“The reports assist the company in identifying the illegal download of some of its blockbuster films and television shows. ”

More porn. Must be “vivid” HAHAHA.

and will **NOT** generate enough revenue to cover the lawsuits some of the alleged pirates wit wild hairs up their asses will bring, with the likes of the eff and chilling effects coalition right by their side.

and this assumes (as you do so blindly) the program and the business behind it has done eeverything by the book…nexicon has not been an honest broker and has already comitted public sins that will ultimately impeach its credibility in any court of law. furthermore, i repeat, nexicon is run by lazy ass penny stock swindling dopes so if anything can be f’d up by the company, it will, despite how grand the idea is or the prototype is. have you actually seen the technology work over time at the scope and scale of management’s claims…or are you just another dupe who give them your $$$$$$$ and take their word for it….just like other fools have for almost a decade, with less than zero to show for it. is track record a consideration in your investments?

the overall point here is that cases like ms thomas cost money, which nexicon does not have and i dont the porno guys will be able to stomach. the riaa has deep pockets and so does the eff, nexicon and their smut peddling friends on the other hand, do not. moreover, what makes you believe nexicon capabilities are on par with mediasentry (riaa’s vendor) a subsidiary of a very well capitalized company?? sorry dude they just are not, it really more of a business issue than technical, management is just plain impotent, which led to its demise out of the mainstream rights holder market.

furthermore, nexicon has already played a dirty hand with getamnesty that they continue to…just look at the website for pete’s sake and their is plenty of dirt under the covers that they will be shown to be a farce in any courtroom if it ever comes to that.

wtf are you talking about? tanya anderson fought the riaa with help of the eff, and the case was dismissed, there wer no fines

on the contrary, she has filed suit to be compensated for her legal fees and damages due to the abuse of process. furthermore, she was granted class action status for her suit. this kind of fight will be coming nexicons sooner than later and when they go to court they will be obliterated for their sins of past an d present.

i’ll bet that nexicon wants these fellas beind them:

http://www.queerty.com/porn/titan-cracking-down-on-porn-thieves-20071003/

dont you know if you stick around sooner those nexicon guys, youll end up witha sie 7 poopshoot?

http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20070604-riaa-throws-in-the-towel-in-atlantic-v-andersen.html

just for moment, stop being nexidronian, and be your own man.

now think about the resources the riaa is losing this battle with. where is this pissant penny stock company going to get the its own resources to with the same tactics?

what makes you think that nexicon is even up to the task technically and businesswise to have the capability to sustain a real effort that would make than a few thousand bucks, while the riaa playing an already mediocre hand?

nexicon is nothing but a bluff? and it is ignorant dopes that don’t call them on it…that allows there meger existance to keep going..

dude call their bluff sometime and watch their house of cards implode.

if you don’t plenty of fileshareres will do what ms. andersen did and watch what happens.

perhaps you have drawn upon personal experience in your first point, but your second is, i have to admit, valid. but then again it falls ginourmously short of any direct factual support for nexicon, and the joke that is getamnesty. also it does nothing to dilute the poison that this market strategy will do to kill off any mainstream rightsholder opportunity. just search ‘porn’ though this sight to see how the vanguards of porn copyright are fighting piracy.

afraid to come out and play today???

sorry for calling you a “delusional shill”

i meant delusional PIMP!

getamnesty will amount to nothing…that’s zero, zip, nada. nexicon has always been short on delivery, the people who run it are no better than worthless, with zero credibility; and ga is a last desperate gasp at keeping the lights on. if the rumors are true about the nature of its “early adopters”/”customers”, the mpaa members wont touch it with a 10′ pole. and furthermore nexicon’s sins will furthermore alientae from any mainstream customer base.

come on, have you actually talked to the these close watchers?

what about the competitive offerings from the more established vendors in the space like mediasentry and baytsp?

logistep is trying to do the same thing europe?

why would rightholders trust the nexicon lackey’s over them?

