Comments on: Google Asked to Remove 100 Million Pirate Search Results in 2014

By: Golu

Golu — Sat, 31 May 2014 20:09:00 +0000

It’s always been a issues and will be.. maybe duckduckgo will give help to some extend.

By: Apenas em 2014, Google recebeu mais de 100 milhões de pedidos de remoção de conteúdo pirata | Livre Navegar

Fri, 30 May 2014 11:08:37 +0000

[…] [com informações de TorrentFreak] […]

By: Adam Johnes

Adam Johnes — Sat, 10 May 2014 23:57:00 +0000

Awesome read all this stuff keeps the world wide web from becoming too predictable…

By: Google recibió más de 100 millones de solicitudes de eliminación de contenido “pirata” en 2014 - La Jornada Web

Thu, 08 May 2014 14:31:15 +0000

[…] La controvertida medida recibe críticas repartidas. Por un lado, algunos dueños de páginas web han manifestado que sus sitios fueron eliminados del buscador sin infringir ninguna ley de derechos de autor, según publica el sitio especializado Torrent Freak. […]

By: Google derribó a más de 100 millones de links de contenido pirata - RedUSERS

Google derribó a más de 100 millones de links de contenido pirata - RedUSERS — Wed, 07 May 2014 14:37:30 +0000

[…] Fuente: Torrentfreak, ADSLZone […]

By: MightyMolecule

MightyMolecule — Wed, 07 May 2014 13:45:00 +0000

For the RIAA the staggering amount of takedown requests only confirms
the notion that the process isn’t very effective. Brad Buckles, RIAA
executive vice president of anti-piracy, previously suggested that
Google should start banning entire domains from its search results. “Every day produces more results and there is no end in sight. We are
using a bucket to deal with an ocean of illegal downloading,” Buckles
said. “Isn’t it simply logical and fair at some point to conclude that such
links are infringing without requiring content owners to keep expending
time and resources to have the link taken down?”

just look at the allusion logic being used here. it’s obvious the censorship system works and is effective in that the amount of processed censorship demands and their satiation are ever increasing….for google. what isn’t effective, is the process of censorship of…the internet. pounding one operator of an algorithm isn’t going to ever singularly transform the entirety of the tubes into one giant licensed venue of official shopping.

basically this conclusion is met with a sly call to mass censorship of the remaining meta-indexing to segue into simple dns/domain redirects on preemptive profiling (by whatever zany metric the mpaa/riaa cares to never divulge) to stifle all warez. hail hydra.

By: thisguyl33t

thisguyl33t — Wed, 07 May 2014 07:50:00 +0000

As pirates we sure have messed up search engines because of our greed for free stuff.

And I’m sure the majority of users here agree with me.

By: Google har modtaget 100 millioner anmeldelser af pirat-links i 2014 | Computer Viden information

Tue, 06 May 2014 23:50:59 +0000

[…] fremgår af den opdaterede udgave af Googles gennemsigtighedsrapport, som Torrentfreak har […]

By: zbeast

zbeast — Tue, 06 May 2014 22:49:00 +0000

Many of the links that google is remove are fake files… put up by spammers, malware company’s and most believe it or not are from anti-trading company’s who post amazing numbers of links to null files.

By: anonymous

anonymous — Tue, 06 May 2014 21:45:00 +0000

the ridiculous thing is, there isn’t one law maker, one politician or government asking the most sensible and urgent of questions. that is, if there has been 100 million take down requests, it must surely mean that there were at least 100 million websites that were offering customers what they wanted and, obviously, not a single entertainment industries website was doing that! the obvious course of action, to any sensible government would be to insist that those industries very quickly helped themselves by giving customers what they wanted instead of them relying on ‘alternative’ sites to fill the hole! instead, the industries are purposefully NOT doing what they should, what the customers want because they want to carry on using it as an excuse to bait people and be able to sue them. i still reckon that this could easily be classed as entrapment!
the time to go down the road of suing people is after all else has failed, and i mean seriously tried, not just put up a single website with delayed releases, full of DRM, of piss poor quality and extortionate prices. they have to be at least as good as the ‘alternatives’. after all if these so-called illegal sites can put out top quality media, with the limited resources, the industries themselves should be able to put out content that was of outstanding quality. it’s their game, after all!!