I demand you investigate into the RIAAs illegal and terrorist practices, peat the whistleblower.[/quote]

There are federal police forces, the BKA in Germany for example, that let child porn sites continue to operate. Under some sort of surveillance of course. The police is using these sites as bait for child porn consumers. The consumers get caught, which makes an excellent case for online surveillance legislation. “Excellent case” of course only, if the public is told “We got some child pornographers, because we were able to spy on them.” The public agrees, because almost nobody likes child pornography. This sort of police work has come to light in a case where they tried to discredit the Java Anon Proxy, an anonymity network. The police is not interested in child pornography per se. Although the individual policeman probably is. Their right to exist is to protect a system, be there criminals or not.

There are federal police forces, the BKA in Germany for example, that let child porn sites continue to operate. Under some sort of surveillance of course. The police is using these sites as bait for child porn consumers. The consumers get caught, which makes an excellent case for online surveillance legislation. “Excellent case” of course only, if the public is told “We got some child pornographers, because we were able to spy on them.” The public agrees, because almost nobody likes child pornography. This sort of police work has come to light in a case where they tried to discredit the Java Anon Proxy, an anonymity network. The police is not interested in child pornography per se. Although the individual policeman probably is. Their right to exist is to protect a system, be there criminals or not.

But it is still worthwhile to let the FBI know what you think should be done.

As your empire gets older and older and withers and begins to die, you will be lucky if you have such a advanced medium to take care of you… You cant depend on your dvd rentals/overpriced popcorn/etc forever… Sooner or later digital will win just as Tivo won over TV.
Nobody wants to walk to the middle man for every piece of crap they toss out.

If you do chose to fight good luck with stopping BT you can cut off all the heads and the Hydra would just grow again as it always does. It has to many legit uses so ya…

There are federal police forces, the BKA in Germany for example, that let child porn sites continue to operate. Under some sort of surveillance of course. The police is using these sites as bait for child porn consumers. The consumers get caught, which makes an excellent case for online surveillance legislation. “Excellent case” of course only, if the public is told “We got some child pornographers, because we were able to spy on them.” The public agrees, because almost nobody likes child pornography. This sort of police work has come to light in a case where they tried to discredit the Java Anon Proxy, an anonymity network. The police isn’t interested in child pornography per se. Although the individual policeman probably is. Their right to exist is to protect a system, be there criminals or not.

But it is still worthwhile to let the FBI know what you think should be done.

http://www.ispreview.co.uk/news/EkpylyVFEVprNOiCbo.html

The UK’s largest residential broadband provider, Virgin Media, has announced its intention to introduce a warning system for those caught engaged in illegal downloading”

that means torrents now, and later news servers, looks like the 3rd party usenet providers will be loosing a big chunk of cash soon.

There are federal police forces, the BKA in Germany for example, that let child porn sites continue to operate. Under some sort of surveillance of course. The police is using these sites as bait for child porn consumers. The consumers get caught, which makes an excellent case for online surveillance legislation. “Excellent case” of course only, if the public is told “We got some child pornographers, because we were able to spy on them.” The public agrees, because almost nobody likes child pornography. This sort of police work has come to light in a case where they tried to discredit the Java Anon Proxy, an anonymity network. The police is not interested in child pornography per se. Although the individual policeman probably is. Their right to exist is to protect a system, be there criminals or not.

But it is still worthwhile to let the FBI know what you think should be done.

WE WILL BURY YOU BPI/RIAA/IFPI

Check here: http://www.news.com/2100-1028_3-5073817.html

How would he know there was child porn?

I’ve seen the RIAA hacking into peoples computers and the website torrentfreak popular searches list contains beastly porn keywords, child porn type keywords a lot even though their sites have no child porn, so they have automated bots sending child porn suggestions, and child porn searches to make the P2P Networks look bad.

Some of the people convicted of child porn may have been set up by the RIAA to be arrested and as a statement against p2p filesharing networks.

Also someone has been promoting child porn on p2p and when I tried to report it, it never got removed which means the RIAA may have bribed our law enforcement to keep that on there to make the filesharing networks a living child porn target.

