<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ISP Stands Up For Torrent Site Owner&#8217;s Privacy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://torrentfreak.com/isp-stands-up-for-torrent-site-owners-privacy-100117/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://torrentfreak.com/isp-stands-up-for-torrent-site-owners-privacy-100117/</link>
	<description>Breaking File-sharing, Copyright and Privacy News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2014 01:03:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>/isp-stands-up-for-torrent-site-owners-privacy-100117/#comment-635421</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 21:38:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=20765#comment-635421</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@neostyles

Your post, #24, has been analyzed and determined to be

[] misleading
[] FUD
[x] trolling

on the basis of the fact that you have (check all that apply)

[x] compared the downloading of a digital file with the theft of a physical object and/or called file sharing &quot;stealing&quot;
[x] vastly exaggerated financial losses to rights holders due to file sharing
[x] insisted that file sharing is killing the music/movie/software/book industries
[x] stated that file sharing harms honest artists by depriving them of needed revenue
[] said that without copyright, there would be no incentive to create or innovate
[] implied or explicitly stated that artists should have absolute, permanent control over their creative works
[x] supported unjust punishments for copyright infringement that do not fit the offense
[x] supported unjust, expensive and invasive anti-piracy laws and measures
[] defended the entertainment industries and/or excused an immoral or illegal action of theirs
[] implicitly or explicitly attacked fair use, right of first sale, and/or the public domain

and you have done this despite the fact that (check all that apply)

[] effectively enforcing copyright on the Internet is difficult, time-consuming and expensive
[x] changing laws to allow easy, effective enforcement of copyright on the Internet would breach peoples&#039; privacy and fair use rights
[] overly broad and restrictive copyright has been demonstrated to harm society and restrict creativity and innovation
[] the modern implementation of intellectual property rights favors large corporations over individuals
[x] just because something is illegal does not mean it&#039;s wrong
[x] the financial losses to file sharing have been challenged and no solid evidence has appeared to support the claims of massive losses
[x] Internet Service Providers have no desire to spend millions of dollars to police their networks and drive away customers
[x] one download of a copyrighted work does not equal one lost sale
[] any financial losses from file sharing are incurred by publishers and distributors as opposed to artists and creators
[] artists may in fact benefit from file sharing as it gives greater exposure which leads to greater sales and a large fanbase
[x] some industries, such as the motion picture industry, are bringing in record profits despite file sharing
[x] due to regional lockout and the entertainment industries&#039; resistance to change, some people have no choice but to pirate content
[] a large amount of free and legal content exists online, proving that people will create even if there&#039;s no financial incentive
[x] you have failed to cite any sources for your arguments, particularly those dependent on data.

In conclusion, I advise you to:
[] review the fundamental intent of intellectual property law
[] actually read the article you commented on
[x] actually respond to the arguments that others make against you
[x] sodomize yourself with a retractable baton.

Obvious troll is obvious.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@neostyles</p>
<p>Your post, #24, has been analyzed and determined to be</p>
<p>[] misleading<br />
[] FUD<br />
[x] trolling</p>
<p>on the basis of the fact that you have (check all that apply)</p>
<p>[x] compared the downloading of a digital file with the theft of a physical object and/or called file sharing &#8220;stealing&#8221;<br />
[x] vastly exaggerated financial losses to rights holders due to file sharing<br />
[x] insisted that file sharing is killing the music/movie/software/book industries<br />
[x] stated that file sharing harms honest artists by depriving them of needed revenue<br />
[] said that without copyright, there would be no incentive to create or innovate<br />
[] implied or explicitly stated that artists should have absolute, permanent control over their creative works<br />
[x] supported unjust punishments for copyright infringement that do not fit the offense<br />
[x] supported unjust, expensive and invasive anti-piracy laws and measures<br />
[] defended the entertainment industries and/or excused an immoral or illegal action of theirs<br />
[] implicitly or explicitly attacked fair use, right of first sale, and/or the public domain</p>
<p>and you have done this despite the fact that (check all that apply)</p>
<p>[] effectively enforcing copyright on the Internet is difficult, time-consuming and expensive<br />
[x] changing laws to allow easy, effective enforcement of copyright on the Internet would breach peoples&#8217; privacy and fair use rights<br />
[] overly broad and restrictive copyright has been demonstrated to harm society and restrict creativity and innovation<br />
[] the modern implementation of intellectual property rights favors large corporations over individuals<br />
[x] just because something is illegal does not mean it&#8217;s wrong<br />
[x] the financial losses to file sharing have been challenged and no solid evidence has appeared to support the claims of massive losses<br />
[x] Internet Service Providers have no desire to spend millions of dollars to police their networks and drive away customers<br />
[x] one download of a copyrighted work does not equal one lost sale<br />
[] any financial losses from file sharing are incurred by publishers and distributors as opposed to artists and creators<br />
[] artists may in fact benefit from file sharing as it gives greater exposure which leads to greater sales and a large fanbase<br />
[x] some industries, such as the motion picture industry, are bringing in record profits despite file sharing<br />
[x] due to regional lockout and the entertainment industries&#8217; resistance to change, some people have no choice but to pirate content<br />
[] a large amount of free and legal content exists online, proving that people will create even if there&#8217;s no financial incentive<br />
[x] you have failed to cite any sources for your arguments, particularly those dependent on data.</p>
<p>In conclusion, I advise you to:<br />
[] review the fundamental intent of intellectual property law<br />
[] actually read the article you commented on<br />
[x] actually respond to the arguments that others make against you<br />
[x] sodomize yourself with a retractable baton.</p>
<p>Obvious troll is obvious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fiket &#183; Vorratsdaten vs. IPRED</title>
		<link>/isp-stands-up-for-torrent-site-owners-privacy-100117/#comment-634855</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fiket &#183; Vorratsdaten vs. IPRED]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 12:51:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=20765#comment-634855</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] weil dies dem Schutz der Privatsph&#228;re des Kunden nach den Regeln der Vorratsdatenspeicherung widerspr&#228;che. TeliaSonera greift also dem schwedischen Gesetzgeber voraus und findet, die [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] weil dies dem Schutz der Privatsph&#228;re des Kunden nach den Regeln der Vorratsdatenspeicherung widerspr&#228;che. TeliaSonera greift also dem schwedischen Gesetzgeber voraus und findet, die [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nicolas</title>
		<link>/isp-stands-up-for-torrent-site-owners-privacy-100117/#comment-634854</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nicolas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 12:48:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=20765#comment-634854</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[that&#039;s a good news!

