<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IP Address Alone Insufficient To Identify Pirate, Court Rules</title>
	<atom:link href="http://torrentfreak.com/court-rules-that-ip-address-alone-insufficient-to-identify-infringer-090615/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://torrentfreak.com/court-rules-that-ip-address-alone-insufficient-to-identify-infringer-090615/</link>
	<description>Torrent News, Torrent Sites and the latest Scoops</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 10:52:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daily newsfeed 06/29/2009 &#171; baixachiado</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/court-rules-that-ip-address-alone-insufficient-to-identify-infringer-090615/#comment-574178</link>
		<dc:creator>Daily newsfeed 06/29/2009 &#171; baixachiado</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 20:01:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=14243#comment-574178</guid>
		<description>[...] IP Address Alone Insufficient To Identify Pirate, Court Rules &#124; TorrentFreak [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] IP Address Alone Insufficient To Identify Pirate, Court Rules | TorrentFreak [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justsomedownloader</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/court-rules-that-ip-address-alone-insufficient-to-identify-infringer-090615/#comment-570805</link>
		<dc:creator>Justsomedownloader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 17:03:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=14243#comment-570805</guid>
		<description>&quot;somebody using your IP address is scary.&quot;
Exactly its pretty trivial for someone (who knows what they&#039;re doing) to use the average persons computer to download and store &quot;stuff&quot; on a hidden partition.
  And ,once in, these same people can erase there hacking tracks and use any legit software that has access to the net, and most do for &quot;updates&quot;, to send info back and forth</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;somebody using your IP address is scary.&#8221;<br />
Exactly its pretty trivial for someone (who knows what they&#8217;re doing) to use the average persons computer to download and store &#8220;stuff&#8221; on a hidden partition.<br />
  And ,once in, these same people can erase there hacking tracks and use any legit software that has access to the net, and most do for &#8220;updates&#8221;, to send info back and forth</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: me</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/court-rules-that-ip-address-alone-insufficient-to-identify-infringer-090615/#comment-570799</link>
		<dc:creator>me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 16:29:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=14243#comment-570799</guid>
		<description>above supposed to go to #23 sorry</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>above supposed to go to #23 sorry</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: me</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/court-rules-that-ip-address-alone-insufficient-to-identify-infringer-090615/#comment-570798</link>
		<dc:creator>me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 16:28:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=14243#comment-570798</guid>
		<description>@28, yes we can win you can loose if you choose</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@28, yes we can win you can loose if you choose</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Entertane.com</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/court-rules-that-ip-address-alone-insufficient-to-identify-infringer-090615/#comment-570618</link>
		<dc:creator>Entertane.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 00:52:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=14243#comment-570618</guid>
		<description>Check out http://www.entertane.com for a new meta-search engine - faster, simpler - access to all your favorite torrent searches</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check out <a href="http://www.entertane.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.entertane.com</a> for a new meta-search engine &#8211; faster, simpler &#8211; access to all your favorite torrent searches</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/court-rules-that-ip-address-alone-insufficient-to-identify-infringer-090615/#comment-570464</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 14:33:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=14243#comment-570464</guid>
		<description>ENCRYPT,ENCRYPT,ENCRYPT!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ENCRYPT,ENCRYPT,ENCRYPT!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tech News Tuesday June 16, 2009 &#124; The Contemplation</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/court-rules-that-ip-address-alone-insufficient-to-identify-infringer-090615/#comment-570423</link>
		<dc:creator>Tech News Tuesday June 16, 2009 &#124; The Contemplation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 11:33:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=14243#comment-570423</guid>
		<description>[...] Gotta Love DHCP Rome court ruled that an IP address does not identify an infringer, only a particular connection. Only solution for ISP - give users assigned IP address.  (Torrent Freak . . .) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Gotta Love DHCP Rome court ruled that an IP address does not identify an infringer, only a particular connection. Only solution for ISP &#8211; give users assigned IP address.  (Torrent Freak . . .) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Italy: IP address insufficient proof of crime-TorrentFreak &#171; FACT &#8211; Freedom Against Censorship Thailand</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/court-rules-that-ip-address-alone-insufficient-to-identify-infringer-090615/#comment-570356</link>