you are nothing more than a delusional shill.

the mpaa rarely discusses its relationships with its ap vendors publicly, which has served nexicon very nicely i assume…and probably has not felt to compelled to comment on its parting ways with nexicon since they did not produce one lick of public acknowledgement when the relationship began. they did promote nexicon as the next best thing in our “community”, but as i mentioned before, the long term results never materialized and never cease to disappoint….and none of their people were ever very well liked either.

as far as material effect on stock, and i know very little about such things, but what duty does the mpaa have about proactively informing the public about the current nature of their relationship with nexicon? I would think that is the responsibility of nexicon’s management. I would also guess, if what you say is true, given their other hamhanded egregious sins…there will be some more ‘spainin to do, perhaps to the sec this time.

you said

“They [mpaa] would never do that. If they still do businesss with Nexicon.”

you can call the mpaa & ask the last time they cut a check…there is a very nice set of instructions on post #22.

or why dont you talk to your friends at nexicon to clarify there position since it would be so “material” to your current opinion.

siia…left a voice mail with my man there, but i am familiar enough to stand by my claim.

there is one rumor, and it’s only that right now, i picked up from irc. it’s about the nature of “motion picture studios” nexicon signed for getamnesty. they are of the kind that has not releasd many theatrical features since the vhs spurred home emtertainment boom of the 80′s. if it’s true…i am pretty sure mainstream copyrightholders will find getamnesty just a little to sticky – if you know what i mean – to deal with.

all of this matters none, because you refuse to see nexion’s real fatal sins.

what you blinded yourself to are the isp safe harbor provisions of the act that have to do with the good faith nature of c&ds and the language they must contain; and furthermore, how isps are pretty much free to practice their own interpretation. i just don’t see many passing on nexicon’s getamnesty “bills” to their customers; and there is plenty of wiggle room for them to give nexicon the finger and forget they ever existed.

now they could attempt to subpoena customer records as the riaa has, but then again nexicon’s resources are pretty much the polar oppopsite of the trade association of 4 mutibillion dollar companies.

regardless, as i mentioned before, nexicon has already committed unforgiveable sins, that will render their credibilty as utterly impotent in any court.

lastly, are mpaa & siia still paying customers?? really?? i’ve heard that both organizatron discretely severed all ties to company. nexicon was a shooting star in this business, that i was disappointed more than a few times at their repeated shortfall on promises. most mainstream rights holders now see nexicon as nothing more than smoke and mirrors.

“i suggest you familiarize yourself with the DMCA and the mechanics of “good faith” C&Ds…BEFORE YOU CONTINUE TALKING OUT YOUR ASS”

don’t you forget your life raft now.

summons ehh?

and where is (are) nexicon (you) going to get the personal info to serve such to the ‘pirates’ from?

i suggest you familiarize yourself with the DMCA and the mechanics of “good faith” C&Ds. If the intent is profit not enforcement vis a vis the C&D process…nexicon is going to have some ‘splainin to do if they ever get to court. but i doubt it will even get that far since most isps will bit bucket the notices for their lack of good faith.

a predictable retort from you might be that nexicon’s lawyers have already green lighted the scheme. just wait till the eff comes slap them down in the defense of an alleged pirate. does nexicon, a cigarette sellin’ shit penny stock company with worthless management, really have the resources to follow though on a protracted legal battle. take a look at the fundamental financials…oh that’s right they have not filed them for any part 2006 or 2007 a sure sign of strength??? when becomes rapidly clear, as if it is not obvious already, that nexicon is a paper tiger shakedown outfit, their (your) threats and will be as meaningless as fart in the wind; and futhermore of zero value to customers and foolhearty shareholders alike.

my words may not be enough to destroy or even soften your miguided resolve; but know this nexicon has already stepped over the line in so many ways with getamnesty.com that their credibility in any legal claim will be undoubltedly impeached…and there aint any goin’ back.

this is the last desperate voyage of the ship of fools that is nexicon, i highly recomend you jump off now.

