http://isohunt.com/torrents/?ihq=cream+hd

http://TehConnection.eu

dedicated to movies and movies only! download the latest releases and lightning fast speeds!

However, how can you say gay porn and Tokyo Drift isn’t worth it as much as yours?

What did you download? My Little Pony? Seriously.

I know what you’re saying, Tommy, but I don’t think gay porn will cause your bandwidth rates to rise.

Life is good. Back to my “criminal” self.

It seemed inevitable that the “all you can eat” deal didn’t work out. I don’t think any company that likes making that much money for fast connections 24/7 will be able to sustain those promises.

I won’t look a gift horse in the mouth.

Thanks, FCC!!

The all-you-can-eat thing has been a cover for all the shady and abusive practices of the ISPs.

America needs this time of policing MORE THAN ANYONE ELSE because we hardly have ANY freedom of choice here.

Stupid people and free-market republicans always claim “we don’t need regulation, just let the market work — people will vote with their dollars”. But this is very misleading because freedom of choice in the market has long been stifled compared to most other developed countries:

1) The FCC basically killed off any chance of new competitors in the market by removing the requirement that cable and phone companies have to provide wholesale access to the cable and phone lines running to consumers homes. Without this mandate, competitors would have to actually tear up and run their own cabling to everyone’s homes, which the FCC doesn’t even allow in the first place. And the argument that the incumbent providers “own” the lines and therefore shouldn’t have to give their competitors leased access is totally bunk because the “last-mile” lines were layed down at tax payers expense.

So the result is that in America you are lucky if you have access to ONE cable broadband provider and ONE DSL provider. And since DSL is very finicky with US phone lines, you have to be within 3-4 miles of the phone company’s switches. So in somewhat rural and many suburban areas you only have access to cable broadband. Now, other than the 1-3% who have access to Verizon’s fiber-optic lines, the only alternative is satellite internet (expensive, unreliable and slow) and rarely wireless over-the-air microwave links (expensive, slow).

2) The other big screw-job is the fact that state and local governments in addition to the federal government have been defrauded out of TEN’S OF BILLIONS of dollars by the regional phone companies.

Basically, many different telecommunications and phone companies over two decades were provided with all kinds of different subsidies, grants, tax breaks, and other financial incentives in order to create next-generation fiber-optic “fiber-to-the-home” networks. Unfortunately, there was a lot of talk, a lot of planning, and finally a lot of excuses and NOTHING was ever completed.

The money was basically tossed away and no one was held accountable because the state governments changed, legislators changed, and the phone companies either were bought out by other companies, merged with other companies, or left the marketplace entirely.

The result was billions of dollars was gone, and there wasn’t even the beginning of nationwide fiber-optic network.

Shameful… more so because most of the population doesn’t even know or care about it.

I won’t be suprised at all if we start seeing people having to pay $100 a month to consume the amount of bandwidth we’ve become use to using. In fact I know it will happen, it’s already starting to happen in certain states and ISPS have announced they expect to expand this nation wide soon.

Cool, comcast isn’t messing with peoples bittorrents anymore. But now we have to pay more money if we want to continue consuming as much bandwidth. Personally I’d rather have isps messsing with my connection then me having to fork over more money.

We had a “platinum” account with Comscam for years. During this time, I had to keep my downloads to a min. if I wanted to maintain at least a 1 ratio in the BT community. We all want to seed, right?

And how much should it cost to browse and check email? Certainly a lot less than to download/upload 100 gigs a month. Bandwidth should be available to users connected for a minimum cost and billed for by usage. Plans such as these would drive competition and free up bandwidth for providers.

Internet is still an Infant. OK, maybe a Toddler.

IF they try to do away with unlimited data plans, I could see some enterprising company continuing to offer it just to greatly expand its customer base against these large companies.