		<dc:creator>Italy: IP address insufficient proof of crime-TorrentFreak &#171; FACT &#8211; Freedom Against Censorship Thailand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 07:15:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=14243#comment-570356</guid>
		<description>[...] http://torrentfreak.com/court-rules-that-ip-address-alone-insufficient-to-identify-infringer-090615/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://torrentfreak.com/court-rules-that-ip-address-alone-insufficient-to-identify-infringer-090615/" rel="nofollow">http://torrentfreak.com/court-rules-that-ip-address-alone-insufficient-to-identify-infringer-090615/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Italy Is The Latest Country To Realize IP Address Alone Does Not ID File Sharers &#124; dv8-designs</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/court-rules-that-ip-address-alone-insufficient-to-identify-infringer-090615/#comment-570285</link>
		<dc:creator>Italy Is The Latest Country To Realize IP Address Alone Does Not ID File Sharers &#124; dv8-designs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 19:11:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=14243#comment-570285</guid>
		<description>[...] how that&#8217;s a problem. So it&#8217;s nice to see that an Italian court is now recognizing that IP addresses alone are not enough to identify a file sharer, and even throwing out cases that don&#8217;t have much more in the way of evidence. Still, in most [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] how that&#8217;s a problem. So it&#8217;s nice to see that an Italian court is now recognizing that IP addresses alone are not enough to identify a file sharer, and even throwing out cases that don&#8217;t have much more in the way of evidence. Still, in most [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Italy Is The Latest Country To Realize IP Address Alone Does Not ID File Sharers</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/court-rules-that-ip-address-alone-insufficient-to-identify-infringer-090615/#comment-570279</link>
		<dc:creator>Italy Is The Latest Country To Realize IP Address Alone Does Not ID File Sharers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 19:03:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=14243#comment-570279</guid>
		<description>[...] recognize how that&#039;s a problem. So it&#039;s nice to see that an Italian court is now recognizing that IP addresses alone are not enough to identify a file sharer, and even throwing out cases that don&#039;t have much more in the way of evidence. Still, in most of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] recognize how that&#8217;s a problem. So it&#8217;s nice to see that an Italian court is now recognizing that IP addresses alone are not enough to identify a file sharer, and even throwing out cases that don&#8217;t have much more in the way of evidence. Still, in most of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tribunal italiano: endereço IP não é suficiente para identificar partilhador &#124; Remixtures</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/court-rules-that-ip-address-alone-insufficient-to-identify-infringer-090615/#comment-570212</link>
		<dc:creator>Tribunal italiano: endereço IP não é suficiente para identificar partilhador &#124; Remixtures</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 14:39:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=14243#comment-570212</guid>
		<description>[...] pedido apresentado inicialmente pelo Ministério Público. Segundo o site Punto Informático (via TorrentFreak), esta é a primeira vez que a Justiça italiana considera que o endereço IP de um internauta [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] pedido apresentado inicialmente pelo Ministério Público. Segundo o site Punto Informático (via TorrentFreak), esta é a primeira vez que a Justiça italiana considera que o endereço IP de um internauta [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MakinMo's Tech Blog</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/court-rules-that-ip-address-alone-insufficient-to-identify-infringer-090615/#comment-570211</link>
		<dc:creator>MakinMo's Tech Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 14:14:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=14243#comment-570211</guid>
		<description>[...] on the contrary, an IP address does not identify an infringer, only a particular connection.Source:http://torrentfreak.com/court-rules-that-ip-address-alone-insufficient-to-identify-infringer-090615/   Jun [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on the contrary, an IP address does not identify an infringer, only a particular connection.Source:<a href="http://torrentfreak.com/court-rules-that-ip-address-alone-insufficient-to-identify-infringer-090615/" rel="nofollow">http://torrentfreak.com/court-rules-that-ip-address-alone-insufficient-to-identify-infringer-090615/</a>   Jun [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cordelia</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/court-rules-that-ip-address-alone-insufficient-to-identify-infringer-090615/#comment-570201</link>
		<dc:creator>Cordelia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 13:57:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=14243#comment-570201</guid>
		<description>@ 51