Fox?
Sony?
Universal?
Disney?
Paramount?
Lionsgate?
WB?

go ahead send me cease and desists or is it a “bill” …i’ll send you my laywers. what nexicon is doing is illeagal here in the EU. check logistep. i don’t think it is going to work with DMCA in USA either.

your buisness model is broke..go sells you pos penny stock somehwere else. lol.

Them–This isnt extortion
Me—”So your saying that if i call you up and tell you that I have pictures of you cheating on your wife with a las vegas hooker and I ask for money, thats not extortion either?”

Victory is mine! lo

Thanks for:

1) removing the embarassing (blush) duplicates.

2) going the extra mile to verify your soucres.

Indeed, such acts demonstrate you are a man of integrity.

All the best!

MNG

Every comment with more than 2 links is kept in moderation to prevent people from spamming, don’t take it personal. I hope you don’t mind that I removed the duplicate comments.

It can take a few hours before I check the moderated comments because TF is not my full-time job. In real life I’m actually scientist, you remind me of those nasty reviewers of high impact journals I have to deal with every now and then. ;)

“A ‘suggestion’ is neither a contract nor an endorsement.”

I never said there was a contract, but I agree that the title is a bit misleading in this regard. I’ve updated (after I called the MPAA) the post and added that they officially deny having anything to do with this.

I e-mailed Nexicon and GetAmnesty to days ago, but haven’t heard back from them.

yours faithfully, Ernesto

Let me take the high road since Torrentfreak has “moderated” my last two post attempts for its obvious contempt and sarcasm…but not because it was untrue. (Do your readers know you actually conduct acts of censorship of the ilk you so decry from just about every organization that vigorously pursue their copyrights.) Since such tone is frowned upon and for so feared it is not allowed to see the light of day, I shall keep it neutral/postive.

First, let me applaud PeacePoorPirate’s courage for calling the MPAA. Frankly, Ernesto, I am at a loss as to why you will not follow suit. I believe you consider yourself to be credible journalist bringing to light the ‘chilling effects’ of the dubious actions by powerful ‘rights-holder’organizations that use their financial might and political sway to ususrp individual rights. However, I just do not see that as license for you to purvey (IMHO) substandard effort as gospel.

Here is a great article about the similarities between methods in science and journalism: http://www.facsnet.org/tools/sci_tech/methods.php3. It states that both have ‘Rules of Evidence’: “Journalism generally requires at least two, preferably three sources to produce a viable news story…The rules of science are more rigorous and require, if not more sourcing, more testing of a theory to prove its validity.”

Furthermore, I assume you can draw upon your own anecdotal experience when reading a piece of investigative journalism, and recall a story that could translate to you article something like “The MPAA’s John Malcolm was reached for comment and claimed no current association with getamnesty.com or Nexicon” and “Nexicon did not return calls for comment” “However, sources (remember, rule of evidence require at least two)” say there is an association” My point here is that the parties in question are always contacted and given the chance to comment. Anything short of such an effort, will, at best, be regarded as unverified, hence not fully credible.

I only tell you this because I happen to know your facts are just plain wrong.

A ‘suggestion’ is neither a contract nor an endorsement. What makes your claim so specious (http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/specious) is that the RIAA does conduct a similar operation via https://www.p2plawsuits.com; which is pretty clear that the ‘evidence’ collected comes from the Internet Anti-piracy firm MediaSentry. Even BayTSP has a similar offering to rights holders (http://www.darkmirage.com/2007/08/28/baytsp-to-the-rescue/)

You give Nexicon WAY to much credit. Take a hard look at them and you’ll see why I say that.

Since I have chosen civility over ridicule, I urge you to choose journalism over tabloidism and do the right thing by following the ‘Rules of Evidence’ before you continue to perpetuate your claims.

Cordially,

MNG (Formerly DYH)

…[/quote]

I rather trust my source than the PR department at the MPAA. Funny by the way that he heard about getamnesty because the news about this site was only featured here so far.

