TorrentFreak

The place where breaking news, BitTorrent and copyright collide

Kim Dotcom Sings: Are You Going to Fix This Mr. President?

Kim Dotcom has just released his long-awaited new song ‘Mr. President’, directed at United States President Barack Obama. In the song Megaupload’s founder says that Hollywood is taking over politics and that the Government is killing innovation. Dotcom released the song and video on his newly launched website, and both can be shared for free.

“The war for the Internet has begun. Hollywood is in control of politics. The Government is killing innovation. Don’t let them get away with that.”

These are the opening words of Kim Dotcom’s newly released track ‘Mr. President’. The song is directed at U.S. President Barack Obama who, according to Dotcom, played an important role in the destruction of Megaupload.

Despite being involved in what the Department of Justice describes as “the largest criminal copyright cases ever brought by the United States,” Kim Dotcom has not chosen to lay low. Instead, he is fighting the forces behind the criminal investigation both off- and online.

“Our Internet Freedom is under attack on President Obama’s watch,” Dotcom told TorrentFreak this morning commenting on the release of the song.

“President Obama should have a look at the situation and reassure his voters that Internet freedom and innovation are his priorities. He should consider helping millions of Mega users to get their files back. Obama should motivate Hollywood to innovate and adopt to today’s light speed Internet environment instead of freezing innovation and progress,” Dotcom adds.


Kim Dotcom’s Mr. President

Megaupload’s founder previously told TorrentFreak that Vice President Joe Biden was the one who ordered the shutdown of the file-hosting service. According to Dotcom the Mega investigation was a ‘gift’ to Hollywood, facilitated by corrupt Government forces.

By targeting Megaupload and teaming up with Hollywood, the U.S. Government chose a path of destruction that will kill many new and innovative businesses on the Internet, Dotcom believes. This needs to change.

“There needs to be a dialog leading to solutions. Aggression and destruction will hurt the US economy. The innovators of tomorrow will avoid doing business in the US. Shutting down one of the leading cloud storage sites, ignoring due process, the rule of law and the constitutional rights of our users is not the way to go,” Dotcom told us.

“Are you going to fix this, Mr. President?”

Dotcom is encouraging everyone who stands by him to copy and share the song. Or as Kim sings:

“We must oppose. Don’t vote for those who want to take us back in time. We must expose the people who chose to turn innovation into crime.”

The track and video are now available on Kim Dotcom’s newly launched website Kim.com.


Kim.com

mr president

Related Posts

Previous Post | Next Post

  • Pingback: Kim Dotcom Sings: Are You Going to Fix This Mr. President?

  • Trololol

    Sounds cool, but too black-eyed-peas-y for me. Also. fuck Obama.

    • Internet Remix Culture

       WE NEED THE VOCAL TRACK !

      • yello

        one word. Beautiful

        • Spidey

          Beautiful? What do you mean in comparison to what? What is beautiful about a fat crook making a propganda video to hook all of you rain dead sheeple?
          You are all a fucking joke.
          Watch what happen in August!!!! Your file sharing days are numbered.

        • Spidey is an idiot

          SPIDEY- since i can not reply to your idiotic comment ill reply above it. Have you even looked into WHY he was arrested at gun point by the USA in a foreign country?? Do you know what his company even did? Or are you too busy reading and spewing back what your own government propaganda has fed you? Everything he did is protected in america with laws, yet they arrested him. Why has rapid share, and 100′s of other file transfer sites still open? Why is bittorrent allowed to continue if copyrighted material is being transferred, oh yeah, the investors are also big hollywood and politicians… and what does it matter he’s fat? and since when are you guilty until proven innocent in america? and why did Mr. Dotcom give access to EVERY major hollywood studio to remove any copyright material they found on Megaupload? Why are you spewing up the same rhetoric of your government? and why do you trust a government that has lied to you OVER AND OVER? Why haven’t you done the slightest bit of research on your own? And you call us sheeple???? 

    • Guest

      Worst song of the decade for me after the Megaupload song.

      • RIAAtarded

        yeah have to agree the message is getting lost in the cheesiness factor of the song. KimDotCom should be trying to gain mass appeal with this and use it as a motivational tool to get across a point. Currently it just seems like a platform for his poor singing voice.

      • Guest

        It’s not about the music, it’s about the message. It also shows that Kim probably did most of it himself. He could have hired someone to compose something better or maybe not as his funds are frozen. Offers would have been there if he asked I’m sure. Dan Bull?
        Get behind the message and spread it!

        • Decimus

          You’re right, it is about the message.  But when you have music incorporated into your message, it can distract the listener from the message, as it was demonstrated.  Music is a form of art and should be judged as such.

          He really should have gotten some artists to help him out.  Most musicians have songwriters, which Kim is completely capable of.  Kim has plenty of fans and supporters, he should really utilize what he can to get the message across.

      • Guest

         The song is great!

    • No1_2_u

      To think Obama was regarded as the “saviour” when he ran for office & entered the White House; seems to me he’s just another whore pulling his pants down for whomever waves the biggest wad of cash in his face.

      • http://otester.myopenid.com/ PiRat

        I think it’s the general public that has their pants down mostly.

      • FakeElections

         He was always a whore. How many times did he say the word “change” before he won. It was like he’d been picked in advance to win i heard him say change so often. Btw the winner next time is Romley. The banks have chosen him already..

      • http://tehparadox.com/ tehPARADOX

        Delusional of people to think that. The presidency is a joke now.

    • PlatinumC

      I love the idea of it alot, but for my personal taste I have to say, that didn’t like the song itself (maybe more drums needed).
      gotta wait for the dub remix I guess

      • WasterOfTime

        With Dotcom’s permission, of course (with credit to him writing the song), I hope he doesn’t mind someone remixing his song to be less cheesy. Keep the message, change the tune.

        As long as the message gets out there, I don’t think he would mind; seeing as getting the message across is the main goal here.

  • http://twitter.com/MAFIAAFire MAFIAAFire

    Heh!

    Beginning to really like this guy! Keep it up Dotcom!

    • Nick

      I bet in the next 48 hours this video will be shut down for no fucking reason, once again for trolling kim.com …

      US have to change, cuz…they aren’t playing a clean game at all.

    • http://torrentfreak.com/ Rob8urcakes

      I’m starting to love this guy too MF :)  And it’s quite extraordinary.  His energy to face-up to these USA fascist bullies in government is so damned admirable there’s gonna have to be a movie made about this whole sorry episode in Human history.

      Kim D’s approach to resolving the problem between media profit + law + rights + freedom is so refreshing that if I were female I’d want to have his babies ffs!!!  But I’ll settle for him becoming the next President of the USA – or, failing that minor obstacle, the World would do instead ;)

      Simply click the LIKE button if you agree.

    • WasterOfTime

       To have enough balls to stand up to the forces of evil/wrong regardless what they do to him; that always ranks well with me. Give this man a pair of Kamina’s glasses. I’d like to hear him yell back “Just who the hell do you think I am?!!”. ‘></'

    • JordanKratz

       Me too MAFIAAFire.
      And a big Hello to you as well !!!