Don&#039;t give them any ideas, particularly not any ideas that would work. 

The thought of police knocking down your door because a torrent was downloaded from somebody using your IP address is scary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ 51</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t give them any ideas, particularly not any ideas that would work. </p>
<p>The thought of police knocking down your door because a torrent was downloaded from somebody using your IP address is scary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cordelia</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/court-rules-that-ip-address-alone-insufficient-to-identify-infringer-090615/#comment-570200</link>
		<dc:creator>Cordelia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 13:52:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=14243#comment-570200</guid>
		<description>How are they going to prove that you weren&#039;t hacked or that somebody didn&#039;t use your wireless --- if you DENY IT?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How are they going to prove that you weren&#8217;t hacked or that somebody didn&#8217;t use your wireless &#8212; if you DENY IT?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cordelia</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/court-rules-that-ip-address-alone-insufficient-to-identify-infringer-090615/#comment-570199</link>
		<dc:creator>Cordelia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 13:49:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=14243#comment-570199</guid>
		<description>I have a a good 3 TB of material downloaded via bittorrent. 

I am in the UK right now and I have never recieved a complaint letter (touching wood). 

But all this is making me PARANOID!!!

I&#039;ve taken to using a Canadian proxy for my BT usage and a UK proxy for my surfing.

Being a Christian woman my surfing is really innocent - no porn (obviously), nothing very political and certanly no terrorist related size. Torrents are my only vice. 

However the Big Brother blanket that is slowly but surely circling in on us. Corporate interests and government spooks want nothing more than your full internet history.

Who knows where it will end? 

What about future employers or someone you fell out wity buying a profile of your internet usage...? 

Spam, government warnings and other threats raining over you until you can&#039;t take it anymore....

Thank goodness I am Swedish and will have the Pirate Party representing my fears in Brussels! Go PP!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a a good 3 TB of material downloaded via bittorrent. </p>
<p>I am in the UK right now and I have never recieved a complaint letter (touching wood). </p>
<p>But all this is making me PARANOID!!!</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve taken to using a Canadian proxy for my BT usage and a UK proxy for my surfing.</p>
<p>Being a Christian woman my surfing is really innocent &#8211; no porn (obviously), nothing very political and certanly no terrorist related size. Torrents are my only vice. </p>
<p>However the Big Brother blanket that is slowly but surely circling in on us. Corporate interests and government spooks want nothing more than your full internet history.</p>
<p>Who knows where it will end? </p>
<p>What about future employers or someone you fell out wity buying a profile of your internet usage&#8230;? </p>
<p>Spam, government warnings and other threats raining over you until you can&#8217;t take it anymore&#8230;.</p>
<p>Thank goodness I am Swedish and will have the Pirate Party representing my fears in Brussels! Go PP!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: makin257 - IP Address Alone Insufficient To Identify Pirate, Court Rule</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/court-rules-that-ip-address-alone-insufficient-to-identify-infringer-090615/#comment-570190</link>
		<dc:creator>makin257 - IP Address Alone Insufficient To Identify Pirate, Court Rule</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 12:45:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=14243#comment-570190</guid>
		<description>[...] on the contrary, an IP address does not identify an infringer, only a particular connection.Source:http://torrentfreak.com/court-rules-that-ip-address-alone-insufficient-to-identify-infringer-090615/      Leave a comment     Powered by LiveJournal.comAdvertisement  Customize               if [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on the contrary, an IP address does not identify an infringer, only a particular connection.Source:<a href="http://torrentfreak.com/court-rules-that-ip-address-alone-insufficient-to-identify-infringer-090615/" rel="nofollow">http://torrentfreak.com/court-rules-that-ip-address-alone-insufficient-to-identify-infringer-090615/</a>      Leave a comment     Powered by LiveJournal.comAdvertisement  Customize               if [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: La dirección IP es insuficiente para identificar a un Internauta &#171; INDIGNADO</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/court-rules-that-ip-address-alone-insufficient-to-identify-infringer-090615/#comment-570181</link>
		<dc:creator>La dirección IP es insuficiente para identificar a un Internauta &#171; INDIGNADO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 12:23:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=14243#comment-570181</guid>
		<description>[...] pueden ver la versión original  en TorrenFreak, ya que esta es una traducción via [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] pueden ver la versión original  en TorrenFreak, ya que esta es una traducción via [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tech News Monday June 15, 2009 &#124; The Contemplation</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/court-rules-that-ip-address-alone-insufficient-to-identify-infringer-090615/#comment-570177</link>
		<dc:creator>Tech News Monday June 15, 2009 &#124; The Contemplation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 12:16:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=14243#comment-570177</guid>
		<description>[...] Gotta Love DHCP Rome court ruled that an IP address does not identify an infringer, only a particular connection. Only solution for ISP - give users assigned IP address.  (Torrent Freak . . .) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Gotta Love DHCP Rome court ruled that an IP address does not identify an infringer, only a particular connection. Only solution for ISP &#8211; give users assigned IP address.  (Torrent Freak . . .) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/court-rules-that-ip-address-alone-insufficient-to-identify-infringer-090615/#comment-570170</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 12:06:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=14243#comment-570170</guid>
		<description>I own a small Hotel with free Wi fi, I have no control over my guests nor keep any records</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I own a small Hotel with free Wi fi, I have no control over my guests nor keep any records</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jakten på fildelere fortsetter &#171; Plausible Fremtider : den som lever får se</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/court-rules-that-ip-address-alone-insufficient-to-identify-infringer-090615/#comment-570141</link>
		<dc:creator>Jakten på fildelere fortsetter &#171; Plausible Fremtider : den som lever får se</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 10:44:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=14243#comment-570141</guid>
		<description>[...] og samtidig trampe på personvernet og ytringsfriheten. I Italia har de ihvertfall skjønt at en IP-adresse ikke er det samme som en person: The District Attorney and judge said that the mere ownership of a connection from where an [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] og samtidig trampe på personvernet og ytringsfriheten. I Italia har de ihvertfall skjønt at en IP-adresse ikke er det samme som en person: The District Attorney and judge said that the mere ownership of a connection from where an [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter J. Krum's Blog</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/court-rules-that-ip-address-alone-insufficient-to-identify-infringer-090615/#comment-570128</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter J. Krum's Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 10:03:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=14243#comment-570128</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;IP Address Alone Insufficient To Identify Pirate, Court Rules...&lt;/strong&gt;

