<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How Can Somebody Who Loves Culture Possibly Defend The Copyright Monopoly?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://torrentfreak.com/how-can-somebody-who-loves-culture-possibly-defend-the-copyright-monopoly-130929/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://torrentfreak.com/how-can-somebody-who-loves-culture-possibly-defend-the-copyright-monopoly-130929/</link>
	<description>Breaking File-sharing, Copyright and Privacy News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2014 14:08:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Menbiens</title>
		<link>/how-can-somebody-who-loves-culture-possibly-defend-the-copyright-monopoly-130929/#comment-1177425</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Menbiens]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jan 2014 23:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=77362#comment-1177425</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How we can http://menbienscommuns.com/2013/11/20/biens-communs-aimerlacultureettolererledroitdauteur/ :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How we can <a href="http://menbienscommuns.com/2013/11/20/biens-communs-aimerlacultureettolererledroitdauteur/" rel="nofollow">http://menbienscommuns.com/2013/11/20/biens-communs-aimerlacultureettolererledroitdauteur/</a> :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony G</title>
		<link>/how-can-somebody-who-loves-culture-possibly-defend-the-copyright-monopoly-130929/#comment-1177310</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tony G]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jan 2014 19:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=77362#comment-1177310</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“…less than 0.05% ever see any
royalties.” How many see *advances*? Ever wonder where advances come from? That would be sales.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“…less than 0.05% ever see any<br />
royalties.” How many see *advances*? Ever wonder where advances come from? That would be sales.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moronbuster</title>
		<link>/how-can-somebody-who-loves-culture-possibly-defend-the-copyright-monopoly-130929/#comment-1147981</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Moronbuster]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Oct 2013 16:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=77362#comment-1147981</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You hit the nail on the head.  This started way back with the chant, &quot;Data wants to be free&quot;.  Of course that is total insanity. &quot;Data&quot; is not sentient and thus, wants &amp; feels&quot; nothing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You hit the nail on the head.  This started way back with the chant, &#8220;Data wants to be free&#8221;.  Of course that is total insanity. &#8220;Data&#8221; is not sentient and thus, wants &amp; feels&#8221; nothing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moronbuster</title>
		<link>/how-can-somebody-who-loves-culture-possibly-defend-the-copyright-monopoly-130929/#comment-1147961</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Moronbuster]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Oct 2013 15:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=77362#comment-1147961</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Monopoly&quot; only applies to a class of product.  Hence, this ENTIRE premise is insane.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Monopoly&#8221; only applies to a class of product.  Hence, this ENTIRE premise is insane.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: clementinesalmassi321</title>
		<link>/how-can-somebody-who-loves-culture-possibly-defend-the-copyright-monopoly-130929/#comment-1147590</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[clementinesalmassi321]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Oct 2013 17:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=77362#comment-1147590</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My Uncle Brayden got a nearly
new silver Ford Escape by parttime working online at home. blog here
J­a­m­2­0­.­ℂ­o­m]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My Uncle Brayden got a nearly<br />
new silver Ford Escape by parttime working online at home. blog here<br />
J­a­m­2­0­.­ℂ­o­m</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JC</title>
		<link>/how-can-somebody-who-loves-culture-possibly-defend-the-copyright-monopoly-130929/#comment-1147411</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JC]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Oct 2013 05:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=77362#comment-1147411</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Invoking religion by the second paragraph *yawn.* Initially I agreed 
with Rick, but the more he continues to do nothing but whine about the 
&quot;Copyright Monopoly&quot; the more I see why people don&#039;t take the pirate 
party seriously.  Plagarism laws are also written under the banner of 
copyright &quot;monopoly&quot;, and those offer legal recourse against people 
taking your work and strapping their name over it to divert your 
accreditation.  Most of these complaints about the &quot;monopoly&quot; are 
*specific* to the MPAA and RIAA agencies and not the concept of 
copyright itself, so arguing &quot;you can&#039;t defend copyright if you love 
culture&quot; is EXACTLY &quot;Westboro-style dogma.&quot;
Is it a shame that artists get screwed over? Yes, and that&#039;s because of legal tarpits.  PLENTY OF PEOPLE ARE SCREWED OVER BY LEGAL TARPITS because laws are built to be innavigable, this is not a &quot;copyright monopoly&quot; problem.

