<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Labels Win Grooveshark Copyright Infringement Case</title>
	<atom:link href="http://torrentfreak.com/labels-win-grooveshark-copyright-infringement-case-140930/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://torrentfreak.com/labels-win-grooveshark-copyright-infringement-case-140930/</link>
	<description>Breaking File-sharing, Copyright and Privacy News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2014 15:45:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Siti Internet Aziendali &#187; Grooveshark, il caricamento che affonda</title>
		<link>/labels-win-grooveshark-copyright-infringement-case-140930/#comment-1241316</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Siti Internet Aziendali &#187; Grooveshark, il caricamento che affonda]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2014 07:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=94573#comment-1241316</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] all&#8217;attività di Greenberg e di alcuni dipendenti denunciati dall&#8217;accusa. Il giudice ha riconosciuto un totale di 5.977 file caricati in violazione del diritto d&#8217;autore, fruiti dagli utenti 36 [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] all&#8217;attività di Greenberg e di alcuni dipendenti denunciati dall&#8217;accusa. Il giudice ha riconosciuto un totale di 5.977 file caricati in violazione del diritto d&#8217;autore, fruiti dagli utenti 36 [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Revista Fibra &#124; Tecnologías de la comunicación &#187; Griesa contra Grooveshark por violación de derechos de autor</title>
		<link>/labels-win-grooveshark-copyright-infringement-case-140930/#comment-1241199</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Revista Fibra &#124; Tecnologías de la comunicación &#187; Griesa contra Grooveshark por violación de derechos de autor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2014 21:44:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=94573#comment-1241199</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] Según el juez, &#8220;hay evidencia irrefutable&#8221; de infracción a partir de un correo electrónico interno difundido por Greenberg en 2007, en el cual le pedía a sus empleados que suban música en formato MP3 para ayudar a crecer en popularidad el servicio. &#8220;Por favor, compartan toda la música posible fuera de la oficina. Este contenido inicial es lo que ayudará a comenzar nuestra red. Descarguen todos los MP3 como sea posible y agréguenlos a las carpetas que comparten en Grooveshark&#8221;, pidió Greenberg en el correo electrónico a su equipo de trabajo según lo reproduce el sitio Torrent Freak. [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Según el juez, &#8220;hay evidencia irrefutable&#8221; de infracción a partir de un correo electrónico interno difundido por Greenberg en 2007, en el cual le pedía a sus empleados que suban música en formato MP3 para ayudar a crecer en popularidad el servicio. &#8220;Por favor, compartan toda la música posible fuera de la oficina. Este contenido inicial es lo que ayudará a comenzar nuestra red. Descarguen todos los MP3 como sea posible y agréguenlos a las carpetas que comparten en Grooveshark&#8221;, pidió Greenberg en el correo electrónico a su equipo de trabajo según lo reproduce el sitio Torrent Freak. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: You Fail Again</title>
		<link>/labels-win-grooveshark-copyright-infringement-case-140930/#comment-1241056</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[You Fail Again]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2014 03:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=94573#comment-1241056</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Big Labels and the RIAA have always done things in a questionable manner. I can see that they may get immediate benefits from lawsuits, but long-term they are only screwing themselves.

Thank you for the great explanation about the squirrels flipping around haphazardly -- it all makes perfect sense.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Big Labels and the RIAA have always done things in a questionable manner. I can see that they may get immediate benefits from lawsuits, but long-term they are only screwing themselves.</p>
<p>Thank you for the great explanation about the squirrels flipping around haphazardly &#8212; it all makes perfect sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BioHazard</title>
		<link>/labels-win-grooveshark-copyright-infringement-case-140930/#comment-1240961</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[BioHazard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2014 14:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=94573#comment-1240961</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Alright by Janet Jackson.  The 12&quot; House mix with Heavy D.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alright by Janet Jackson.  The 12&#8243; House mix with Heavy D.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JG</title>
		<link>/labels-win-grooveshark-copyright-infringement-case-140930/#comment-1240892</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JG]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2014 04:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=94573#comment-1240892</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not only does it mean more pure profit for them, they probably could have came to some deal to cover the licensing fees they &quot;should&quot; have paid while trying to build up their user base.  For example the first 53 million songs (or whatever the number is) that get streamed could be charged double royalty fees, to make up for those missed before obtaining agreements.


