LMFAO!!

http://i28.tinypic.com/66ah5k.jpg

http://i26.tinypic.com/x6a2bl.jpg

I’m surprised you can find the time to post comments, what with your busy schedule of eagerly jerking off the MAFIAA with both hands.

Tell me, are you tragically retarded enough to actually mistake filesharing for theft, or are you fully aware that you’re lying and simply being a good little slut?

Either way, I find it quite amusing that you would position yourself as standing on some kind of moral highground, when the MAFIAA are nothing more than crime families shielded beneath a thin corporate facade. They commit theft, they commit extortion, they commit terrorism, and given the chance, they are willing to ruin lives by suing people for tens of thousands of dollars over downloading a number of MP3s that would equal about $15 in the real world.

And yet, here you are defending them. Doesn’t the irony of that just tickle you? You crusade against filesharing because it’s “wrong”, all the while standing on some of the lowest moral ground there is. You’re nothing but a willing whore for a syndicate of criminals.

From the moral ground [i]I[/i] and every other filesharer stands on, I can only spit down in contempt upon slime like you.

What they request is practically TOTAL SURVEILLANCE to prevent normal people to commit “information crimes”. Do they really mean that people who get disconnected from the internet will magically start to buy everything they would otherwise have downloaded? They will only make sure those people will NEVER again buy a music record or a dvd. I mean, you would really have to be an imbecile to keep buying from someone who sued you off the internet.

Its idiotic. Anti-copying laws are idiotic. Whats the point of legislating prohibition laws just to keep a “copy manufacturing industry” alive in an era where everybody and their dog has copying machines at their home?? Its like prohibiting private refrigerators in order to forcefully keep an ice deliverer industry alive. Nobody would give up making ice in their homes just to enable ice industry employees to “make a living” delivering ice to everybodys home. It wont work with copying prohibiton too.

Damn, damn modern day fascism.

Thats for criminal cases – civil cases go by what could be termed ‘majority of evidence’.

And anyway, the national backbone is funded by the state. Why should the ISPs care? It’s infrastructure, like roads and delivery of electricity is. Once the population’s demands grow beyond capacity, capacity is increased. It’s not so hard if you give up the capitalist viewpoint of something having to “pay for itself”.

It is not, and will never be, ok to steal what others have created.[/quote]
Sure but we don’t steal anything. *Prove* me wrong. Otherwise it’s your word against mine and (God bless presumption of innocence!) this means I’ve won already. :-)

[quote comment="371927"]“Copyright infringement requires that a physical copy be made, which does not and cannot occur with electronic transfer.”

It’s not true.[/quote]

Sure it’s not true. There’s no such thing as “copyright”, ergo here can’t by any “copyright infringement” (whatever this crap might mean) at all.

http://prodigydancer.baywords.com/

This is one of many false rumours spread by greedy downloaders who want to enjoy others work without paying for it.

It’s not true.

http://progagainstpirates.baywords.com/