<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Comedy Copyright Battle Raises Seriously Funny Issues</title>
	<atom:link href="http://torrentfreak.com/comedy-copyright-battle-raises-seriously-funny-issues-120612/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://torrentfreak.com/comedy-copyright-battle-raises-seriously-funny-issues-120612/</link>
	<description>Breaking File-sharing, Copyright and Privacy News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2014 15:04:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Militant Libertarian &#187; Comedy Copyright Battle Raises Seriously Funny Issues</title>
		<link>/comedy-copyright-battle-raises-seriously-funny-issues-120612/#comment-938258</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Militant Libertarian &#187; Comedy Copyright Battle Raises Seriously Funny Issues]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2012 02:16:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=52469#comment-938258</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Posted: June 19th, 2012 by Gadget42 from TorrentFreak [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Posted: June 19th, 2012 by Gadget42 from TorrentFreak [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DocGerbil100</title>
		<link>/comedy-copyright-battle-raises-seriously-funny-issues-120612/#comment-938178</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DocGerbil100]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2012 22:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=52469#comment-938178</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For anyone who&#039;s not been following, this bizarre case is still moving forward and officially  now qualifies as Genuinely Funny Yet Horrifying At The Same Time Comedy Gold: Funnyjunk&#039;s lawyer Charles Carreon (not Funnyjunk, &lt;i&gt;per se&lt;/i&gt;, just the lawyer (unless - as has been suggested - they are secretly one and the same)) has now actually filed his lawsuit against The Oatmeal, Indiegogo, the National Wildlife Federation, the American Cancer Society and 100 John Does on the internet who said/did mean things about him, on various deeply spurious grounds.

Carreon is clearly a man who believes he can dig his way to the moon.

See http://www.popehat.com/2012/06/17/the-oatmeal-v-funnyjunk-part-iv-charles-carreon-sues-everybody/ for more details.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For anyone who&#8217;s not been following, this bizarre case is still moving forward and officially  now qualifies as Genuinely Funny Yet Horrifying At The Same Time Comedy Gold: Funnyjunk&#8217;s lawyer Charles Carreon (not Funnyjunk, <i>per se</i>, just the lawyer (unless &#8211; as has been suggested &#8211; they are secretly one and the same)) has now actually filed his lawsuit against The Oatmeal, Indiegogo, the National Wildlife Federation, the American Cancer Society and 100 John Does on the internet who said/did mean things about him, on various deeply spurious grounds.</p>
<p>Carreon is clearly a man who believes he can dig his way to the moon.</p>
<p>See <a href="http://www.popehat.com/2012/06/17/the-oatmeal-v-funnyjunk-part-iv-charles-carreon-sues-everybody/" rel="nofollow">http://www.popehat.com/2012/06/17/the-oatmeal-v-funnyjunk-part-iv-charles-carreon-sues-everybody/</a> for more details.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: calcul prêt hypothécaire</title>
		<link>/comedy-copyright-battle-raises-seriously-funny-issues-120612/#comment-937774</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[calcul prêt hypothécaire]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2012 11:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=52469#comment-937774</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Oatmeal’s content, but hours later they had all been removed. He’s not amused and says he will not pay.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Oatmeal’s content, but hours later they had all been removed. He’s not amused and says he will not pay.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kolos</title>
		<link>/comedy-copyright-battle-raises-seriously-funny-issues-120612/#comment-937456</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kolos]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2012 09:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=52469#comment-937456</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The dude of the oatmeal is pissed because he was asked to pay 20000 because he posted some crap in his blog about bj. Also he gave up on bj last year because it was a waste of time]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The dude of the oatmeal is pissed because he was asked to pay 20000 because he posted some crap in his blog about bj. Also he gave up on bj last year because it was a waste of time</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Qsdklfj</title>
		<link>/comedy-copyright-battle-raises-seriously-funny-issues-120612/#comment-937146</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Qsdklfj]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jun 2012 21:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=52469#comment-937146</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bitching about people sharing your images: wrong.

Bitching about people sharing your images and making money of it: justified.

