HTTP Traffic Overtakes P2P, Courtesy of YouTube
Written by Ernesto on June 18, 2007A recent study shows that YouTube is responsible for nearly 10% of all Internet traffic. As a result of the increased popularity of YouTube and other video streaming sites, HTTP traffic now generates more traffic than P2P, for the first time since 2002.
The data gathered by Ellacoya, a company that offers broadband service optimization solutions for IP networks, shows that 46% of all Internet traffic is generated by HTTP traffic, compared to 37% by P2P.
In comparison, two years ago, 65% of all the data sent over the Internet was P2P related. However, that soon changed after the big boom of video streaming services. Unfortunately there is no data on the total growth of Internet traffic, but it is likely that P2P traffic is still growing, only not relative to HTTP traffic.
A breakdown of the HTTP traffic reveals that audio and video streaming represents 41% of the HTTP traffic, half of that is caused by YouTube. Text and images from web pages are still using a bit more bandwidth (46%), but this wont be for long.
Interestingly, newsgroups only account for 9% of the total traffic, but are treated as a separate category in Ellacoya’s report. However, most of the data shared on newsgroups can be categorized as peer-to-peer traffic, in this case both HTTP and P2P will be responsible for 46%. Gaming, Voip and non HTTP video streaming fill up the gaps with 2%, 1% and 3% respectively.
The total volume of bandwidth that people consume will probably continue to grow in the years to come. New streaming services, and Internet based TV project such as Joost will require massive amounts of bandwidth. Also, BitTorrent is still gaining popularity, earlier this week we reported that Mininova is still growing at a rapid pace, they served 1 billion downloads in less than 6 months.
Let’s hope the pipes won’t clutter.
Previously: How to Stop Warez Pirates: Ask Them Nicely
Next: CBS Promotes BitTorrent Downloads
22 Responses (Add yours or TrackBack)
Cool. Does this mean ISPs like Rogers in Canada will now be shaping or blocking YouTube too?
[quote comment="118110"]Cool. Does this mean ISPs like Rogers in Canada will now be shaping or blocking YouTube too?[/quote]
They’ll probably will, haha
Anything to get rid of all the commercials on regular cable TV…..
I pay for cable but use the net for viewing as I demand a choice to block out commercials… I resent them showing commercials on time I pay for, no matter what the argument… I don’t need to know about the latest new and improved Tampon or learn about a drug that will save my life from one illness only to kill me in the process…. If I want or need a product I’ll make a few calls….
Now the question is, how much of that HTTP traffic is in itself “illegal”? Could well be over 50 % “illegal” with p2p if you could figure that.
Excellent report on how things such as video are affecting the internet though.
To get those figures into the proper context:
This study only applies to certain North American ISPs that are also Ellacoya’s customers !!!
They are already traffic shaping and discriminate p2p traffic.
And how does enctypted and obfuscated p2p traffic fit into this all ?
Does it fall into the http, p2p or non-http-streaming category ?
And don’t forget, Ellacoya wants to sell its technology to more ISPs !
This whole “study” is nothing more than a marketing gag.
thank youtube, sure.
oh yeah, and protocol encryption, that too.
lol
I won’t be surprised if out Malaysian government starts trotelling HTTP speeds as they did for torrents.
Streamyx sucks big time!!
15 references to this post
Add your response