Comments on: Meet DtecNet – RIAA’s New Anti-Piracy Partners

By: Waiting to enlist providers, RIAA continues to attend in courts | Sir Arthur's Den

Sat, 24 Jan 2009 20:16:32 +0000

[...] partner DtecNet Software, that has bumped MediaSentry for the unauthorized downloads inquiries, are exactly the same used by the above said MediaSentry and by any other being based on the use of an ordinary P2P client to [...]

By: In attesa di arruolare i provider, RIAA continua a frequentare i tribunali | Sir Arthur's Den

Sat, 24 Jan 2009 19:48:19 +0000

[...] DtecNet Software, che ha preso il posto di MediaSentry nelle indagini sui download non autorizzati, sono esattamente gli stessi impiegati dalla suddetta MediaSentry e da chiunque altro essendo basati sull’utilizzo di un banale [...]

By: Dan

Dan — Sat, 17 Jan 2009 22:41:43 +0000

"since no anti-piracy company is capable of identifying uploads to anyone but itself"

What ? If you're part of a swarm for a file, that file is the only thing being exchanged. The hash checks make it a guarantee that you are doing this. So what exactly does a peer reporting that it has 20% of a file, then that it has 30% of a file identify if not that they have received an upload ?

They've already identified themselves as participating in uploading/downloading a pirated file and on top of that you can see them doing it.

Are you really going to act surprised when courts finally decide to take this as evidence too ? I mean, literally every other case/suit they hear doesn't have this standard of evidence and admission of guilt going on.

By: Christopher

Christopher — Fri, 16 Jan 2009 12:58:21 +0000

Actually, I agree with him. I wish death DAILY on the people running the MPAA, RIAA and a few other things in this country.
I'm not going to kill them myself or help someone kill them….. but if an accident happens to them, I will be DANCING IN THE STREETS.

By: Christopher

Christopher — Fri, 16 Jan 2009 12:55:26 +0000

Yeah, you REALLY think that just speaking out is going to get anything done? The only time our government EVER steps in on behalf of the people is when they are fearful for one of two things: their lives or their jobs!
I'll be blunt: I condone ANY action against these people, save those that cause physical harm to someone else IMMEDIATELY AND DIRECTLY. That means vandalism…. I'm fine with it against these companies.

By: Crandom

Crandom — Thu, 15 Jan 2009 19:50:08 +0000

faeces

By: Roze

Roze — Thu, 15 Jan 2009 17:41:45 +0000

Hard work? You mean hard work plundering the artist's hard work, you industry scum. The holy spirit dictates that you deserve to be dead already, and it is possible that someone may need carry out the will of the holy spirit. It is possible that the natural order of the world may now need to be restored, and that the sinner may now need to be sent to hell. Écrasez l'Infâme! Crush the infamous thing! Roze

By: Roze

Roze — Thu, 15 Jan 2009 17:41:36 +0000

setting a building on fire is going to hurt innocent people regardless of neighbors
That is why I recommend against it.

However, how could DDoS attacks do that much? You know, I am sure that much of what you have stated has already been done.

"It would be unsound fancy and self-contradictory to expect that things which have never yet been done can be done except by means which have never yet been tried." — Francis Bacon

"Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results." — Albert Einstein

Écrasez l'Infâme! Crush the infamous thing!
Roze

By: Roze

Roze — Thu, 15 Jan 2009 17:41:22 +0000

Actually, much political action here translates into non-government organizations. Although political parties may have helped in the past with various political movements, most of it was non-governmental organizations. Écrasez l'Infâme! Crush the infamous thing! Roze

By: Roze

Roze — Thu, 15 Jan 2009 17:41:13 +0000

Just because you write that it is absurd, doesn't make it absurd. Écrasez l'Infâme! Crush the infamous thing! Roze

By: Roze

Roze — Thu, 15 Jan 2009 17:41:12 +0000

I did understand the literal meaning, but I was unsure about the actual meaning, because I think that it was meant to signify something other than its literal meaning. Écrasez l'Infâme! Crush the infamous thing! Roze

By: Roze

Roze — Thu, 15 Jan 2009 17:41:02 +0000

Actually, the RIAA is an industry lobby group, not just an industry legal group. Écrasez l'Infâme! Crush the infamous thing! Roze

By: FLB

FLB — Thu, 15 Jan 2009 17:37:10 +0000

roze, you need psychiatric attention.

seriously.

i think all that cartoon porn has gone to your head.

By: FLB

FLB — Thu, 15 Jan 2009 17:29:22 +0000

really? then why haven't you banned roze who has continually condoned them?

By: FLB

FLB — Thu, 15 Jan 2009 06:13:05 +0000

"Free culture benefits"
———————————————————

incorrect. it does not benefit the people who make the "culture".

therein lies the conflict.

you say: "I want your hard work for free!"
I say: "eat shit and die".

unfortunately for me, technology has granted you a window of opportunity to pilfer till your heart's content. your selfishness is also the incentive for the continued erosion of everyone's privacy so while we will eventually all be victims at the culmination of this war, it is the content creators who are doubly-so.

