists get better treatment from the government than hackers and filesharers.

    • Hangpirates

      Maybe you think putting him in prison where he will get buggered is better. Most men disagree. When did you come out Ram me?

      • Boyhowdy

        You can’t be imprisoned for a civil suit.

    • Martin-glomb

      What kind of troll are you and what the hell is that for a comment you just made? You sound like one of those ignorant fox fanboys with more disfunctional brain cells than a dead body just one hour after death.

  • Joharkaran93

    welcome to democracy

    • Hangpirates

      Yes it’s great to live in a Democratic country where thieves get nailed. I guess Fisher doesn’t think so. Still this case is going viral and now more copyright holders will follow the same path as Flava and it will cost more people more money if caught stealing.
      That’s democracy in action.

  • Pingback: How 10 Porn Movie Downloads Cost One Man $1.5 Million By Sam… | News

  • Pingback: How 10 Porn Movie Downloads Cost One Man $1.6 Million By Sam… | Orange Claymore Red Slime

  • Hangpirates

    Bloody good news. They should nail a few more free loaders.

    • Fredrika

      > “Bloody good news. They should nail a few more free loaders.”

      So that the pirates decide it’s time to move on to a next-generation filesharing protocol, which is untouchable both technically and legislatively, so that no more pirates can get nailed?

    • HungPirate

      Like your mom freeloading off my cock?

      • KIlledTroll

        Ah!

        Now you call yourself “HungPirate” paid troll?

        Di I told you to stop changing your name and to stop voting fand responding to yourself?

        Is it serious doctor?

    • Scary_Devil_Monastery

      For the last fifty years it’s been tried.

      Sadly for you however, the verdict is that the “pirates” eventually come out winners.

      It didn’t go any better for the catholic church either. Really, it’s been shown through history that even butchering people wholesale won’t stop what is now called “piracy” nor diminish it.

      I invite you to try, though. The harder your methods, the more the public moves against you.

  • Pingback: How 10 Porn Movie Downloads Cost One Man $1.5 Million - My Blog

  • Pingback: Tech-Critics: How 10 Porn Movie Downloads Cost One Man $1.5 Million By Sam…

  • Guest

    digital chatter, random noise, XXI century of democracy

  • Pingback: Torrent user must pay back the adult industry – Inquirer

  • Pingback: Deset porno filmova koštat ?e ga 1,5 milijuna dolara // Gadgeterija

  • Pingback: How 10 Porn Movie Downloads Cost One Man $1.5 Million By Sam… | 1v8 NET

  • Pingback: ?????????? ??????????? ?? $1,5 ??? ?? ??????????????? ????????? ???????????? - ?????????? onliner.by

  • Pingback: How 10 Porn Movie Downloads Cost One Man $1.5 Million By Sam… | Real True News

  • Pingback: ???????? $1.5 ????. ?? "???????" ??? BitTorrent ??? ??????????? 10 ??????? ?????

  • Pingback: How 10 Porn Movie Downloads Cost One Man $1.5 Million By Sam… « VidenOmkring

  • Pingback: Multa de 1,5 millones de dólares por compartir 10 películas pornográficas en BitTorrent

  • Roswell1701

    This is UNBELIEVABLE! Not so much the judgment and the fine, but the fact that it resulted from downloading PORNOGRAPHY! I just don’t get it. The Internet is awash with porn. Actually, some would argue that the Internet EXISTS because of porn! Truly mind-boggling…

    • Guest

      Maybe you are just a brainwashed christian and you simply don’t want to get it?

      • Roswell1701

        Actually, I’m a Hedonist. Self-abasement is my life!. How could pointing out the IRONY of some one being busted for downloading porn rather than a major Hollywood release lead you to believe that I’m a Christian, and brainwashed at that? Maybe you’re just a STUPID FUCKING TROLL!… Well, that was fun. Now you’ll have to excuse me. I think I’ll download some porn and jerk off. Have a nice day, ASSHOLE! :)

    • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_IXEXH64S34XF2A2OHGO5C2IWII Timothy

      The Internet was used for academic and scientific reasons long before porn was available on the internet. There’s no arguing facts.