Anti-piracy groups and lawyers across Europe are unmovable - they say that since they logged a copyright infringement from a particular IP address, the bill payer is responsible. Now a court in Rome has decided that on the contrary, an IP address does ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>IP Address Alone Insufficient To Identify Pirate, Court Rules&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Anti-piracy groups and lawyers across Europe are unmovable &#8211; they say that since they logged a copyright infringement from a particular IP address, the bill payer is responsible. Now a court in Rome has decided that on the contrary, an IP address does &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trancefreak</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/court-rules-that-ip-address-alone-insufficient-to-identify-infringer-090615/#comment-570092</link>
		<dc:creator>trancefreak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 07:34:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=14243#comment-570092</guid>
		<description>To judge a person with only an IP-adress as evidence i wrong.
Often there are several persons using the same connection.

Here&#039;s an example.

&quot;a man gets hit by a car, when he lies on the ground, badly injured, he manage to write down the number on the cars license plate. Then he can hold the owner of this car responsible for the accident, and sue him or report him to the police. But now the police will investigate WHO drove the car, not just hold the owner responsible&quot;

see where i&#039;m going?, You just see the internet as the car, and there a is big chance that it maybe wasn&#039;t the owner who drove!, maybe it was the owners spouse or son? or maybe the car was stolen just a few minutes before the accident! 

That you can be held responsible for a crime just because it was commited through a cable you pay for i rediculous! 
This shitty outlook on &quot;law&quot; just proves that the whole system is gettin manipulated by the industri!

i sickens my!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To judge a person with only an IP-adress as evidence i wrong.<br />
Often there are several persons using the same connection.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s an example.</p>
<p>&#8220;a man gets hit by a car, when he lies on the ground, badly injured, he manage to write down the number on the cars license plate. Then he can hold the owner of this car responsible for the accident, and sue him or report him to the police. But now the police will investigate WHO drove the car, not just hold the owner responsible&#8221;</p>
<p>see where i&#8217;m going?, You just see the internet as the car, and there a is big chance that it maybe wasn&#8217;t the owner who drove!, maybe it was the owners spouse or son? or maybe the car was stolen just a few minutes before the accident! </p>
<p>That you can be held responsible for a crime just because it was commited through a cable you pay for i rediculous!<br />
This shitty outlook on &#8220;law&#8221; just proves that the whole system is gettin manipulated by the industri!</p>
<p>i sickens my!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/court-rules-that-ip-address-alone-insufficient-to-identify-infringer-090615/#comment-570089</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 07:16:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=14243#comment-570089</guid>
		<description>There is also a possibility someone downloaded data on your computer through a trojan. 
But if someone wants to stay stealthy on the net he can always use IP filters and anonymous proxy&#039;s to avoid being identified. In that case it would take a lot of resources to get to the guy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is also a possibility someone downloaded data on your computer through a trojan.<br />
But if someone wants to stay stealthy on the net he can always use IP filters and anonymous proxy&#8217;s to avoid being identified. In that case it would take a lot of resources to get to the guy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dario Salvelli&#8217;s Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; IP: Ignoto Pirata</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/court-rules-that-ip-address-alone-insufficient-to-identify-infringer-090615/#comment-570067</link>
		<dc:creator>Dario Salvelli&#8217;s Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; IP: Ignoto Pirata</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 05:27:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=14243#comment-570067</guid>
		<description>[...] Ignoto Pirata         // Anche Torrentfeak, ormai una bibbia del peer to peer e dei diritti digitali, segnala l&#8217;articolo di Punto [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ignoto Pirata         // Anche Torrentfeak, ormai una bibbia del peer to peer e dei diritti digitali, segnala l&#8217;articolo di Punto [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/court-rules-that-ip-address-alone-insufficient-to-identify-infringer-090615/#comment-570042</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 03:57:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=14243#comment-570042</guid>
		<description>Italy wins over France. Problem is that there should be common law within the EU. Also, this will just lead to new lobby for a law that explicitly does make the customer, to whom the IP address belongs, responsible - no matter who actually dun it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Italy wins over France. Problem is that there should be common law within the EU. Also, this will just lead to new lobby for a law that explicitly does make the customer, to whom the IP address belongs, responsible &#8211; no matter who actually dun it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IP Address Alone Insufficient To Identify Pirate, Court Rule &#171; Netcrema - creme de la social news via digg + delicious + stumpleupon + reddit</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/court-rules-that-ip-address-alone-insufficient-to-identify-infringer-090615/#comment-569996</link>
		<dc:creator>IP Address Alone Insufficient To Identify Pirate, Court Rule &#171; Netcrema - creme de la social news via digg + delicious + stumpleupon + reddit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 23:06:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=14243#comment-569996</guid>
		<description>[...] IP Address Alone Insufficient To Identify Pirate, Court Ruletorrentfreak.com [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] IP Address Alone Insufficient To Identify Pirate, Court Ruletorrentfreak.com [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: born again pagan</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/court-rules-that-ip-address-alone-insufficient-to-identify-infringer-090615/#comment-569964</link>
		<dc:creator>born again pagan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:52:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=14243#comment-569964</guid>
		<description>@ 46 reasoned neostyles

