Comments on: Kim Dotcom: If I Was President of the United States….

By: BeNice

BeNice — Fri, 01 Feb 2013 06:52:00 +0000

“Stop sending trash to Mars”
You know what’s interesting about that comment?
In a recent RT interview, he was asked what he’d be doing if he weren’t doing what he currently is.
His response indicated that he supports Mars exploration.
So, either he got caught in a lie, or he was actually just referring to the quality of the Mars programs (ie, they should be sending humans or better exploration technology, instead of the trash they’ve been sending).

By: longlivemega

longlivemega — Sun, 28 Oct 2012 03:35:00 +0000

Your comparison is flawed. Obama and Bush are part of the same project. Obama is just finishing up what Bush started. If Bush were allowed another four years, he would be doing the sames things Obama is doing right now. Also, if Romney were to not focus on Hollywood and the Internet, it would be because he’s focused on even more evil projects. Obama and Romney are both corrupt, evil people. We shouldn’t be voting for either one of them. The “lesser-evil” voting method doesn’t really apply this year because both candidates are so incredibly evil. The Republicrat party needs to die. We need to stop supporting it. Vote third-party or do a write-in.

By: FightTheCorruptGov

FightTheCorruptGov — Sun, 28 Oct 2012 03:25:00 +0000

I don’t agree with ending space exploration.
This exploratory science is the most important sort of science as far as I’m concerned.
It is the science that is most likely to result in us discovering completely new things about our universe which will change things to such an extent that disease curing becomes child’s play.
It is the pseudo-scientists — such as those torturing animals in labs and developing new military weapons & unnecessary toxic pharmaceuticals — who need to be shut down.
If any changes need to be made to space exploration programs, it should be increases in funding and transparency and separation from the government/military.

By: LoneNomad

LoneNomad — Mon, 08 Oct 2012 06:09:00 +0000

One question: was the lightbulb invented by some guy (Edison probably stole the concept) staring at a candle for hours before getting the idea? No, it was discovered through research in electricity. ¨Stop researching electricity! We need light, not fancy arcs!¨ is equivalent to ¨Stop sending thrash to mars, we need to cure cancer!¨. We very rarely have all the variables affecting our lives. You can’t just ask scientists to just find a cure for cancer. Just like the lightbulb, they’re not likely to find an answer by looking at tumor radiography for hours. We need research in every fields to cover every fronts that might give us answers.

Stop deifying nature and oversimplifying the relationships between everything that makes our world hold together ; Rationalize and see how thing as they truly are, with the less bias possible, then think about how they should be ; Don’t be afraid of idealism ; Stop making empty and useless affirmations: ¨We’re all doomed¨ doesn’t lead us anywhere good.

I believe that if everyone lived by these statements, we would all be better off.

By: LoneNomad

LoneNomad — Mon, 08 Oct 2012 06:07:00 +0000

Sorry, wrong thread.

By: LoneNomad

LoneNomad — Mon, 08 Oct 2012 06:06:00 +0000

I believe that if everyone lived by these statements, we would all be better off.

By: Dervin Alexander

Dervin Alexander — Tue, 25 Sep 2012 06:04:00 +0000

and fix all other problems! DOTCOM2102

By: Jason Wright

Jason Wright — Mon, 24 Sep 2012 14:52:00 +0000

The biggest issue is that NASA is literally sending the trash of our science to mars.

We have the ability to create insanely better technology to send on the journey, but they do not because NASA is stuck in an outdated way of doing things.

Hows that rocket propulsion going? Oh right, its outdated and has been for many years.

The biggest issue is that the war on free energy is what actually truly affects NASA, as most of the other forms of traveling to space actually use a technology that creates its own energy.

NASA just needs a little bit of a restructure. Sure, those Nazi scientists from project paperclip were super smart all those years ago – But sadly they layed a groundwork for an organisation that would find itself obsolete by the private market.

By: Abraham_Lincoln

Abraham_Lincoln — Wed, 12 Sep 2012 09:13:00 +0000

If Kim were President, he would sit onto Obama and squash him. He would then proceed to squash on all those dirty rotten scoundrel congress members who take bribes and back-handers from the corrupt elite and powerful.

In this way, Kim will have pretty much overnight removed the corrupt from both Houses, where Kim can then proceed to lead the US to a brighter, more united, more prosperous country, free from cronyism and corruption.

God Bless Kim Dotcom and the U.S. of A.

By: TurboKitty

TurboKitty — Wed, 12 Sep 2012 01:31:00 +0000

In the event the President vetoes a law, Congress and the Senate have to reconvene to come up with a 2/3rds majority to pass that law without the President’s signature … Congress still makes the laws …