Comments on: IFPI Abandons “3 Strikes” Model for Danish File-Sharers

By: Nik

Nik — Wed, 05 Nov 2008 07:58:28 +0000

“alleged file-sharers”

That line always gets me, there is no way LEGALLY they can tap into the packets your pc receives or sends out, so how do they know? They dont… They just accuse you and without proof thats slander, Virgin Media recently got taken to court by a close friend of mine who pretty much wiped the floor with them, he doesnt even file-share! Hes a journalist, so you see where im coming from right?

By: IFPI Abandons 3 Strikes? Model for Danish File-Sharers « Internet Making Money

Wed, 05 Nov 2008 07:55:29 +0000

[...] Read the full story here:http://torrentfreak.com/ifpi-abandons-3-strikes-model-for-danish-file-sharers-081103/ [...]

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Tue, 04 Nov 2008 11:10:29 +0000

Ya! the entairtainement terrorists lost on this one.

Ther is no other way to put it.

By: TerribleTony

TerribleTony — Tue, 04 Nov 2008 09:28:46 +0000

There is someone in the IFPI called Jesper Bay? Oh, the irony. That is soo funny!

By: 1984

1984 — Tue, 04 Nov 2008 07:18:57 +0000

Finally, a bit of good news from the danish front for a change. Yay Denmark!

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Tue, 04 Nov 2008 03:41:37 +0000

Oh look! It’s a faux intellectual nerd circle jerk!

By: 5th of November

5th of November — Mon, 03 Nov 2008 22:11:35 +0000

for #22: Remember remember…

So whats with the flood of trolls here as of late? If your going to take the time at least do it right. Fetid tapioca is in no way a suitable replacement for the formerly spongy gray matter that once filled your noggin. May I suggest lead instead? Sometime ago they developed an express delivery system.

Editorializing aside, it’s good to find that some countries have a bet of sense left when it comes to fair balance. To take what is nearly an essential tool away because one MAY have offended someone (likely with too much money already) by actually seeking to listen/watch their works without paying them due tribute and then *gasp!* promoting it to others if they happen to like it!

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 03 Nov 2008 21:39:11 +0000

I say, there seems to be a lot of morons here that think TPB is great.

It sucks I tell you. It’s slow, crappy, shitty and medicore.

Again: TPB sucks ass, dogs dick and all of your Mummas.

By: TrAbB

TrAbB — Mon, 03 Nov 2008 20:17:00 +0000

SHHH!!! They might catch on!!

By: ormidude

ormidude — Mon, 03 Nov 2008 19:15:25 +0000

im with the anger on this , lets bring back the death penalty for corrupt goverment employees (i wish thre would be plenty of jobs with the goverment in the uk if they cleaned house )

By: Roze

Roze — Mon, 03 Nov 2008 18:02:52 +0000

@22
Indeed, something important to happen is something like protest meetings. Unity against an enemy is key – have we unity yet?

Roze

By: The Anger

The Anger — Mon, 03 Nov 2008 16:37:22 +0000

Good one Denmark. In England no one in public office has any balls any more. It’s all about lining each others pockets and having lush banquets. Revolution is long overdue. Seriously.

By: Ghost

Ghost — Mon, 03 Nov 2008 16:37:06 +0000

No, its not. TPB has done more for P2P than just about anyother Tracker, so shut up.

@13

We all hope so, but I doubt it.

By: Roze

Roze — Mon, 03 Nov 2008 14:58:46 +0000

@19
I think that we need to look more in the long-term, though, since I hear so little speaking about it here. I think that it is important to think about how things can change in the long-term, and how long-term change can be effected, and ultimately the long-term strategy to get the best long-term results for file-sharing &c. I think it is best not to lose sight of what is ultimately good, and that is that all usage of copyrighted material be made legal when it is non-commercial and given proper ascription. The future of P2P and millions of other things (for copyright does affect millions of things) is what is at stake.

Roze

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 03 Nov 2008 14:41:00 +0000

“I think that it is best not to be too enthusiastic about any of this. I do not believe that those who reject “3 strikes” are actually in favor of the private property rights of replication and distribution. I believe that the majority of those who are against it still believe that it is somehow “stealing,” and that it is just a privacy concern. This may be a small gain for us, but the war will not be won in the end with only people concerned about “security” matters, uncaring about file-sharing as a whole.”

Yeah, it is a small gain, but a gain nonetheless.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 03 Nov 2008 14:40:28 +0000

IFPI are fucking insane for even hoping to make this reality. So many systems here in denmark are becoming more and more dependant on the internet. Most Banks let you access through internet to transfer money and make payments. The government itself(!) encourages people to submit certain tax papers through the internet, like “Forskudsopgørelse” and “Skattekort”. They stopped sending those tax paper by letter!…WE ARE ACTUALLY DEPENDING ON THE INTERNET FOR THIS…And these tax paper reforms was initialised by the government, it would be pretty ******* insane if they suddenly supported IFPI’s case about shutting people off the internet.

Good luck to people in France and New Zealand by the way. I feel sorry for you and hope you get a better government who actually sides with its people.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 03 Nov 2008 13:43:58 +0000

#6 is a fuckin’ muppet…

@8 hahaha, good one!

By: www.eZee.se

www.eZee.se — Mon, 03 Nov 2008 13:23:23 +0000

@6, what the heck does TPB have to do with anything in this article? what are you talking about?

Good news, but dont get too happy all this means is that all the politicians in Denmark are not corrupt.., yet.

Politicians change, and these bastards are going to get new friends, what we can hope is that they make more enemies than friends or that P2P evolves faster than these idiots can make *enforceable* laws.

As for Sarkozy in France, he sucks monkey balls… make that dirty monkey balls.

http://www.eZee.se

By: Roze

Roze — Mon, 03 Nov 2008 10:46:09 +0000

@7 and everybody else

I think that it is best not to be too enthusiastic about any of this. I do not believe that those who reject “3 strikes” are actually in favor of the private property rights of replication and distribution. I believe that the majority of those who are against it still believe that it is somehow “stealing,” and that it is just a privacy concern. This may be a small gain for us, but the war will not be won in the end with only people concerned about “security” matters, uncaring about file-sharing as a whole.

Roze
http://www.10ch.org/

By: Bubbles

Bubbles — Mon, 03 Nov 2008 10:29:01 +0000

give up with the 3 strikes stuff because your on the trail to an epic fail…