I think you might have this one wrong amigo. I said wtf and just called the mpaa and the dude was pretty cool. I told him my name was “Ira Goldstein” but I really I wanted to say Haywood Jablomie LOL. He said he heard of getamnesty.com and Nexicon but there was “no association” and that was not there strategy anyway. He said there are a lot of companies that come up with all sorts of ideas they pitch to them and when turned down try to do PR stunts to bring them to do business. I asked if he thought this is what was going on with getamnesty.com, he said he does not speak for them Finally, I asked him about the website p2plawsuits.com and he said that was the riaa which is pretty obvious when you look at the site, and they dont have any plans for anything like it.

You may want to check your sources bro, or just call the mpaa yourself.

vaya con dios,

jorge rivera
somewhere in the southwest

I strongly urge you to do your homework before you spout off such specious speculation. Getamnesty.com is NOT in any way commissioned or sanctioned by the MPAA[/quote]

I’ve heard from an insider (trusted source) that the MPAA is behind this. Besides that, the press release says: “Nexicon developed the GetAmnesty(TM) Program at the suggestion of a major copyright owner trade association.”

I’ve done my homework!

So why don’t you quote the section of the article that shows express support from the MPAA…

Did you even try call the MPAA? or Nexicon?

Or are you afraid to get the factss from the horses mouth??

Or are you going to force me into my 1st Grade taunt (Bok Bok…Bok Bok)

DYH

Somehow I can’t find the part of the artcle that claims otherwise.

I strongly urge you to do your homework before you spout off such specious speculation. Getamnesty.com is NOT in any way commissioned or sanctioned by the MPAA, their members or affiliates. First course of business of any credible journalistic effort is investigation. Did anyone call the MPAA at their opulently appointed office in Encino?…its so easy with theses 10 steps:

1) Dial +1 (818) 995-6600
2) Ring Ring…Ring Ring
3) The Receptionist will answer: “Motion Picture Association”
4) You say: “Can I talk to somebody in charge of anti-piracy for the Internet?
5) The Receptionist will reply: “Just a moment while I connect you”
6) Ring Ring…Ring Ring
7) The Evil Intractable Nightmare Inducing Bogeyman will answer: “MPAA Internet anti-piracy…how can we ruin your life?’ (Not really, you’ll actually get a real human being that will likely say: “This is [First Name]“)
8) You say: Is get amnesty.com in any way commissioned or sanctioned by the MPAA?
9) MPAA Dude tells you: “No”, “Never heard of it” or something succinctly disclaiming any association.
10) But not taking “No” for an answer, you retort: “But what about Nexicon’s claims…”

and PLASE report your answer right back here.

Of course you could read the original press release: http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/070814/latu056.html?.v=101 and see that there no specific endorsement. Press releases are marketing folks, not gospel. When they claim that “Nexicon developed the GetAmnesty(TM) Program at the suggestion of a major copyright owner trade association”…that translates to they ain’t got s#!t.

Then this MUST be a ‘phishing’ scam!

STEEEEERIKE 2!!!!!

Oh what’s that at the end of the press release? Could it be? Oh yes, it is a ‘forward-looking statement’ disclaimer required by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Nexicon is public company, but that is what the stock symbol tells you at the beginning of the press release. Hmm ‘Pink Sheets’…Alas, an investment worthy of the trust of widows and orphans (Call your broker for his/her sage advise). Nevertheless, these guys would be looking at spending a few years in the Crowbar Hilton, by willfully committing such fraud in the course of their fiduciary responsibilities. Hell. just call investor relations, The contact is at the bottom.

My point is don’t believe everything you read unless, and react like a horse-toothed jackass, until you do your homework.

Anyone who posts beyond this without having the BALLS to call the MPAA, is a absolute coward and your arguments, more like epithets, shall have the credibility of Mein Kampf.

Cordially,

DYH