TorrentFreak

The place where breaking news, BitTorrent and copyright collide

Leaked: IFPI Tutorial On How To Stop Pre-Release Music Leaks

Following the inadvertent leak of several IFPI and RIAA reports this week and our subsequent articles, today we wind up with perhaps the most ironic of the series. It covers a presentation by the IFPI’s head of anti-piracy operations to industry insiders on how to prevent leaks. It explains how individuals gain access to pre-release music, how to set up honey-traps to ensnare them, and also hints at why the UK’s Serious Organized Crime Agency targeted the RnBXclusive blog earlier this year.

This week TorrentFreak has been running articles based on the leak of several IFPI and RIAA internal documents. Today’s article covers IFPI’s attempts to educate their members on how to mitigate a relatively new technique for obtaining pre-release music.

Online release groups and other leakers have always been resourceful when it comes to getting the latest tunes, whether from light-fingered employees at CD packing plants or friendly music-reviewing sources with access to fresh promos.

“Web piracy is similar to organized crime, there is a hierarchy, our goal is to identify those at the top,” Mo Ali, Head of Internet Anti-Piracy Operations at IFPI explained during his April 2012 presentation.

IFPI’s investigative aims are to:

1. Identify the source site of the leak
2. Identify the original uploader
3. Gather intelligence and evidence about the user.
4. Work with the record label to prevent further leaks.
5. Determine if there is a criminal case.

Ali adds that through their investigations, IFPI have been able to reduce the number of leaks. One such investigation, against the music release group “DOH”, is detailed in the slide below.

IFPI DOH

Another slide details how a South American blogger called “ALEKO” had been spotted posting pre-release music online. IFPI say that through various online profiles he was identified as a music journalist. IFPI sent a local investigator to speak to ALEKO and he confessed that he had tried to get music by blackmailing producers. Initially though, ALEKO said he’d been obtaining music from hackers.

The hacking phenomenon is detailed by IFPI in the remaining slides. The music group reports that producers very often send tracks via email, so hackers try to gain access to their accounts in order to get music, even before it gets into promo form.

In order to protect their members from such attacks (and this is good advice for anyone operating an email account), IFPI warns against phishing emails which claim to be from well-known file-storage sites but are really there to obtain email log-in details.

PhishIFPI

IFPI suggests a number of techniques for identifying bogus emails but then goes a step further by giving instructions on how to set up honey-traps to capture would-be music hackers.

IFPIIP

IFPI say this method has already ensnared a number of individuals. Interestingly, one slide appears to shine light on a big pre-release raid earlier this year. The screenshot in the presentation slide below shows the RnBXclusive release blog site after it had been raided by the UK’s Serious Organized Crime Agency.

RNBxIFPI

At the time, no-one could understand why the organized crime division of the police would be interested in a lowly music blog. But the inclusion of the site’s seized homepage in this report and the message that “The majority of music files that were available via this site were stolen from the artists” seem to point in a particular direction, at least as far as IFPI are concerned.

Finally, it seems appropriate that we should augment this anti-leaking advice from IFPI with some security guidance of our own.

In order to prevent reports on global anti-piracy strategy, offline vs online swapping, and another on the ineffectiveness of SOPA leaking out in public, please ensure that your Intranet doesn’t have a public-facing Internet webpage, even if it is only for a few minutes.

IFPIIntranet

Related Posts

Previous Post | Next Post

  • Rhpgnjuh

    “Web piracy is “similar” to organized crime, there is a hierarchy, our goal is to identify those at the top,”

    or

    “Web piracy is  ”similar” to governments, there is a hierarchy, our goal is to identify those at the top,”

    Yes,   they are all very “similar”

    • P1rat3 Pa7ty

      Which also implies government is “similar” to organized crime ;)

      • Yoda

        Thanks Captain Obvious (:

        • Captain Obvious

           You’re welcome ;)

        • Lmg

          Don’t you mean “Captain Obvious, I thank”?

        • yello

          its not piracy wasting their profits…
          their FIFTH step was to decide whether a criminal case was present in their circumstance… after 4 other, expensive steps

        • Danny

          @035ff96c9f61b1ee82f0c5b7d84021de:disqus

          That was my thought.

          They should surely determine that first no?