&quot;Uhm, did I miss something?&quot;

Boy, I&#039;ll say you have...


&quot;Isn&#039;t an IP adress a way of identifying a computer?&quot;

Perhaps &quot;a computer,&quot; though not necessarily the end user...


&quot;Provided you can link that IP adress to certain connections/downloads, what more evidence could you possibly expect to prove beyond a doubt that someone is a pirate?&quot;

You&#039;re (purposely?) missing the entire point ... what evidence exists regarding the actual user? What if Lars Ulrich breaks into my house while I&#039;m in church ... and he decides to download some steamy transsexual porn? Just because he&#039;s playing with my computer (among other things) while I&#039;m busy praising Jesus, you can&#039;t hold ME responsible for his actions. Amen!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ 46 reasoned neostyles</p>
<p>&#8220;Uhm, did I miss something?&#8221;</p>
<p>Boy, I&#8217;ll say you have&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;Isn&#8217;t an IP adress a way of identifying a computer?&#8221;</p>
<p>Perhaps &#8220;a computer,&#8221; though not necessarily the end user&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;Provided you can link that IP adress to certain connections/downloads, what more evidence could you possibly expect to prove beyond a doubt that someone is a pirate?&#8221;</p>
<p>You&#8217;re (purposely?) missing the entire point &#8230; what evidence exists regarding the actual user? What if Lars Ulrich breaks into my house while I&#8217;m in church &#8230; and he decides to download some steamy transsexual porn? Just because he&#8217;s playing with my computer (among other things) while I&#8217;m busy praising Jesus, you can&#8217;t hold ME responsible for his actions. Amen!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/court-rules-that-ip-address-alone-insufficient-to-identify-infringer-090615/#comment-569960</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:46:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=14243#comment-569960</guid>
		<description>What I dont understand is how the authorities can get involved in a civil investigation. How can the RIAA tell the local police to seize your property on such a flimsy basis?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I dont understand is how the authorities can get involved in a civil investigation. How can the RIAA tell the local police to seize your property on such a flimsy basis?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Visca</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/court-rules-that-ip-address-alone-insufficient-to-identify-infringer-090615/#comment-569953</link>
		<dc:creator>Visca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:20:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=14243#comment-569953</guid>
		<description>@neostyles an IP, on internet, identify a ROUTER, and differents computers can connect to internet throug this (especially if the router has wifi)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@neostyles an IP, on internet, identify a ROUTER, and differents computers can connect to internet throug this (especially if the router has wifi)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fulllovegirl</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/court-rules-that-ip-address-alone-insufficient-to-identify-infringer-090615/#comment-569947</link>
		<dc:creator>fulllovegirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 20:47:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=14243#comment-569947</guid>
		<description>H-O-T Dating Networking Site __S e e k B i C o m___ helps you find your ideal lover</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>H-O-T Dating Networking Site __S e e k B i C o m___ helps you find your ideal lover</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HBO&#8217;s Bill Maher Takes On President Obama &#124; Fundawn News</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/court-rules-that-ip-address-alone-insufficient-to-identify-infringer-090615/#comment-569944</link>
		<dc:creator>HBO&#8217;s Bill Maher Takes On President Obama &#124; Fundawn News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 20:39:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=14243#comment-569944</guid>
		<description>[...] IP Address Alone Insufficient To Identify Pirate, Court Rules &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] IP Address Alone Insufficient To Identify Pirate, Court Rules &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: curious</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/court-rules-that-ip-address-alone-insufficient-to-identify-infringer-090615/#comment-569943</link>
		<dc:creator>curious</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 20:37:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=14243#comment-569943</guid>
		<description>The IP address should at very least warrant credentials for a warrant.  (ya I said it)    The warrant should include search and seizure of computers found at said location of IP address in question.  If copyrighted material is found on that computer, the owner is, in fact, responsible.  No matter who actually hit the download button.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The IP address should at very least warrant credentials for a warrant.  (ya I said it)    The warrant should include search and seizure of computers found at said location of IP address in question.  If copyrighted material is found on that computer, the owner is, in fact, responsible.  No matter who actually hit the download button.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neostyles</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/court-rules-that-ip-address-alone-insufficient-to-identify-infringer-090615/#comment-569930</link>
		<dc:creator>neostyles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 19:36:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=14243#comment-569930</guid>
		<description>Uhm, did I miss something?  Isn&#039;t an IP adress a way of identifying a computer?  Provided you can link that IP adress to certain connections/downloads, what more evidence could you possibly expect to prove beyond a doubt that someone is a pirate?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uhm, did I miss something?  Isn&#8217;t an IP adress a way of identifying a computer?  Provided you can link that IP adress to certain connections/downloads, what more evidence could you possibly expect to prove beyond a doubt that someone is a pirate?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dairRIAA</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/court-rules-that-ip-address-alone-insufficient-to-identify-infringer-090615/#comment-569913</link>
		<dc:creator>dairRIAA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 18:31:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=14243#comment-569913</guid>
		<description>If you own a gun and do your absolute best to lock it up and keep it safe from others, and if someone decides they want access to the gun, gets their hands on it and commits a crime with it; you are not guilty of any crime.