      • Roswell1701

        No shit, Timothy. I was simply being fasecious… So get the stick out of your ass.

  • JordanKratz

    Just keep on ripping off people with your asshole lame lawsuits.1.5 Million bucks for ten movies.
    FUCK YOU !
    I hope that as more of these types of shakedowns occur people will just rise up and be motivated to truly Fuck that whole Industry up.

  • Pingback: 1,5 miliona dolarów odszkodowania za udost?pnianie filmów | HackingNews.pl - Najnowsze wiadomo?ci ze ?wiata hackingu

  • Pingback: Multa de 1,5 millones de dólares por compartir 10 películas pornográficas en BitTorrent - Marketing digital : Marketing digital

  • Pingback: How 10 Porn Movie Downloads Cost One Man $1.5 Million By Sam… | Gadget News, Reviews and Guides

  • Jesus

    I am going to sue you for defamation and subpoena your IP for your IP addresss. I will sue the blog and seek their domain. See you in court.

    • Pork on a Boat

      Cool story Jesus. I heard you turned water into wine, that shits cool, mind showing me how? Being a student means I can’t afford as much booze. Cheers bud.

  • Hogspace

    Well one thing he and everyone should know. Never ever EVER pay for online porn. WTF would you give these creeps your credit card details anyway? gotta be nuts. The web is awash with free porn.

    • Chronoss2008

      lend me your girlfriend ill make mroe free porn LOL

      • Hogspace

        She is SE Asian, you know you want it.

  • Pingback: Multa de 1,5 millones de dólares por compartir 10 películas pornográficas en BitTorrent | TodoMdP

  • Pingback: Multa de 1,5 millones de dólares por compartir 10 películas pornográficas en BitTorrent | Compupixel

  • Pingback: I film porno che costano un milione e mezzo di dollari - Giornalettismo

  • Anonymous

    regardless of whether the guy did this or not, to issue a fine of this magnitude is absolutely ridiculous! i have to wonder what incentive the judge received for issuing a fine of this magnitude? does Flava Works, Inc expect to get any of this money? if so, i would whistle it goodbye. this could turn into another continuously appeal similar to the Tenanbaum and Thomas cases. they have gotten nowhere and i doubt they ever will. if ‘punishment’ handed out when there is sufficient proper evidence that rules against a single, ordinary person, were to be sensible. it would stop the endless court cases that drag on for years, benefiting no one!

  • Theonlyone

    We all know Flava Works wont see $1.50 of the fine imposed, so their victory is hollow.

  • Chronoss2008

    so if i shread a 10000 movies i should pay
    1,500,000,000
    haha good luck collecting assholes

  • Pingback: Multa de 1,5 millones de dólares por compartir 10 películas pornográficas en BitTorrent | Shft

  • Steven

    The punishment is much higher than the fines. He has been publicly humiliated for liking gay porn.

    Wonder what will employers doing background checks on him will think.

    • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_IXEXH64S34XF2A2OHGO5C2IWII Timothy

      How do you know that he was “liking” the gay porn? Were you stroking with him?
      Do you think it’s going to list the porn titles in the background search? Do you think he cares? Do you really think his employer will care? Please, tell us more.

      You are making ASSumptions.

  • Pingback: USA: Filesharer muss 1,5 Millionen Dollar Schadenersatz für 10 Filme bezahlen | BASIC thinking

  • Pingback: Fine of $1.5 million for sharing 10 pornographic movies on BitTorrent | Tech Crash

  • Some stuff

    Anyone realized something important?
    He was caught sharing this on a PRIVATE tracker.

    • guest

      So?? private trackers are full of people willing to sell their souls (and IP addreses) for a few dollars. This is nothing new.

    • Scary_Devil_Monastery

      Which in the end is why private trackers do zip for security. On the contrary, private trackers have membership lists which is why the case against you, once busted, gets easier to make.