  • Nigger

    Niggers

  • retaliate

    My favourite artists leak their own material while it’s a work-in-progress so people can see the efforts involved and the evolution of the material.

    The UK Grime/Underground Hiphop and Dubstep scenes (which overlap but are not synonymous) tend to be using their own rules and own business model in recent years.  It’s pretty much all holding with indie labels, fans get giveaways of full albums  and are encouraged to buy the 320kbps versions, etc. if there’s anything they like.
    They post promo tracks all over YouTube, SoundCloud, etc. – They’re in it for the art, the experimentation, the exploration of sound – It seems to many of them the fame, money, etc. comes when it comes and not because it’s being forced and faked by monopolies.

    The IFPI can go fuck themselves – they’re a redundant distribution model and a bureaucratic bottleneck for talent that serves no purpose other than to divert the largest amount of revenue to those who add the least artistic value to the art (or “product” from their perspective).

    The Internet has replaced these dinosaur industries and they are doing what they can to unduly and undeservedly keep themselves alive through lies, slander and of course bribery of elected officials.

    The leaked revelation that there’s more offline sharing than online sharing also makes their whole witchhunt a complete joke.

    IFPI… just die already – you worthless pieces of shit.

    • Timmy Junior

      Also, don’t forget the metal community. They have their own business model. <3

      When moving away from mainstream music you feel very free in what you can listen to. Tis' a good feeling.

    • John Spartan

      “They’re in it for the art, the experimentation, the exploration of sound”
      Musicians doing it for the music…. wow… what a concept.
      If the Mafiaa are to be believed, then musicians only doing for money, money and more money.

      • Netgrazer

         That’s a very big /if/.

      • Danny

        The ‘artists’ they represent are usually the ones with all the money, or another talentless hack being forced on us by the latest reality TV show backed by someone with all the money.

    • Gae

      The less mainstream music styles I usually find are embracing the new technologies available to them in order to directly reach their fans. Free promos, downloadable mixes and even full albums are regularly handed out as to these people the music matters more than making men in suits happy and in turn the fans reward them in other ways.

      People like the IFPI and friends are mainly interested in the big money low quality commercial junk that they can hand out to radio stations to be played 50 times daily, in these cases its all about the money and no care for the music or the fans which is why they are happy to come out with all their dirty tricks to protect their operations.

    • Guest

      How are indie labels different from labels under RIAA? Can anybody explain? I thought being a Indie meant you are an independent artist or band and are not associated with any association or company. If Indies have labels too we are back to square one again.

      • Anyone

        the RIAA is only the “big four” labels
        every other label is considered “indy”

        while they might suck their artists just as dry as the RIAA at least they are not bribing politicians and judges

        • Guest

          Ah ok thanks mate.

        • Danny

          Artists generally get a much bigger cut of the wegde in indie labels too and don’t get locked into multi album based contracts.

      • Sowasvonhacke

        Just releasing music as a tape copy is kind of a dead end. I mean, we had that already. The tape scene of the 80′s long gone. Now, convert your tracks into flac – what’s the point?
        Labels still functioning as a medium that does more or less good to the bands. Remember promotion? Concerts?
        Question today is the rights management. Why bands still reluctant to publish under creative commons (individual rights management, more or less)  remains a secret to me.

      • Scary_Devil_Monastery

        I’ll add to “Anyone” below. Many indie artists do have “labels” – if by “labels” we mean the one set up by the artists themselves.

        In some cases these labels more resemble cooperatives than corporations.

  • Desu1

    1. Design shitty PowerPoint;
    2. Siphon money from artists for the privilege;
    3. ????
    4. Balls

    • FakeElections

       Your doing that wrong!

      • Anyone

        You’re spelling it wrong

        • FakeElections

           Fair enough lol

  • Violated0

    You would think anyone hacking someone’s email account & more would be familiar with using Tor over a VPN link when there is no way of them finding you then unless you blab your mouth off about things unique to your life. Not to forget keeping all your local evidence encrypted under some anti-tamper scheme.

    Nope they only bask in their own glorious nature thinking they are invulnerable. That in hacker terms are like those rare morons who videotape themselves breaking the law and then uploading this to YouTube!