I support privacy, but not when there&#039;s people making money off it. One should share so that others may enjoy it, sharing while making profit is wrong.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bitching about people sharing your images: wrong.</p>
<p>Bitching about people sharing your images and making money of it: justified.</p>
<p>I support privacy, but not when there&#8217;s people making money off it. One should share so that others may enjoy it, sharing while making profit is wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: darXness</title>
		<link>/comedy-copyright-battle-raises-seriously-funny-issues-120612/#comment-937052</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[darXness]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jun 2012 12:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=52469#comment-937052</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[the donation is already 100k ++ ...WTF???]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the donation is already 100k ++ &#8230;WTF???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: farenheit</title>
		<link>/comedy-copyright-battle-raises-seriously-funny-issues-120612/#comment-936738</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[farenheit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2012 13:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=52469#comment-936738</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reasons people support The Oatmeal and not the RIAA: 
1) He&#039;s an individual we can identify with, not a faceless corporation;
2) He doesn&#039;t sue his own customers;
3) His comics are funny;
4) He&#039;s an artist, not an artist&#039;s lawyer or an artist&#039;s accountant;
5) He&#039;s &#039;sticking it to the man&#039; (FunnyJunk&#039;s lawyer) in the same way that TPB &#039;stuck it to the man&#039; (RIAA&#039;s lawyers). The Oatmeal and TBP are the same in this respect.
6) He has likeability, and that counts for a LOT
7) He has internet credibility (in the same way that TBP do) and that counts for a lot too
8) He played the &#039;charity&#039; card. If RIAA promised to donate all proceedings from copyright claims to charity, they would probably have a LOT more public support
9) It wasn&#039;t just any charity, it was a cancer charity. Pretty much everyone knows someone who has been affected by cancer (or has been affected themselves). NOT supporting his cause would therefore be callous and seriously uncool
10) Did I mention his comics are really damn funny?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reasons people support The Oatmeal and not the RIAA:<br />
1) He&#8217;s an individual we can identify with, not a faceless corporation;<br />
2) He doesn&#8217;t sue his own customers;<br />
3) His comics are funny;<br />
4) He&#8217;s an artist, not an artist&#8217;s lawyer or an artist&#8217;s accountant;<br />
5) He&#8217;s &#8216;sticking it to the man&#8217; (FunnyJunk&#8217;s lawyer) in the same way that TPB &#8216;stuck it to the man&#8217; (RIAA&#8217;s lawyers). The Oatmeal and TBP are the same in this respect.<br />
6) He has likeability, and that counts for a LOT<br />
7) He has internet credibility (in the same way that TBP do) and that counts for a lot too<br />
8) He played the &#8216;charity&#8217; card. If RIAA promised to donate all proceedings from copyright claims to charity, they would probably have a LOT more public support<br />
9) It wasn&#8217;t just any charity, it was a cancer charity. Pretty much everyone knows someone who has been affected by cancer (or has been affected themselves). NOT supporting his cause would therefore be callous and seriously uncool<br />
10) Did I mention his comics are really damn funny?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Junkie92</title>
		<link>/comedy-copyright-battle-raises-seriously-funny-issues-120612/#comment-936736</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Junkie92]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2012 13:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=52469#comment-936736</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Can You Believe A Rickshaw Can Do That !! Funniest Rickshaws Ever !!


http://www.funnyblips.com/2012/06/can-you-believe-rickshaw-can-do-than.html]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can You Believe A Rickshaw Can Do That !! Funniest Rickshaws Ever !!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.funnyblips.com/2012/06/can-you-believe-rickshaw-can-do-than.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.funnyblips.com/2012/06/can-you-believe-rickshaw-can-do-than.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>/comedy-copyright-battle-raises-seriously-funny-issues-120612/#comment-936504</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jay]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2012 18:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=52469#comment-936504</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[... Wait, what?

You support FJ?  How does that compute when they want money for nothing?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230; Wait, what?</p>
<p>You support FJ?  How does that compute when they want money for nothing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stupid stupid stupid</title>
		<link>/comedy-copyright-battle-raises-seriously-funny-issues-120612/#comment-936503</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[stupid stupid stupid]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2012 18:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=52469#comment-936503</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Both of them are wrong. Inman is being an asshole for thinking that he can control the entire internet to respect the [bullshit] copyright on his comics. I say &quot;entire internet&quot; because if he&#039;s mad that FJ is profitting from ad revenue of his comics, then he should also be mad at FB, Twitter, Reddit, etc, ad infinitum.

But that isn&#039;t nearly as bad as FJ actually threatening to sue Inman for displaying his opinion on his own website, considering it &quot;defamation.&quot; That is arguably WORSE than the RIAA threatening suing music sharers unless they pay up, because the RIAA is suing over the actual downloaded song, whereas FJ would sue Inman because he gets a lot of traffic to his blog. Utter trash.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Both of them are wrong. Inman is being an asshole for thinking that he can control the entire internet to respect the [bullshit] copyright on his comics. I say &#8220;entire internet&#8221; because if he&#8217;s mad that FJ is profitting from ad revenue of his comics, then he should also be mad at FB, Twitter, Reddit, etc, ad infinitum.</p>
<p>But that isn&#8217;t nearly as bad as FJ actually threatening to sue Inman for displaying his opinion on his own website, considering it &#8220;defamation.&#8221; That is arguably WORSE than the RIAA threatening suing music sharers unless they pay up, because the RIAA is suing over the actual downloaded song, whereas FJ would sue Inman because he gets a lot of traffic to his blog. Utter trash.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
