TorrentFreak

The place where breaking news, BitTorrent and copyright collide

iiNet v AFACT Anti-Piracy Case Appeal Set For August 2010

Earlier this year Hollywood lost its case against iiNet when a court ruled that the ISP could not be held responsible for the actions of its subscribers when they committed copyright infringements using BitTorrent. The studios appealed and now the date has been set for the Federal Court re-run. iiNet boss Michael Malone is confident of a second victory.

February this year saw Aussie ISP iiNet celebrating after it successfully defended a legal attack by Hollywood anti-piracy outfit AFACT.

Village Roadshow, Universal Pictures, Warner Bros Entertainment, Paramount Pictures, Sony Pictures Entertainment, Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation, Disney Enterprises, Inc. and the Seven Network took iiNet to court in the hope that a judge would find the ISP responsible for the copyright infringements of its customers.

Judge Justice Dennis Cowdroy shattered that dream and iiNet won its landmark case. Quickly AFACT announced it would appeal the judgment which it said had left an “unworkable environment for content creators and content providers” and represented “a serious threat to Australia’s digital economy.”

Its now being reported that beginning on August 2nd and running for the next 4 days, the appeal will be heard by a full bench of the Federal Court. The time allocated is a dramatic reduction over the month long saga of the first hearing.

“We go into this latest legal round anticipating we will come out in an even stronger position than when we won in February,” iiNet chief Michael Malone told The Australian.

AFACT’s appeal will consist of 15 areas where they believe original case judge Justice Cowdroy got his decision wrong, but even if the Federal Court agrees, Malone believes an AFACT victory would be a hollow one.

“Neither the original case nor this latest appeal will stop piracy — even if in the unlikely event they won the appeal,” he concludes.

Related Posts

Previous Post | Next Post

  • Anon

    Go iiNet!

  • Simon

    Seriously, just give up.

  • duane

    Australia NEEDS that victory. A lot of bad news from that side of the world lately.

  • Anonymous

    Go iiNet! Hollywood just doesn’t know when to throw in the towel do they?

  • chris

    So AFACT think the judge was wrong, come on !

  • Seasoned Goat

    damage penalty time to hand over teh keys (hollywood)

  • Matthew

    Gosh the studios are stupid! If a drunk driver kills an innocent bystander, can the police charge Holden? Same thing applies. iiNet FTW!!

  • Anonymous

    damn afact wasting money

  • JayD

    May 15, 2010 at 01:34 by Anonymous
    damn afact wasting money

    if we remain buying their products they receive more money so they can sue the hell out of us…

    Stop buying!!!

  • Anonymous

    “derp derp we didn’t get it our way let’s appeal hurr” – MAFIAA

  • gorehound

    illage Roadshow, Universal Pictures, Warner Bros Entertainment, Paramount Pictures, Sony Pictures Entertainment, Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation, Disney Enterprises, Inc. and the Seven Network boycott them all by not buying any new movies and only buying your movies used.screw these big studios.they have a lot of nerve trying to do this to company that has nothing to do with “piracy”.

    I want to see Hollywood’s Stocks Go Down !!!!

  • Anonymous

    There is absolutely no way to prevent people from sharing digital files. It is just not possible.

    The notion that they can slowly impose a software or hardware so DRMed that hacking is impossible is a pipe dream.

    It is time to Hollywood to surrender to the people before there is nothing left of them.

  • scott

    uncharacteristically for a torrentfreak article, you missed an important point: iinet is _also_ appealing the decision.

    They argue that their original win didn’t go far enough and want clarification on several points (see here http://www.arnnet.com.au/article/340072/afact_iinet_appealing_its_win_judgment/)

    should they win, IMHO it will be a lethal blow to AFACT since it will mean that ISP customers’ privacy will trump their subpoenas.

  • StevO

    This is just retarded. If they can make ISPs responible, they will do it with every ISP. These people are insane, and every government/court should be very scared of this type of tactic. Lets hold the gun makers responsible for every crime. Lets hold car manufacturers resposible for every accident. Lets hold beer makers resposable for every liver damaged drunk. ETC> ETC> Christ, what is their problem.

  • danni

    Scott, I read the article you linked to, and it appears that iinet is not appealing the win judgement. It is, however, seeking clarification on a couple of points the original judge was unable to confirm, since AFACT is already bringing the issue back into the courtroom through it’s appeal.

    Agreed with your last comment, if they win, it will be a blow to AFACT. I hope iinet win again.

  • Drake3

    “Lets hold the gun makers responsible for every crime. Lets hold car manufacturers resposible for every accident. Lets hold beer makers resposable for every liver damaged drunk.”

    Yeah, perhaps we should start holding MAFIAA responsible for any crimes which occur in the vicinity of the airing of one of their movies! (i.e. A plane was hijacked at gunpoint and the in-flight movie was playing at the time, so MAFIAA facilitated the crime.)

