They have to pay the postal charges before seeing what the item is LOL

An MP? *lol*. How charmingly naive…

Those corporatist clowns in Parliament collectively invented Copyright (a couple of hundred years ago, but still…) and shoved it down our throats in the first place, making all this ACS:Law non-sense possible today.

Writing your MP on copyright-related abuses is like asking the executioner to please not kill you. It’s an utter waste of time: they’ll never listen to us, they listen to those with the biggest bribes.

Their address is at the top of the form where it says “you MUST fill in this…”

I doubt it is for free… Just had a thought though, like in the ‘old’ days if you don’t put a return address on it they have to pay for the stamp anyway. Even better make the return address one of their clients…

During typing the following idea developed: FLOODING them with mail without stamps and as return sender their clients in your area or that Mandy MP (someone has to pay for the stamp).

Would that work ?

We can start a campaign of sending bricks, breezeblocks and other random heavy crap to them. Packaged up with a business reponse ID on top so they have to pay for it.

yeah! this story has entered the popular today section on popurls.com…

If everyone does, These MP’s will have nothing else to do other than investigate these assholes.

How it can be possible for a law firm to send out letters like this is anyones guess.

I might make a song, Copyright it and then jump on any random tracker, hoover up UK IP addresses and start mailing these people.

Infact, How on earth they got a judge to allow them to get the addresses of these people is beyond belief.

If everyone does, These MP’s will have nothing else to do other than investigate these assholes.

How it can be possible for a law firm to send out letters like this is anyones guess.

I might make a song, Copyright it and then jump on any random tracker, hoover up UK IP addresses and start mailing these people.

Infact, How on earth they got a judge to allow them to get the addresses of these people is beyond belief.

anyone sane would not fill that!

and as someone said before, is funny that you MUST fill the damn thing.

This isn’t as bad as the sanctioned (illegally bribed) spyware and search-and-seisure bullshit the ratfinks want to push on us, but still an irritating attempt at an invasion of privacy.

:sigh:

In regard to your questionaire regarding my internet use, it can be summed up thusly.

It wasnt me, it was Lord Mandy.

Regards,

A Non.

ACS doing a deal with Doorstep debt collection firms with the aim of “interviewing under caution” at the doorstep whomever answers the door at the address of the alleged infringment.

I myself would obviously tell them to FO, but if I was out???

I would imagine the stupid berd (er indoors) would gladly discuss all the american shows she watches and how clever she is knowing how utorrent werkz and how the kids mp3 players get stuffed with all that crap that passes for music these days. Geez

“Return to sender – NO CONTRACT”

a piece of law that works for us!
Easy as that – and don’t forget to draw the pirate ship on the envelope.

1. Have you ever sued for infringement and won?
2. Do you know what extortion is?
3. Would you allow your tax records to be examined?
4. What is the legal definition for infringement?
5. etc…

1. “Many of my friends have access to my connection (5+ per day usually, among about 50 people per week in total)”

2. “I will not provide a list of my friends without a court order as it would be disrespectful of their right to privacy. Furthermore, I will not respond to any further correspondance from ACS:Law until a court order has been provided.”

3. “If a court order is provided I intend to obtain a court order against ACS:Law and any 3rd parties involved in this case under Civil Procedure Rules to demand the disclosure of all data held pertaining to my case. This would be a pre-litigation request, requiring you to provide this information at cost to yourselves.”

They may send further letters but you are under no obligation to reply or provide information without a court order and they now face the possibility that such a court order could lead to time-consuming and costly work just to proceed with a case that may well fail the test of the courts.

Peace!!

“The form MUST …”
Wouldn’t that have consequences as entrapment ?

“Are you willing to submit the computers in your household for forensic analysis ? ”

Sure we’ll let them mess with all the computers in the household. LOL

By the way, does that include servers, dreambox, NAS devices, Microcontrollers, car computers, mp3/xvid players ?

“Signed…Date….”

If it looks obviously like a trap, then it is a trap. Way too obvious.

They also seem to target large families as they seem to want to know the information of 6 people and children ofcourse, how about:
‘Name: Andrew (Age 1) Admitted YES/NO: . Comment: not sure, cant understand him yet.’

Too bad you probably need to waste a stamp and an envelope on it otherwise if everyone in UK start copying this form and flooding them with bogus admissions of non-existent people they can’t catch anyone stupid enough to fill in the form.

Let’s review:

DRM and other viruses – What a way to encourage customer loyalty…NOT!! Since the Sony virus CD attack, I have declared a complete and total boycott of ALL Sony products. Not a thing with a Sony label on it is allowed in my home, and never will be again. The same goes for EA, Valve, Apple and Microsoft. Circulating malware loses them a customer permenantly. Anyone else want to share their fate?

Harassment of customers – Bankrupt people can’t buy your overpriced product. Threatened people don’t want to. People feeling robbed damn sure don’t to. Attacking the customer base = very bad idea. It’s too bad for you that you refuse to negotiate instead of bullying.

Interference with goverments of soverign nations – There’s only two words that can define that: Terrorism, and treason. Really begging for a bullet, aren’t you?

Harassing the military – Let me remind you, the military has big guns, big tanks, big missiles, the keys to big nukes, and they know how to use them. Do you have a deathwish, or what?

What the hell makes you think heavyhanded tactics are going to work? Is that the result of brain damage incurred from too much cocaine use?

Quite frankly, you earned the disgust and scorn you have recieved. In my estimate, the labels are merely soulless vermin driven only by greed, and an enemy of all mankind.
As for the artists you claim to protect, I can only feel pity for those that foolishly continue to support you. After all it’s well known you don’t really support them.

http://acsbore.files.wordpress.com/2010/02/acs-quest-1ed.jpg

http://acsbore.files.wordpress.com/2010/02/acs-quest-2ed.jpg

I bet there is a mull faced moron filling that in right now.

copy of the parody fishing questionnaire from the page linked IN THE ARTICLE.

And even if you can prove that you were on a vacation trip. They convict you to pay damages, because you may not have secured your WLAN enough.

Torrents / limewire or http aswell?

Andrew Crossley, you are SCUM.