Is it a shame that there aren&#039;t competing media agencies who innovate and render the MPAA/RIAA obsolete? Yes, and that&#039;s because of *patent* law of which these agencies hold patents across almost every concept of media compression and force their release cycles and DRM through patent licensing.  PLENTY OF PEOPLE ARE SCREWED OVER BY PATENT LAW (and trolling) because patent laws protect being allowed to use a concept, while copyright only affects *one specific story, or work.*

Consider that anyone who wants to make a nonlinear video editor, which is absolutely vital for making modern movies, MUST pay an &quot;MPAA-tax&quot; to be allowed to use MPEG formats.  Also note that MPEG formats are the only ones supported by a lot of consumer hardware (I don&#039;t mean a linux box running VideoLAN, I mean set top boxes that old people have), which means they&#039;re still going to get paid even though all they did was buy the algorithm from someone else 5 years ago and stick it in a holding company.

Funny how in 1940s era USA, where non-commercial piracy was considered a minor (often ignored) offense there was no need to completely abolish all ideas of copyright.  It simply wasn&#039;t as big of a problem, because it focused on people who could be proven to cause actual economic theft (e.g. bootleggers selling pirate videos as their own.)  Now that some cartels have used a myriad of ways to enact government corruption, we somehow need to ditch a tool they are using? Why do we not care about the laws (patents) which they abuse to actually gain enough inertia to start making copyright worse?

Consider that copyright allows competing ideas, just not *copied* ideas.  Patents allow a holding company to buy up ideas and not allow anyone else to use it, akin to reserving the concept of plot twists to yourself.  Suddenly, that sounds a hell of a lot more of a priority doesn&#039;t it?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Invoking religion by the second paragraph *yawn.* Initially I agreed<br />
with Rick, but the more he continues to do nothing but whine about the<br />
&#8220;Copyright Monopoly&#8221; the more I see why people don&#8217;t take the pirate<br />
party seriously.  Plagarism laws are also written under the banner of<br />
copyright &#8220;monopoly&#8221;, and those offer legal recourse against people<br />
taking your work and strapping their name over it to divert your<br />
accreditation.  Most of these complaints about the &#8220;monopoly&#8221; are<br />
*specific* to the MPAA and RIAA agencies and not the concept of<br />
copyright itself, so arguing &#8220;you can&#8217;t defend copyright if you love<br />
culture&#8221; is EXACTLY &#8220;Westboro-style dogma.&#8221;<br />
Is it a shame that artists get screwed over? Yes, and that&#8217;s because of legal tarpits.  PLENTY OF PEOPLE ARE SCREWED OVER BY LEGAL TARPITS because laws are built to be innavigable, this is not a &#8220;copyright monopoly&#8221; problem.</p>
<p>Is it a shame that there aren&#8217;t competing media agencies who innovate and render the MPAA/RIAA obsolete? Yes, and that&#8217;s because of *patent* law of which these agencies hold patents across almost every concept of media compression and force their release cycles and DRM through patent licensing.  PLENTY OF PEOPLE ARE SCREWED OVER BY PATENT LAW (and trolling) because patent laws protect being allowed to use a concept, while copyright only affects *one specific story, or work.*</p>
<p>Consider that anyone who wants to make a nonlinear video editor, which is absolutely vital for making modern movies, MUST pay an &#8220;MPAA-tax&#8221; to be allowed to use MPEG formats.  Also note that MPEG formats are the only ones supported by a lot of consumer hardware (I don&#8217;t mean a linux box running VideoLAN, I mean set top boxes that old people have), which means they&#8217;re still going to get paid even though all they did was buy the algorithm from someone else 5 years ago and stick it in a holding company.</p>
<p>Funny how in 1940s era USA, where non-commercial piracy was considered a minor (often ignored) offense there was no need to completely abolish all ideas of copyright.  It simply wasn&#8217;t as big of a problem, because it focused on people who could be proven to cause actual economic theft (e.g. bootleggers selling pirate videos as their own.)  Now that some cartels have used a myriad of ways to enact government corruption, we somehow need to ditch a tool they are using? Why do we not care about the laws (patents) which they abuse to actually gain enough inertia to start making copyright worse?</p>
<p>Consider that copyright allows competing ideas, just not *copied* ideas.  Patents allow a holding company to buy up ideas and not allow anyone else to use it, akin to reserving the concept of plot twists to yourself.  Suddenly, that sounds a hell of a lot more of a priority doesn&#8217;t it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dale Burden</title>
		<link>/how-can-somebody-who-loves-culture-possibly-defend-the-copyright-monopoly-130929/#comment-1146367</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dale Burden]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2013 15:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=77362#comment-1146367</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think what the article is saying is some people do not want to have to pay for a product as they would rather steal it and pretend that in some way the property of the person that created it should belong to lazy people like the writer. However I am willing to bet that people that actually put in hours or sometimes years of work on something will have another view point. The people that actually put in the work feel they should have the sole right to sell the product they created. That&#039;s what the copyright law does. 


