Comments on: Keep the bad guys out

By: burnin

burnin — Sat, 08 Dec 2007 20:46:43 +0000

works for me! And, i think its a great program. especially useful when chinese hackers go on a field trip via your computer. plus can identify what sites use cookies that i don’t want spying on me thx. up yours. burn that mfs

By: TheWatcher

TheWatcher — Mon, 05 Nov 2007 08:58:46 +0000

Of course, if you have a reason to run from the RIAA and what not, then stop using the client… burn!

By: rjgcjymlcd

rjgcjymlcd — Sun, 24 Jun 2007 15:47:53 +0000

Hello! Good Site! Thanks you! qrfzgybuus

By: free ringtones

free ringtones — Mon, 02 Apr 2007 08:43:54 +0000

free ringtones…

news…

By: Sam DeRenzis

Sam DeRenzis — Mon, 01 Jan 2007 07:04:28 +0000

Actually my friends your arguments are well founded, the main point here would be not to create a list of IP’s that are “dangerous” or somehow associated with anti-piracy legislation, instead they should be working on an application that would list all known IP’s that are not!

You start with a basic premise, every IP online is a possible monitoring area for the said “threat”. Instead of worrying about locating it, merely block all of them, then build a full list of the ones that aren’t a threat. In time this will come to encompass most Websites in use, and be much more complete than others. It would offer the best security in my opinion…

By: Ritchie

Ritchie — Tue, 05 Sep 2006 19:31:57 +0000

1. The lists are inaccurate because any idiot can change his ip and there are new dynamic ip’s every second. You’d have to ban the whole internet to be safe, so what’s the point? Do you really think any “bad guy” company who is after file sharers will have any trouble going around these programs ? Get Real!
2. They block legit adresses, too, which only slows you down but doesn’t protect you from anything (see 1)
3. Peer Guardian managed to restart my pc (which had been running rock solid for 24/7 for weeks before) in random intervals when i tried it out, great work guys ;-)

By: Gerry

Gerry — Sun, 27 Aug 2006 01:53:16 +0000

Just get a paid for Proxy and hide your IP.

By: mortgage broker wachovia mortgage

mortgage broker wachovia mortgage — Thu, 01 Jun 2006 22:45:54 +0000

circumventing light Gonzales crime.reductions:prospers.especially barest

By: Iceman

Iceman — Thu, 12 Jan 2006 14:18:44 +0000

I think u people all got wrong.I have using peer guardian software and tell u people it really blocks http.I think u people will be usin option block everything.Instead of that enable the option p2p only.

By: r00ted

r00ted — Tue, 10 Jan 2006 06:37:18 +0000

If they are so inaccurate, join teh community and help perfect them.

But of course, nothing will ever be complete, 100% protection. The internet is ever-evolving.

By: vgjvcgj

vgjvcgj — Tue, 10 Jan 2006 01:56:51 +0000

I’d rather block a whole data center with some nasty ips on it then allow the nasty ips in.

saywhat bitches got schooled.

By: sjk

sjk — Mon, 09 Jan 2006 20:45:03 +0000

Just because they are not up to your standards does not mean they are up to ANY standards. These technologies are still in their relatively early stages, and cannot be expected to live up to the strictest standards quite yet. As with any technology, it will most likely get better as time goes on, but we have to try to be patient.

By: Ernesto

Ernesto — Mon, 09 Jan 2006 18:35:48 +0000

Thank god they invited a “enable http” option.

By: WTFNO

WTFNO — Mon, 09 Jan 2006 18:30:14 +0000

Hard work doesnt mean the end result is of any standards at all. These morons have blocked entire carriers (Backbones) and entire floors of a datacenter (thousands of servers) all because of a suspicious company name. Does that sound like they are competant to decide who your computer should talk to?

By: Ernesto

Ernesto — Mon, 09 Jan 2006 18:04:54 +0000

I agree with the first comment. The effectiveness of these list has not been proven.
However, the second point is nonsense, these people work hard to keep the lists up-to-date. Sure there will be Ip’s on there that do not belong there, but not like u suggest.

And people like to have a (false) sense of security. Please don’t ruin that.

By: WTFNO

WTFNO — Mon, 09 Jan 2006 17:58:03 +0000

Few important points to consider:
1) The effectiveness of these lists is highly questionable.
2) Many of these lists are completely inaucurate. They contain millions of incorrect IPs, and cant guarantee they auctually filter any of the scanners IPs. The people who maintain the list (bluetack) are morons who seemingly put zero thought into what blocks they use. If everybody ran this software p2p would fall apart because 95% of the internet would be blocked, including all the seeders. Dont use this trash software until the lists it uses are brought up to any sort of standards at all.