Mac BitTorrent Clients Reviewed

Written by Smaran on September 03, 2006 

The number of user-friendly, appealing BitTorrent clients available for the platform are very few in comparison to the number of those available for Windows.

In this article we will highlight the most popular Mac BitTorrent applications and compare their features.

If you don’t like torrents try MP3 Fiesta. They hold nearly 67,000 albums from nearly 17,000 artists. Prices are around the $0.10 mark for single tracks with full albums coming in at roughly $1.00. Tracks are available from 192kbps and they take major credit cards and PayPal

Mac OS X is heralded as the most appealing operating system on the market and one of the most capable as well thanks to its BSD (Unix) core.
Sadly, the number of user-friendly, appealing BitTorrent clients available for the platform are very few in comparison to the number of those available for Windows.

In this article we will highlight the most popular Mac BitTorrent applications and compare their features.

BitTorrent OSXLet’s start with the granddaddy of them all, Bram Cohen’s self-titled BitTorrent application. It’s gotten kind of confusing since he named the protocol, his company and his application all BitTorrent. BitTorrent OSX is a very (and I mean very) basic application. It’s as feature-full as Safari’s download box and that’s not saying much. Now some people wouldn’t mind something like that, but if you’re looking for simplicity Transmission is a much better choice. BitTorrent OSX also takes an age to start up on my MacBook Pro.

Transmission is my current Mac B.T. client of choice. TransmissionIt’s an Open Source project, maintained by the developer of the popular Mac DVD ripping application, HandBrake. Transmission does its job well. A neat feature it offers is the ability to view download and upload rates in the dock, so I don’t even have to open up the program to check how my downloads are going. Another great thing Transmission does is copy the .torrent file to its support folder, then trash the original file from my desktop thereby leaving no mess of files behind for me to clean up. Now just like everything Transmission has its flaws, the biggest of which is that Demonoid, a leading BitTorrent directory has banned it on ocassion! They say it doesn’t adhere to set standards.

AzureusAzureus is a cross-platfrom BitTorrent client written in Java. It’s slightly slower than all the other native Mac B.T. applications, but has features none of the others can boast of. Therefore it remains one of the most popular clients, even on the Mac. The one reason I have both Azureus and Transmission installed at any given time is because Transmission doesn’t allow me to select which files I want from a particular torrent. We call the feature ‘Selective Downloading’ and Azureus is sadly the only popular Mac B.T. client that lets me do that! There are also a number of great plug-ins for Azureus that let you do all sorts of things like subscribe to RSS feeds with .torrent enclosures.

Tomato TorrentTomato Torrent is a very plain alternative, seriously lacking in eye-candy and begging for a new icon (and maybe a new name too). It’s based on the official BitTorrent client. I think it desrves a mention because I know a few people who swear by it. It comes with an AppleScript file that you can place in folders you want to download to. When you want to download a torrent to a specific folder, you just drag the .torrent file onto the piece of AppleScript to initiate the transfer. One pro is that it’s an extremely light client that hogs very little RAM. It’s the closet thing to uTorrent on the Mac.

Bits on WheelsBits on Wheels is a slightly out-dated (last updated Sep. ‘05), yet popular Mac BitTorrent client. It claims to be “the first 100% native BitTorrent client for the Macintosh” as it is written in Objective-C and Cocoa.

Bits on Wheels is freeware but not Open Source. One of its main features is a visual 3D Swarm with which you can observe what’s actually going on under the hood, how many seeders and leechers you’re connected to and the bits transferring between everyone. Bits on Wheels is very OSeXy (heh!), it’s how I’d imagine the default OS X BitTorrent downloader to look if there was one. bits on wheels sawrmIf not to use the first native OS X B.T. client, I’d download it just to fly around in 3D chasing bits.