But in the eyes of the RIAA/MPAA, you&#039;re supposed to be GUILTY without any proof whatsoever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you own a gun and do your absolute best to lock it up and keep it safe from others, and if someone decides they want access to the gun, gets their hands on it and commits a crime with it; you are not guilty of any crime.</p>
<p>But in the eyes of the RIAA/MPAA, you&#8217;re supposed to be GUILTY without any proof whatsoever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IP Address Alone Insufficient To Identify Pirate, Court Rules &#124; AntiMatter's Blog</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/court-rules-that-ip-address-alone-insufficient-to-identify-infringer-090615/#comment-569910</link>
		<dc:creator>IP Address Alone Insufficient To Identify Pirate, Court Rules &#124; AntiMatter's Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 18:24:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=14243#comment-569910</guid>
		<description>[...] from: TorrentFreak         Category: File-Sharing  You can follow any responses to this entry via RSS. You can leave a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] from: TorrentFreak         Category: File-Sharing  You can follow any responses to this entry via RSS. You can leave a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tosh</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/court-rules-that-ip-address-alone-insufficient-to-identify-infringer-090615/#comment-569904</link>
		<dc:creator>Tosh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 18:06:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=14243#comment-569904</guid>
		<description>There is no need to secure ones hard drive, this is a civil case with dl/acs there is no way they can get access to ones hard drive</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is no need to secure ones hard drive, this is a civil case with dl/acs there is no way they can get access to ones hard drive</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lune</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/court-rules-that-ip-address-alone-insufficient-to-identify-infringer-090615/#comment-569900</link>
		<dc:creator>Lune</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 18:01:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=14243#comment-569900</guid>
		<description>Oh and the UK side of things really, really blows, you are legally obliged to provide keys to decrypt encrypted data, failure to do so gains you 2years of jail time.... So anyone with a really good reason to encrypt stuff is just going to take the 2years and laugh... o_O</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh and the UK side of things really, really blows, you are legally obliged to provide keys to decrypt encrypted data, failure to do so gains you 2years of jail time&#8230;. So anyone with a really good reason to encrypt stuff is just going to take the 2years and laugh&#8230; o_O</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lune</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/court-rules-that-ip-address-alone-insufficient-to-identify-infringer-090615/#comment-569899</link>
		<dc:creator>Lune</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 17:59:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=14243#comment-569899</guid>
		<description>Anyone saying that in the US you can take the fifth and avoid incriminating yourself is wrong, it was tested in court in march of this year and the guy was ordered to decrypt the drive.