    • http://www.petetong.net/ Blah

       always liked Kimble :D

  • Fantastic

    Obama is in way too deep to do anything. And I have my own doubts to his ignorance of this whole affair.

  • Sketch

    yeah god dammit i want my video of my POT grow back…..i cant live without it….i actaully had to put it up on rapidshit…..idk man, i find myself quite removed from new zealand and the kim dotcom saga……he does seem to whine alot, of course if the govt took my billions i would whine alot too.

  • H4rfang

    The US government, the RIAA, MPAA are killing innovation and they are also screwing artist, it’s time for them to pay for that. they should all go to jail because they are the biggest murderer of all time. f*ck them all

    • Guest

       The artists screw themselves over by going under the blanket with MPAA and RIAA. The way to kill the MPAA and RIAA is for the artists to scrub their contacts and go indie.

  • tiger97a

    you go kim, i use to feel that we shouldn’t copy anything but this has shown the us is being bought and paid for by companies that should not be allowed to lobbyist congress but how do you think they gotten rich, by having knowledge of stock moves an so forth. go kim dot com

  • etherkye

    A. Why is the song not on the website.

    B. Why is there no G+ button!!!

  • GUEST

    Another catchy tune by the dude behind B.E.P.

    I hope the US thinks this is a thorn in their eyes. They keep shooting themselves in the foot. The US Government, MPAA and RIAA – The 3 most hated organizations in this world. I can only hope that one day that they all self-implode.

  • Incognito

    Not a single word about how Kim Schmitz is a cheap bastard who wouldn’t hesitate to sell out his mates, when he was busted for card fraud? Or that he made a fortune by ripping of artists, kids and basically everybody? Seriously, this man does not deserve any fame. This movement has much better heroes to offer, who also are in serious legal trouble (Peter Sunde, Bradly Manning, hundreds of Anons being charged for computer sabotage, etc). 

    • GUEST

       Neither of the abovementioned names have the same Social power and connections that Kim DotCom possesses. You think Bradly is rubbing shoulders with Black Eyed Peas and big artists? Or live in a $30M mansion…? They cant even pay their fines – Kim could pay that shit, in a heartbeat if those criminal charges were dropped. His lawyer bills are most likely bigger than their fines.

      And yes…Kim spent $3M on a music video, but $0 on Lobbying Powers in the US. I know where my $3M would have gone to. He would have been going still and MPAA would only have the option to civil sue his fat arse.

      • No More Corruption Please

        As a US citizen, I applaud Dotcom for not throwing money at lobbyists to win undemocratic influence over our representatives. Lobbying is a sleazy practice no matter what the goal is.

        Besides, the MPAA, RIAA, and BSA can and will outspend any opposition on lobbying. Dotcom isn’t *that* rich.

        • Corruption is why we win

          Applaud all you want, but when you lose, what good did your moralistic principles do for you?

        • Guest

           @5fc21e10668c2961dafe4754f1c4e325:disqus  Extionating the artists like the MPAA and RIAA etc. by giving the artists back very little of the money and keeping the vast majority of money for themselves. Bribing and paying off politicians to do your very dirty work to get what you want may be moralistic to you my friend but its CORRUPTION to the eyes of the world.

        • Corruption is why we win

          Guest, why are you talking about artists being paid?  This isn’t even in discussion here.

          On the topic of lobbying: Your problem is you’re unable face the truth about how the world
          actually works.  It’s a fucking fact that money talks, and “bribing”
          those in positions of influence can greatly help you towards getting
          what you want.  Call it corrupt if you like (except it’s legal here, so
          technically it’s not), but that’s just the way things are.

          So,
          if or when you find yourself to have lost position to others that did
          not limit their means of defeating you due to cute notions of morality,
          you tell me: what good does it do for you?  Business doesn’t really give a
          fuck for morality other than for its usefulness in portraying a positive public image.  Limiting your own ability to win in the face of
          competition due to morality concerns is a handicap that can
          cause you to lose to a competitor that doesn’t care, because by not doing so they gain the advantage.  Though you may not like that, it’s a fact.  It’s the
          real world, not the fancy fairytale you’ve been raised to believe.  Open
          your eyes and look around.

        • Guest

          @5fc21e10668c2961dafe4754f1c4e325:disqus

          Fuck the way the world works. it’s time to change it. 

        • GUEST

          Your applauds don’t help when all the funds are frozen, you’re thrown in jail for a month and your house is raided and everyone you own is TAKEN.

          I would HAVE paid them the $3M and I would have AVOIDED getting slapped around in Prison. Look at Rapidshare. They spent $1M on lobbying themselves out of trouble.

    • Guest

      The former claim has already been punished by the courts.

      The latter claim has yet to be proven in court.

      You don’t get to SWAT team someone for crimes already prosecuted for.

    • Guest

      If you want to talk about ripping of artists I suggest you look at the MPAA and RIAA as they are very ones in this world who are SCREWING the artists big time with extortionating money from those artists with the giving the artists very little money and keeping the vast majority of the money for themselves. So do you think its ok for the MPAA and RIAA to be extortionate and racketeering etc. The artists have only got themselves to blame for signing up to blood sucking extortionate racketeering leaches in the first place.

    • Guest

      lol

      The fact that MAFIAA trolls are telling is not to give Kim Dotcom fame is a sign that we should absolutely give Kim Dotcom fame. 

      • Guest

        *telling us

  • Anonymous

    showing my complete ignorance on the matter, how can this be entered into the music charts? i assume what is needed is a way of buying the song to prove the number of purchases? is this something that only Kim can sort out? wouldn’t it be absolutely awesome if it got to the number 1 spot around the world? with the numbers that opposed SOPA, PIPA, ACTA, TPP, CISPA and other similar ‘freedom destroying bills in favour of giant corporations and industries’, this shouldn’t be a problem. what i can see though is those that this is directed towards doing whatever they possibly can, as usual, to stifle the people. so much truth in the song, it’s sure to hurt!!

    • Derp

      Will never happen because the song hurts my ears.

  • Regular guy

    There’s a lot of crazies on here cheering for some fat gangster who’s made millions from fraud and theft.  More likely all this cheering is orchestrated – he’s got ever incentive to get his friends and partners in crime posting and tweeting in earnest to give the impression that he’s got popular support.  He made his choice a long time ago to engage in fraud and theft and we’re all better off if he’s behind bars 

    • Lthrpuphlfx

      You are a “Regular Guy…..full of Shit!

    • GUEST

       His past crimes have nothing to do with the current crime he’s charged for, you fucking moron. He did his time, he got a slap on the wrist (blame German courts for this), so fraud and theft (of credit cards etc.) has nothing to do with the current situation.

      He’s an opportunistic man who got first move advantage in a business that each Tech Giant has started to form; cloud storage space.

