<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Court: ISP Not Responsible When Subscribers Infringe Copyrights</title>
	<atom:link href="http://torrentfreak.com/court-isp-not-responsible-when-subscribers-infringe-copyrights-110908/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://torrentfreak.com/court-isp-not-responsible-when-subscribers-infringe-copyrights-110908/</link>
	<description>Breaking File-sharing, Copyright and Privacy News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2014 16:30:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: IMPORTANT: Bing News RSS feed has moved! : The Web Hosting World</title>
		<link>/court-isp-not-responsible-when-subscribers-infringe-copyrights-110908/#comment-839073</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[IMPORTANT: Bing News RSS feed has moved! : The Web Hosting World]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 05:01:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=39873#comment-839073</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Court: ISP Not Responsible When Subscribers Infringe Copyrights &#8211; TorrentFreakIn a case brought by EMI against one of Germany’s largest Internet service providers, a court has ruled that the ISP cannot be held liable when its subscribers infringe copyright. Music giant EMI wanted the ISP to block a certain file-sharing site but [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Court: ISP Not Responsible When Subscribers Infringe Copyrights &#8211; TorrentFreakIn a case brought by EMI against one of Germany’s largest Internet service providers, a court has ruled that the ISP cannot be held liable when its subscribers infringe copyright. Music giant EMI wanted the ISP to block a certain file-sharing site but [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Business Matters: Pandora Stock Falls 11% on Debut of New Clear Channel &#8230; &#124; How To Trade Singapore SGX Stocks Profitably</title>
		<link>/court-isp-not-responsible-when-subscribers-infringe-copyrights-110908/#comment-836828</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Business Matters: Pandora Stock Falls 11% on Debut of New Clear Channel &#8230; &#124; How To Trade Singapore SGX Stocks Profitably]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 09:43:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=39873#comment-836828</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Pandora Bulks Up &#8212; Pandora has added workout mixes to its genre stations section. Mixes such as &#8220;80s Cardio,&#8221; &#8220;Country Fitness&#8221; and &#8220;Hard Rock Strength Training&#8221; target groups of listeners by activity and genre preference. That&#8217;s quite a difference from the personalization that has been Pandora&#8217;s claim to fame &#8211; the Escape Club&#8217;s &#8220;Wild Wild West&#8221; has little in common with Gary Numan&#8217;s &#8220;Cars.&#8221; But it&#8217;s not Pandora&#8217;s first foray into broad categories. The genre stations were added in September 2010. (Press release) Germany Lets ISP Off the Hook &#8212; A German court has ruled one of the country&#8217;s Internet service providers (ISPs) cannot be held liable for the copyright infringement of its subscribers. According to the decision, the claim was &#8220;unfounded&#8221; because the ISP merely provides a technical service and is not allowed the look at its subscribers&#8217; traffic. EMI had reportedly brought the suit because it considered the access the ISP gives to file-sharing sites to be copyright infringement. (  TorrentFreak) [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Pandora Bulks Up &#8212; Pandora has added workout mixes to its genre stations section. Mixes such as &#8220;80s Cardio,&#8221; &#8220;Country Fitness&#8221; and &#8220;Hard Rock Strength Training&#8221; target groups of listeners by activity and genre preference. That&#8217;s quite a difference from the personalization that has been Pandora&#8217;s claim to fame &#8211; the Escape Club&#8217;s &#8220;Wild Wild West&#8221; has little in common with Gary Numan&#8217;s &#8220;Cars.&#8221; But it&#8217;s not Pandora&#8217;s first foray into broad categories. The genre stations were added in September 2010. (Press release) Germany Lets ISP Off the Hook &#8212; A German court has ruled one of the country&#8217;s Internet service providers (ISPs) cannot be held liable for the copyright infringement of its subscribers. According to the decision, the claim was &#8220;unfounded&#8221; because the ISP merely provides a technical service and is not allowed the look at its subscribers&#8217; traffic. EMI had reportedly brought the suit because it considered the access the ISP gives to file-sharing sites to be copyright infringement. (  TorrentFreak) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Court: ISP Not Responsible When Subscribers Infringe Copyrights &#124; Unión Andina de Patentes</title>
