EvID4226Patch223d-en.zip

Written by Ernesto on March 10, 2006 

If you don’t like torrents try MP3 Fiesta. They hold nearly 67,000 albums from nearly 17,000 artists. Prices are around the $0.10 mark for single tracks with full albums coming in at roughly $1.00. Tracks are available from 192kbps and they take major credit cards and PayPal

Previously: Bitcomet follows Azureus and uTorrent

Next: About Me

301 Responses

Pages: « 13 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 12 13 » Show All

176 Dec 14, 2007 at 15:19 by ZoEb

Thanx for ur wonderful effort.I feel sorry for u.

Some people here just don’t get it.

[1] A decent Anti Virus WILL detect this file as a VIRUS. Simply bcz it alters TCPIP.sys [ Which in this case is NOT bad ].

[2] A network administrator should’ve known that this thing is not suited for a network

I had to uninstall my BitDefender Total Security just to run this.

It’s worth it guys

Zoeb,
India

177 Dec 15, 2007 at 01:55 by ZoEb

[quote comment="238966"]Thanx for ur wonderful effort.I feel sorry for u.

Some people here just don’t get it.

[1] A decent Anti Virus WILL detect this file as a VIRUS. Simply bcz it alters TCPIP.sys [ Which in this case is NOT bad ].

[2] A network administrator should’ve known that this thing is not suited for a network

I had to uninstall my BitDefender Total Security just to run this.

It’s worth it guys

Zoeb,
India[/quote]

SORRY!
After initially approving it I am taking back my comments on this patch.

I have observed it’s behaviour. Although it DOES change the max no of open connections in TCPIP.sys, it’s a virus.

Bit Defender kept blocking it from executing itself several times, even hours after I applied the patch.

[ Though I did delete the patch after applying, it copied itself in to c:\...System Volume Information and repeatedly tried to execute itself; a typical behaviour of a Trojan ]

178 Dec 16, 2007 at 00:53 by mary

shall i download or not ???? im using azureus vuse

179 Dec 19, 2007 at 17:28 by drpc

tool evid is a trojan

180 Dec 20, 2007 at 15:28 by click here

outlay refreshers throb critique ineffective helm,opportunity.coupled!

181 Dec 24, 2007 at 12:10 by Anonymous

This Is Not A virus…
I Downloaded And worked on a 1Mbit connection. My Download Speed before was 35-50 and now is 70-90.
Thx, Cool Tool :)

182 Dec 25, 2007 at 03:19 by Anonymous

[quote comment="12330"]I have XP HOME EDITION and DONT hAVE SP1 does that affect this because when i want to install the patch it says your system has no limitaions no patching needed and dosent give me a choice i have to aboard.[/quote]

183 Dec 27, 2007 at 22:34 by juggernot

Does this patch work for vista home premium? I’ve been looking for a simple patch to increase the number of connections, so I hope this works for vista. Otherwise I have to follow a nine step guide.

184 Dec 31, 2007 at 02:52 by Vista User

‘ello there mates!
im using vista and well to say the least it sucks do not buy! SO yes any way is there any hope of them putting out a new patch that can work with this devilish excuse for a os?

185 Jan 02, 2008 at 23:46 by redaxe

wow!! it was instant! thanks a million….:)

186 Jan 03, 2008 at 00:04 by p

great thanx

187 Jan 03, 2008 at 05:14 by charver

DO IT PEOPLE post 144 Azereus - Norton is b*ll shit might as well not bother with anti virus mcafee firewall or zone alarm is best firewall and freeware avast is best antivirus i had a virus norton couldn’t detect! mcafee couldn’t do anything with it not even quarantine avast was recommended by one of them tech geeks and it shifted the virus str8 away! install the patch people it DOES work on XP SP2 i use utorrent and it has more than tripled my download speed!!!