    • Esn

       @fc71c4dff9d6e4d717ba303dd1377e15:disqus , this isn’t about Kim, this is about what he now represents. It’s not Kim Dotcom who has popular support, it’s the idea of being able to share culture with whoever you want and being free from unwanted surveillance. Things that his website facilitated. Everybody understands that if he’s allowed to go down, they’ll go after other filelockers like Dropbox next, and they’ll restrict the internet as much as they possibly can. There’s a reason why the government and Hollywood are collaborating so closely: their objectives are the same, to know exactly what the citizens are doing online and prevent activities they don’t like.

      For others, it’s about preventing the chilling effect that things like this (shutting down a company with no trial, allowing them no money for their own defence) will surely have on technological innovation. TorrentFreak had an article about that recently, linking to a study that was done about how the shutdown of Napster affected the past decade: http://torrentfreak.com/how-big-music-threatened-startups-and-killed-innovation-120709/

      • Monster

         Please!…Kim Dotcom pretends to represent the people the same way Obama did when he was up for election. In the end he’s no different than any other politician or common crook. He’s all about getting his power & money.

        Things do need to change and people shouldn’t be getting hammered for all this copyright/pirating shit but lets please stop putting this man on a pedestal like he’s some kind of peoples champ.

        Lets also not forget that everybody who says “fuck obama” now all over the world also bought into his bullshit 4 years ago..not just americans.

    • Techanon

      He hasn’t been convicted of anything yet, so much for inocent until proven guilty.

    • Dupe

      and pricks like you posting here, that condone a complete takeover of the internet by a bunch of 80 year old, self serving, backwards thinking, megalomaniacs, is ok, is it?

    • Film at 11:00

      Regular guy publicly exhibits the average IQ of a true regular guy.

    • Madmac

       Who you talkin bout… Mr dead apple… The thief who became apple?

    • Guest

      If you want to talk about Fraud and Theft then I suggest you look at the MPAA and RIAA etc. as they are the very ones who have made Millions if not a Billion or 2 from the SCREWING of their very own artists big time with extortinating more from with giving the artists very little money and keeping the vast majority of money for themselves. The MPAA and RIAA are the very ones who should have been charged with Fraud, Racketeering etc.

    • Guest

      “ fat gangster who’s made millions from fraud and theft. ”

      I think you’ve got Kim Dotcom confused with the  MAFIAA, son.

    • Guest

      Go away and hide your ugly face corporate paid troll! You are too obvious to be useful as a fake opinion generator. Even if you were not the large number of dissenting opinion you generate each time you write a word would have make your posting counter productive for your bosses anyway.

      Sorry dude but your crap is not working at all and you should be ashamed of yourself for such an immoral behavior. But I believe this to be the trade-mark of the corporate entertainment industry and their departments of lies and deception.

      Everyone is use to it by now and compensate automatically.

  • Pingback: Kim Dotcom Sings: Are You Going to Fix This Mr. President? | We R Pirates

  • Montisaquadeis

    Hmm wonder how long till this get removed due to copy violations.

    • FinalApokylypse

       I hope it happens, would be hilarious. Especially if it was the big guns like UMG etc :P.

    • Guest

      If the song is kept on his very own website then i guess he will be served with a DMCA notice but if the song is uploaded to another website that he does not operate like youtube for example then they will be the ones to be served with a DMCA notice and I would not be surprised if this does happen and the song gets taken off the likes of youtube etc. Just shows the corruption and misuse of the DMCA if the song gets taken off any site other than his own website.

  • Guest

    Most people kinda love freedom but they are also willing to give it up if it doesn’t concern them or if they’re poked hard enough into getting defensive.
    If people actually knew and understood the effects of internet censorship they’d oppose it, but finding the information and properly understanding it is hard.

    I hope a simple song could be a good gateway for that information for the general public.
    Get that thing to youtube, dailymotion, faceboo, twitter, google+, steam, get it everywhere. Make a wiki page for it.
    Let people inform themselves of the truths the governments don’t want them to know.
    Information is oppression’s biggest threat.

  • Guest

    Has the sound of ‘I’m a Barbie Girl in a Barbie World…’ 

    Really credible and cool, mister Schmitz.

    • Austronymous Coward

      So? Rap and Hip-Hop has always taken segments of songs previously made and rehashed it into something new (for relative values) without paying for the “right” to use the sampled music.
      Oh, you haven’t seen the vids by Dan Bull (Douglby) or Dave-from-Boyinaband.com (Boyinaband) about “Lord Finesse” suing Mac Miller for $10 Million for using “Hip 2 Da Game” (which sampled Oscar Peterson’s “Dream of You”) in a free release (aka: no fucking money being made), or read upon the Dan Bull video articles, have you?

      Oh, wait, that wasn’t the point you were shilling at, was it? *sigh* Corptards, trying so hard to act as if they were gurus sent to preach to us “mere mortals” of the Digital Age (or some might argue, Digital Realm).

  • Anon

    He’s actually starting to sound good and it’s definitely a catchy tune.

  • Pingback: Kim Dotcom Sings: Are You Going to Fix This Mr. President? - Webmaster Forum

  • Pingback: Kim Dotcom mit neuer Website und Song: What happened to “Change”, Mr. President? | Basic Thinking

  • Conservative

    This song R0xx0rz!  Kim Dotcom hasn’t been this kewl since the Amiga daze!

    This song is much better than any Blackeyed Peas song I have ever heard.

  • Fist Obama

    Let’s boycott all US products :)
    Fight these TERRORIST with our wallets!

    • Guest

      I’m alrady boycotting as much US as I possibly can.
      Cannot avoid them all, I’m afraid.

      • Liquid Man

        Oil you mean? Hope one day we can make our own technology without their fucking oil.

    • Anyone

      most “US products” are made in China anyway
      they are boycotting themselves ;)

      • Liquid Man

        Nope. Then China will be forced to make products for other countries but not the US ;)

  • Carolyn Blake

    But keep in mind, it is not nor has it ever been about copyright. That is just a nice perk of income the industry gets. What this is about is engineering control and takeover of the internet. And protecting Monsanto.

    • ScrewEwe2

      “What this is about is engineering control and takeover of the internet. And protecting Monsanto.”

      So in the end, the MAFIAA isn’t about music and movies but protecting Monsanto’s genetically enginered Soybean monopoly? OK………….now I understand. We better shut down the interwebz so the Moon Nazi’s don’t get hold of Monsanto’s genetically enginered Soybean plans and use the Moon to grow Soybeans and then sell underpriced Soy Sauce to the Chinese, thereby cutting out American Soy Sauce farmers. What’s next, putting American Dental Floss farmers out of business? These Moon Nazi’s, Monsanto and the Chinese are indubitably inscrutable indeed. 

  • boobs

    Can we get the extradition quashed, just so he doesn’t release any more songs ?

