<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Gets Involved in BitTorrent Search Engine Lawsuit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://torrentfreak.com/google-gets-involved-in-bittorrent-search-engine-lawsuit-110220/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://torrentfreak.com/google-gets-involved-in-bittorrent-search-engine-lawsuit-110220/</link>
	<description>Breaking File-sharing, Copyright and Privacy News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2014 12:39:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Volgens IsoHunt is Google de grootste torrent zoekmachine &#171; Nieuws &#171; iShaper</title>
		<link>/google-gets-involved-in-bittorrent-search-engine-lawsuit-110220/#comment-775949</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Volgens IsoHunt is Google de grootste torrent zoekmachine &#171; Nieuws &#171; iShaper]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 17:48:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=31877#comment-775949</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] maand werd zoekgigant Google voor het eerst betrokken in een BitTorrent case. Google toonde interesse in de zaak tussen isoHunt en de MPAA omdat het [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] maand werd zoekgigant Google voor het eerst betrokken in een BitTorrent case. Google toonde interesse in de zaak tussen isoHunt en de MPAA omdat het [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google’s the Largest Torrent Search Engine, isoHunt Tells Court &#124; Portable Bosna</title>
		<link>/google-gets-involved-in-bittorrent-search-engine-lawsuit-110220/#comment-775948</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Google’s the Largest Torrent Search Engine, isoHunt Tells Court &#124; Portable Bosna]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 17:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=31877#comment-775948</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] giant Google got involved in a BitTorrent case for the first time in its history. The company took interest in the ongoing court case between isoHunt and the MPAA, fearing that the standing injunction has [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] giant Google got involved in a BitTorrent case for the first time in its history. The company took interest in the ongoing court case between isoHunt and the MPAA, fearing that the standing injunction has [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: P2PTalk &#187; Google’s the Largest Torrent Search Engine, isoHunt Tells Court</title>
		<link>/google-gets-involved-in-bittorrent-search-engine-lawsuit-110220/#comment-775753</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[P2PTalk &#187; Google’s the Largest Torrent Search Engine, isoHunt Tells Court]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 03:40:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=31877#comment-775753</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] giant Google got involved in a BitTorrent case for the first time in its history. The company took interest in the ongoing court case between isoHunt and the MPAA, fearing that the standing injunction has [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] giant Google got involved in a BitTorrent case for the first time in its history. The company took interest in the ongoing court case between isoHunt and the MPAA, fearing that the standing injunction has [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google’s the Largest Torrent Search Engine, isoHunt Tells Court &#124; We R Pirates</title>
		<link>/google-gets-involved-in-bittorrent-search-engine-lawsuit-110220/#comment-775704</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Google’s the Largest Torrent Search Engine, isoHunt Tells Court &#124; We R Pirates]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 00:20:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=31877#comment-775704</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] giant Google got involved in a BitTorrent case for the first time in its history. The company took interest in the ongoing court case between isoHunt and the MPAA, fearing that the standing injunction has [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] giant Google got involved in a BitTorrent case for the first time in its history. The company took interest in the ongoing court case between isoHunt and the MPAA, fearing that the standing injunction has [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>/google-gets-involved-in-bittorrent-search-engine-lawsuit-110220/#comment-775677</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2011 23:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=31877#comment-775677</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] giant Google got involved in a BitTorrent case for the first time in its history. The company took interest in the ongoing court case between isoHunt and the MPAA, fearing that the standing injunction has [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] giant Google got involved in a BitTorrent case for the first time in its history. The company took interest in the ongoing court case between isoHunt and the MPAA, fearing that the standing injunction has [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google&#8217;s the Largest Torrent Search Engine, isoHunt Tells Court &#124; TorrentFreak</title>
		<link>/google-gets-involved-in-bittorrent-search-engine-lawsuit-110220/#comment-775673</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Google&#8217;s the Largest Torrent Search Engine, isoHunt Tells Court &#124; TorrentFreak]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2011 22:38:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=31877#comment-775673</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] giant Google got involved in a BitTorrent case for the first time in its history. The company took interest in the ongoing court case between isoHunt and the MPAA, fearing that the standing injunction has [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] giant Google got involved in a BitTorrent case for the first time in its history. The company took interest in the ongoing court case between isoHunt and the MPAA, fearing that the standing injunction has [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danyol Mengur</title>