    • http://www.facebook.com/Amak1131 Samuel Anderson

      They obviously haven’t caught anyone who knows what they’re doing. Those ones would be using VPNs as you mentioned.

      • Timmy Junior

        Well, the ones who know what they’re doing can sometimes stumble up – example would be going on Google when using your VPN (as you’d be logged in with your current cookies stored in Firefox it’d then link your VPN to your Google account). Just small things like that can give you away.

        Most people live under the idea “it wont happen to me”, that may be another reason people get caught as they don’t fear the IFPI.

      • http://nejtillpirater.wordpress.com/ Nejtillpirater

        Right. Tell that to Hector Xavier Monsegur. Criminals always have the false impression of knowing exactly what they’re doing and that they will never get caught. But eventually they will.

        • Anyone

          he is just a poor guy that happened to have made a few strong enemies

          it’s sad that they got him to rat other people out, but up until then he did nothing wrong

        • jesuschrist

           What does Hector Xavier Monsegur have anything to do with leaking music?
          Hide yourself in some hole and die already you failed excuse of a MAFFIA troll.

        • Scary_Devil_Monastery

          Ah yes. The odds of getting caught is what – one in a hundred? One in a thousand?

          And that only concerns those who can actually be classified as “criminals” to start with, in the legal definition.

          If we go by your own oft-stated assumption of “criminal” the odds suddenly shoot to one in ten million getting caught. You demonstrably have a somewhat wider definition than just the books of law.

          If we add to those the people who are “criminals” in the eyes of the law but not in the eyes of the general public – filesharers, jaywalkers and people allowing their pets to mate within 1500 feet of a california restaurant, say…the number of “criminals” escaping justice escalates by an order of magnitude or more.

          In short, the only criminals who do get caught are either the ones where society is quite willing to expend massive resources. Murderers, bank robbers and terrorists. Or the low-hanging fruit – like an odd hacker or two.

          For the main majority of “Anonymous” and “Lulzsec” however, their operations are quite safe. Safer than, say, the risk of getting involved in an automobile accident and similar statistics.

          So I for one can’t really subscribe to your vindictive guarantees that “criminals” will get caught. It is, quite simply so that for the crimes in which you have an interest, the rule is that they don’t. May I recommend – as usual – that you check your facts before spouting hollow dogma?

  • JordanKratz

    IFPI you are not invulnerable.
    Hope you like playing whack a mole.

  • Jesus H. “Fucking” Christ

    Even though I fully support piracy/file-sharing and leaking released material to countries that don’t have access to it yet, I don’t support leaking things before their original release dates. It’s disrespectful to the artists, especially when a lot of leaked material is unfinished or low quality, which could affect the art’s perceived quality.

    There’s nothing wrong with downloading leaks when they’ve been made, because the damage has already been done, but I don’t support leaking in the first place.

    Piracy = innovation.
    Leaking = just rude.

    Purely my opinion, though.

    • Chab

      The “problem” you mention is IMO only a “consumer” problem. If you decide that you want to be spoiled with low quality shit, that’s your problem. I always do a precheck of the source and content before downloading virtually anything.

      If it exists that means there’s a demand for it. Free for all that’s my motto.

    • FakeElections

      I can think of some instances where the opposite have been true, for me anyways. For example there have been a few Drum and Bass tracks that i’ve got the unreleased versions of. They are better than the finished products because…
      A: The finish tracks were released on a cd (mastered too loud cutting the bass and distorting the sound. (No quality copy’s were ever released)
      B: The released tracks came with extra vocal samples which ruined the tracks…
      C: I had to wait around 2-3 years for the offical versions of the tracks to come out…
      So basicly i guess if the artist decided to make music and hold it back from the public for years, maybe they deserve their music to be leaked…

      • Guest

         ”if the artist decided to make music and hold it back from the public for years, maybe they deserve their music to be leaked…”

        Can you justify this claim? What makes the artist deserve to have their music released in a form they do not approve of? The choice to not release their music negatively affects no one. How can it be an action that makes them deserving of something that someone else does when the artist’s action affects no one else? What propositions lead you to this belief, and can you logically justify them? Or is this just something you’re saying because the release of their music against their will benefits you, so it automatically must have been the right thing to do?