By: James

James — Thu, 15 Jan 2009 04:17:32 +0000

Thanks for information ;) __________________________ http://www.jugargame.com

By: Doubleshot Expresso » Blog Archive » RIAA’s New Partner signals no change in tactics

Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:05:33 +0000

[...] Full story [...]

By: Peter

Peter — Wed, 14 Jan 2009 12:47:23 +0000

How is it posible to pirate things in Australia when they take like 2 months to come out from when the us releases? We also have max connection speed of 100kb/s up so how do we?

By: TerribleTony

TerribleTony — Wed, 14 Jan 2009 11:21:39 +0000

I just wonder, is the BPI/RIAA/etc/etc sharing the cost of the legal letters that will need to be compiled and mailed out to virtually everybody on the planet with and internet with the ISPs, or have the ISPs been forced into absorbing those costs themselves? If so, internet charges will have to rise.

By: TerribleTony

TerribleTony — Wed, 14 Jan 2009 11:13:54 +0000

The BPI are nothing but a bunch of gangsters who are only to happy to threaten innocent local shops with court proceedings if they play the radio and don't pay them protection money. Better to lie to them and say you play classical only, and watch them creep away like the vermin they are.

By: Cybercity pålagt censur | Dreamless Weblog

Cybercity pålagt censur | Dreamless Weblog — Wed, 14 Jan 2009 09:52:42 +0000

[...] ud fra overstående kunne det måske være relavant at det danske firma DtecNet nu har overtaget opgaven med at fange pirater for det amerikanske [...]

By: –––

––– — Wed, 14 Jan 2009 09:26:20 +0000

Are you thick and unable to intake information. 100kb/s for whole dvd rip of 4.5 gigs and when it comes here its been on Internet for 2 months before it is released on shelves.
Now when responding think of those facts before posting the obivous also have you downloaded any new movies that where ripped from Australia?

By: Meocross

Meocross — Wed, 14 Jan 2009 09:07:37 +0000

im tired… do these pathetic idiots think they can take on half of the planet that are downloading files? when the hell are these fools going to go bankrupt.

By: Dr. Feces.

Dr. Feces. — Wed, 14 Jan 2009 08:49:17 +0000

It's entrapment…

By: Mr. Feces

Mr. Feces — Wed, 14 Jan 2009 08:46:56 +0000

I forgot…Definitely human feces…People pick up animals feces all of the time, it's not funm, but it's no big deal…But there is something about a nice large human turd sitting or being mailed somewhere it shouldn't that really gets peopl riled up…..

By: Mr. Feces

Mr. Feces — Wed, 14 Jan 2009 08:45:36 +0000

Mail them feces…Place bags o' feces on their doorstep…Feces, feces, feces feces…..The best revenge is feces….And it's funny as shit too…

By: abigale

abigale — Wed, 14 Jan 2009 07:51:04 +0000

the riaa/mediasentry/dtectnet doesnt quite operate in a legal framework entirely. how is monitoring dont infridging any privacy law? especially in the EU. loggin your ip adres is privacy infridgement, as wel as getting your real adres based on pure speculation.
they try to hack and takeover torrent websites(oink, sharezea etc) and harras people into roilling over dead on behalf of their insane wishes. and how's bribing politicians ?
its all within a legal grey area if not pure illegal. they act in the name of the law but breach some law themselves. thats the industry for you.

By: mister_playboy

mister_playboy — Wed, 14 Jan 2009 07:35:59 +0000

Thank you Department of Homeland Security.

By: a nonny mouse

a nonny mouse — Wed, 14 Jan 2009 07:32:47 +0000

burn these b@stards. Free culture benefits us all, empowered pricks like this who make a killing out of throttling musicians and robbing customers should burn in hell!

By: NubCakes

NubCakes — Wed, 14 Jan 2009 06:55:17 +0000

Fortunately the same system the RIAA operates in allows entities to also go above everyone and change the law.

By: NubCakes

NubCakes — Wed, 14 Jan 2009 06:47:16 +0000

Ummm, yeah… you might wanna leave the legal advice to actual lawyers mate.

By: NubCakes

NubCakes — Wed, 14 Jan 2009 06:45:05 +0000

There's this thing called "the internet" that is essentially a world-wide network linking computers all over the world, including Australia.

By: NubCakes

NubCakes — Wed, 14 Jan 2009 06:43:16 +0000

Their role is to represent the interests of record labels. Those interests are not in line with fileshareres. The mission of the RIAA has nothing to do with interests of filesharers.

By: NubCakes

NubCakes — Wed, 14 Jan 2009 06:40:50 +0000

"RIAA and gov's only respond to people who actually do things"

The RIAA is irrelevent in this instance as they operate within a legal framework that is set by the Government. The Goverment responds to how people will vote. People don't usually vote based on one issue such as copyright related law either. Many people, including myself, actually base a large part of their voting choice on how they percieve the electee rather than policy.