  • Nick

    lol, from 1:28 to 1:31 it’s police from Montreal, and it’s not the same situation AT ALL here…sorry guys lol^^ 

  • Obvious

    Why do all the megaupload songs sound the same :(

    • Anyone

      same producer

      • MadAsASnake

         you can say the same thing about the average boy band…

  • wandfow

    I think fat boy needs to go have a few more cheeseburgers lol.
    Anon-Now.tk

  • http://nejtillpirater.wordpress.com/ Nejtillpirater

    “Dotcom released the song and video on his newly launched website, and both can be shared for free.”

    For free as in that the pirated copyright owners have already paid for it through lost sales. It’s easy to be generous when somebody else has paid for it.

    • Conservative

      I am a pirated copyright owner.  But I did not in any way pay for this video to be produced.  

      • http://nejtillpirater.wordpress.com/ Nejtillpirater

        If you didn’t lose any sales because of Kim Dotcom’s piracy, you obviously didn’t pay. But the copyright owners who did lose sales because of Kim Dotcom have obviously paid for the video since his money comes from piracy.

        • Anyone

          piracy doesn’t cause “lost sales”
          stop spreading that lie that has been disproved many times already

          and his money came from people paying for a great service he provided, not from piracy

        • Guest

          The money has not come from piracy i suggest you look at his website http://www.kim.com. before you flap your gums lol

        • Monster

           Piracy helps people like you. Its been proven time and time again. Just because you’re terrible at what you do you use it as an excuse.

        • GUEST

           You never LOST sales. Your production simply SUCKED. Get that through your THICK skull, please.

        • http://nejtillpirater.wordpress.com/ Nejtillpirater

          @ac772b48d6728242138b1df18c9716e5:disqus 

          “ You never LOST sales.”

          Piracy is like going to the movies and paying voluntarily afterwards, and in 99% of the cases saying that you didn’t like it so you’re not going to pay. Or going to a football match and not paying because your team lost or any other bad excuses for not paying.

          Of course it’s lost sales in many cases, you can’t ignore that.

    • Anyone

      you can’t pay anything with “lost sales”
      what are you rambling on about?

    • Guest

      Yeah shared for FREE, unlike the blood sucking leaches of the MPAA and RIAA who are the ONES who are extortionating and racketeering money from their very own artists with taking vast amounts of money and only giving the artists very little in return. The MPAA and RIAA etc are the ones who should be charged with extortion and racketeering, Kim Dotcom has not committed any crimes under US law or jurisdiction because he does come under US law or jurisdiction.

      If you don’t like the fact that artists are getting very little money then i suggest you take it up with the blood sucking leaches at the MPAA and RIAA as they are ones who are doing the extortionating and racketeering etc. Taking a very huge percentage and only giving the artists very little in return. As for siding with the MPAA and RIAA etc. then as the song goes go “you are pissing in the wind my friend pissing in the wind”

      • Guest

        I meant to have said “Kim Dotcom has NOT committed any crimes under US law or jurisdiction because he does NOT come under US law or jurisdiction.

    • Fredrika

      > “For free as in that the pirated copyright owners have already paid for it through lost sales.”

      You seem extremely confused today. You can not pay with something that you did not have in the first place. There’s not such thing as a lost sale. Either you sold or you didn’t. If you didn’t, for whatever reason, you did not have the sale. Since you didn’t have it, you can not loose it. You cannot loose what you never had. Simple logic, which for some reason seems to go right by you.

      When an entrepreneur fails to sell something, for whatever reason, it means he has failed at selling, and that means that he deserves no money whatsoever. He has no right to any money whatsoever. That’s how entrepreneurship and the free market works.  Do you have a problem with the free market? Are you advocating communism or a planned economy, where weak failed entrepreneurs should get money for free, without selling anything?

      > “It’s easy to be generous when somebody else has paid for it.”

      You seem to have a hard time understanding the concept of paying and money today. He paid for it himself, with his own money. The fact that some of that money might have been made from running a service which others have used to commit copyright infringements does not mean that those money aren’t his money.

      That a person has had his copyright monopoly infringed upon does not mean that all money belonging to an abettor to the alleged infringer automatically belongs to the copyright holder. If he can prove economical damage, he might be awarded compensation from the actual infringer, but compensation is something completely different than ownership of money.

      • http://www.facebook.com/vehrmt Ian Vehrmt

        Fredrika, I’ve read a few your comments on various articles today, and I just wanted to tell you that your ability to use proper reasoning and facts when countering typical irrational comments is refreshing, and has quite frankly made my evening. I salute you.

        • Fredrika

          > “Fredrika, I’ve read a few your comments on various articles today, and I just wanted to tell you that your ability to use proper reasoning and facts when countering typical irrational comments is refreshing, and has quite frankly made my evening. I salute you.”

          And i wasn’t even about to rock!! =)

        • Fredrika

          > “..and has quite frankly made my evening.”

          Regarding making someone’s evening, obviously, first of all, thank you for the complement! Compliments and a noticeable higher amount of likes on one’s comments under an article than any other commentator always warms me up.

          But i write my comments because i have a lot of fun while writing them, and since i read and write fast, it takes very little time from my other activities.

          However, sometimes you get responses on comments that actually makes one’s day or evening, when someone seems to have read them and indicates that he understood them and that it changed his way of looking upon things. One such discussion i had that comes to memory is the one under this article with commentator Resin(the comments unfortunately doesn’t come in correct chronological order, but maybe you can make them out any way) from seven months ago(The article is also worth a read):

          http://torrentfreak.com/the-copyright-industry-a-century-of-deceit-111127/

          Initially i wasn’t sure if he was just another troll(as some of the regulars here on TF), or someone ignorant idiot hell-bent on not understanding(as TF’s newest addition, if anyone can guess who i refer to..), but as the discussion progressed he challenged me with more questions that showed that he tried to understand, and that he actually listened and understood, and in the end seemed to have gotten a deeper understanding for the subject. Seeing that in his responses really made my evening that night.

          And if you want more evenings made there are 1200+ comments under my Disqus profile.. =) Although there is a lot of repetitive debunking of trolls and the same propaganda and falsified premisses over and over again..

      • jmsarturo

         Fredrika, your comments turn me on.

        • Fredrika

          > “Fredrika, your comments turn me on.”

          I haven’t even flashed you!! =)

        • jmsarturo

          What’s stopping you? ;p

      • MadAsASnake

         I’m guessing that, as they beleive more money than exists belongs to them, that no-one else can legally have money or pay for things…

      • Hsun

        Again your tired boring mantra ‘you seem confused’. Have you ever just sat back and self analysed yourself?
        What a tired bore you are.

    • Guest

      Kim Dotcom’s money came from MegaUpload subscriptions. 

      You’re pretending like all MegaUpload subscribers were pirates. Which is unsurprising considering that you’re a MAFIAA plant with a vested interest in demonizing Dotcom and MU. 

      If you subtracted the number of pirate subscriptions from the total number of MU subscribers, it would still likely be generating a fuckton of revenue and making Dotcom rich. 