		<link>/google-gets-involved-in-bittorrent-search-engine-lawsuit-110220/#comment-773010</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Danyol Mengur]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 20:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=31877#comment-773010</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I disagree, because a lot of users use it to preview a movie to see if it is worth buying, if i see a movie at a friends and it looks good I&#039;d buy it, same goes if i saw it from someone who downloaded a torrent or whatever of it, if i liked it enough I&#039;d buy it, otherwise it wouldn&#039;t be worth taking up hard drive space in the first place, and if the person liked the movie, as far as I&#039;m concerned, if they go out and buy it, I feel the original Downloaded copy should be completely legal for them to have (as long as they don&#039;t give everyone and their dog a copy, honestly, do some research about how an Anime piracy study showed that it actually improved and boosted sales as the people watched them and liked them and hence, went out and bought them to add to their collection, and I&#039;m guessing you are an MPAA/RIAA Spokes-Idiot, and maybe a total moron (no offense)!!! and as far as all this goes it is all just about the RIAA&#039;s and MPAA&#039;s Power hungry and greedy attitude, the revolution of Downloading Music overtime led to the music artists being able to break free of the strangle hold record company&#039;s/ Record Labels, who&#039;s GREEDY A$$ES take all but maybe 1% of the earnings the artist&#039;s talent generates.PERIOD!!! and personally I feel that the MPAA needs to actually use the statistics of what movies sell more knowing their is piracy going on (has been for who knows how long, i remember people double taping with Audio and Video Cassettes) and they never made a big deal then, and the people who really liked the movie would go out and buy it because the double taping caused quality loss and so does re-encoding and shrinking a digital movie, so when these so called &quot;pirates&quot; find a movie they like with these &quot;evil pirate sites&quot; and go and buy them, because they saw it first and it was good and therefore didn&#039;t buy some other movie that turns out to be crap (because they never saw it first) and can&#039;t take it back because of store policies, then the good movie they could have previewed and purchased gets a lower sales rating (because they never saw it), and instead bought a different movie that it turns out they HATE (because they never saw it first) and it gets a better sales rating than the good movie (and it is actually a really crappy movie) so Hollywood thinks Oh... People Liked this, so we should make a sequel or others similar to it, meanwhile the good movie gets lower sales and falters, never gets a sequel or anything made similar to it... and meanwhile everyone who bought the crappy movie is stuck with it because it looked really good (i.e. The Village - The Trailers Made it look really cool and like a horror or thriller, but instead it was a P.O.S. about people living in a little nature reserve illegally and the adults were just using  scare tactics to stop the youngsters from leaving the nature reserve) POINT MADE



also as far as isohunt is concerned
well, regardless they still bare the name &quot;ISOhunt&quot; meaning &quot;Disc Image Hunt&quot;, they could shut down isohunt rename the site webhunt, nethunter, thehunt, etc, and redirect to the newly designed, reformatted, recreated site. with a ten second notice stating that the owner has chosen to terminate isohunt.. and start a new site, that is not actually the old site and therefore nullify any court injunctions, stipulations, etc against the previous site &quot;isohunt&quot; and like someone else stated &quot; use Bot accesses and searches to increase the legitimate searchs for legal torrents such as abandonware and freeware and free programs cloud responses to typed in words and phrases, that is if they actually needed to do that...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree, because a lot of users use it to preview a movie to see if it is worth buying, if i see a movie at a friends and it looks good I&#8217;d buy it, same goes if i saw it from someone who downloaded a torrent or whatever of it, if i liked it enough I&#8217;d buy it, otherwise it wouldn&#8217;t be worth taking up hard drive space in the first place, and if the person liked the movie, as far as I&#8217;m concerned, if they go out and buy it, I feel the original Downloaded copy should be completely legal for them to have (as long as they don&#8217;t give everyone and their dog a copy, honestly, do some research about how an Anime piracy study showed that it actually improved and boosted sales as the people watched them and liked them and hence, went out and bought them to add to their collection, and I&#8217;m guessing you are an MPAA/RIAA Spokes-Idiot, and maybe a total moron (no offense)!!! and as far as all this goes it is all just about the RIAA&#8217;s and MPAA&#8217;s Power hungry and greedy attitude, the revolution of Downloading Music overtime led to the music artists being able to break free of the strangle hold record company&#8217;s/ Record Labels, who&#8217;s GREEDY A$$ES take all but maybe 1% of the earnings the artist&#8217;s talent generates.PERIOD!!! and personally I feel that the MPAA needs to actually use the statistics of what movies sell more knowing their is piracy going on (has been for who knows how long, i remember people double taping with Audio and Video Cassettes) and they never made a big deal then, and the people who really liked the movie would go out and buy it because the double taping caused quality loss and so does re-encoding and shrinking a digital movie, so when these so called &#8220;pirates&#8221; find a movie they like with these &#8220;evil pirate sites&#8221; and go and buy them, because they saw it first and it was good and therefore didn&#8217;t buy some other movie