Like we don’t have enough middle men already.

1. Guilt from what? Those people that download because they cannot afford the legal alternative at all can’t be guilty and affluent at the same time..

2. The point made in the article. If you’re going to pay, why have a middleman and why not pay a price equal to a legal purchase IF YOU CAN?

Which leads to
3. Downloading should and is mostly done by people who cannot keep up with the 50.000 new things to buy every day, yet still want access to cultural artefacts.
As long as no FLATRATE SOLUTION is offered, they will continue to indulge via “illegal” downloading.

Offer a flatrate solution for the modern consumer and all this becomes legal and an income stream instead of criminals and “lost sales”(..which are purely invented to begin with).

Sorry guys, no flatrate no dice. The money goes to usenet, vpn, rapidsh.t etc instead.

Your loss, industry.

All in all, it sounds like easy money for lots of lawyers in just consulting fees alone, even if Moozar doesn’t actually get any confessions!

In other words, if you do not pay what they are demanding, you can face legal problems. And as you created an accout there and sent your personal data, I can bet you will be prossecuted. You are handling your personal data and admiting you downloaded the song. Its the best thing copyright holders could expect.

Another completely pointless website trying to profit off guilt. When are they actually going to learn that all we need is a download service that will sell digital music for a proper price. We don’t need or want any of these stupidly ridiculous sites and their daft business models. Sell your frickin songs online for 10 or 20p a track and I’ll buy them, lots and lots of them. that will be 10 or 20p more than they would otherwise be getting for it.

“If you don’t sell it for a price that I like, I will steal it” is extortion, which is a crime fyi.

Oh Neo, how wrong you are in your assumptions of the original poster.

You assume that because they won’t pay more than 20p they’ll simply ‘take’ the track, but that’s not what the poster said at all.

They said that they weren’t willing to pay more than 20p per track, which could mean what you assumed, but just as easily (and more likely) it could mean that they wouldn’t download that track at all.

So rather than MAKE 10p or 20p from a happy paying customer, the record labels have simply lost a sale and maybe even a customer and with it, they’ve lost many future sales.

That’s not a crime, it’s not extortion, it’s not really anything beyond a disgruntled consumer expressing their dissatisfaction at the price point currently set for digital media distribution methods.

In a true market-economics system, the value of a product is not what you choose to sell it for, it’s what someone is willing to pay for it.

Not going to hapen. We are BOYCOTTING!

Would be cool if there would be a possibility to send money directly to your favorite; film director, actor, singer etc account not to these crooks.

MooZar has no agreement with the copyright holders and has no authority to grant any rights to copyrighted material.