No, if we accept the laws then copying can NEVER be called “stealing” in any way possible.

That, I believe, is why the word has been banned in courtrooms – because unethical copyright troll lawyers have tried to bamboozle the actual judge by using a legal term irreconcilable with any copyright infringement case.

“But: the main keywords in the document where “depriving” and “stealing for own profit”. Do we agree agree so far?”

No, we don’t. Copying is not and can never be “theft”.
Theft – depriving someone of their property – is theft, whether you were motivated by a profit motive or not.

Copyright infringement is – at worst – a civil offense.
Theft is a crime. The difference is as big as between murder and jaywalking.

The entire basis of the copyright cult trying to push the word “theft” is simply because they know full well no one will believe person A making a copy of file X is a bad thing.

Not even then. Delivering spoilers unwanted is an annoyance, not illegal or unlawful.

Whereas taking a screen capture and using it as basis for nonprofit art is as clearcut a case of “fair use” as you can come across.

Not that the copyright cult cares. To them, “fair use” is still simple blasphemy.