And in the example above, over HALF were wrong.

Are you a raging dyslexic or are you simply unable to comprehend basic math? IP-adressation does not work. period.

Scam artists do claim it does work since it can generate a mass extortion model a la ACS:Law for no effort involved.

Defending that model makes you look like someone who fell for a P.T. Barnum scam defending it even after Barnum revealed the trick.

That’s the only way such letters CAN be sent. Which you would know, if you knew how the tech worked.

And as you would knew if you read up on the scientific studies performed by departments of computer science which got confused about the number of takedown notices they received adressed to their laser printers and network routers.

So it’s actually unavoidable that the letters will be sent, literally, from “out-of-a-hat”.

Actually…given how the technology works you can get letters with demand whether you downloaded, did not download, or even if you didn’t own a computer in the first place. IP-adressing isn’t exactly accurate as has been proven many times.

So NTP is even more wrong than you would say. It’s a given that out of a thousand adressed claim letters at least 12% will be erronously adressed from the start.

See…. That’s your problem… You’re forgetting all of the $$$ (or I suppose in this case £££) MAFIAA agents have “donated” to the judge’s “re-election” fund…

Why do you think they pick specific areas to file their suits against downloaders… They know they can’t bribe (er donate to) every single judge in the country…. Plus having the trial take place as far away from the defendant’s home as possible puts another strain on the defendant, causing him to fold even quicker…

That’s why i used the word “trying”.

And all the times you lied about the facts, what was your goal at those times?

> “..in contrast to the very biased views that are presented through the pirates.”

Do you know what biased actually means?

> “Same in Swedish.”

You can’t understand what i mean in Swedish either? Because just as XpMule wrote, you just claimed to not being able to understand what i write.

> “And I’ve tried to sort it out..”

Can you provide one single example of where you tried that? If what you’re saying is true, and actually happened in reality that shouldn’t be to hard, now should it?

> “..but she’s damnright evil..”

Moahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!

> “..deliberately posting misinterpreted views of my postings..”

No, i interpret them as they should be interpreted according to correct use of language.

> “..together with lies..”

Can you provide an example maybe?

> “Or she’s extremely confused.”

Can you provide one single example of where you believe me to confused?

> “Been blocked here a couple of times for no reason.”

Rest assured, there’s always a reason when a user gets blocked. That you don’t agree with that reason doesn’t mean that it doesn’t exists. This right here is another example of you lying, claiming that no reason exists, when obviously it does.

> “Enough said, I’ll go on ignoring Fredrika.”

Of course you will, because you can’t back up any of your claims.