188 Jan 03, 2008 at 09:43 by Anonymous

i dont know how to react to all of these comments. I want to install it but i see theres a lot of people who say it wont work. I will just try a different TCP optimizer. This sounds risky and i dont know my computer perfectly.

sorry

189 Jan 04, 2008 at 01:01 by kmo

[quote comment="130678"][quote comment="130676"]Hey can one one help me I download the patch and it
Placid Thoughts
#17. Everything you want in life has a price.
#16. Praise the act, not the person.
#15. Everything in life starts with a decision.

Cloud-O-Tag
3G bag BEA blog bug C2D Christmas crumpler d300 fun Gusty Gibbon hardware hobby IBM Intel Internet IT keyboard Leian Life linux live writer lowepro Maxis meme Microsoft mobile Nikon outing patch PC personal phone photography random Screw up Serendipity shop Singapore software tcpip.sys tech arp technology torrent travel ubuntu Vista windows work xp
Popular Entries
Guide: How to Mobile Blog on Serendipity Weblog

(121)
Part 1

(100)
Fixing the Windows XP/2003 Taskbar Tooltip bug

(86)
Ubuntu 7.10 (Gutsy Gibbon) released!

(52)
Patching Vista’s TCPIP Connection Limit

(50)
Categories
@ ARP
@ Food
@ Life
@ Moblog
@ Photography
@ Random
http://atpeaz.placidthoughts.com/index.php?/categories/8-SterlingPJ
@ Technology
@ Work
@nnouncements

All categories
Archives
October 2007
September 2007
Recent…
Older… Ken’s Digital Canvas
Random Image

Pine cone

Name

Homepage/Email

Comment

Sponsors

My Friends and sites!
Leian
Dashken’s I-Blog
Plasma’s Idiosyncrasies
Ed’s Blog
Ken’s Digital Canvas
Placid Thoughs
Earn Microstock
Tech ARP
Garvin Hicking
The Lost Outpost
Statistic

Search this blog:
» Blogs that link here
» View my profile

Blog Administration
Open login screen
Powered by
Serendipity PHP Weblog
KB932596 and Vista 64 TCPIP.sys connection limit patch
Here’s the problem! If you’ve patched your Vista with the connection limit patch, beware! Either do not install this KB932596 update or unpatch it and then install the update. However, also beware that the patch won’t work even if you re-patch it after installing this new update. The signature of the tcpip.sys file has changed with this new update [Update: I've made a wrong assumption and has posted the right information for the KB932596 update here. Sorry for the wrong information here]. Therefore, you’d need to wait till a newer version of the patch is released.

For those of you who are as unfortunate as I was without connection for a while (till I figured out how to undo the damage), here’s how you can get the original tcpip.sys file back working.

One way, as I found out to work, is to simply just disable the driver signature detection system during booting up of Vista. You can do this by invoking the boot menu by pressing the F8 key just before Vista loads (the same method to get into safe more) and choose the option do just that. But of course, I have no idea what else was changed in the latest version of tcpip.sys that’s been updated with KB932596, so this may not be the best solution.

The other would be to uninstall KB932596 and restore the original tcpip.sys file. You can do this by going to the Uninstall Programs option in the Control Panel and uninstall the KB9325996 update. Once you’ve done that, restart Vista. Next, run this command “sfc /scanfile=c:\windows\system32\drivers\tcpip.sys” to get Vista to scan for the ‘corrupted file’ and restore it with the original file. Restart Vista again. The finally, reinstall the update via Windows Update.

So with this, I’m giving up Vista as the main machine to run torrents. It’s just too much trouble to keep using new versions of the tcpip.sys patch everytime Microsoft decides to update the tcpip.sys driver.

Posted by Ken Ng on Thursday, August 16. 2007 at 20:17 in @ Technology

Karma for this article: ++ | + | 0 | - | –
Current karma: 5, 15 vote(s) 25 hits
Defined tags for this entry: kb932596, microsoft, patch, tcpip.sys
Related entries by tags:
Why I Love Microsoft Hardware’s Warranty Policy
Reviving IIS 6.0 on Windows 2003 from error 2149648394
More on Live Writer and Serendipity
Testing a post from Windows Live Writer
Vista 64 rearing it’s ugly head

http://atpeaz.placidthoughts.com/

190 Jan 04, 2008 at 07:15 by steph_26

i dounloaded it now what do i do next ?

