I believe he is once again redefining it as “Statements of fact I don’t want to agree with”.

What you can do (and should) is realize that elected politicians hold greater power over people than even the most power-hungry corporate CEO. And yet they are held to even less responsibility and accountability by their bosses than even the most sloppily run middle manager of a used tire company in Bumf*ck, Iowa.

If politicians can and should expect the boss – the general public – to hold them under close surveillance then the effects of lobbying will diminish.

Personally I have this idea – every online connection in offices and public building to be monitored with open access to anyone from the public at all times. Any paper signed by a politician in their official capacity – even if it’s just a dinner bill – should be public information.

That’s the way many companies manages it’s personnel and their work environments. It’s inexcusable that politicians escape that supervision.

At which point in time, he said, we should remember to help them.

The pirate party is just a name for a liberal movement. If that brand name becomes sullied, another party will rise to take it’s place. It’s the way of progress.

HTH
HAND
kthxbai

> Edited by author 2 hours ago)

I’ve noticed that you in an dishonest attempt at looking less ignorant have started to edit your comments quietly after gotten replies to them that point out the weak spots in your arguments.

> “Laws must be followed in a democracy, otherwise there will be an anarchy..”

As everyone who has studied history or civics and social studies in school knows, laws does in no way out of principle have to be followed to avoid anarchy. You’re completely denying thousands of years of history and reality with that ignorant claim. On the contrary it works very well to disobey laws, if the violation cause no actual harm to society, and that has been the case with thousands outdated and illegitimate laws through out history, as Anyone pointed out to you.

Violating the illegitimate and non-functioning parts of the copyright monopoly that regulates non-profit use certainly causes no anarchy whatsoever, something which you are fully aware of, so your entire claim is completely dishonest from beginning to end, and the only thing you manage to do is to continue to argue exactly as a non-thinking fascist or Judge Dredd. There’s no actual argument present in any of your claims, they still only consists of meaningless empty circular reasoning, and that is still a logical fallacy. Please read up on that topic.

> “..exactly what the pirates want.”

Another dishonest claim and out right lie from you. Pirates want reformation of the copyright monopoly, because the non-profit parts of it can not be proven necessary to society in any manner, and they never have been, nor can they be upheld without dismantling several civil liberties and human rights. Reformation of law is something that all political parties seek, and is in no way the same thing as anarchy.