  • guest

    Seriously people, they don’t expect to actually collect 1.5M, and that was never their main intention behind this. The whole point was to intimidate future pirates, so the greater the amount of money involved the better the effect.

    • Scary_Devil_Monastery

      Someone ought to tell them they hit the point of diminishing returns a very long time ago. What stuff like this does is to persuade every last citizen reading it that something is very very wrong with copyright law.

    • Jerryspringer

      Maybe less than 1% more of people who pirate porn will settle. Maybe none extra will settle its not a victory when you make a huge fine out of a default judgement. It just make them more of asshole to the type of people who pirate porn.

  • Anon

    If this was a default judgment (as is stated above), then there was no defense ever presented to the lawsuit (i.e. the defendant has not responded to the lawsuit, allowing the allegations in the complaint to be VIEWED as true, not that they ARE true.) To call this a “verdict” is highly misleading. Default judgments are set aside in seconds if and when previously unrepresented defendants decide to contest them.

    Odds are this guy never ends up paying the porn co. a solitary penny.

  • Pingback: Multa de 1,5 millones de dólares por compartir 10 películas pornográficas en BitTorrent | El Tenanpa

  • Pingback: Amenda de 1,5 mil. $ pentru un american care impartea filme XXX pe BitTorrent | Gadget Report

  • Heh

    so obviously we’re all setting up a fund so that the defendant can defend himself, right? i mean, otherwise, we’re just blowing smoke out of our latino-black-gay-asses.

  • Pingback: Porn Downloader Ordered To Pay $1.5 Million Fine In BitTorrent Decision - Forbes

  • Pingback: File-sharer skips court date; hit with $1.5 million in fines | how to get the most from your gaming console

  • Pingback: Illegal file-sharer gets slapped with $1.5 million in damages | GADGETNUZ

  • Pingback: Armor Games – File-sharer skips court date; hit with $1.5 million in fines

  • polsenpol

    “To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries.”

    Pornography is now a ‘useful Art’ !!

    • Scary_Devil_Monastery

      If it keeps teenagers occupied I could very well make a case that it is a useful art.

      Hell, if the concept of protection is that the art should be “useful” then a lot of artists will have to step away from the copyright table right there…

  • Pingback: File-sharer skips court date; hit with $1.5 million in fines | Printing Service Ft Myers

  • Pingback: File-sharer skips court date; hit with $1.5 million in fines | CELL and COMPUTER

  • Pingback: Mundos Digitais » Americano se dá muito mal e paga 1,5 milhão de dólares por 10 filmes pornográficos

  • Pingback: File-sharer skips court date; hit with $1.5 million in fines | TabletPCTrend.com

  • Tron Leader

    Maybe the company could give the guy a job working in the studio and he could work off his debt that way.

  • http://www.schnittshow.com Schnitt

    Folks it a civil judgement and can be discharged via bankruptcy, Nothing to see here move along.

    • Lawdog

      Absent willful conduct, fraud, wrongful death or debts arising from injuries caused in a drunk driving accident, some civil judgments can be discharged.

      WILLFUL CONDUCT = NON-DISCHARGABLE DEBT

      • http://www.schnittshow.com Schnitt

        I respectfully disagree I just had a family member with many willful conduct situations file for chapter 7 and they were discharged, its all up to the interpretation of the trustee and the court what gets discharged or not.

        While the law is the law, interpretation and having a human involved allows for some unique situations to occur.

        Whats the old saying? “Never say Never”

  • http://fightcopyrighttrolls.com/ SJD
  • MISTERIOTONES

    I EM ON OF THE PIRATES … AND WEE ARE MANIE!!!

  • erasmus654

    This shit just never fucking ends. I’ll tell you what IS criminal: Wasting time and money going after people for sharing amongst themselves when that time and money could be spent on things like feeding the homeless, helping people find affordable housing, going after mega corporations that are fleecing the world to the bone.