      Furthermore, one download does not automatically equal one lost sale by any stretch of the imagination, so your argument breaks down even more. If that’s possible.

      Incidentally, the copyright owners are rarely the artistst. The owners are usually  artist-robbing thieves like the MPAA or RIAA. Just wanted to clear that up. 

  • Guest

    I wonder how long it will be before the US authorities take down and shut his website being as it has the .com address?

  • Pingback: Kim Dotcom Launches Vicious Offensive Against World With New Song of Mass Destruction [Video] « VidenOmkring

  • Kawli

    not bad really, although he is a touch ego-maniacal
    the message rings true

  • Andrew me

    I want to leave this link here so that you can see who the person is that the DOJ is trying to destroy.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZvrRaeHD5TE

  • Pingback: Tech-Critics: Kim Dotcom Launches Vicious Offensive Against World With New Song of Mass Destruction [Video]

  • Guest

    In before the video is removed from Youtube on a bogus copyright infringement claim.

  • Moonsurfer_1

    Shared the song. Would have prefered a metal version though!

    • ScrewEwe2

      Yeah, a metal version would have been cool. Personally, I’m not into this techno pop slop, however, knowing that headbangers are a minority, I’m sure that a ton of folks will love his song and video. I’ll never warm up to electronic drum beats. Gotta give Kim 10 points for tryin’ though.

      My thoughts go out to the people killed, wounded and affected by the Colorado movie theater shooting last night. Gotta get ready to head out so I think I’ll listen to some Slayer,Seasons In The Abyss while I get ready. 

  • What about CC?

    From his website:
    “© ALL RIGHTS RESERVED”

    “6. Copyright PolicyYou may not post,
    distribute, or reproduce in any way any copyrighted material,
    trademarks, or other proprietary information without obtaining the prior
    written consent of the owner of such proprietary rights.”

    Umm.. hasn’t he heard about Creative Commons? Cmoon.. all the pro-pirates, pro-internet-freedom people should use CC.

  • Regular guy

    Sounds like I shaken up a few crazies… Good.  The foul mouthed commentary is just a reflection on what the people who have written it are like.  What we write and say often says more about ourselves than anything else.

    It’s all the usual tedious list of excuses and contrivances defend either Kim Dotcom or his deceitful cause.

    The various notions of internet freedom are one such contrivance – I’m just surprised at the lengths people to go to fool themselves.

    The internet is not free and never has been.  For starters to get on to the internet one has to pay, most commonly through an ISP or a phone company, mostly big corporations.  No pay = no internet. 

    Freedom for what?  Surveillance of what?  Every day when we log on we have ensure our firewalls are up to date to fend of viruses and malware, we receive phishing emails that try to con us into divulging bank account passwords.  The “internet freedom” that’s demanded for Pirate Bay, Megaupload etc. to continue unhindered is also a protection for any other con artist.  People can’t have it both ways.  If you have your bank account hacked into – then you might need to consider just who is benefitting from your campaigning for “internet freedom”. 

    • Trav

        “Sounds like I shaken up a few crazies… Good.  The foul mouthed
      commentary is just a reflection on what the people who have written it
      are like.”

      Nope.

      Since you provoked it.

      IMO, those who provoke a specific response have no grounds to go “Ahaah! This proves X about [person]“.

    • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_DWYCIV77HW454SKAKZWDH5IZZE Dudeman

      I thought the 50 cent party only got their 50 cents for
      posting pro government stuff in China… :)

       With your overwhelming knowledge of the Internet (aka ‘The Tubes’), you’d
      think that you’d understand how ‘preaching’ a message goes especially when you
      go to a site where you’re certain to find no quarter. But God love you for
      trying.

       Freedom and Personal Responsibility go hand in hand. If someone has to
      keep you safe from the world you live in then you aren’t “Free”, you
      are little more than a petchildinvalid who for all intensive purposes are not free. As for who benefits from the free exchange of ideas we (mostly) currently enjoy? Everyone does. Is that good or bad? Neither…Both.. Who knows? But it’s FREE! Our only other option is to have a select few, easily corruptible individuals decide what is acceptable behavior for us.

        “Cost” in respect to “Free” is moot since we
      speak English and words have multiple meanings (i.e. Free can mean “No
      Cost” but also means “the power to determine action without
      restraint”. So “land of the free” doesn’t mean that it doesn’t cost
      anything just like “a free internet” doesn’t mean “like at Starbucks”. However I find it interesting that you cite how we pay “big
      corporations” for our internet as if that’s a bad thing while also trying
      to condemn a piece of work that is essentially lashing out at legislation that
      benefits a few big corporations… and no one else (except maybe for some people trying to pad their re-election campaigns). *swing and a miss*

       

       But I digress… Good luck in your “crusade” to
      do… whatever it is you think you’re going to do (you were never very clear on that)… Even if that’s just to “Shaken up a few crazies” (Oh…Right… Well done sir!)

      • Regular Guy

        A surprising attempt at intellectual engagement, untypical for this site.  To develop further the discussion on a couple of points,

        There is much ranting about sucking it to major record labels but the internet as we know it owes everything to massively bigger corporations investing billions on fiber optic cables etc – and they get a return on their investment through the money we all pay to get on the internet.  I offer no opinon as to whether this is a good thing or not – it’s just a fact.  The degree of ”Internet Freedom” we have is dependent on the commercial interests of those whom we pay for access – always has been.

        Plus of course Megaupload is a major corporation – generating millions that enables Kim Dotcom a flamboyant lavish lifestyle in his mansion.  There is something peculiar about the supposed anti-capitalists on this thread being so anxious to defend him.

        Yes there are two types of free, i.e. “no cost” and “liberty” but the two things cannot be separated.  One may be free to travel where one wants but that’s restricted by planes trains and automobiles not being available for free. This is the situation with the internet.

        My sole purpose in posting was to “shake up a few crazies” – its surprisingly easy when all you have to do is deliver some frank truths.

        • Guest

          “There is something peculiar about the supposed anti-capitalists on this thread”

          There are no supposed anti-capitalists on this thread. Making up points is bad, mmkay? 

          “My sole purpose in posting was to “shake up a few crazies” -”

          Your sole purpose seems to have been to troll with some strawmen. 

    • Guest

      I guess you would consider it to be ok for the MPAA and RIAA to be extortionate and racketeering their very own artists because that is what the MPAA and RIAA are clearly doing. They are the ones who are CORRUPT.

      And as for your comment “The foul mouthed commentary is just a reflection on what the people who have written it are like” you are clearly judging yourself the same exactly as what you have written yourself. PMSL

    • Guest

      “Every day when we log on we have ensure our firewalls are up to date to fend of viruses and malware”

      lulzI see somebody is a Windows user =D

      • Guest

         Luzd see somebody is a  Mac user. I don’t want to frighten you but Tests have shown that the mac OS although based on linux is easier to hack than windows.

        Why? Because these idiot removed the user security capabilities to make it

        EASY TO USE!!!

