<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Day One: AFACT v iiNet BitTorrent Piracy Appeal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://torrentfreak.com/day-one-afact-v-iinet-bittorrent-piracy-appeal-100802/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://torrentfreak.com/day-one-afact-v-iinet-bittorrent-piracy-appeal-100802/</link>
	<description>Breaking File-sharing, Copyright and Privacy News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2014 21:09:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: bogler</title>
		<link>/day-one-afact-v-iinet-bittorrent-piracy-appeal-100802/#comment-696532</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bogler]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 22:47:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=25902#comment-696532</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[David Catterns? David Sh1tworms, more like.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David Catterns? David Sh1tworms, more like.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jahm Mitt</title>
		<link>/day-one-afact-v-iinet-bittorrent-piracy-appeal-100802/#comment-695339</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jahm Mitt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Aug 2010 23:11:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=25902#comment-695339</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The RIAA and MPAA even scam thir own.

AFACT - they are so crooked even their bogus PR campaign is a lie.

http://torrentfreak.com/tech-news-sites-tout-misleading-bittorrent-piracy-study-100724/ [torrentfreak.com]

http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100708/02510310122.shtml [techdirt.com]

http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-ct-disney-20100708,0,4051564.story [latimes.com]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The RIAA and MPAA even scam thir own.</p>
<p>AFACT &#8211; they are so crooked even their bogus PR campaign is a lie.</p>
<p><a href="http://torrentfreak.com/tech-news-sites-tout-misleading-bittorrent-piracy-study-100724/" rel="nofollow">http://torrentfreak.com/tech-news-sites-tout-misleading-bittorrent-piracy-study-100724/</a> [torrentfreak.com]</p>
<p><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100708/02510310122.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100708/02510310122.shtml</a> [techdirt.com]</p>
<p><a href="http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-ct-disney-20100708,0,4051564.story" rel="nofollow">http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-ct-disney-20100708,0,4051564.story</a> [latimes.com]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Day Two: AFACT v iiNet BitTorrent Piracy Appeal @ blog.idtorrent.org</title>
		<link>/day-one-afact-v-iinet-bittorrent-piracy-appeal-100802/#comment-694089</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Day Two: AFACT v iiNet BitTorrent Piracy Appeal @ blog.idtorrent.org]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 22:01:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=25902#comment-694089</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] detailed yesterday, AFACT &#8211; which has chosen not to go after primary infringers (iiNet customers using [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] detailed yesterday, AFACT &#8211; which has chosen not to go after primary infringers (iiNet customers using [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Day Two: AFACT v iiNet BitTorrent Piracy Appeal - Download Movies, Software, Games, Music and More - TPC</title>
		<link>/day-one-afact-v-iinet-bittorrent-piracy-appeal-100802/#comment-694014</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Day Two: AFACT v iiNet BitTorrent Piracy Appeal - Download Movies, Software, Games, Music and More - TPC]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 15:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=25902#comment-694014</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...]  [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Content owners, ISPs in global battle over piracy &#124; Concurrent Media</title>
		<link>/day-one-afact-v-iinet-bittorrent-piracy-appeal-100802/#comment-694012</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Content owners, ISPs in global battle over piracy &#124; Concurrent Media]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 15:18:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=25902#comment-694012</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Australia, arguments began this week in the appeal brought by the Australian Federation Against Copyright Theft (AFACT) after a lower [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Australia, arguments began this week in the appeal brought by the Australian Federation Against Copyright Theft (AFACT) after a lower [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Day Two: AFACT v iiNet BitTorrent Piracy Appeal &#124; We R Pirates</title>
		<link>/day-one-afact-v-iinet-bittorrent-piracy-appeal-100802/#comment-693970</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Day Two: AFACT v iiNet BitTorrent Piracy Appeal &#124; We R Pirates]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 11:40:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=25902#comment-693970</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] detailed yesterday, AFACT &#8211; which has chosen not to go after primary infringers (iiNet customers using [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] detailed yesterday, AFACT &#8211; which has chosen not to go after primary infringers (iiNet customers using [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: P2PTalk &#187; Day Two: AFACT v iiNet BitTorrent Piracy Appeal</title>
		<link>/day-one-afact-v-iinet-bittorrent-piracy-appeal-100802/#comment-693966</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[P2PTalk &#187; Day Two: AFACT v iiNet BitTorrent Piracy Appeal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 11:21:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=25902#comment-693966</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] detailed yesterday, AFACT &#8211; which has chosen not to go after primary infringers (iiNet customers using [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] detailed yesterday, AFACT &#8211; which has chosen not to go after primary infringers (iiNet customers using [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>/day-one-afact-v-iinet-bittorrent-piracy-appeal-100802/#comment-693959</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 10:40:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=25902#comment-693959</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@29 - Som Joe:
True.