		<link>/court-isp-not-responsible-when-subscribers-infringe-copyrights-110908/#comment-834507</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Court: ISP Not Responsible When Subscribers Infringe Copyrights &#124; Unión Andina de Patentes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 23:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=39873#comment-834507</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Via http://torrentfreak.com/court-isp-not-responsible-when-subscribers-infringe-copyrights-110908/    Esta entrada fue publicada en Copyrights. Guarda el enlace permanente.    &#8592; Committee protects writer’s copyrights [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Via http://torrentfreak.com/court-isp-not-responsible-when-subscribers-infringe-copyrights-110908/    Esta entrada fue publicada en Copyrights. Guarda el enlace permanente.    &larr; Committee protects writer’s copyrights [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: German Court Says ISP Not Responsible For Users Who Infringe &#171; waweru.net</title>
		<link>/court-isp-not-responsible-when-subscribers-infringe-copyrights-110908/#comment-834024</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[German Court Says ISP Not Responsible For Users Who Infringe &#171; waweru.net]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 16:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=39873#comment-834024</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] have been mixed on this, with no clear precedent yet being set. Thankfully, a recent ruling has rejected EMI&#039;s attempt to pin secondary liability on an ISP for its users infringing. EMI had argued that the ISP, HanseNet, should be forced to use DNS [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] have been mixed on this, with no clear precedent yet being set. Thankfully, a recent ruling has rejected EMI&#039;s attempt to pin secondary liability on an ISP for its users infringing. EMI had argued that the ISP, HanseNet, should be forced to use DNS [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ISP HanseNet no se hace responsable cuando sus suscriptores infringen derechos de autor &#124; Tecnocápsulas</title>
		<link>/court-isp-not-responsible-when-subscribers-infringe-copyrights-110908/#comment-833892</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ISP HanseNet no se hace responsable cuando sus suscriptores infringen derechos de autor &#124; Tecnocápsulas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 04:54:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=39873#comment-833892</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] http://torrentfreak.com/ (en inglés)  *{margin:0; padding:0;} ul{ list-style:none;} #socialbuttonnav {width:90%; [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://torrentfreak.com/" rel="nofollow">http://torrentfreak.com/</a> (en inglés)  *{margin:0; padding:0;} ul{ list-style:none;} #socialbuttonnav {width:90%; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hansenet siegt gegen EMI: Keine Internetsperren bei Filesharing von Alice Kunden &#124; EMI,Filesharing,Hansenet,Urteil,Alice,Alice DSL,eDonkey,Landgericht Köln &#124; www.tutsi.de</title>
		<link>/court-isp-not-responsible-when-subscribers-infringe-copyrights-110908/#comment-832768</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hansenet siegt gegen EMI: Keine Internetsperren bei Filesharing von Alice Kunden &#124; EMI,Filesharing,Hansenet,Urteil,Alice,Alice DSL,eDonkey,Landgericht Köln &#124; www.tutsi.de]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2011 13:46:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=39873#comment-832768</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] 362/10 veröffentlichten Urteil wurden die Namen der Kläger und der Beklagten entfernt, aber nach mehreren übereinstimmenden  Informationen aus mehreren frei zugänglichen Quellen handelt es sich bei dem [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 362/10 veröffentlichten Urteil wurden die Namen der Kläger und der Beklagten entfernt, aber nach mehreren übereinstimmenden  Informationen aus mehreren frei zugänglichen Quellen handelt es sich bei dem [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>/court-isp-not-responsible-when-subscribers-infringe-copyrights-110908/#comment-832749</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rob]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2011 12:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=39873#comment-832749</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Agreed but you are too soft.  When you say piracy is about getting for-sale merchandise for free, call it what it is.  It&#039;s stealing, theft, larceny, pilfering, filching.  I&#039;m sure there are many more colorful words for describing it but that&#039;s what it is.

There are a lot of folks who justify theft since they don&#039;t like the price.  I agree that buying a CD with one good song and a lot of garage music is ridiculous.  However, there are usually ways to legally acquire JUST the good songs for a resaonable price.  Even if there wasn&#039;t, theft is never justified.  I&#039;m sure few like the price of a new car but that doesn&#039;t justify theft.  (Of course it&#039;s almost trivial to steal music through the Internet with little chance of being caught while it&#039;s considerably higher risk to steal a car.)