Here is one reference to it:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/03/03/encryption_password_ruling/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone saying that in the US you can take the fifth and avoid incriminating yourself is wrong, it was tested in court in march of this year and the guy was ordered to decrypt the drive.</p>
<p>Here is one reference to it:<br />
<a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/03/03/encryption_password_ruling/" rel="nofollow">http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/03/03/encryption_password_ruling/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IP Address Alone Insufficient To Identify Pirate, Court Rules!!! - ABA DSS - Free to Air Satellite TV Community</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/court-rules-that-ip-address-alone-insufficient-to-identify-infringer-090615/#comment-569857</link>
		<dc:creator>IP Address Alone Insufficient To Identify Pirate, Court Rules!!! - ABA DSS - Free to Air Satellite TV Community</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 16:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=14243#comment-569857</guid>
		<description>[...] infringer?s PC - it means little on its own.  Thank you Italy for your common sense.     Source: IP Address Alone Insufficient To Identify Pirate, Court Rules &#124; TorrentFreak    __________________ Testing: KBOX K1 Plus with KHUB, Neosat iPro2000+, Conaxsat Mini. Probably [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] infringer?s PC &#8211; it means little on its own.  Thank you Italy for your common sense.     Source: IP Address Alone Insufficient To Identify Pirate, Court Rules | TorrentFreak    __________________ Testing: KBOX K1 Plus with KHUB, Neosat iPro2000+, Conaxsat Mini. Probably [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Court: IP Address Alone Can Not Identify Pirate &#124; BestTechie.net</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/court-rules-that-ip-address-alone-insufficient-to-identify-infringer-090615/#comment-569848</link>
		<dc:creator>Court: IP Address Alone Can Not Identify Pirate &#124; BestTechie.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 15:41:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=14243#comment-569848</guid>
		<description>[...] things may be changing.  According to TorrentFreak, anti-piracy lawyers “say that since they logged a copyright infringement from a particular IP [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] things may be changing.  According to TorrentFreak, anti-piracy lawyers “say that since they logged a copyright infringement from a particular IP [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IP Address Alone Insufficient To Identify Pirate, Court Rules &#8230; &#124; Spoof Info - Stay Safe &#38; Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/court-rules-that-ip-address-alone-insufficient-to-identify-infringer-090615/#comment-569846</link>
		<dc:creator>IP Address Alone Insufficient To Identify Pirate, Court Rules &#8230; &#124; Spoof Info - Stay Safe &#38; Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 15:26:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=14243#comment-569846</guid>
		<description>[...] post: IP Address Alone Insufficient To Identify Pirate, Court Rules &#8230;    Permalink - Comments RSS Feed - Comments are closed - Trackback URL - Share on Twitter   Related [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] post: IP Address Alone Insufficient To Identify Pirate, Court Rules &#8230;    Permalink &#8211; Comments RSS Feed &#8211; Comments are closed &#8211; Trackback URL &#8211; Share on Twitter   Related [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fausty &#124; torrentfreedom.net</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/court-rules-that-ip-address-alone-insufficient-to-identify-infringer-090615/#comment-569845</link>
		<dc:creator>Fausty &#124; torrentfreedom.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 15:22:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=14243#comment-569845</guid>
		<description>@Anonymous: you can&#039;t be sent to jail, in the USA, for refusal to turn over an encryption password/passkey - it&#039;s classified under self incrimination, i.e the 5th Amendment. The only open legal question relating to passkeys is whether border agents can demand a machine be decrypted before allowing a citizen back into the country - that issue is in front of several appelate courts.

The UK &quot;anti-encryption&quot; law is a horse of a different color - through the UK doesn&#039;t have a 5th Amendment (but they do have a queen).

Fausty &#124; www.cultureghost.org</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Anonymous: you can&#8217;t be sent to jail, in the USA, for refusal to turn over an encryption password/passkey &#8211; it&#8217;s classified under self incrimination, i.e the 5th Amendment. The only open legal question relating to passkeys is whether border agents can demand a machine be decrypted before allowing a citizen back into the country &#8211; that issue is in front of several appelate courts.</p>
<p>The UK &#8220;anti-encryption&#8221; law is a horse of a different color &#8211; through the UK doesn&#8217;t have a 5th Amendment (but they do have a queen).</p>
<p>Fausty | <a href="http://www.cultureghost.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.cultureghost.org</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: meneame.net</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/court-rules-that-ip-address-alone-insufficient-to-identify-infringer-090615/#comment-569840</link>
		<dc:creator>meneame.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 15:12:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=14243#comment-569840</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Italia: Una dirección IP no es suficiente para identificar a un &quot;pirata&quot; [eng]...&lt;/strong&gt;

&quot;Los grupos y abogados anti-piratería de toda Europa son inamovibles - dicen que si han detectado una infracción de copyright desde una dirección IP particular, el titular de la linea es responsable. Ahora un juzgado de Roma ha decidido que una...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Italia: Una dirección IP no es suficiente para identificar a un &quot;pirata&quot; [eng]&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>&quot;Los grupos y abogados anti-piratería de toda Europa son inamovibles &#8211; dicen que si han detectado una infracción de copyright desde una dirección IP particular, el titular de la linea es responsable. Ahora un juzgado de Roma ha decidido que una&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: taffer</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/court-rules-that-ip-address-alone-insufficient-to-identify-infringer-090615/#comment-569839</link>
		<dc:creator>taffer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 15:03:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=14243#comment-569839</guid>
		<description>Thank you, rickatnight11.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, rickatnight11.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rickatnight11</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/court-rules-that-ip-address-alone-insufficient-to-identify-infringer-090615/#comment-569837</link>
		<dc:creator>rickatnight11</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 15:01:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=14243#comment-569837</guid>
		<description>@taffer
You can checksum the file.  Every torrent has enough meta-data about the files being shared, which is how your client is able to ensure that the file you downloaded is the file that was shared.  This is also how you are able to resume downloads, download various parts of the file from various sources, and also seed a file you downloaded elsewhere.  This system of checksums ensures that anyone connecting to the tracker via a particular torrent is sharing the EXACT same file.

