Probaly you won't believe me though :( Oh well, not much I can do except ask for it to be removed is there.

Probaly you won't believe me though :( Oh well, not much I can do except ask for it to be removed.

And yes, fair point regarding the viewpoints thing, however I'm reading what you posted which is another persons words that aren't there in their entirety so I can read the semantics either way.

I have definitely not failed to relate it to the issue at hand since it is related.

Is this seriously trying to say that people viewpoints are unable to be atered
If you had given any thought about the first line itself, then you would know that it is saying that whatever are the viewpoints of people, whether it regards their particular interests of the general interest of the people, the idea of the general will and common interest itself cannot be changed, nor can the idea be destroyed. Although people may differ on what exactly is the common interest and general will, the idea itself is unalterable and indestructible. The idea of public good shall always be there, and shall eventually prevail, even though, for the time being, it may be encroached upon by interests of factions.

One would need to be blind to all of history to think that the public good does not prevail, or that tyranny lasts forever. Take, for example, the abolition of serfdom.

The point of my comment, I agree. It's a shame companies are hurting the customers for buying the game, while pirates like ourselves enjoy a fully working product with no hidden software. My sympathy goes to the customers.

From here perhaps: http://books.google.com.au/books?id=6cVgNriRS4cC&…

The first line is at odds with what happens in the real world – unless you give qualications:

"The general will is always constant, unalterable and pure"

Is this seriously trying to say that people viewpoints are unable to be atered – what a load of bollocks. because this

So this quote is trying to say