That said, I do approve of the ruling.  I know that the industry is doing all it can to protect itself but this is no different than seeking damages from the post office/UPS/FedEx because they delivered a package whose contents are illegal.  Although difficult, the sender and receiver are liable, not the delivery mechanism.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed but you are too soft.  When you say piracy is about getting for-sale merchandise for free, call it what it is.  It&#8217;s stealing, theft, larceny, pilfering, filching.  I&#8217;m sure there are many more colorful words for describing it but that&#8217;s what it is.</p>
<p>There are a lot of folks who justify theft since they don&#8217;t like the price.  I agree that buying a CD with one good song and a lot of garage music is ridiculous.  However, there are usually ways to legally acquire JUST the good songs for a resaonable price.  Even if there wasn&#8217;t, theft is never justified.  I&#8217;m sure few like the price of a new car but that doesn&#8217;t justify theft.  (Of course it&#8217;s almost trivial to steal music through the Internet with little chance of being caught while it&#8217;s considerably higher risk to steal a car.)</p>
<p>That said, I do approve of the ruling.  I know that the industry is doing all it can to protect itself but this is no different than seeking damages from the post office/UPS/FedEx because they delivered a package whose contents are illegal.  Although difficult, the sender and receiver are liable, not the delivery mechanism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>/court-isp-not-responsible-when-subscribers-infringe-copyrights-110908/#comment-832433</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Sep 2011 17:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=39873#comment-832433</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[..,awesomee,, &lt;b&gt;I just got a $829.99 iPad2 for only $103.37 and my mom got a $1499.99 HDTV for only $251.92, they are both coming with USPS tomorrow. I would be an idiot to ever pay full retail prîces at places like Walmart or Bestbuy. I sold a 37&quot; HDTV to my boss for $600 that I only paid $78.24 for.
I use &lt;a href=&quot;http://minilien.fr/a0kxfi&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; EgoWïn.com &lt;/a&gt; &lt;b&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>..,awesomee,, <b>I just got a $829.99 iPad2 for only $103.37 and my mom got a $1499.99 HDTV for only $251.92, they are both coming with USPS tomorrow. I would be an idiot to ever pay full retail prîces at places like Walmart or Bestbuy. I sold a 37&#8243; HDTV to my boss for $600 that I only paid $78.24 for.<br />
I use <a href="http://minilien.fr/a0kxfi" rel="nofollow"> EgoWïn.com </a> </b><b></b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Technology Blog: Court ISP Not Responsible When Subscribers Infringe Copyrights</title>
		<link>/court-isp-not-responsible-when-subscribers-infringe-copyrights-110908/#comment-832308</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Technology Blog: Court ISP Not Responsible When Subscribers Infringe Copyrights]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Sep 2011 23:54:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=39873#comment-832308</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] to block a certain file-sharing site but the court decided otherwise and dismissed the case.Source:http://torrentfreak.com/court-isp-not-responsible-when-subscribers-infringe-copyrights-110908/      Posted by Makin   at [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to block a certain file-sharing site but the court decided otherwise and dismissed the case.Source:<a href="http://torrentfreak.com/court-isp-not-responsible-when-subscribers-infringe-copyrights-110908/" rel="nofollow">http://torrentfreak.com/court-isp-not-responsible-when-subscribers-infringe-copyrights-110908/</a>      Posted by Makin   at [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Court: ISP Not Responsible When Subscribers Infringe Copyrights - elblogdepaola's posterous</title>
		<link>/court-isp-not-responsible-when-subscribers-infringe-copyrights-110908/#comment-832271</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Court: ISP Not Responsible When Subscribers Infringe Copyrights - elblogdepaola's posterous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Sep 2011 21:22:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=39873#comment-832271</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] In a case brought by EMI against one of Germanys largest Internet service providers, a court has ruled that the ISP cannot be held liable when its subscribers infringe copyright. Music giant EMI wanted the ISP to block a certain file-sharing site but the court decided otherwise and dismissed the case.Source:http://torrentfreak.com/court-isp-not-responsible-when-subscribers-infringe-copyrights-110908/ [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In a case brought by EMI against one of Germanys largest Internet service providers, a court has ruled that the ISP cannot be held liable when its subscribers infringe copyright. Music giant EMI wanted the ISP to block a certain file-sharing site but the court decided otherwise and dismissed the case.Source:<a href="http://torrentfreak.com/court-isp-not-responsible-when-subscribers-infringe-copyrights-110908/" rel="nofollow">http://torrentfreak.com/court-isp-not-responsible-when-subscribers-infringe-copyrights-110908/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