         Good job Steve Job!

        • Guest

          *laughs* 

          Yes, the Mac OS is easier to hack than Windows. That’s why Windows is the one that gets the holy fuck hacked out of it on a daily basis, and also why it’s inflicted with hundreds of thousands of viruses and other varieties of malware. Because it’s fucking harder to hack.

          Winbot logic.

          You know, an OS needs to achieve a certain level of God awful shitty programming to have all the security holes of Windows, and no other OS in history has come even close to that level. I’m not just talking about the Mac OS, I’m talking about Linux, FreeBSD, BeOS, Haiku, AmigaOS, whatever. You name it. They’re all about a hundred times more secure because they were fortunate enough to have not been programmed by the dire retards at Microfail. 

        • Anyone

          @ac772b48d6728242138b1df18c9716e5:disqus
          Mac OS IS easier to hack
          but with single digits market share most programmers just don’t bother
          even if it is harder to hack Windows you’re hitting a much larger marketshare, so in the end it is more “economical” to go that route

    • Guest

      “The “internet freedom” that’s demanded for Pirate Bay, Megaupload etc. to continue unhindered is also a protection for any other con artist.”

      Nope. The freedom demanded for The Pirate Bay, Megaupload, etc. has nothing whatsoever to do with the freedom to con people, or hack in to bank accounts, or write malware or viruses.

      Like every industry shill, facts aren’t on your side – so you have to make shit up in an attempt to support your position. But nothing can support a  position based on fallacies, so it never really works. Aww, poor wittle shill.

  • Ah ha!

    I GET IT! Kim Dotcom = Kim.com!

    • Truth

      Me too, never dawned on me before.

  • Pingback: Torrent News » Kim Dotcom Sings: Are You Going to Fix This Mr. President?

  • Pingback: === popurls.com === popular today

  • tremor

    Megalomaniac. Fitting? I think so.

  • Pingback: Kim Dotcom Sings: Are You Going to Fix This Mr. President? - Webmaster Forum: Webhosting, SEO, Internet Marketing

  • Kim SMASH!

    Awesome website and music video.  

    So, is there a betting pool yet on how many hours it will be before the phony DCMA takedown notices start flying?

  • Pingback: In the News.. | TorGuard.net Blog - Anonymous VPN Services

  • Pingback: Kim Dotcom lança nova canção contra o governo dos EUA [vídeo] | Consultoria Jr

  • http://modmyi.com/forums/iphone-4-new-skins-themes-launches/740147-neurotech-hd.html#post5637502 Jay

    Hehe, nice – anything that calls out Obama is fine by me.

  • Hey Kim

    Hey Kim, how about making your site NoScript friendly? Way too heavily dependant on Javascript dude. 

    • Shogunreaper

       you can set what things that noscript blocks..

  • Pingback: Kim Dotcom Launches Vicious Offensive Against World With New Song of Mass Destruction [Video] | Aclarar Piel Blog Oficial

  • Anon

    Needs a dubstep remix

  • Mpaasucksdick

    Better be careful, when Obama pulls Chris’s cock from his mouth, he’ll get his man to do something about this…

  • Joe Bidden

     the thing i don’t get is: how will kim.com collect the money from the copyright for this song, if he only shares it?

    • Techanon

      donations?

    • Anyone

      this is more about getting the message out there than money

  • Pingback: Kim Dotcom Releases Song Call “Mr. President” | Pulse2 Technology and Social Media News

  • Pingback: Kim Dotcom Launches Vicious Offensive Against World With New Song of Mass Destruction [Video] |

  • xmichaelx

    Good message; terrible, terrible, song.

    Really awful. Really.

  • Pingback: Kim DotCom se enfrenta a EEUU a través de la música | IntelDig

  • bean pole

    this comment has been removed for the safety of the human race. but for those of you who have super duper xroxy proxies and wizard gnomes here’s  what it said
    i’m pretty sure that fat geezer has lost a few muther fuckin’ pounds, so some good has come of all this. nice message tho’

  • Pingback: Kim Dotcom Launches Vicious Offensive Against World With New Song of Mass Destruction [Video] « Robot Insurance

  • Pingback: Kim Dotcom Launches Vicious Offensive Against World With New Song of Mass Destruction [Video] | energizer67

  • Pingback: Kim Dotcom Launches Vicious Offensive Against World With New Song Of Mass Destruction | Gizmodo Australia

  • JordanKratz

    Keep up the good work Kim Dotcom.Millions of us Worldwide are behind you.
    Republicans and Democrats…………..You both are Corrupt Hypocrites and you both suck.

  • Regular Guy

    Guest above is extraordinarily exercised about the MPAA and RIAA ripping off their artists etc. But it’s just another exercise in distortion designed to justify the criminal activities of the pirates.

    There is an obvious inaccuracy in that both are  trade associations – they are not record labels or content creators and can’t rip off artists when they don’t have any.  Let’s assume therefore that Guest is referring to their member companies such as Paramount Pictures or Sony Records etc.

    If this was happening then the appropriate response is surely to support artists in efforts to secure improved royalty rates from studios and labels.  One can campaign for new laws.  There are organisation such as the Musicians Union in the UK dedicated to negotiating with record labels on artists behalf. 

    The degree to which record labels may be ripping off artists (or not) is a matter on which opinons differ but piracy is not an appropriate response.  For artists that just replaces low returns with no returns.

    • Guest

      It has been proved time and time again that piracy ie file sharing does not equate to sales loss so therefore there is NO actual payment loss to artists when doing so. Many people on here will agree that file sharing as in piracy does not equate to sales or payment loss to artists.

      • Guest

        To copy something as in file sharing is not a criminal activity because a person still retains the original file whereas to take/steal the original and leave nothing behind would be criminal. File sharing is not and never will it be criminal. To say file sharing is a criminal offence is a distortion to justify the lies of the Hollywood cartel because they are loosing money from their outdated business practices.

      • Spidey

        You are a complete bellend! I just just want for you to know this, but I suspect you already know it.

    • Anyone

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hollywood_accounting

      I want to see you spin this one

      • Guest

        I think you scared him off hehe

  • PelouzeTF

    Innovation LOL

    If Megaupload was innovative it wouldn’t need other companies/creators copy-written materials to make the idea work. The website would collapse if it only served businesses sharing documents and people sharing funny cat videos.

    Fact, almost all of these supposedly “user uploaded” websites only exist because the owners take advantage of loopholes and the users are happy to give these innovation killing lockers money to feed their insatiable appetite incredibly cheap / free.

    Storage isn’t innovation Kim. Never has been.

    • Anyone

      they didn’t need other companies’ materials, that’s just what some users choose to upload

      you don’t shut the whole post office down because some people send drugs over it
      you don’t close the highway because some people are speeding
      you don’t close MegaUpload because some people are infringing on a monopoly

      • PelouzeTF

        Of course they need materials that people really want. I’m sure you would believe that two identical filelockers, one hosting funny cat videos/people falling over clips and one redistributing the lastest films, movies and music would have exactly the same traffic and revenue ?