What’s more, is cell phone companies haven’t been offering unlimited data for very long. It would be rough for them to turn back on it when they JUST got to the point to have it. The first one to market against it, would have a hard time. So, if the big ISP’s stopped offering unlimited data, there would be a push for faster cell-phone net speeds and more people would use their cell phone connections for the internet.

If a service provider sells someone an internet connection with unlimited download/upload then they have no right to throttle it. If the losers with slow connection cant handle it then go buy faster connections.

I personally have 24mb/3mb adsl(50e/month), best i can get here. Well i pay for a 24/3 but it’s about 12mb/2mb connection because of too long phonelines, still better than anything else. If some moron from my isp decides to throttle my connection ill sue them in a hearthbeat. Not so easy to sue people in finland but still ill find a way.

If you buy a movie that is supposed to be 2.5 hours long and what you get is a 1 hour long movie with lots of scenes cut off will you watch it without complaining?

Since when did AT&T start? They don’t in my area, I dropped comcast to go with AT&T DSL and couldn’t be happier after dicking around with comcast, their service is horrible, not just the traffic shaping!

Here is the pledge:
http://www.28chan.org/pledge.php

The problem we have with comcast (yes, it sucks) is that they were adding up to 3000ms latency to ALL traffic on ALL ports about 30 seconds after we started any torrent. If I killed the torrent(s), latency would return to 25ms in about 30 seconds. This was just stupid traffic management and either incompetence on their part or criminal interference.

So instead of paying $460 a year or $35/mth, over 6 mths it becomes $280 or $46 a month, a substantial difference.

See their cunning and unscrupulous ways?

But if this happens, we all know that BT will die in favor of a technology that is indistinguishable from other web traffic using current traffic filtering tools.

Everyone has grown accustomed to hopping technologies when it comes to file sharing. Like MJ in his prime, you can’t stop it, you can only hope to contain it.

lol, slut.

The “bandwidth shortage” crisis is a hoax, a get-rich-quick scheme invented by the upper management of certain ISPs as an excuse to overcharge their customers and disrupt BitTorrent traffic at the behest(read, bribery) of the copyright cartel.

Just because Comcast got bitchslapped by the FCC for causing fraudulent BitTorrent disruption, fraudulent being the key word there numb-nuts, doesn’t mean that ISPs will now be forced to use a consumption based billing model.

Go spread your FUD elsewhere, Mr. Dickless.

Its about time comcast got in shit for sucking so bad. It has been one of the most hated ISPs for some time. I laugh at them for being so stupid as to invest in traffic shaping technology. They have succeeded in winning the bad PR race.
I hope it was worth it to save a few million gigs of bandwidth that costs them like 0.005 cents to transfer.

If comcast does not comply it should be broken down and divided among company’s that want to provide a good service at reasonable prices. Same goes for rogers/bell here in Canada.

Free market is supposed to allow company’s to compete but instead they collude to increase there profits and reduce the overall service that people pay for. Why upgrade networks when you can charge a 10000x markup for a gigabyte of zeros and ones. But hey with the advent of new technology that make things run faster and better then ever, it is just not doable… unless you are Verizon… FUK IT lets just give all telco infrastructure to Verizon and then we can see upgrades instead of downgrades. BRING ON THE FIOS!!!
Fuk these shitty greedy ISPs that only care about extracting money so they can not invest it in improvements.

As long as the money Comcast makes from lying is more than they lose from penalties/bad PR, the behavior will continue.

The FCC if very very far from a night in shining armor. Like any policing force, it’s about the money, not protecting the public welfare.

Ordering Comcast to stop throttling and actually stopping throttling are two entirely different animals.

In other words, don’t count your chickens yet.

Guess that’s an option for the smaller ISPs…

Bittersweet indeed…

ALL ISPs manage traffic. They have to. It’s called an oversubscription model and it works. And all those who use the internet to surf the web and use email are pretty darn happy about it. We don’t have to wait ages for a page to load just because some bandwidth hog is downloading Gigs of content.

This is the worst decision possible. All internet traffic is NOT created equal and anyone who believes otherwise is naive.