However, owners of file lockers and the like, fully know they wouldn’t have a cat in hells chance of making fat profits if they didn’t benefit from the current loopholes that fill their shabby websites with millions of copy-written files for people to download for free (or a fee that goes directly to their pockets) at the expense of the companies and people that make the product.

So of course they’re not going to be the ones to press for change in the online environment. Which is why the majority of freeloaders will always side with them.

Some people think it’s censorship when rights-holders lobby for laws to protect their investments. But where actually is the censorship for example, if one day you are not able to download a dvd rip of “Django Unchained” for free rather than paying for an authorized copy or stream like you should ??

Were peoples free speech or civil rights trampled on?

Of course not.

Gandhi is similarly laughable while advocating secession in India?

The apartheid regime in South Africa was justified in incarcerating Mandela?

PelouzeTF, kindly tell us where you personally draw the line for when “free speech” ends?

Ideally it shouldn’t force americans to view the founding fathers as tax-evading lowlife scum.

I would not advise 90-year olds reading this to snort lines in full view of the nearest police officer, joyfully exclaiming “At last! Old Enough!”.

Just in case bobmail is wrong. He usually is, whenever he tries to discuss law, IT or logic.

I must say his act has slipped downhill fast though. Almost as if the one doing the posting was our old friend “Baghdad Bob”-Anon.