will see what will happen!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that&#8217;s a good news!</p>
<p>will see what will happen!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crown Royal</title>
		<link>/isp-stands-up-for-torrent-site-owners-privacy-100117/#comment-634816</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Crown Royal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 02:18:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=20765#comment-634816</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Once upon a time, US ISPs had balls too: http://epic.org/privacy/copyright/verizon/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once upon a time, US ISPs had balls too: <a href="http://epic.org/privacy/copyright/verizon/" rel="nofollow">http://epic.org/privacy/copyright/verizon/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Links 19/1/2010: A Lot of LCA Coverage, Linux 2.6.32 Gets Extended Maintenance &#124; Boycott Novell</title>
		<link>/isp-stands-up-for-torrent-site-owners-privacy-100117/#comment-634812</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Links 19/1/2010: A Lot of LCA Coverage, Linux 2.6.32 Gets Extended Maintenance &#124; Boycott Novell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 01:08:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=20765#comment-634812</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] ISP Stands Up For Torrent Site Owner’s Privacy The Swedish ISP TeliaSonera is refusing to comply with a court ruling ordering the company to hand over information identifying the owner of SweTorrents. Instead, it has appealed the decision, arguing that the verdict is in violation of the European data retention directive and claiming that SweTorrents doesn’t host any copyrighted files. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ISP Stands Up For Torrent Site Owner’s Privacy The Swedish ISP TeliaSonera is refusing to comply with a court ruling ordering the company to hand over information identifying the owner of SweTorrents. Instead, it has appealed the decision, arguing that the verdict is in violation of the European data retention directive and claiming that SweTorrents doesn’t host any copyrighted files. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gidnurgia</title>
		<link>/isp-stands-up-for-torrent-site-owners-privacy-100117/#comment-634807</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gidnurgia]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 00:37:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=20765#comment-634807</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What I find interesting is that the Swedish state owns 37.5% and the Finnish State owns 13.5% of TeliaSonera...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I find interesting is that the Swedish state owns 37.5% and the Finnish State owns 13.5% of TeliaSonera&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: concerned a little</title>
		<link>/isp-stands-up-for-torrent-site-owners-privacy-100117/#comment-634792</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[concerned a little]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 22:52:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=20765#comment-634792</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ilovetorrents n bitsoup are up, but not filepost.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ilovetorrents n bitsoup are up, but not filepost.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: concerned</title>
		<link>/isp-stands-up-for-torrent-site-owners-privacy-100117/#comment-634780</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[concerned]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 22:14:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=20765#comment-634780</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[fingers crossed...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>fingers crossed&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kapcha</title>
		<link>/isp-stands-up-for-torrent-site-owners-privacy-100117/#comment-634775</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kapcha]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 22:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=20765#comment-634775</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TeliaSonera FTW! )]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TeliaSonera FTW! )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: concerned now</title>
		<link>/isp-stands-up-for-torrent-site-owners-privacy-100117/#comment-634763</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[concerned now]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 20:47:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=20765#comment-634763</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[oops!
you&#039;re right mate: not working so much anymore...but it happens sometimes.
will try later on, or tomorrow...:)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oops!<br />
you&#8217;re right mate: not working so much anymore&#8230;but it happens sometimes.<br />
will try later on, or tomorrow&#8230;:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