By: NubCakes

NubCakes — Wed, 14 Jan 2009 06:36:15 +0000

"I am not sure what you mean by "can't condone here,"

You don't understand that simple statement?

By: NubCakes

NubCakes — Wed, 14 Jan 2009 06:34:13 +0000

Well, there's somethng for you to work on. I think it's more a case of some people support the idea in principle but won't actually get out there and do something about it.

I don't live in the US but you seem to be self-defeating. The US Pirate Party may not hold much political clout but whilst people believe it is therefore pointless to support it it never will have any…

If you don't support the Pirate Party or some other political party because they "can't do anything" then that translates to "and they never will be able to anything".

By: BenJones

BenJones — Wed, 14 Jan 2009 04:43:09 +0000

Criminal activities are something we can't condone here. That includes vandalism.

By: Brian

Brian — Wed, 14 Jan 2009 04:36:19 +0000

Dude that comment would get you arrested here in the US

By: Waffle Pirate

Waffle Pirate — Wed, 14 Jan 2009 03:22:17 +0000

Countdown until DtecNet is repeatedly hacked and subjected to email leaks.. 5… 4.. 3.. 2.. 1.

By: NubCakes

NubCakes — Wed, 14 Jan 2009 03:05:06 +0000

Probably emails for cease and desist type stuff I'd guess.

By: John Rocky

John Rocky — Wed, 14 Jan 2009 02:45:16 +0000

Sounds like some of these folks really need to find a hobby!

anonweb.pro.tc

By: dxtr

dxtr — Wed, 14 Jan 2009 02:32:34 +0000

It will fail as well. There is no force powerful enough to combat piracy and that is the unsaid truth. Get real people. dxtr http://stuckinframes.blogspot.com

By: maxpower2911

maxpower2911 — Wed, 14 Jan 2009 02:22:21 +0000

Reality check. I think it's just a little absurd to compare the Boston tea party and the suffrage movement to file sharing.

By: CHRoNoSS

CHRoNoSS — Wed, 14 Jan 2009 02:17:32 +0000

OK folks heres a very easy defense for ANY ISP
two things a landlord renting you a room, and Canadian Tire selling you a hammer.
Scenario one that will carry too scenario two: BUYING A HAMMER
OK so some nut gos and buys a hammer form a retail outlet and murders 50 people with it.
The way Hollywood would have us believe here legally is that it isn't the person with the hammers fault its the store that sold him the hammer and thus we have them suing the retail outlets to prevent ANYONE form getting hammers. Interestingly home sales dropped all of a sudden and a bridge collapsed killed 200 people ( 4 times what the hammer nut did in 1st place)
Scenario two, landlord:
DO you think that landlords would tolerate someone saying that due to the possibility that your home can be used for storing hammers that they cant rent to you? ALSO because you bought that hammer and have it in your home its not YOUR fault your a homicidal maniac and murdered 50 people NO NO. its the hammer retail outlet and maybe even the manufacturer. What's the saying guns don't kill people, people kill people.
So here we have you getting removed form a home as your not the hommicidal maniac your a carpenter and because you have a hammer you cant rent a room.

Doesn't it sound great to be the mpaa and riaa. What happens when your wrong and someone dies because of your actions?

So if Hollywood can do this then i would say we should immediately go after gun manufacturers , hammer makers, pencil makers, anything we can get rid of that's a weapon or thought of and anyone who has a cdr writer YOUR now going to be homeless, you have a dvdr or blank cdrs your homeless now. GET OUT your evil aren't you? heh. Stupid try and its because they realize they cant prove people do things so go after isps , well the other thing an isp MUST realize is that millions use p2p and if you really want to get screwed and go out of business then i highly suggest capitulating.

By: Beavis

Beavis — Wed, 14 Jan 2009 02:12:04 +0000

hi dtecnet

we will give you the full treatment just like media sentry dont worry :)

By: poor mans ddos

poor mans ddos — Wed, 14 Jan 2009 02:05:52 +0000

go to their page, and set it to reload every second (tabmix plugin in FF)

By: omg

omg — Wed, 14 Jan 2009 02:00:09 +0000

People need to learn how to use the REPLY button. It couldnt be more obvious..

hit yourself.

By: mister_playboy

mister_playboy — Wed, 14 Jan 2009 01:40:54 +0000

… and if file sharing becomes criminal? Struggling for any kind of rights essentially means something criminal MUST take place, as it is a struggle against the current set of laws.

Morality based on mere legalism isn't much of a morality at all.

By: Grubby Ankles

Grubby Ankles — Wed, 14 Jan 2009 01:33:15 +0000

This is getting to be like Wile E. Coyote & Road Runner. When will they get to the TNT and boulders?

By: anon

anon — Wed, 14 Jan 2009 01:25:42 +0000

Do it!