        No, you wouldn’t shut down either the post office or highway for the actions of “some” people abusing the service.

        Thats not exactly the case with filelockers though. Of course, I’m sure you believe that its only one or two people uploading material that infringe creators copyrights and that everyone else uploads family vacation videos that are being downloaded by 1000′s of people LOL.

        I really need to buy a premium filelocker subscription to get the latest video of some random persons vacation…….jeez deluded much ? LOL

    • Fredrika

      > “If Megaupload was innovative it wouldn’t need other companies/creators copy-written materials to make the idea work. The website would collapse if it only served businesses sharing documents and people sharing funny cat videos.”

      That exact same catastrophically ignorant argument could be made regarding the VCR’s and all other technological innovations which initially was used for home copying of intellectual works. So do you have a problem with Sony and JVC for innovating Betamax and VHS?

      In reality innovation of new technological products and services should obviously never stand back just because they can be used for copying of copyrighted works, even if it means infringing copying. To believe otherwise you have to suffer from serious delusion of grandeur. Do you seriously believe that our entire society and all technological advancements should revolve around the demands of a few monopoly holders, to make sure that they never have to experience the concept of free market competition? Newsflash, the supreme courts already put that ignorant stupid demand in the grave were it belongs decades ago.

      If people want to innovate new products and services which can be used for both legal and illegal use, and they just happen to be mainly used for infringing use(until the grossly incompetent content industry manages to figure out how to benefit from them, as they eventually did with VHS), that’s just the way it’s going to be, that’s the way it has to be for innovation to occur, and that’s the way the courts have already decided that it should be.

      The only party which will complain about that and reality are weak failed entrepreneurs that can’t handle themselves on the free market, but as you are fully aware of, weak failed entrepreneurs that can’t handle themselves on the free market deserve no revenues whatsoever, unless of course, you advocate communism or a planned economy???

      > “Fact, almost all of these supposedly “user uploaded” websites only exist because the owners take advantage of loopholes..”

      Again you spread out right lies. The courts who have a hell of a lot more understanding for which prohibitions that are reasonable and not to use in society have already concluded that the cyber lockers operate in the only reasonable  manner that exists, which is to respond to takedown notices afterwards when they receive them. That’s the way it has to work to not violate much more important values than a legislative monopoly, There exists no loop hole.

      So what you called a fact was in fact a lie.

      > “..and the users are happy to give these innovation killing lockers money to feed their insatiable appetite incredibly cheap / free.”

      Innovation killing? News flash: MP3, MP3 players, DivX, Xvid, H264, media players, Direct Connect, BitTorrent and cyberlockers were not innovated by the content industry. No new consumer oriented innovations have ever been innovated by the content industry, the content industry are on the contrary trying to stop all new innovations, until they’ve figured out a way to control it so that the free market stops existing and so that consumers no longer have any control over their own products that they own. You really distort reality in your claims. The only thing that kills innovations are the monopoly holders.

    • http://nejtillpirater.wordpress.com/ Nejtillpirater

      +1

      • Guest

        Does Nejtillpirater mean no more pirating?

        • http://nejtillpirater.wordpress.com/ Nejtillpirater

          The name in Swedish stands for “No to pirates and the (Swedish) Pirate Party)”

        • Fredrika

          > “Does Nejtillpirater mean no more pirating?”

          It’s the equivalent of No To Jews, where jews has been replaced with another group of people, ranging in the numbers of close to a billion. But it’s quite a good name, since it reveals how un-objective, biased and hard-headed he is even before you start reading his comments. He doesn’t need to take arguments, consequences or facts into account, he mind is already principally made up.

        • Guest

           @nejtillpirater:disqus  If it means “No To Pirates” as in File Sharing Shouldn’t be Allowed then you are in the very minority posting on this website and you will drown trying to stop the tide of the ocean of file sharers etc. when it engulfs you. File sharing is NOT a CRIMINAL OFFEENCE and you can either realise this or drown.

        • http://nejtillpirater.wordpress.com/ Nejtillpirater

          @flphpp:disqus 

          I usually don’t answer your postings since they’re full of ad hominem. I flagged your posting as inappropriate since this one was one of the worst. You are one of the worst pirates, not only ignorant but also  really mean.

          “It’s the equivalent of No To Jews, where jews has been replaced with another group of people, ranging in the numbers of close to a billion.”

          That’s a lie. I have nothing against pirates as persons, just the piracy.

          You really don’t deserve answers, you’re simply evil.

        • Guest

           @nejtillpirater:disqus Not everyone who reads and comments on this website are pirates. Perhaps you should find out if the person is indeed such a pirate that you state that they are before you state that the person is a pirate otherwise you will end up with egg on your face when the accusation backfires on you should the person not be a pirate that you state that they are.

      • Fredrika

        > “That’s a lie. I have nothing against pirates as persons, just the piracy.”

        Then your signature should be NejTillPiratkopiering and not NejTillPirater. Do you have a problem with both the Swedish and English language? Pirater or pirates are a group of people, close to a billion, and you are clearly against that group of people according to your signature. So it’s definitely not a lie.

        Regarding ignorance, again i encourage you, as i have done for the last three years, if you can come up with one single sentence or paragraph from me, which you believe to be incorrect, please quote that sentence or paragraph and explain what you believe to be incorrect, instead of coming up with meaningless empty accusation and one-liners, as you just did, and i will help you read that sentence property until you understand what it actually says, and why it is indeed fully correct exactly as it is was written.

        I’m waiting.

        Btw, educating someone about what your signature actually means isn’t evil or mean. Unless you consider education, facts and knowledge evil and mean.

    • Cat Video

      “Storage isn’t innovation Kim. Never has been.” 

      ARE YOU A FUCKING MORON?  OBVIOUSLY YOU ARE! 

      Advances in storage media has been one of the fundamental technologies for the past 30 years.  Cloud storage is no exception. 

      You are such a piece of shit stupid fuckhead moron. 

      DIE TROLL DIE. 

      PS  Don’t FUCK with my cat videos! 

      • PelouzeTF

        As a business model (and it doesn’t matter what you’re storing) storage is not an innovation.

        Additionally Kim is not innovating, he merely copied the people before him.

        I wont fuck with your cat videos ;)

        Oh, nearly forgot, you are a moron, die

        • Guest

          Megaupload has not broken any US laws because the company does not come under US jurisdiction and therefore as such cannot break US laws because it does not come under US jurisdiction. And the only people who have broken NZ laws is the FBI with the illeagal warrants and illegal searches and for sending hard drives over to the US without any permission from the NZ authorities.

  • Anger

    Fuck RIANZ!

    Anger is a gift.

  • Vladv

    Bye bye OBAMA in next november elections!

  • John Doe

    So, there’s this arrogant little prick whose mass is only rivaled by the size of his own ego and who used to rat out warez traders for money and protection. He eavesdropped on the users of his BBSs and his partyline, again selling the collected data.