@30 - Nathan:

&quot;It will be a very fascinating decision and [it has been] a fascinating case to watch and a lot of interesting evidence has been tendered. We are waiting for the outcome of that before we make any calls about whether we need new legislation or not.&quot; Conjob said.

http://www.arnnet.com.au/article/328529/conroy_holds_his_breath_iinet_v_afact_verdict/

Wow. Check the link below. The comments he makes just scare me.

Apparently he stated this as a solution. &quot;getting content industry players to change their business models and adopt Internet delivery mechanisms.&quot; Can not find it anywhere else. Unlikely to happen probably just make alleged copyright infringers automatically guilty. :)

http://www.crn.com.au/News/140900,iinet-trial-could-be-test-case-for-government-p2p-policy.aspx

The other link below discusses that it is certain that the government will be called on to changed the law. It would be great if they just made it legal to &#039;file-share&#039; when not for profit. But this is never going to happen.

http://www.itnews.com.au/News/166400,legal-experts-expect-appeal-in-iinet-judgement.aspx]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@29 &#8211; Som Joe:<br />
True.</p>
<p>@30 &#8211; Nathan:</p>
<p>&#8220;It will be a very fascinating decision and [it has been] a fascinating case to watch and a lot of interesting evidence has been tendered. We are waiting for the outcome of that before we make any calls about whether we need new legislation or not.&#8221; Conjob said.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.arnnet.com.au/article/328529/conroy_holds_his_breath_iinet_v_afact_verdict/" rel="nofollow">http://www.arnnet.com.au/article/328529/conroy_holds_his_breath_iinet_v_afact_verdict/</a></p>
<p>Wow. Check the link below. The comments he makes just scare me.</p>
<p>Apparently he stated this as a solution. &#8220;getting content industry players to change their business models and adopt Internet delivery mechanisms.&#8221; Can not find it anywhere else. Unlikely to happen probably just make alleged copyright infringers automatically guilty. :)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.crn.com.au/News/140900,iinet-trial-could-be-test-case-for-government-p2p-policy.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.crn.com.au/News/140900,iinet-trial-could-be-test-case-for-government-p2p-policy.aspx</a></p>
<p>The other link below discusses that it is certain that the government will be called on to changed the law. It would be great if they just made it legal to &#8216;file-share&#8217; when not for profit. But this is never going to happen.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.itnews.com.au/News/166400,legal-experts-expect-appeal-in-iinet-judgement.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.itnews.com.au/News/166400,legal-experts-expect-appeal-in-iinet-judgement.aspx</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harquebus</title>
		<link>/day-one-afact-v-iinet-bittorrent-piracy-appeal-100802/#comment-693937</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Harquebus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 08:34:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=25902#comment-693937</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If printed out all of Australia&#039;s laws, rules and regulations, it would fill seven semi-trailers. This could go on for years and years.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If printed out all of Australia&#8217;s laws, rules and regulations, it would fill seven semi-trailers. This could go on for years and years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Binary Bandit</title>
		<link>/day-one-afact-v-iinet-bittorrent-piracy-appeal-100802/#comment-693917</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Binary Bandit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 07:29:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=25902#comment-693917</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hmmm...seems to me that iiNet should counter sue AFACT. Why you ask...well, AFACT represents the companies that produce the pirated products. They wouldn&#039;t be pirated on their networks, clogging the pipes, so to speak, if it wasn&#039;t for the inducement via advertising to see the movies. Most of the trailers are misleading and exagerate the worth of the movies getting everyone all excited, thus inducing the pirates to download.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm&#8230;seems to me that iiNet should counter sue AFACT. Why you ask&#8230;well, AFACT represents the companies that produce the pirated products. They wouldn&#8217;t be pirated on their networks, clogging the pipes, so to speak, if it wasn&#8217;t for the inducement via advertising to see the movies. Most of the trailers are misleading and exagerate the worth of the movies getting everyone all excited, thus inducing the pirates to download.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