        • Scary_Devil_Monastery

          Even being pro-pirate I sympathize with this. You can only own information until you release it. But if you keep your creation a secret then having it leaked is tantamount to someone publishing your personal details.

          In order to leak an unreleased production what you have essentially done is first an act of intrusion or otherwise unlawfully obtaining information held as a secret. It’s a far cry from merely copying what has already been published.

    • Scary_Devil_Monastery


      Leaking = just rude.”

      True enough. What is leaked might not even be the final version the artist actually approves of. 

  • Mwhahaha

    Off topic, but I just noticed this story and thought UK readers might be interested:

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2012/jul/28/isecurity-services-emails-social-media 

    • Rhpgnjuh

      Its a damn shame us brits dont have the support like the yanks do(no offense),  because i see a hell of alot more of this coming, and seriously doubt they’ll be any opposition.

      • FakeElections

        I agree, the attitude towards protecting civil liberties is no where near as strong in the UK as the USA. Plus are media is biased just like the USA, the mainstream media likes to make things confusing as possible.

        Thanks Mwhahaha for posting that article…

    • Danny

      By the way, to all reading this.

      This legislation actually comes from the EU and is why most EU states are planning to implement similar plans. See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_Retention_Directive

  • Mwhahaha

    Music copying is a serious crime now?

    Yet fixing inter bank lending rates is apparently a bit of a giggle?

    • Guest

      If you are Mr Goodwin who worked for the RBS caused the RBS scandal then steps down and now has x’s million pound pension pot and is still roaming the streets. Should have been locked up so I guess crime does pay.if you worked for a bank. Wheres in Ireland you get arrested and sent to court.

  • Pingback: Torrent News » Leaked: IFPI Tutorial On How To Stop Pre-Release Music Leaks

  • Anonymous

    the answer to 99% of the problems the entertainment industries, including IFPI, have is to listen to what customers keep saying to them and act accordingly. instead of then paying out loads of money unnecessarily, there would be more going into the industries coffers and the pockets of the greedy execs. admittedly, there may well not be anything more going into artists pockets but that is a problem for them to deal with with the industries and their ‘ways of accounting’. this is shown by the lack of sharing of monies from TPB fines to artists (not that i think there should have been any fines anyway), it is nothing to do with file sharing.

    • Scary_Devil_Monastery

      False.

      The Ifpi, MPAA, RIAA et al. aren’t the entertainment industry.

      They are simply the ravenous horde of lawyers unleashed upon the unsuspecting public. If the actual entertainment industry were to adapt to piracy, the people at Ifpi/RIAA/MPAA are all out of a job.

      And this is why they lobby not only washington but also the entertainment industry itself with FUD propaganda. Because if Hollywood and SONY back down, the Ifpi will vanish.

  • IFPISuckMeWilly

    Powerpoint FAIL! Bhahahahaaha

  • TugFooo

    Thats just really too funny when you think about it dude.
    Gettin-Anon.it.tc

  • Pingback: In the News.. | TorGuard.net Blog - Anonymous VPN Services

  • H4rfang

     the IFPI the RIAA and some artist are really stupid and have no computer skill …

    because first, some artist must be fucking retarded because as i can see, they reply to a phishing e-mail and give their username/pass for their filehosting account so the hacker can access all unrealeased song and then share everything all over internet.. and i bet they go cry to the RIAA when they know that their unreleased song have been downloaded on a massive scale. their stupidity explains why they agree to give all of their money to the RIAA without any problem. i guess they reply seriously and give all info needed to every mail they receive in their ”junk mail” .. secondly as i can see, the IFPI are fucking retarded too.. they leak some confidentials anti-piracy strategy reports. this story remember me the MediaDefender story, The breach included emails, a phone conversation, and a number of internal anti-piracy tools, including some source code.

    the IFPI, RIAA and some artist are simply stupid and retarded and they will all slowly die soon because they are fucking retarded and because they have no skill at all ;)

    • Camanon7

      Seriously, you’d think evolution would have taken care of them by now.

      • FakeElections

        Sorry for trolling but i (think) you meant natural selection should have removed these scum from the planet by now :D Unfortunately natural selection removes the weak and corporations with money and lobbying power are by no means weak :(

        • Camanon7

          Yeah, that.