Considering it costs them nothing to have Groovshark running along side iTunes, Spotify, etc there&#039;s no reason to favor a large lump sum and shutting down Grooveshark instead of letting it operate and establishing another long-term income stream.   Grooveshark might not bring in the millions like iTunes or Spotify, but a little somethin-somethin has to be better than nothing, right... Though with having a ton of streaming services available, that means each service is going to have to lower subscription prices in order to compete, which could translate to a loss of income for the suits (10% of $25 is a lot more than 10% of $9.99).  But then again, as prices go down, more people will probably sign on for a service, or even two (for awhile I was paying for both Spotify and Google All Access).  And if they have a decent service that offers a wide song selection for a decent price - that drastically lowers their incentive to pirate...  Why should I risk getting caught and sentenced to prison time and a multi-million dollar fine when I could just pay $10 a month.  Plus using legit sources drastically reduces my risk of downloading malware and having to hunt through all the dark corners of the &#039;net to find a new source every few months when MAFIAA gets my current one taken offline.


And the squirrel probably flips around to disguise it&#039;s scent trail.  The more chaotic and over lapping it is, the less likely the neighborhood cat is going to be paying the squirrel a house call...  Or the eagle over head will be able to swoop down &amp; snatch it off the ground... Or a rival squirrel will find his food stockpile....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not only does it mean more pure profit for them, they probably could have came to some deal to cover the licensing fees they &#8220;should&#8221; have paid while trying to build up their user base.  For example the first 53 million songs (or whatever the number is) that get streamed could be charged double royalty fees, to make up for those missed before obtaining agreements.</p>
<p>Considering it costs them nothing to have Groovshark running along side iTunes, Spotify, etc there&#8217;s no reason to favor a large lump sum and shutting down Grooveshark instead of letting it operate and establishing another long-term income stream.   Grooveshark might not bring in the millions like iTunes or Spotify, but a little somethin-somethin has to be better than nothing, right&#8230; Though with having a ton of streaming services available, that means each service is going to have to lower subscription prices in order to compete, which could translate to a loss of income for the suits (10% of $25 is a lot more than 10% of $9.99).  But then again, as prices go down, more people will probably sign on for a service, or even two (for awhile I was paying for both Spotify and Google All Access).  And if they have a decent service that offers a wide song selection for a decent price &#8211; that drastically lowers their incentive to pirate&#8230;  Why should I risk getting caught and sentenced to prison time and a multi-million dollar fine when I could just pay $10 a month.  Plus using legit sources drastically reduces my risk of downloading malware and having to hunt through all the dark corners of the &#8216;net to find a new source every few months when MAFIAA gets my current one taken offline.</p>
<p>And the squirrel probably flips around to disguise it&#8217;s scent trail.  The more chaotic and over lapping it is, the less likely the neighborhood cat is going to be paying the squirrel a house call&#8230;  Or the eagle over head will be able to swoop down &amp; snatch it off the ground&#8230; Or a rival squirrel will find his food stockpile&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: You Fail Again</title>
		<link>/labels-win-grooveshark-copyright-infringement-case-140930/#comment-1240884</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[You Fail Again]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2014 03:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=94573#comment-1240884</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They were actually gaining a foothold with the following:


&lt;strong&gt;Grooveshark Signs With Sony, Steps Over that Wavy ‘Piracy’ Line&lt;/strong&gt;
http://torrentfreak.com/grooveshark-signs-with-sony-steps-over-that-wavy-piracy-line-130828/

&lt;strong&gt;&quot;Grooveshark has just announced that it has reached a settlement with Sony/ATV Music Publishing. The agreement, which puts all legal disputes between the companies behind them, sees the signing of a licensing agreement to make Sony/ATV content legally available from the Grooveshark platform.&quot;&lt;/strong&gt;


Plus, they had already made a deal with EMI:
[From same article]


&lt;strong&gt;&quot;The licensing deal is the second in less than four weeks for Grooveshark. Earlier this month the company announced that it had settled its differences with EMI Music Publishing with the signing of a licensing agreement. According to Informa, EMI is the second largest music publisher with a 20% revenue market share in 2012.&quot;&lt;/strong&gt;


Things seemed to be looking up for them...until now, that is.


