Comments on: European Court Of Justice Reviews P2P Filtering Case

By: Doraemon-

Doraemon- — Mon, 22 Feb 2010 13:33:20 +0000

Networking industries generate more incomes, pay more taxes, and create more jobs than music and film industries together.
Specially film creations can only exist in Europe because of the public financing.

We do not need any more huge discographical industries, just as they were not needed in the 19th century, and there was music creation too.
Technology made them necessary at some time, and now technology makes them obsolete.
They can simply transform, or disappear.
But technological progress is not going to disappear or revert just for someones’ obsolete businesses.
It’s not a good idea to keep a model that turns 90% of citizens into criminals.
Private copy of contents must be legal anywhere. You can’t simply stop the wind from blowing.
Copying and distributing other people’s work is piracy. Copy some contents for your own use is not.

By: John

John — Sun, 21 Feb 2010 12:43:15 +0000

Test.

By: stop software patents

stop software patents — Fri, 19 Feb 2010 17:23:29 +0000

http://petition.stopsoftwarepatents.eu/211000297544/

By: How To Copyright a Song : Music Protected by Copyright | Copyright Law

How To Copyright a Song : Music Protected by Copyright | Copyright Law — Thu, 18 Feb 2010 15:27:38 +0000

[...] European Court Of Justice Reviews P2P Filtering Case (torrentfreak.com) [...]

By: COPYRIGHT & SAMPLING [part 2] | Copyright Law

[...] European Court Of Justice Reviews P2P Filtering Case (torrentfreak.com) Related Posts [...]

By: Bleh

Bleh — Mon, 15 Feb 2010 03:56:32 +0000

@22

I’ve 100mb/s connection for 30€ per month, why should I not get this while it’s ubercheap and uberfast? I’m hosting free online gaming servers with zero connection problems and I can play with gamers on the other end of the world while this would be impossible with a slower connection. It’s not just about downloading movies etc, so don’t make false statements.

By: Belgio: la Corte Europea rivedrà il caso Sabam-Scarlet « YBlog

Belgio: la Corte Europea rivedrà il caso Sabam-Scarlet « YBlog — Sun, 14 Feb 2010 16:58:05 +0000

[...] P2P provoca strascichi curiosi un po’ in tutto il mondo. Ad esempio, dopo tanti anni il Belgio ha chiesto alla Corte di Giustizia della Comunità Europea di rivedere il caso [...]

By: Outsider

Outsider — Sun, 14 Feb 2010 09:31:05 +0000

@18 The economy is being damaged already. 50% losses in revenue for the record industry over 10 years means a lot of people were put on the dole. Watch as the movie and TV industries start to feel the pinch now as well. ISPs don’t create either added value or that many jobs. They pimp bandwidth, facilitating large-scale piracy of other people’s work. The day they start investing in content, I might have more sympathy.

By: XavZz

XavZz — Thu, 11 Feb 2010 18:00:09 +0000

I don’t like SABAM !!

They claim copyright money, and it all goes into their own filthy pockets..

When at work, the radio is on and more than 8 people listen; they claim you have to pay for the music

Freak’n INSANE

1 message 2 all of you guys.

Eat shit, choke and die some more

(Same goes for BREIN)

By: Links 11/2/2010: LinuxQuestions.org Awards, Myst Online Set Free | Boycott Novell

Thu, 11 Feb 2010 14:50:08 +0000

[...] European Court Of Justice Reviews P2P Filtering Case In a landmark case the music copyright group SABAM has been chasing a local Internet provider in court, trying to force the company to filter P2P traffic, thus far without result. The Brussels Court of Appeal has now referred the case to the European Court Of Justice where it will be thoroughly examined once again. [...]