  • ofProto

    Awesome thanks to this we should get more Zero day releases thanks IFPI!

  • foff

    They forgot to talk about the intentional leaks as promotional gimmick.  

  • Techanon

    I was wondering who was the sourse of the leak reports. So it was google cache….
    pfft lmao.

    • http://tehparadox.com/ tehPARADOX

      Fluff term to generate interest.

  • https://openid.org/lulaladrao LulaLadrao

    Oh yeah. IFPI looks like full of incopetent people doing nothing to earn they salaries.

    All this is bullshit.

  • Guest

    May also want to run any files you obtain through an audio fingerprint scrubber:

    https://github.com/EtiennePerot/ascrubber

  • Sean

    Any chance you could post the original PDF’s? 

  • Sensei

    “Well organized criminal group we call mafia, the best organized mafia, we call the government. ”
    Governments have never existed to solve problems domestic or international.
    Governments and their institutions exist merely to further and secure the
    interests of favored groups, but We the People are never the favored group.

    • http://nejtillpirater.wordpress.com/ Nejtillpirater
      • Guest

        lol

        It isn’t paranoia, it’s the observation of plain old out-in-the-open reality. 

        Why do you think the masses keep getting poorer while the rich elite keep  getting richer? It’s because governments and their institutions are ultimately managed by rich privileged assholes, and rich priveleged assholes look out primarily for themselves and eachother.

        Increasing poor, decreasing middle class, crumbling infrastructure, domestic strife… They don’t really care. None of those problems effect rich people like themselves and neither is there money to be gained from solving them. 

        There is, however, mucho mucho money to be gained from securing the interests of “favoured”(e.g., loaded) groups like the IFPI. Which is why governments and their institutions give these groups priority over their own people and country.

      • ScrewEwe2

        Top results from your Google search:

        Searches related to paranoia

        Paranoid schizophrenia   A sub-type of schizophrenia as defined in the diagnostic…

        Personality disorder   A deeply ingrained and maladaptive pattern of behavior…

        Psychosis  A severe mental disorder in which thought and emotions…

        Delusional disorder   Delusions are irrational beliefs, held with a high level of conviction, that are highly resistant to change even when the delusional person is exposed to forms of proof that contradict the belief.

        Nejtillpirater, I’m sorry to break it to you buddy, but you clearly display tendencies of someone suffering from “Delusional Dissorder”.

      • Scary_Devil_Monastery

        It’s been established for quite a few millenia now that it is all but impossible to keep corruption from influencing government.

        And yet you believe it to be paranoia to assume that government can not always be trusted.

        Go figure.

  • Camanon7

    Am I the only one that thinks it’s convenient that there’s been so many “leaks” from the MAFIAA lately?

    • Danny

      These are their ‘honey pots’ they just don’t realise that people remove the fingerprints and release it anyway. Hence why only a few people have been arrested and shit loads of pre releases occur.

  • Andrew me

    I will try again, copyright was created to protect artists from the industry giants who use the copyrighted material for profit without compensating the artist.

     Copyright laws were not in any way created to go after citizens just wanting to listen to content. It is not up to the government to provide a way for musicians to make money that is up to them.

     Now can we start getting labels and those stealing from the musicians into court and leave there fans alone.

    • http://nejtillpirater.wordpress.com/ Nejtillpirater

      “It is not up to the government to provide a way for musicians to make money that is up to them.”

      But it is up to the government to protect the musicians lawful rights.

      • Anyone

        yes

        but it is not the job of the government to protect the greedy middlemen that rip off artists and try to stifle all progress, simply because they can’t compete in the free market

        • http://nejtillpirater.wordpress.com/ Nejtillpirater

          Piracy has nothing to do with competition. All companies must compete by following the law. The music and film industry is full of competition since there are billions of different songs, movies etc.

        • Fredrika

          > “Piracy has nothing to do with competition.”

          Indeed it does, because piracy offers the exact same effect as free market competition does, where the entrepreneurs have to compete with others sources that offer products identical to the one they try to sell.

          > “All companies must compete by following the law.”

          Which is a completely irrelevant and circular reasoning, and therefore not an argument.

          > “The music and film industry is full of competition since there are billions of different songs, movies etc.”