I wonder why the labels just can&#039;t seem to understand that in spite of the illegalities used to get this far, it will only mean &#039;mo money&#039; for them in the long run?


Trying to figure them out is like trying to figure out why a squirrel flips around in the grass for no apparent reason.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They were actually gaining a foothold with the following:</p>
<p><strong>Grooveshark Signs With Sony, Steps Over that Wavy ‘Piracy’ Line</strong><br />
<a href="http://torrentfreak.com/grooveshark-signs-with-sony-steps-over-that-wavy-piracy-line-130828/" rel="nofollow">http://torrentfreak.com/grooveshark-signs-with-sony-steps-over-that-wavy-piracy-line-130828/</a></p>
<p><strong>&#8220;Grooveshark has just announced that it has reached a settlement with Sony/ATV Music Publishing. The agreement, which puts all legal disputes between the companies behind them, sees the signing of a licensing agreement to make Sony/ATV content legally available from the Grooveshark platform.&#8221;</strong></p>
<p>Plus, they had already made a deal with EMI:<br />
[From same article]</p>
<p><strong>&#8220;The licensing deal is the second in less than four weeks for Grooveshark. Earlier this month the company announced that it had settled its differences with EMI Music Publishing with the signing of a licensing agreement. According to Informa, EMI is the second largest music publisher with a 20% revenue market share in 2012.&#8221;</strong></p>
<p>Things seemed to be looking up for them&#8230;until now, that is.</p>
<p>I wonder why the labels just can&#8217;t seem to understand that in spite of the illegalities used to get this far, it will only mean &#8216;mo money&#8217; for them in the long run?</p>
<p>Trying to figure them out is like trying to figure out why a squirrel flips around in the grass for no apparent reason.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: You Fail Again</title>
		<link>/labels-win-grooveshark-copyright-infringement-case-140930/#comment-1240882</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[You Fail Again]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2014 03:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=94573#comment-1240882</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For a second, I thought you had died long ago.
Then I realized you&#039;re not Zasu.

Good question, regardless!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For a second, I thought you had died long ago.<br />
Then I realized you&#8217;re not Zasu.</p>
<p>Good question, regardless!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zazoo Pitts</title>
		<link>/labels-win-grooveshark-copyright-infringement-case-140930/#comment-1240843</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zazoo Pitts]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2014 22:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=94573#comment-1240843</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What song was it?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What song was it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grooveshark, il caricamento che affonda &#124; SecoloNuovo</title>
		<link>/labels-win-grooveshark-copyright-infringement-case-140930/#comment-1240740</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Grooveshark, il caricamento che affonda &#124; SecoloNuovo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2014 18:10:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=94573#comment-1240740</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] relativi all&#039;attività di Greenberg e di alcuni dipendenti denunciati dall&#039;accusa. Il giudice ha riconosciuto un totale di 5.977 file caricati in violazione del diritto d&#039;autore, fruiti dagli utenti 36 milioni [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] relativi all&#039;attività di Greenberg e di alcuni dipendenti denunciati dall&#039;accusa. Il giudice ha riconosciuto un totale di 5.977 file caricati in violazione del diritto d&#039;autore, fruiti dagli utenti 36 milioni [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: You Fail Again</title>
		<link>/labels-win-grooveshark-copyright-infringement-case-140930/#comment-1240789</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[You Fail Again]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2014 17:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=94573#comment-1240789</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;&quot;Look you wasn&#039;t interested to help us, but now we are mega popular we want to now work with you it&#039;s in your own interests as we want to give you money now!&quot;&lt;/strong&gt;
 
And the Mighty Labels replied:
&lt;strong&gt;&quot;Thou shalt have no other gods before Me!&quot;&lt;/strong&gt;
[we hear a loud, rumbling of thunder nearby]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>&#8220;Look you wasn&#8217;t interested to help us, but now we are mega popular we want to now work with you it&#8217;s in your own interests as we want to give you money now!&#8221;</strong></p>
<p>And the Mighty Labels replied:<br />
<strong>&#8220;Thou shalt have no other gods before Me!&#8221;</strong><br />
[we hear a loud, rumbling of thunder nearby]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