that turns out to be crap (because they never saw it first) and can&#8217;t take it back because of store policies, then the good movie they could have previewed and purchased gets a lower sales rating (because they never saw it), and instead bought a different movie that it turns out they HATE (because they never saw it first) and it gets a better sales rating than the good movie (and it is actually a really crappy movie) so Hollywood thinks Oh&#8230; People Liked this, so we should make a sequel or others similar to it, meanwhile the good movie gets lower sales and falters, never gets a sequel or anything made similar to it&#8230; and meanwhile everyone who bought the crappy movie is stuck with it because it looked really good (i.e. The Village &#8211; The Trailers Made it look really cool and like a horror or thriller, but instead it was a P.O.S. about people living in a little nature reserve illegally and the adults were just using  scare tactics to stop the youngsters from leaving the nature reserve) POINT MADE</p>
<p>also as far as isohunt is concerned<br />
well, regardless they still bare the name &#8220;ISOhunt&#8221; meaning &#8220;Disc Image Hunt&#8221;, they could shut down isohunt rename the site webhunt, nethunter, thehunt, etc, and redirect to the newly designed, reformatted, recreated site. with a ten second notice stating that the owner has chosen to terminate isohunt.. and start a new site, that is not actually the old site and therefore nullify any court injunctions, stipulations, etc against the previous site &#8220;isohunt&#8221; and like someone else stated &#8221; use Bot accesses and searches to increase the legitimate searchs for legal torrents such as abandonware and freeware and free programs cloud responses to typed in words and phrases, that is if they actually needed to do that&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danyol Mengur</title>
		<link>/google-gets-involved-in-bittorrent-search-engine-lawsuit-110220/#comment-773009</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Danyol Mengur]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 20:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=31877#comment-773009</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I disagree, because a lot of users use it to preview a movie to see if it is worth buying, if i see a movie at a friends and it looks good I&#039;d buy it, same goes if i saw it from someone who downloaded a torrent or whatever of it, if i liked it enough I&#039;d buy it, otherwise it wouldn&#039;t be worth taking up hard drive space in the first place, and if the person liked the movie, as far as I&#039;m concerned, if they go out and buy it, I feel the original Downloaded copy should be completely legal for them to have (as long as they don&#039;t give everyone and their dog a copy, honestly, do some research about how an Anime piracy study showed that it actually improved and boosted sales as the people watched them and liked them and hence, went out and bought them to add to their collection, and I&#039;m guessing you are an MPAA/RIAA Spokes-Idiot, and maybe a total moron (no offense)!!! and as far as all this goes it is all just about the RIAA&#039;s and MPAA&#039;s Power hungry and greedy attitude, the revolution of Downloading Music overtime led to the music artists being able to break free of the strangle hold record company&#039;s/ Record Labels, who&#039;s GREEDY A$$ES take all but maybe 1% of the earnings the artist&#039;s talent generates.PERIOD!!! and personally I feel that the MPAA needs to actually use the statistics of what movies sell more knowing their is piracy going on (has been for who knows how long, i remember people double taping with Audio and Video Cassettes) and they never made a big deal then, and the people who really liked the movie would go out and buy it because the double taping caused quality loss and so does re-encoding and shrinking a digital movie, so when these so called &quot;pirates&quot; find a movie they like with these &quot;evil pirate sites&quot; and go and buy them, because they saw it first and it was good and therefore didn&#039;t buy some other movie that turns out to be crap (because they never saw it first) and can&#039;t take it back because of store policies, then the good movie they could have previewed and purchased gets a lower sales rating (because they never saw it), and instead bought a different movie that it turns out they HATE (because they never saw it first) and it gets a better sales rating than the good movie (and it is actually a really crappy movie) so Hollywood thinks Oh... People Liked this, so we should make a sequel or others similar to it, meanwhile the good movie gets lower sales and falters, never gets a sequel or anything made similar to it... and meanwhile everyone who bought the crappy movie is stuck with it because it looked really good (i.e. The Village - The Trailers Made it look really cool and like a horror or thriller, but instead it was a P.O.S. about people living in a little nature reserve illegally and the adults were just using  scare tactics to stop the youngsters from leaving the nature reserve) POINT MADE



also as far as isohunt is concerned
well, regardless they still bare the name &quot;ISOhunt&quot; meaning &quot;Disc Image Hunt&quot;, they could shut down isohunt rename the site webhunt, nethunter, thehunt, etc, and redirect to the newly designed, reformatted, recreated site. with a ten second notice stating that the owner has chosen to terminate isohunt.. and start a new site, that is not actually the old site and therefore nullify any court injunctions, stipulations, etc against the previous site &quot;isohunt&quot; and like someone else stated &quot; use Bot accesses and searches to increase the legitimate searchs for legal torrents such as abandonware and freeware and free programs cloud responses to typed in words and phrases, that is if they actually needed to do that...