By providing the logs of downloading the file from an IP and the checksum of the file, you have proven that the file originated from the source IP and contains the exact same data.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@taffer<br />
You can checksum the file.  Every torrent has enough meta-data about the files being shared, which is how your client is able to ensure that the file you downloaded is the file that was shared.  This is also how you are able to resume downloads, download various parts of the file from various sources, and also seed a file you downloaded elsewhere.  This system of checksums ensures that anyone connecting to the tracker via a particular torrent is sharing the EXACT same file.</p>
<p>By providing the logs of downloading the file from an IP and the checksum of the file, you have proven that the file originated from the source IP and contains the exact same data.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: popurls.com // popular today</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/court-rules-that-ip-address-alone-insufficient-to-identify-infringer-090615/#comment-569832</link>
		<dc:creator>popurls.com // popular today</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 14:46:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=14243#comment-569832</guid>
		<description>[...] and UMG launching unlimited music service&#160;Cykel: A Plug-in Electric Bike Sharing Concept&#160;IP Address Alone Insufficient To Identify Pirate, Court Rule&#160;Planet &#039;spotted&#039; in Andromeda galaxy&#160;Phil Jackson May Be The Greatest Coach Ever&#160;New [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and UMG launching unlimited music service&nbsp;Cykel: A Plug-in Electric Bike Sharing Concept&nbsp;IP Address Alone Insufficient To Identify Pirate, Court Rule&nbsp;Planet &#8216;spotted&#8217; in Andromeda galaxy&nbsp;Phil Jackson May Be The Greatest Coach Ever&nbsp;New [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: taffer</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/court-rules-that-ip-address-alone-insufficient-to-identify-infringer-090615/#comment-569827</link>
		<dc:creator>taffer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 14:42:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=14243#comment-569827</guid>
		<description>Yes, you can do that or you can claim to have done that. My point is, how can you prove to a third party that the file you present is a file you have downloaded from that computer? You can show logs of the connection to that IP, but how do I know the file you come up with is not just copied from your own hdd?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, you can do that or you can claim to have done that. My point is, how can you prove to a third party that the file you present is a file you have downloaded from that computer? You can show logs of the connection to that IP, but how do I know the file you come up with is not just copied from your own hdd?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: greylion</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/court-rules-that-ip-address-alone-insufficient-to-identify-infringer-090615/#comment-569825</link>
		<dc:creator>greylion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 14:39:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=14243#comment-569825</guid>
		<description>@ #7 and #9:
What if you&#039;ve lost the encryption key?
If I had it on a USB-stick, and my dog chewed it to bits (no pun intended), then it&#039;s gone, there&#039;s no way to decrypt.

If you can be sentenced for that, it&#039;s another example of &#039;guilty until proven innocent&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ #7 and #9:<br />
What if you&#8217;ve lost the encryption key?<br />
If I had it on a USB-stick, and my dog chewed it to bits (no pun intended), then it&#8217;s gone, there&#8217;s no way to decrypt.</p>
<p>If you can be sentenced for that, it&#8217;s another example of &#8216;guilty until proven innocent&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rickatnight11</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/court-rules-that-ip-address-alone-insufficient-to-identify-infringer-090615/#comment-569824</link>
		<dc:creator>rickatnight11</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 14:37:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=14243#comment-569824</guid>
		<description>You&#039;ve already stated that the IP links to one person and one person only.  If a file was &quot;shared&quot; from that computer in full (which can be recorded from publicly accessible information on the tracker) then that computer has shared the file.

To view it from another side, if I connect to a tracker, pull your information as the only seed, and download the entire file from you, then you had the file at one point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;ve already stated that the IP links to one person and one person only.  If a file was &#8220;shared&#8221; from that computer in full (which can be recorded from publicly accessible information on the tracker) then that computer has shared the file.</p>
<p>To view it from another side, if I connect to a tracker, pull your information as the only seed, and download the entire file from you, then you had the file at one point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: taffer</title>
		<link>http://torrentfreak.com/court-rules-that-ip-address-alone-insufficient-to-identify-infringer-090615/#comment-569818</link>
		<dc:creator>taffer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 14:22:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=14243#comment-569818</guid>
		<description>What if it&#039;s formatted by then?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What if it&#8217;s formatted by then?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