I am a poor writer that tries to sell what he can to make a living. If I let just anyone sell my book I&#039;d not make any money to live on and they would be getting money for something they did not put any effort into. Someone please explain to me why this generation thinks they should have everything handed to them without having to lift a finger. Guess what? Your wrong. Stop trying to steal other peoples work and actually do some yourself.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think what the article is saying is some people do not want to have to pay for a product as they would rather steal it and pretend that in some way the property of the person that created it should belong to lazy people like the writer. However I am willing to bet that people that actually put in hours or sometimes years of work on something will have another view point. The people that actually put in the work feel they should have the sole right to sell the product they created. That&#8217;s what the copyright law does. </p>
<p>I am a poor writer that tries to sell what he can to make a living. If I let just anyone sell my book I&#8217;d not make any money to live on and they would be getting money for something they did not put any effort into. Someone please explain to me why this generation thinks they should have everything handed to them without having to lift a finger. Guess what? Your wrong. Stop trying to steal other peoples work and actually do some yourself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Como alguém que ama cultura pode defender o Monopólio do Copyright? &#124; PIRATAS</title>
		<link>/how-can-somebody-who-loves-culture-possibly-defend-the-copyright-monopoly-130929/#comment-1144311</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Como alguém que ama cultura pode defender o Monopólio do Copyright? &#124; PIRATAS]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Oct 2013 23:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=77362#comment-1144311</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] por Rick Falkvinge*, via TorrentFreak [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] por Rick Falkvinge*, via TorrentFreak [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Free and thinking &#187; Fängelse för fildelning har inte ökat den japanska musikförsäljningen - IDG.se - Störst på it-nyheter</title>
		<link>/how-can-somebody-who-loves-culture-possibly-defend-the-copyright-monopoly-130929/#comment-1142218</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Free and thinking &#187; Fängelse för fildelning har inte ökat den japanska musikförsäljningen - IDG.se - Störst på it-nyheter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Oct 2013 07:13:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=77362#comment-1142218</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] Dagens lästips: How Can Somebody Who Loves Culture Possibly Defend The Copyright Monopoly? [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Dagens lästips: How Can Somebody Who Loves Culture Possibly Defend The Copyright Monopoly? [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Food and Music are Entwined Commodoties &#124; Eating in Zion</title>
		<link>/how-can-somebody-who-loves-culture-possibly-defend-the-copyright-monopoly-130929/#comment-1142164</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Food and Music are Entwined Commodoties &#124; Eating in Zion]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Oct 2013 00:17:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=77362#comment-1142164</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] licenses and channels with most of the companies that want to play music. These systems, we know, do not encourage creativity. They have an interest in stifling it. It&#8217;s advantageous, after all, to create the appearance [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] licenses and channels with most of the companies that want to play music. These systems, we know, do not encourage creativity. They have an interest in stifling it. It&#8217;s advantageous, after all, to create the appearance [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