  • Pingback: BitTorrent porn sharer hit with whacky $1.5 million fine » TakeAwayPoint | TakeAwayPoint

  • Pingback: Multa de 1,5 millones de dólares por compartir 10 películas pornográficas en BitTorrent | SONSEMAR NOTICIAS

  • Pingback: Porn Purchase Proves Cripplingly Costly

  • AsianGhost77

    All this fuss is about entertainment. Porn stars are paid far more than a professor. Some minutes entertainment you can do yourself at home is stamped with something called copyright worth millions of dollars. A professor must work very hard for decades to earn the same amount of money if he/she is lucky enough. In this law domain, government is more busy with entertainment than science and technology. Believe me, your nation is suffering national degradation slowly but surely. Asian nations will seize all your glory in the next 50 years, for sure.

  • chuwha
  • Pingback: How 10 Porn Movie Downloads Cost One Man $1.5 Million | Gizmodo Australia

  • Pingback: Downloader Dinged $1.5M for Sharing Adult Movies – Reason

  • http://twitter.com/krozareq krozareq

    Re-enc your shit, bro.

  • Pingback: Schadensersatz von 1,5 Millionen für 10 Pornos | Klaus Ahrens: News, Tipps, Tricks und Fotos

  • Pingback: BitTorrent porn sharer hit with whacky $1.5 million fine | AIVAnet

  • Pingback: ?? » ?????G????????150???

  • Pingback: Bow-chicka-uh-oh: Man told to pay $1.5m for sharing ten porn movies - Noticias em tempo real

  • Pingback: Bittorrent Pirate to pay $1.5M | MyCE.com

  • Pingback: Copyright Maths – How do you analyse the numbers? « Tim Dobson

  • Pingback: ??????? WWW | ??? ?????????? ?????????? ?? $1,5 ??? ?? ??????????????? ????????? ????????????

  • Pingback: Links 3/11/2012: Fedora as Rolling-Release Distribution Amid Delays? | Techrights

  • Pingback: Pour ceux qui rêvent de fortune » Une amende de 1,5 million de dollars pour le partage de dix films

  • Pingback: Za dijeljenje porno sadržaja putem interneta kazna 1,5 milijuna dolara | NoviPortal

  • Pingback: File-sharer gets slapped with $1.5 million in damages | WorldNewsTech – IT News , Security , Internet latest news

  • Pingback: Un américain doit payer 1,5 million de dollars pour 10 films pornos partagés Montserrat Agence de Communication

  • Pingback: BitTorrent Pirate Ordered to Pay $1.5 Million Damages For Sharing 10 Movies | Virginia News Press | Virginia Breaking News Headlines | Virginia News Directory

  • Pingback: ???????? 1.5 ????. ??????? ??? "???????" ??? BitTorrent | Digital Life

  • Pingback: ???????? 1.5 ????. ??????? ??? «???????» ??? BitTorrent

  • Pingback: Sex Tech: Historic BitTorrent porn damages, Verizon arrest over nude pics | My Blog

  • Mikko Rauhala

    A notable feature here is the use of digital watermarking to identify the origin of the files. Regardless of whether this particular individual knowingly spread the files or not, buying watermarked content clearly exposes one to ridiculously massive liability if the files are leaked to the public.

    So what this case tells us is that buying media is unsafe unless you know for a fact that it’s not watermarked. Even if you don’t intend to copy it around; mistakes, cracks and outright equipment thefts happen.

  • Pingback: ???????? 1.5 ????. ??????? ??? «???????» ??? BitTorrent

  • Pingback: Dijelio pornografiju putem torrenta: Kazna 1,5 milijuna dolara!

  • Pingback: Sex Tech: Historic BitTorrent porn damages, Verizon arrest over nude pics | Electronic Staff

  • Pingback: Copyright, risarcimento milionario | infropy - information entropy

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100003037095323 Jerilyn Nighy

    Hrmm. Wouldn’t let me reply in a thread. Anyhow. Please stop blinding assuming that criticism of Romney is praise for Obama. Also please stop lying about Bain. Bain didn’t save, nor did it intend to save, jack shit. Please look up the definition of predatory and vulture capitalism. Also go fuck yourself Roswell, with capitalism’s dick once you remove it from your mouth.

