Comments on: Dan Mitchell Exposes TorrentFreak as BitTorrent Pirates

By: U.S. House Harbors BitTorrent Pirates | ..:: apolloKIDZ ::..

U.S. House Harbors BitTorrent Pirates | ..:: apolloKIDZ ::.. — Fri, 30 Dec 2011 18:06:40 +0000

[...] downloads since the site only tracks a limited percentage of total BitTorrent traffic. Again, this is real and confirmed data that is just as good as the evidence used by the RIAA when they sued tens of [...]

By: House of Representatives harboring hundreds of online pirates | FavStocks

House of Representatives harboring hundreds of online pirates | FavStocks — Wed, 28 Dec 2011 08:19:28 +0000

By: House of Representatives harboring hundreds of online pirates | Hotspyer – Breaking News from around the web

Wed, 28 Dec 2011 02:17:37 +0000

By: While Drafting SOPA, the U.S. House Harbors BitTorrent Pirates | We R Pirates

Mon, 26 Dec 2011 21:20:37 +0000

By: Geoff

Geoff — Sat, 24 Dec 2011 11:32:00 +0000

The trouble is, how long before the RIAA, in their typical biased way start referring to that article as fact? “Look, Torrentfreak is a infringing site, Dan Mitchell says so.

By: Rob8urcakes

Rob8urcakes — Fri, 23 Dec 2011 10:44:00 +0000

lol, but I’d have laughed louder if you’d called him a low-rentboy, keyb warrior :)

By: ANoiXioNA

ANoiXioNA — Thu, 22 Dec 2011 09:37:00 +0000

Quote of the day….. +1

“We could explain it to you, but we can’t understand it for you”

I will be ripping n burning that into my brain.

By: Pirate

Pirate — Thu, 22 Dec 2011 07:51:00 +0000

Oh no you didnt!

Lol he just got owned

By: Petrus_arne

Petrus_arne — Thu, 22 Dec 2011 05:00:00 +0000

in Norwegian law it is written that if you do not have a physical verson of movies / music / books, then you should not have to pay more than once … same rules are in usa. hidden away in the old law if I am not completely mistaken

Go and keep fredom safe…go,go TorrentFreak…

By: ANoiXioNA

ANoiXioNA — Wed, 21 Dec 2011 23:18:00 +0000

first off…. Tactically +186000² ( it fell into your lap…you took it…good )

Argue….. and win with facts…with someone “”above”” you…( esteemed social writer standing wise… NOT my judgement… you know what I mean tho ? )

? Be seen as a Bully …… or be humiliated ?
This Moron obviously didn’t read the memo about not arguing with someone “”beneath them””. He can’t win….. literally.

You are right to call this moron … a moron ( u wnt , I wL : )
paraphrasing of course .. but essentially when you think about it … it’s the same thing… providing OBVIOUS facts and debunking the argument of an opposing arguer. That’s way more humiliating than calling someone a name.

*ps* nice to see you angry write…it brings on a smile : ) …. when someone channels emotion into winning an argument factually.
Passion is so underrated……

“out”