Comments on: IFPI Loses “Deep-Linking” Case Against Baidu http://torrentfreak.com/ifpi-loses-deep-linking-case-against-baidu-100126/ Breaking File-sharing, Copyright and Privacy News Wed, 29 Oct 2014 04:49:46 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2 By: Global Geek News Podcast #54 | Global Geek News /ifpi-loses-deep-linking-case-against-baidu-100126/#comment-638151 Wed, 03 Feb 2010 16:18:56 +0000 http://torrentfreak.com/?p=20993#comment-638151 [...] IFPI loses deep-linking case against Baidu [...]

]]> By: Copyright gilt nur für Andere: Baidu « 11k2 /ifpi-loses-deep-linking-case-against-baidu-100126/#comment-636824 Thu, 28 Jan 2010 14:24:51 +0000 http://torrentfreak.com/?p=20993#comment-636824 [...] (via torrentfreak) [...]

]]> By: dizzee rascal /ifpi-loses-deep-linking-case-against-baidu-100126/#comment-636787 Thu, 28 Jan 2010 11:31:41 +0000 http://torrentfreak.com/?p=20993#comment-636787 I have to agree with ppl saying trackers should be set up in China. With this ruling, it seems it’s the safest place to be for BitTorrent.

]]> By: Links 27/1/2010: KDE 4.4 RC3, GNOME Foundation Adds Bradley Kuhn | Boycott Novell /ifpi-loses-deep-linking-case-against-baidu-100126/#comment-636780 Thu, 28 Jan 2010 11:26:16 +0000 http://torrentfreak.com/?p=20993#comment-636780 [...] IFPI Loses “Deep-Linking” Case Against Baidu In 2008, Baidu was sued for around $9 million by Sony BMG, Universal Music and Warner Music for providing so-called “deep-links” to copyright music tracks. A court has now ruled that providing search results does not breach copyright law, clearing China’s biggest search engine of wrong-doing. [...]

]]> By: Borderliner /ifpi-loses-deep-linking-case-against-baidu-100126/#comment-636696 Wed, 27 Jan 2010 23:23:48 +0000 http://torrentfreak.com/?p=20993#comment-636696 Seems that China is, at this moment atleast, *the* place when setting up your own metadata site – just let everybody known that you are, indeed, a search engine, and as this ruling says – this metadata by itself is not illegal.
Only sad that running such a site successfully would most likely also mean that one has to develop contacts to local “businessmen” which would probably bee too muchhass, and too many bribes, for an average hobbysite.

]]> By: Anonymous /ifpi-loses-deep-linking-case-against-baidu-100126/#comment-636636 Wed, 27 Jan 2010 20:43:25 +0000 http://torrentfreak.com/?p=20993#comment-636636 baidu is informally run by government how can some us corp challane it in china itself

]]> By: bifter /ifpi-loses-deep-linking-case-against-baidu-100126/#comment-636590 Wed, 27 Jan 2010 15:59:38 +0000 http://torrentfreak.com/?p=20993#comment-636590 IFPI we are own all your choonz

]]> By: Whatever /ifpi-loses-deep-linking-case-against-baidu-100126/#comment-636552 Wed, 27 Jan 2010 10:43:50 +0000 http://torrentfreak.com/?p=20993#comment-636552 How much money would the artists have gotten if the IFPI didn’t exist and no money was wasted on these lost legal actions ?

@53 You missed one:
[x]Whining that (a search for) a certain form of encoded data (mp3) is illegal while it is not.

However it does fall into the catagory “misleading” and “trolling”.

]]> By: Unauthorized Content Consumer /ifpi-loses-deep-linking-case-against-baidu-100126/#comment-636545 Wed, 27 Jan 2010 09:45:50 +0000 http://torrentfreak.com/?p=20993#comment-636545 Oh and…those Chinese sure gotz biiiig bawlz. xD

]]> By: http://lots-of-documentaries.blogspot.com /ifpi-loses-deep-linking-case-against-baidu-100126/#comment-636544 Wed, 27 Jan 2010 09:41:13 +0000 http://torrentfreak.com/?p=20993#comment-636544 Another one in the eye for the IFPI!

This is GREAT news!

]]>