  • Pingback: 1.5 millones de dólares en multa por compartir películas en BitTorrent

  • anonymous

    Got nothing against porn downloaders though I think the torrents shouldn’t be mixed up with the ordinary torrents (music, tv, pdf books, etc). If a child doesn’t have parental guidance on relationships then someone young who watches a porn movie may think that’s actually how you behave in a real-life relationship. The porn downloaders (usually addicted downloaders who collect porn rather than watch it and normally obsessives who can’t accept criticism) are not bad or evil people but they are selfish and stubborn. I say no to censorship but yes to separation – porn torrents should be removed from Pirate Bays general listings and if Pirate Bay wants to continue hosting porn torrents they should start up a site dedicated to their more fantasy-driven members. Its a shame that the behaviour of porn downloaders is so tied into their lack of normal relationships but then if all you want is an sexual partner who is compliant and an object for the mind that must have control then go ahead and do as you will. As the old woman says (in Chaucer’s Canterbury Tales) to the knight when he asks of her what it is that people want out of a relationship – the wise old women replies “control”.

  • Pingback: Canadians Better Protected From “Copywrath” Starting Today | TorrentFreak

  • ME

    what cruel human being would hang a millstone around a mans neck and toss him into the river…..because thats exactly what the judge has done here, surely the punishment has to fit the crime, or are we going to bring the death penalty back for speeding next?

    The judge in my honest opinion, far exceeded his reach and acted like a complete B****CUNT.

  • Pingback: Seks Met | Seks Met 1,5 miljoen dollar boete voor delen 10 pornofilms

  • Pingback: First Software Maker Joins BitTorrent Lawsuit Bonanza | TorrentFreak

  • Pingback: First Software Maker Joins BitTorrent Lawsuit Bonanza | Best Seedbox

  • Pingback: First Software Maker Joins BitTorrent Lawsuit Bonanza | We R Pirates

  • Pingback: First Software Maker Joins BitTorrent Lawsuit Bonanza | Kuvilla

  • Pingback: BitTorrent Pirate Ordered to Pay $1.5 Million Damages For Sharing 10 Movies | Kuvilla

  • Pingback: Multa de 1,5 millones de dólares por compartir 10 películas pornográficas en BitTorrent | IUS ABOGADOS

  • Pingback: TorrentFreak Trolls a Copyright Troll | We R Pirates

  • Pingback: TorrentFreak Trolls a Copyright Troll | Best Seedbox

  • Pingback: TorrentFreak Trolls a Copyright Troll | Kuvilla

  • BTGuard - BitTorrent Anonymously

NewsBits

Even more news...

  • Blu-ray Anti-Piracy Tech Stops Discs and Promotes Purchases

    An anti-piracy system present in all official Blu-ray players since 2012 has received a fresh update...

  • Foxtel Breeds Pirates by Locking Up Game of Thrones

    One of the main reasons why people turn to piracy is the lack of legal alternatives....

  • UK Student Admits Breaching Sony Copyrights With Leak of PS3 SDK

    Last year an Internet user known as El Nomeo leaked version 3.70 of Sony’s Playstation3 SDK...

  • Pirates Can Be Identified Despite Sharing IP Addresses, ISP Claims

    Carrier-Grade Network Address Translation is a network mechanism through which many Internet subscribers can share the...

  • Feds Seize Cash from Major Bitcoin Exchange’s Dwolla Account

    The U.S. Government has taken a significant action against the web’s top Bitcoin exchange by seizing...

MostDiscussed

Below are TorrentFreak's most discussed articles of the past month. Join the discussion if you like.

CopyQuote

Left Quote

“The Pirate Bay has been one of the most important movements in Sweden for freedom of speech, working against corruption and censorship.

Peter Sunde Left Quote

PopularArticles

A selection of some TorrentFreak's classics dug up from our archives.