    Something tells me they wouldn’t get the point if I were to suggest that to them. ;)

  • Unauthorized Content Consumer

    @12

    Thanks for the spam.

  • trollfeedingfrenzy

    lol’ed at neoqueef just now after seeing her trolling innocent bystanders on FREAKBITS.. they re talking bout the hitler clips takedown requests.. and sure enough, that little douche neotroll is preaching about ‘even DLing you tube videos is stealing’ and other such nonsense…

    loser..

  • Turbis

    Hollywood and ISP’s are run by the same people so who the hell cares.

  • anon2

    wish iiNet all the good luck going. although they have won once already, they better be prepared for more than just this appeal by AFACT. if the case goes iiNet’s way (hopefully) again, there will be another appeal and another and another until eventually AFACT gets what it wants. seen too much of this elsewhere to believe they will stop. they just need to find out who to give how much to. once they know that, then they will get the ‘epic win’ and out will come the comments of ‘how justice came to its senses’.

  • TerribleTony

    I wonder if iiNet are seeing an increase in subscriber numbers…

  • Trelew

    If the corporations loose the suit they probably will buy out iiNet and change the user agreement and screw over everyone anyways. That seems to be general consensus now, buy out the ISP, change the user agreements, and that way they can screw all internet users without having to worry about what is right. Regardless how many times we show the corporations they are in the wrong, they will just ignore it because they don’t care about the truth and what’s right; all they care about is furthering their greed and power.

  • Fazer*27

    im Sayin, as per like all you are sayign Now, that just as per as Jon Lemon of Beetles, and cinnaman chalenges and such as that stuff. And further researches, just as like all You Are sayin. Plus if you are your usin good gramer and like that, it helps you now?

  • Anonymous

    Law or no law, piracy is not going away.

  • Whatever

    @“unworkable environment for content creators and content providers” and represented “a serious threat to Australia’s digital economy.”

    Since the trolls always scream about LAW, where is the law argument here ? This is really an American argument where laws are put aside to go to war or screw other countries in other ways.

    Both arguments are the MAFIAA’s problem and no reason for a judge to change the verdict in their favor. I don’t know Australian law but i assume there is no part mentioning “if there is an unworkable enviroment for content providers or the Australian digital economy is in danger then Mickey Mouse wins any needed courtcase”

    Could be funny in court when the MAFIAA starts explaining that the Australian digital economy is in danger by not sending money to mostly US companies. Then the defense merely has to point out that ISP’s, PC sellers and IT personel which are part of the ‘digital economy’ don’t appear to be an endangered species by the use of bittorrent.

  • xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

    I was so impressed with iiNet’s stand on this issue that I changed from Optus to iiNet when I moved house. AFACT deliberately targeted one of the smaller ISPs, hoping to set a legal precedent that could be used against the more powerful ones later. Thank goodness they failed.

  • Si

    @26 iiNet is the 3rd largest ISP in Australia…wouldn’t exactly call that small

    Will be good to see iiNet’s appeal :D thanks for the info 13

  • Borderline Voter

    “Neither the original case nor this latest appeal will stop piracy — even if in the unlikely event they won the appeal,” AFACT concludes.

    So why spend the time and money for an outcome which will do nothing.

  • anti-gun

    isn’t it amazing – if MPAA holds the seller of bandwidth responsible for the use of its bandwidth, then NRA should hold responsible the use of the guns that people buy… and criminally prosecute ARMS DEALERS each time someone is shot – columbine, etc.

  • BTGuard - BitTorrent Anonymously

NewsBits

Even more news...

  • Pirate Bay Founder Gottfrid Svartholm on Freedom of Speech

    Freedom of speech is a highly valued commodity, but should people be allowed to say whatever...

  • Blu-ray Anti-Piracy Tech Stops Discs and Promotes Purchases

    An anti-piracy system present in all official Blu-ray players since 2012 has received a fresh update...

  • Foxtel Breeds Pirates by Locking Up Game of Thrones

    One of the main reasons why people turn to piracy is the lack of legal alternatives....

  • UK Student Admits Breaching Sony Copyrights With Leak of PS3 SDK

    Last year an Internet user known as El Nomeo leaked version 3.70 of Sony’s Playstation3 SDK...

  • Pirates Can Be Identified Despite Sharing IP Addresses, ISP Claims

    Carrier-Grade Network Address Translation is a network mechanism through which many Internet subscribers can share the...

MostDiscussed

Below are TorrentFreak's most discussed articles of the past month. Join the discussion if you like.

CopyQuote

Left Quote

“The Pirate Bay has been one of the most important movements in Sweden for freedom of speech, working against corruption and censorship.

Peter Sunde Left Quote

PopularArticles

A selection of some TorrentFreak's classics dug up from our archives.