191 Jan 09, 2008 at 20:13 by nubie

doesn’t work for me…don’t know why but i just downloaded the patch and extracted the file opened the program followed the instructions there…

192 Jan 11, 2008 at 19:16 by Toejam31

I did a lot of reading about this patch, and after weighing the pros and cons, decided to back up and give it a try. First off, the latest edition of NOD32 did NOT detect the patch as a virus. Second, it worked flawlessly, and I changed the connections to 100 with no difficulty. Third, after rebooting, I was able to up the connections in Azureus to 100 (instead of 8!) and this significantly raised my download speed. Finally, I changed the max number of connections within Firefox to 100 with the Fasterfox add-on, and watched webpages load much, much faster, which made my newly upgraded broadband connection complete (and worth the money.) Note: My version of the TCPIP.SYS file is (5.1.2600.2892), and the patch had no problems with this. Last, but not least, the error messages in the Event Viewer log disappeared. In conclusion: problems - none. Is the patch worth installing - yes.

193 Jan 12, 2008 at 16:42 by Anonymous

I received the following batch output when attempting to apply this patch…doesn’t sound good.

Intelligent TCPIP.SYS patcher / EventID 4226 patch Version 2.23d
(c) 2004-05 LvlLord (www.LvlLord.de) use parameter /? for more options

This program is in development. Visit http://www.LvlLord.de for a new version
——————————————————————————-

- Windows mode
- Recognised Windows-directory: C:\WINDOWS

- ‘Windows XP SP2 or newer’ TCPIP.SYS detected …

- Build of TCPIP.SYS : 5.1.2600.3244 (I386)
- Build of safety copy: 5.1.2600.2892 (I386)
(will be overwritten due to changed version)

Found limit position : 0×4F6A2
Current maximum concurrent half-open connections: 10

If you continue, please press ‘Abort’ and ‘Yes’ on the popup from Windows
File Protection. Because we change system files, Windows tries to restore the
original one. So it’s normal.

Do you really want to change the limit to 50?
(Y=Yes / N=No / C=Change limit) Y

Creating work-copy … done …
New limit set. Now calculating checksum …
Checksum is: 0×625DE
Patch complete …
Preparing to install file …

The following files can be used by Windows to replace a changed TCPIP.SYS:
- c:\windows\ServicePackFiles\I386\TCPIP.SYS

May these files be renamed until end of patching?
No will abort the patcher. (Y=Yes / N=No)
Installing new file …
System TCPIP.SYS got changed …
Waiting 15 seconds to recheck the file again …
15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, 0

Now active TCPIP.SYS:
Build of file : 5.1.2600.2180 (I386)
Limit of file : -1577058381

Windows reinstalled an other TCPIP.SYS version, than it was before.
You’re PC is in an undefined state.
Please do the following things, to revert all changes:
- Restart your Computer IN SAFE MODE!!!
- Start the console with Start/Run/CMD
- Enter the following commands one after the other
cd /d C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM32\DRIVERS
del tcpip.sys
copy tcpip.sys.original tcpip.sys
- After that you can restart your computer as normal.

To find out why this happend, please post a message in the forum on:
http://www.LvlLord.de

Patch aborted …
Press any key to exit …

Any ideas what to do now to get this patch working?