Conclusion
Clearly, feature-wise Azureus is the winner. Bits on Wheels and Transmission are both great alternatives to BitTorrent OSX. If only Bits on Wheels would be updated more often and Transmission become standards-compliant and both of them allow Selective Downloading, they might start taking back some market share. And lets not forget the light weighted tomato. Tomato Torrent could use a few more features and better interface, but it too is a great BitTorrent client.

Worthy Mentions
AcquisitionAcquisition is a Mac p2p program like Limewire that accesses popular file-sharing networks like Gnutella to search for files. It also doubles as a BitTorrent client. Although I have never been able to achieve superior download speeds that I do with Transmission or Azureus, it’s iTunes-integration is sweet.

From version 9 Opera the popular cross-platform browser has implemented a simple, built-in BitTorrent client. It’s supposedly “targeted at novice users.”

.torrents are OSeXy.

Windows Clients Comparison
BitTorrent Client Features (wiki)

If you don't like torrents try MP3 Fiesta. They hold nearly 67,000 albums from nearly 17,000 artists. Prices are around the $0.10 mark for single tracks with full albums coming in at roughly $1.00. Tracks are available from 192kbps and they take major credit cards and PayPal

Previously: BitTorrent Inc expands server park

Next: Why BitTorrent Works

137 Responses (Add yours or TrackBack)

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 [6] Show All

126 Mar 15, 2008 at 16:26 by James P

Great site! Thanks for the help picking a Torrent Client… Transmission is fast and works great. Also TV torrent work good.

127 Mar 16, 2008 at 10:58 by Mr

Dick

128 Mar 18, 2008 at 07:15 by tomfrey

Since I switched to 10.5 I’ve been having trouble finding a client that works. Both Bittorrent and Azureus don’t seem stable. Transmission doesn’t seem to understand the new firewall system, always gives a red light. I’m using Bitrocket, but it has a couple of annoying bugs - it occasionally gets confused and generates negative share ratios, and it crashes if I choose a torrent from Tapecity. Anyone with any insight into any of this, I’d be glad to hear from you.

129 Mar 20, 2008 at 00:49 by Ray Zorback

Awesome reviews. I DL’d Transmission and it works fine for what I need.

Thanks for the post & the info! I’ve searched for this everywhere!

-Ray

130 Mar 30, 2008 at 17:57 by Stephy

Bit on Wheels uses only one processor and it uses it a LOT.

131 Apr 12, 2008 at 16:29 by Jamie R

I have been using Bit Rocket but it is unstable, regularly crashing on OSX. Just downloaded Transmission, with thanks to this article.

132 Apr 12, 2008 at 21:54 by vokality

Can anyone suggest some good bittorrent directories to use with Transmission

133 May 16, 2008 at 17:14 by valli

I just can’t stand Azureus, it is a cheap Java App that simply sucks on every system. Downloading is ok, but the UI, workflow and that mediacenter thing are really bad.

134 May 31, 2008 at 16:46 by Chris H

Greate guide, I downloaded Transmission after reading this article (newbie Mac user)… worth noting, however, is that Transmission DOES have selective downloading! Not just Azureus.

135 Jun 03, 2008 at 03:20 by ml

Xtorrent is a nice and simple program as well.

136 Jun 04, 2008 at 14:24 by David R

To the author of this article: Thank you SOOOOOO much. When I updated to the newest BitTorrent, it began driving me mad with DL interruptions caused by errors (not to mention a host of other annoyances). After I read this article and DL’ed Transmission, not only did the interruptions cease (that alone >10x’ed the functional rates) - but also the max UL rate quadrupled, which had the side benefit of doubling the max DL rate.

Since I’m a Comcast user, I dunno whether that’s because Transmission is that much more robust, or because Transmission data flies under the radar of Comcast’s “traffic shaping.” But either way, I’m very grateful. To the author, and to Transmission’s developer: THANK YOU.

1 references to this post

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 [6] Show All

Add your response

It takes approximately 1 minute for your comment to appear on TorrentFreak after it's posted.