Yes I am a corporate whisleblower, and have investigated into the RIAAs illegal and beastly tactics to get the Filesharing networks shut down so they can illegally maintain their corporate music monopoly and have no amateur artists.

Now about me suspecting them of terrorism, they act exactly like the Mafia

Here are my reasons they are like the mafia and like a terrorist organization:

1)They bribe/lobby our Senators to illegalize P2P sharing, piracy, lied to the people that sharing is stealing, when sharing is not stealing, it is copying.
2)The RIAA Bribed or made hacking legal for them
3)The RIAA has been targeting thousands upon thousands of people and they act like a terrorist organization attacking people on Social Security (SSI) that can’t afford to pay for tons of music, attacking dead people, attacking poor people, attacking college students which means many get into being illegal pornstars, and prostitution just to pay for college funds and/or RIAA settlenments.
(4)They operate illegally, Conning artists rights away.
(5)The RIAA has to be breaking some sort of law with the tactics they are doing.
(6)And I heard a rumor they have been using unlicensed investigators.

I demand you investigate into the RIAAs illegal and terrorist practices, peat the whistleblower.

the battle for filesharing is won. the battle for diminishing anti-p2p budgets has just begun (April 1 is the start of the new business year in the UK when annual budgets are decided)

if any BPI employee afraid for their jobs needs career advice then i suggest you send your resume to Robert Mugabe. if you are looking for work closer to home then better leave your work experience out of it …

http://www.fileprompt.com

Welcome to the UK police state.

So, he basically says I’ve got 200 free downloads. When I do more, it probably starts paying off to bully me to pay for so called economic losses.

Let’s start to pack together the stuff into 1TB junks. That will be enough for 65 years of continuous entertainment, given uncompressed music albums or 700MB movies that run for about 2 hours. That should be acceptable for the average filesharer who starts at age 10 and goes deaf at age 75.

> echo “200*10^6/700/365/12″ | bc

@20
It depends on where you live.

Isnt it supposed to be against the law to violate the privacy of users and check what they are doing ?

But according to the RIAA the lawsuits against the customers are working! So are the lawsuits working? if this is not working why are they doing it?

To rob the people even further?

Why the governement is not doing anything?

Are they waiting for someone to do the job for them the Hugly way?

Thay can suck my fucking balls. Look at it like this. By the time thay have closed one torrent tracker ther is 1000s more opend.

Aint that the truth fella ;-)

Which is why the music companies should be embracing the technology! It’s already been proven that people are prepared to pay for files distributed via torrent sites, so why can’t the BPI get its head out of its arse and create its own client/network that will earn it some money lost due to “vanishing CD sales”?
Chasing the current users of torrent clients or the sites that host trackers will just make more enemies in the huge potential market for legal (and paid) torrents.
The horse has already bolted, Mr BPI. You’ve got some catching up to do.

P.S. What sort of a name is “Jollyon”?

Is it not the way the dynosaurs where built?

Computers networking is an asteroid with the names of BPI RIAA, IFPI, CRIA, MPAA, Vivendique Universale, Sony/BMG, EMI,Time Warner writen on it.

Good!

The Copyright Cartel lives in a fantasy land where it’s somehow possible to acheive victory in their unwinnable war, and they have an extremely low comprehension of P2P filesharing.

That’s why they think they can “clamp down” on hundreds of thousands of people. Their pea-size brains are hopelessly outweighed by their planet-sized greed.

Also, I’ll say it again if only because it bears repeating: it’s a stupid idea to paginate the God damn comments. Go back to displaying them all at once, or you might as well just limit the number of user comments to 24, because everything that spills over into the ensuing pages will be read so seldomly it might as well be invisible… Which it already damn near is.

@ANON – elitish SOB aren’t you? I use uTorrent because of it’s features but if Shareaza came along and added better Torrent features to their client I’d switch in a heartbeat. What the fuck does it matter what client you’re using? so long as you’re not trying to cheat the trackers (which is why most private trackers restrict clients), then it doesn’t make any difference.

http://www.hack5.blogspot.com

Torrent is here to stay…no denial !

Then just ask your favorite trackers to ban the client.