194 Jan 12, 2008 at 19:08 by me

[quote comment="117029"]Hi
I downloaded and unzipped this patch but but when I try to run the .exe nothing happens. Does anybody have this problem? thanks[/quote]
where the fuck do u put this crack there isnt anywhere i know off

195 Jan 13, 2008 at 12:24 by Toejam31

Sounds to me like you may have two problems. First off, the patch may not support modifying the 5.1.2600.3244 build. The last update I see on the http://www.lvllord.de/ website describes how the patch will still function with the (what is now an older) 5.1.2600.2892 build, but that update/comment was as of 2006-06-16. Second, it’s fairly obvious that Windows File Protection is replacing the TCPIP.SYS file with another copy from elsewhere on the hard drive. I ran into a similar situation when I wanted to install Starskin (a desktop theme manager) and had to patch the uxtheme.dll file. The only workaround was to search for all versions of this file and rename them … only then could I add the patched file, as illustrated on this page: http://themes.belchfire.net/index.php?showtopic=9001&pid=11859&mode=threaded&start=. I suspect that you’ll have to do something very similar in order to keep the OS from interfering with the patching process.

196 Jan 15, 2008 at 20:00 by Anonymous

mmmmm you know theres a worm in this file when you instal or what ever but youll be fine if you have a virus protector that can find it right of the bat but in all ends it works good

197 Jan 20, 2008 at 12:13 by Ivo

Try this to increase the limit:
http://research.eeye.com/html/tools/RT20060808-1.html

Supported TCPIP.SYS Versions

Windows XP [32-bit]
SP2 5.1.2600.2180 (xpsp_sp2_rtm.040803-2158)
SP2 with MS05-019 GDR 5.1.2600.2685 (xpsp_sp2_gdr.050525-1028)
SP2 with MS05-019 QFE 5.1.2600.2685 (xpsp.050525-1029)
SP2 with MS06-007 GDR 5.1.2600.2827 (xpsp_sp2_gdr.060112-1653)
SP2 with MS06-007 QFE 5.1.2600.2827 (xpsp.060112-2213)
SP2 with MS06-032 GDR 5.1.2600.2892 (xpsp_sp2_gdr.060420-0254)
SP2 with MS06-032 QFE 5.1.2600.2892 (xpsp.060420-0256)
SP2 with MS08-001 GDR 5.1.2600.3244 (xpsp_sp2_gdr.071030-1259)
SP2 with MS08-001 QFE 5.1.2600.3244 (xpsp_sp2_qfe.071030-1255)

Windows Server 2003 [32-bit]
SP1 5.2.3790.1830 (srv03_sp1_rtm.050324-1447)
SP1 with MS06-007 GDR 5.2.3790.2617 (srv03_sp1_gdr.060112-1537)
SP1 with MS06-007 QFE 5.2.3790.2617 (srv03_sp1_qfe.060112-1555)
SP1 with MS05-032 GDR 5.2.3790.2709 (srv03_sp1_gdr.060523-1514)
SP1 with MS05-032 QFE 5.2.3790.2709 (srv03_sp1_qfe.060523-1529)
SP1 with MS08-001 GDR 5.2.3790.3036 (srv03_sp1_gdr.071030-1207)
SP1 with MS08-001 QFE 5.2.3790.3036 (srv03_sp1_qfe.071030-1207)
SP2 5.2.3790.3959 (srv03_sp2_rtm.070216-1710)
SP2 with MS08-001 GDR 5.2.3790.4179 (srv03_sp2_gdr.071030-1207)
SP2 with MS08-001 QFE 5.2.3790.4179 (srv03_sp2_qfe.071030-1207)

198 Jan 21, 2008 at 17:46 by TLM

This doesn’t work!!! Don’t waste your time. I was getting 150KB/s and now I am getting around 50KB/s.

199 Jan 29, 2008 at 15:35 by Anonymous

“This doesn’t work!!! Don’t waste your time. I was getting 150KB/s and now I am getting around 50KB/s.”

Is that true??? I want to know!!!

200 Jan 31, 2008 at 21:40 by THIS IS NOT A FAKE

Is strange for me…

At the begining i was scared coz the stability of the system, then i tought it was a virus, but my NOD32 didnt detected like it.

Then i saw that i was downloading at 230 Kb/sec, when i had a 2MB internet speed.

So my internet conection is 110% efective.

Thanks

Pages: « 13 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 12 13 » Show All

Responses are closed

All remaining responses will continue to be archived. Use the TorrentFreak forums if you want to discuss something.