Wrong. MD never should have existed in the first place.

Be a nice new year’s gift to read about MD getting raped in court by their investors and clients.

Even funnier is how quick it was all taken away from him. Who says there’s no karma?

[quote comment="247975"]Yay, they’re going down *Salutes as the MD ship sinks to hell*[/quote]

I believe that’s a one-finger salute? :)

[quote comment="247975"]Even funnier is if he reads this. (Hi Randy; I hate you!)[/quote]

Me, too! Happy New Year Randy! You pwned putz.

Even funnier is if he reads this. (Hi Randy; I hate you!)

Now, since I didn’t start this with “fuck MD”, let the “@ROFLcopter: fuck you!” pounding begin.

(BTW, how many of you are digitizing your home movies and sharing them with BT? ’cause I think that’s the sharing that you are thinking of.)[/quote]

actually no your wrong as far as digital content goes the ONLY way it can legally be classed as stealing is if somebody buys/downloads something and then releases it and says its theres for example if i changed the startup screen on windows and changed everything that said windows to uNoWhO and took out the logo and then started selling it saying i had made it THAT is stealing me sending little bits and peices of data to somebody else which may or may not turn into something made by somebody else isnt stealing its sharing information

We’re no longer stupid
We’re no longer controlled by these dictator
We do as we please
Free like oxygen
Free as a bird
Screw greedy scumbag
I don’t even watch any movies
I just share wuahahahahahaha

And what makes you think we all live in America? Pull your head out of your ass, American laws mean nothing in my country.

Now, since I didn’t start this with “fuck MD”, let the “@ROFLcopter: fuck you!” pounding begin.

(BTW, how many of you are digitizing your home movies and sharing them with BT? ’cause I think that’s the sharing that you are thinking of.)

Those rules go against two things that I cherish; Freedom and Sharing, therefore I do not obey them.

The government can try to change the definition of theft all they want – I’m not going to go with their new definition. I’ll stick with the true definition.

Eat a dick Randy. My country’s laws permit me to legally share, and it is your company’s actions which are illegal and immoral!

Your rationale is EXACTLY the same used by Germans during the Nazi regime to excuse what was done to the jews.. “If you’re not one what should it matter to you?”

Really, eat a big old dick you facist fuck.

http://beaclan.darktech.org/index.php

****************************************************

http://beaclan.darktech.org/index.php

****************************************************

dude honestly stfu u dont know what your talking about ALOT of people here SHARE nobody STEALS and yes we do wish ill on those trying to stop it when its some company trying to intimidate/force governments that they have no jurisdiction over to try to close something thats not even illegal to begin with just because its interfering with some companys cash flow if anything they are the ones that are breaking the law not us and the MD emails proved it

in a way you are right in a way you totally missed the point of what i was saying

what im saying is if ALOT of BT users brought shares yes the price would go back up but the BT users would have a say as to what the company does its basically a silent takeover which alot of companys do and if we really wanted 2 fcuk em over we could all “donate” our MD shares to TPB and give them basically control of the company

I’d not heard of Hollywood Accounting before. Thanks for the info. Seems everyone’s screwing everyone else in the entertainment industry. My heart bleeds…NOT.

@MD
Die.

@uNoWho
If we buy stocks, not only will they get money, but their stock price will go up and they will actually look good. Besides, unless you buy a significant portion of the company, you’re gonna have as much a say as a janitor in congress.

They will end up bankrupting, after the leak every company with any common sense knows that they can’t trust MD with shit. They’re probably selling their stocks, just like Enron CEO’s, before they declare bankruptcy.

And as far as the stealing-sharing conflict, jd, any software worth playing is worth buying. Same with movies, series, music, etc. Not the best place to flame people who use bittorrent, considering the domain and all.

oh and btw nave its not deceiving at all basically every time they take a small trophy the stock price almost hits $2.50 once they take a hit they are down 2 basically nothing

and it is SHARING not stealing stealing means that everyone who ever downloaded it would have gone to see it at the movies most of the people who download it will go and see it at the movies anyway but want to see if its worth there money and dont start about IP laws they are diff state 2 state and country 2 country and usually it doesnt stand up in court anyway

That’s the way stock graphs are represented. Imagine the size a graph would have to be if a stock went through the roof. Therefore, they’re artificially ‘squashed’ through the vertical plane.

HTH

BWAHAHAHAHAHAetc…

Merry Christmas, MediaDefender Assholes. Let’s hope you’re all laid off by the New Year…

(Ain’t schadenfreude grand…?)

Sorry, but you’re mistaken – we are not stealing by sharing data on the internet. Theft implies that I have taken something from them, which I’m sure you will agree is physically impossible as I’ve never been to hollywood to take anything from any movie studio.[/quote]
As much as I would love to agree with you, different rules are applied to what is known as intellectual property.