Comments on: Illegal Downloads 150x More Profitable Than Legal Sales http://torrentfreak.com/illegal-downloads-150x-more-profitable-than-legal-sales-091009/ Breaking File-sharing, Copyright and Privacy News Tue, 28 Oct 2014 21:09:27 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2 By: GrinfilledCelt /illegal-downloads-150x-more-profitable-than-legal-sales-091009/#comment-609097 Thu, 22 Oct 2009 02:53:35 +0000 http://torrentfreak.com/?p=17821#comment-609097 It just sounds like spam to me. “We’ll just send out tons of mail and if anyone is stupid enough to fall for it, we make money!”

]]> By: Illegal Downloads 150x More Profitable Than Legal Sales | Gadget Mania Gadgets and Gadget News /illegal-downloads-150x-more-profitable-than-legal-sales-091009/#comment-608976 Wed, 21 Oct 2009 16:12:36 +0000 http://torrentfreak.com/?p=17821#comment-608976 [...] News link: here [...]

]]> By: Make me rich: steal my content « Nuff said /illegal-downloads-150x-more-profitable-than-legal-sales-091009/#comment-608689 Tue, 20 Oct 2009 08:38:01 +0000 http://torrentfreak.com/?p=17821#comment-608689 [...] The more people download songs illegally, the more money publishers make, argues this post from the TorrentFreak blog. [...]

]]> By: Chasing online pirates is a gold mine! | Lanka Journal /illegal-downloads-150x-more-profitable-than-legal-sales-091009/#comment-608653 Tue, 20 Oct 2009 04:22:43 +0000 http://torrentfreak.com/?p=17821#comment-608653 [...] one of them, Germany-based DigiRights Solutions, reveals how profitable this business actually is, reports TorrentFreak news [...]

]]> By: mckensie' /illegal-downloads-150x-more-profitable-than-legal-sales-091009/#comment-608508 Mon, 19 Oct 2009 15:51:34 +0000 http://torrentfreak.com/?p=17821#comment-608508 suck it music media

]]> By: kaxalax /illegal-downloads-150x-more-profitable-than-legal-sales-091009/#comment-608460 Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:29:41 +0000 http://torrentfreak.com/?p=17821#comment-608460 why are people so resistant to paying for music?

why do you so vigorously defend your right to steal from artists?

If you keep stealing music, many musicians will stop making it.

you will end up with music being totally free but also totally shit.

well done, fuckers!

]]> By: Jon /illegal-downloads-150x-more-profitable-than-legal-sales-091009/#comment-608407 Mon, 19 Oct 2009 08:20:06 +0000 http://torrentfreak.com/?p=17821#comment-608407 Time to fight back and start bombing the multimedia copyright industry.

I wonder if we can recruit some brainwashed muslim suicide bombers to walk into the Sony, EMI, Virgin etc offices and for the love of Allah and music blow them up?

hihi.. just joking. but then again copying is becoming a sort of religion is it not?

]]> By: buildblog | Die regionalität deutscher Startups – Warum das “winner takes it all”-Prinzip nicht greift. /illegal-downloads-150x-more-profitable-than-legal-sales-091009/#comment-607996 Sat, 17 Oct 2009 10:20:13 +0000 http://torrentfreak.com/?p=17821#comment-607996 [...] Mit Privatkunden ist – mal abgesehen von der Erotik- und Musikindustrie – nur schwer Geld zu verdienen. Wobei es offenbar danach aussieht, dass mulitmedialer Bezahlcontent sich besser verkauft, wenn er zumindest aus rechtlichen Grauzonen stammt. [...]

]]> By: fnord özön « /dev/blog /illegal-downloads-150x-more-profitable-than-legal-sales-091009/#comment-607733 Fri, 16 Oct 2009 09:01:45 +0000 http://torrentfreak.com/?p=17821#comment-607733 [...] Egy német content-maffia szervezet számításai szerint pereskedéssel 150x akkora haszonra lehet …, mint a zeneforgalmazással. Így lesz a fogyasztók kriminalizálásából üzleti modell. Ezzel a t?kével ráadásul finanszírozni lehet az állami gépezetek elkötelezettségét. A BSA tanulmányából kiderül, hogy automatizált programokkal derítik fel a fájlmegoszókat, 2.4 millió figyelmeztetést küldtek szét az els? félévben. Lehet, hogy jó üzlet a kalózkodás a BSA-nak is? [...]

]]> By: Ninja /illegal-downloads-150x-more-profitable-than-legal-sales-091009/#comment-607482 Thu, 15 Oct 2009 02:21:09 +0000 http://torrentfreak.com/?p=17821#comment-607482 I wonder where is the ‘illicit’ here… I’d just ignore the letter lol.

]]>