    On top of that he dabbled in insider trading.

    And this individual acts (and is hailed) as if he was the saviour of the internets?

    Puh-LEEZE!

    • Guest

      and you my friend walk alone lol

    • huh

       Very true.  Let the DB burn.

  • Freja

    @All of you who critisize the USA in connection with copyright:

    Be
    aware that the USA is just as much of a self serving tyrant in the area
    of foreign politics. Find out the truth about big ongoing conflicts
    like Syria, what happened in Libya the buildup towards action against
    Iran and various ongoing propaganda wars.

    I recommend RT.com as a
    good alternative source of news, or even PressTV for the diametrically
    opposed worldview to what’s getting served up on Fox News, Sky and the
    BBC.

    Being a pirate is all about free access to information,
    power to the people and getting at the truth. There is more to it than
    just hating those who try to stop you from downloading what you want.

    • huh

       Yea, RussiaToday…. great source of alternative news there…….

  • Pingback: » Mis favoritos de ayer Guru Meditation

  • Bill

    Yea,  comparing free speech to copyright breach. Well done humanity…

  • Pingback: Kim Dotcom Sings: Are You Going to Fix This Mr. President? – TorrentFreak « Current News « Direct Global Media

  • AnonymousCowherd

    “browser not supported”?

    I’m running debian/unstable iceweasel you ninny, kim. Fix your browser detection code.
     

    • Desu1

      User agent?

  • Pingback: Kim Dot Com Rilis Lagu Menantang Pemerintah | music enthusiast

  • Guest

    Him Martin Luther King comparison don’t be so fucking STUPID! It is not the same thing and that makes a mockery of the work of Martin Luther King! Kim is just some fat rich guy using the internet to make money by being a legalised in your face pirate. 

    Fuck lockers they are blatant money makers off other peoples works. BT/Usenet are different and about sharing not profit – thankfully harder to shut down than KIM dot IDIOT. I support the Pirate Bay but Kim can go fuck himself if he thinks I would bother protesting for him.I don’t mind the song but I won’t listen to it again it is not that good.This fucking Kim dot idiot just draws attention we don’t need as he is a pirate and operated for profit. He is trying to get on the back of our sharing community (not the same thing as a locker) with all his bullshit so he can get out his legal mess by having us all protesting for him. He can rot in a jail fuck him and his rapid share pirate shit.

    I hate this guy full stop. He thinks he is a freedom fighter when he is just some greedy fat man that got caught!

    Support Usenet/BT and let Kim rot and stop him using us for his own ends.

    • Hsun

      Spot on.

  • Lololololol002

    Good song.

  • Spidey

    I have to laugh at all the idits rallying around for Kim Dotdouchbag.
    This guy made millions from aiding in stealing other peoples work.
    He calls himself an inovator???? What?????
    You did not crack cold fusion Kim!! You set up a fucking file share site. BIG DEAL.

    He got caught and now is trying to put a political slant on it so all these fucking ass clowns jump on it and say ‘ hey are freedoms of speech’.
    It has nothing to do with freedom of speech. Since when has stealing other peoples works had anything to do with freedom of speech? Pirates are basically counterfeiters, no more no less.

    If Megaupload was a companie that relied upon sharing legal materials such as business documents, peoples photo’s etc then they would have gone out of business, or not made the vast amounts of money they did.
    Look at some of the sites that shit themselves and changed their business model to sharing files the uploader has created. They have seen an incredible loss in revenue and that is fact.

    Kim dotcom could not give a fuck about you people. He is just trying to rally support because he knows his fat ass is gonna get splintered in court.

    Lets see you all support him when he cuts a deal with Hollywood to supply all the IP addresses and customer details to save his own ass.
    The fat twat is corrupt to the core and you ass clowns all foloow him and salute him.
    KIM DOTCOM could not give a flying fuck about you all. Before he had his business taken down, when did he ever stand up in the public eye and mention internet freedomns and try and be the figure head of the crusade? WHEN?

    This is the time that ass clown Fredrika will start her reply with ‘you seem confused’.

    Kim Dotcom is fucked, believe me.
    He will cut a deal to save his own sorry ass and sell you lot down the fucking river.
    Mark my words.
    he has done it before.
    No all fall into line like good little brain washed sheep and hail your new hero of the hour.
    Assclowns. BYE BYE.
    Your friendly neighbourhood spiderman.

  • Spidey

    I can just picture you sad fuckers in your rooms, hunched over you computers singing this crap song and believing every word of it. You sad gang of tossers ha ha.
    ‘Taking over our internet….don’t let them get away with that, imprisoning a greedy fat twat ’ ‘ it starts with sheep like you, doing what you’re told to do, by my propaganda machine, brainwashin the brain dead teen’
    ‘Lets come together, stand and fight, whilst I make ‘songs’ that are pure shite, lets come together just to help me, I cut a deal and sell your IP’  ‘ I ‘innovate’ it’s my eureka whilst you talk shite like dear FREDREKA’
    ‘you seem confused’ LMFAO
    HA HA
    You fucking numb skull, easily lead, complete thick as fuck gobshites.
    If you would follow that fat sack of shit you would follow fucking anyone.

  • Pingback: Kim Dotcom lança nova canção contra o governo dos EUA [vídeo] | Lucas Farias

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/XKKMTSZCAGWAGUKJUPHSYRVBTU Ellen

    hahahah What a clow u are Spidey… go burry ur damaged brain in a sink hole

  • Pingback: Kim Dotcom mit neuer Website und Song: What happened to “Change”, Mr. President? | Android

  • http://frog.xxx/ XXXFree

    Conspiracy

  • BTGuard - BitTorrent Anonymously

NewsBits

Even more news...

  • The Pirate Bay Isn’t Down Completely, Just Having a Few Issues

    Twitter and Facebook, not to mention the TorrentFreak inbox, are currently alive with complaints that The...

  • Pirate Bay Founder Gottfrid Svartholm on Freedom of Speech

    Freedom of speech is a highly valued commodity, but should people be allowed to say whatever...

  • Blu-ray Anti-Piracy Tech Stops Discs and Promotes Purchases

    An anti-piracy system present in all official Blu-ray players since 2012 has received a fresh update...

  • Foxtel Breeds Pirates by Locking Up Game of Thrones

    One of the main reasons why people turn to piracy is the lack of legal alternatives....

  • UK Student Admits Breaching Sony Copyrights With Leak of PS3 SDK

    Last year an Internet user known as El Nomeo leaked version 3.70 of Sony’s Playstation3 SDK...

MostDiscussed

Below are TorrentFreak's most discussed articles of the past month. Join the discussion if you like.

CopyQuote

Left Quote

“The Pirate Bay has been one of the most important movements in Sweden for freedom of speech, working against corruption and censorship.

Peter Sunde Left Quote

PopularArticles

A selection of some TorrentFreak's classics dug up from our archives.