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree, because a lot of users use it to preview a movie to see if it is worth buying, if i see a movie at a friends and it looks good I&#8217;d buy it, same goes if i saw it from someone who downloaded a torrent or whatever of it, if i liked it enough I&#8217;d buy it, otherwise it wouldn&#8217;t be worth taking up hard drive space in the first place, and if the person liked the movie, as far as I&#8217;m concerned, if they go out and buy it, I feel the original Downloaded copy should be completely legal for them to have (as long as they don&#8217;t give everyone and their dog a copy, honestly, do some research about how an Anime piracy study showed that it actually improved and boosted sales as the people watched them and liked them and hence, went out and bought them to add to their collection, and I&#8217;m guessing you are an MPAA/RIAA Spokes-Idiot, and maybe a total moron (no offense)!!! and as far as all this goes it is all just about the RIAA&#8217;s and MPAA&#8217;s Power hungry and greedy attitude, the revolution of Downloading Music overtime led to the music artists being able to break free of the strangle hold record company&#8217;s/ Record Labels, who&#8217;s GREEDY A$$ES take all but maybe 1% of the earnings the artist&#8217;s talent generates.PERIOD!!! and personally I feel that the MPAA needs to actually use the statistics of what movies sell more knowing their is piracy going on (has been for who knows how long, i remember people double taping with Audio and Video Cassettes) and they never made a big deal then, and the people who really liked the movie would go out and buy it because the double taping caused quality loss and so does re-encoding and shrinking a digital movie, so when these so called &#8220;pirates&#8221; find a movie they like with these &#8220;evil pirate sites&#8221; and go and buy them, because they saw it first and it was good and therefore didn&#8217;t buy some other movie that turns out to be crap (because they never saw it first) and can&#8217;t take it back because of store policies, then the good movie they could have previewed and purchased gets a lower sales rating (because they never saw it), and instead bought a different movie that it turns out they HATE (because they never saw it first) and it gets a better sales rating than the good movie (and it is actually a really crappy movie) so Hollywood thinks Oh&#8230; People Liked this, so we should make a sequel or others similar to it, meanwhile the good movie gets lower sales and falters, never gets a sequel or anything made similar to it&#8230; and meanwhile everyone who bought the crappy movie is stuck with it because it looked really good (i.e. The Village &#8211; The Trailers Made it look really cool and like a horror or thriller, but instead it was a P.O.S. about people living in a little nature reserve illegally and the adults were just using  scare tactics to stop the youngsters from leaving the nature reserve) POINT MADE</p>
<p>also as far as isohunt is concerned<br />
well, regardless they still bare the name &#8220;ISOhunt&#8221; meaning &#8220;Disc Image Hunt&#8221;, they could shut down isohunt rename the site webhunt, nethunter, thehunt, etc, and redirect to the newly designed, reformatted, recreated site. with a ten second notice stating that the owner has chosen to terminate isohunt.. and start a new site, that is not actually the old site and therefore nullify any court injunctions, stipulations, etc against the previous site &#8220;isohunt&#8221; and like someone else stated &#8221; use Bot accesses and searches to increase the legitimate searchs for legal torrents such as abandonware and freeware and free programs cloud responses to typed in words and phrases, that is if they actually needed to do that&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AtomicFrog</title>
		<link>/google-gets-involved-in-bittorrent-search-engine-lawsuit-110220/#comment-772581</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AtomicFrog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2011 19:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=31877#comment-772581</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Shame on this Gary Fung and isohunt, what is the difference between being a thief and helping a thief to steal? I hope that the law put an online piracy like Gary Fung behind bars and shut down ishunt forever.

The directly consequences of isohunt is to hurt the bottom line of movie studios and digital download content. 

I am SO surprise that this Gary Fung would even hire a lawyer to fight back; guess he must be making so much money that he won&#039;t give it up lightly. I mean if it is as simple as some 15 yr old trying to share the world and make a penny of out it, I can understand but report says that Gary Fung makes over 3M a yr by online piracy. He needs to be arrested and put behind bars for good]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shame on this Gary Fung and isohunt, what is the difference between being a thief and helping a thief to steal? I hope that the law put an online piracy like Gary Fung behind bars and shut down ishunt forever.</p>
<p>The directly consequences of isohunt is to hurt the bottom line of movie studios and digital download content. </p>
<p>I am SO surprise that this Gary Fung would even hire a lawyer to fight back; guess he must be making so much money that he won&#8217;t give it up lightly. I mean if it is as simple as some 15 yr old trying to share the world and make a penny of out it, I can understand but report says that Gary Fung makes over 3M a yr by online piracy. He needs to be arrested and put behind bars for good</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reedit</title>
		<link>/google-gets-involved-in-bittorrent-search-engine-lawsuit-110220/#comment-772125</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[reedit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2011 12:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=31877#comment-772125</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think we should create a tracker called tracker-google.com :D

http://www.getaseedbox.com/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think we should create a tracker called tracker-google.com :D</p>
<p><a href="http://www.getaseedbox.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.getaseedbox.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