          As you are fully aware of copyright is a legislative monopoly that specifically forbids competition regarding use of a certain intellectual work in conjunction with goods and services, and as a result of that there is absolutely no competition whatsoever regarding goods and services which is built up around the use of specific songs, movies etc.

          No one has ever claimed that there aren’t different songs, movies etc, so that’s yet another a straw-man argument from you. The fact that there exists different songs, movies etc is completely irrelevant, because the discussion about filesharing always revolve around the actual legislative monopoly that does exist, the copyright monopoly, and that indeed prohibits competition regarding one and the same songs, movies etc, by excluding the monopoly holder from the free market.

      • Jatillpiratz

        “But it is up to the government to protect the musicians lawful rights.”

        No it’s not. It is up to the courts to protect the musicians’ rights, because copyright laws already exist to do this. The governments only get involved when those laws are changed, and currently the only thing they’re changing is the balance of power towards corporate entities, at the expense of musicians.

      • Scary_Devil_Monastery

        It is up to the government to implement a reasonable and proportionate response to violations of rights.

        You keep assuming that it’s far more important for government to protect the lawful rights of a musician not to have his/her music copied than it is for millions of perfectly lawful citizens to retain their rights of privacy.

        Your statement only becomes truthful if you quote the other half of the argument.

  • McCheezits

    Is anyone able to score a copy of the PDFs? I just want to look at it…

  • Mr. M

    Serious Organized Crime Agency? Seriously? What are they gonna do next, go after “organized jaywalking cartels”? Yikes. Have them do something useful instead.

    • Danny

      We don’t have jaywalking in the UK. We have common sense.

      • ScrewEwe2

        Danny, here in the US we do have Jaywalking cuz we live on the wild side and we’ve all become too damn fat and lazy from drinking seriously oversized carbonated drinks, that we can’t walk the extra 20 steps to the crosswalk. Looks around and say’s “Where’d I put that damn Cheeseburger?”

        • Danny

          SOCA is a UK agency not a US one.

    • ScrewEwe2

      Well, Mayor Bloomberg of New York is probably talking to the Police Commissioner about forming a Seriously Oversized Carbonated Beverage Task Force To Eradicate Lard Asses Because They Make The Transporatation Authority Spend Too Damn Much Money In Fuel Costs Agency. Now Bloomberg will say it’s all for the health of New York residents, but really it’s to save money on fuel costs on the city busses.

      Of course SOCBTFTELABTMTTASTDMMIFCA doesn’t quite have the same ring to it as SOCA does.

      • McCheezits

        Is Bloomberg blocking free drink refills as well, or is he just limiting the size of beverage units?

  • wushang681

    tinyurl.com/cyk9xz2

  • http://twitter.com/brooklin352 brooklin352

    my roomate’s
    ex-wife earned $17785 past month. she has been making cash on the
    laptop and moved in a $318300 home. All she did was get blessed and put
    into use the clues laid out on this website

    http://LazyCash49.com

  • BTGuard - BitTorrent Anonymously

NewsBits

Even more news...

  • The Pirate Bay Isn’t Down Completely, Just Having a Few Issues

    Twitter and Facebook, not to mention the TorrentFreak inbox, are currently alive with complaints that The...

  • Pirate Bay Founder Gottfrid Svartholm on Freedom of Speech

    Freedom of speech is a highly valued commodity, but should people be allowed to say whatever...

  • Blu-ray Anti-Piracy Tech Stops Discs and Promotes Purchases

    An anti-piracy system present in all official Blu-ray players since 2012 has received a fresh update...

  • Foxtel Breeds Pirates by Locking Up Game of Thrones

    One of the main reasons why people turn to piracy is the lack of legal alternatives....

  • UK Student Admits Breaching Sony Copyrights With Leak of PS3 SDK

    Last year an Internet user known as El Nomeo leaked version 3.70 of Sony’s Playstation3 SDK...

MostDiscussed

Below are TorrentFreak's most discussed articles of the past month. Join the discussion if you like.

CopyQuote

Left Quote

“The Pirate Bay has been one of the most important movements in Sweden for freedom of speech, working against corruption and censorship.

Peter Sunde Left Quote

PopularArticles

A selection of some TorrentFreak's classics dug up from our archives.