Comments on: Most Popular DVDrips on BitTorrent (wk17)

By: kldbori

kldbori — Sun, 28 Dec 2008 12:15:50 +0000

why is i cat get vcdquality whgen i try to log onto it it sends me somewhere else

By: Most Popular DVDrips on BitTorrent (wk18) | Clint Is A Geek.com

Most Popular DVDrips on BitTorrent (wk18) | Clint Is A Geek.com — Sat, 10 May 2008 17:00:28 +0000

[...] (last week) [...]

By: Most Popular DVDrips on BitTorrent (wk17) | Clint Is A Geek.com

Most Popular DVDrips on BitTorrent (wk17) | Clint Is A Geek.com — Sat, 10 May 2008 15:42:08 +0000

[...] Most Popular DVDrips on BitTorrent (wk17) [...]

By: Zwartbaard » Blog Archive » Most downloaded DVDrips for week 17

Zwartbaard » Blog Archive » Most downloaded DVDrips for week 17 — Tue, 06 May 2008 13:56:45 +0000

[...] (last week) [...]

By: Most Popular DVDrips on BitTorrent (wk18) | TorrentFreak

Most Popular DVDrips on BitTorrent (wk18) | TorrentFreak — Tue, 06 May 2008 08:39:51 +0000

[...] (last week) [...]

By: Kenny Kenny

Kenny Kenny — Sun, 04 May 2008 14:04:49 +0000

Reminds me of the people arguing for Telesyncs to be in xvid rather than svcd’s and getting shouted down because of compatibilty issues, or even the shock of the use of SVCD’s rather than VCD’s by TS groups, (and I can’t even remember that famous release groups name who started releasing three svcd movies and were shouted down by people who said it was a waste of bandwidth) . A 2 x 700mb AC3 film is usually pretty fine as it is. Bandwidth is less of an issue anyway nowadays. If you are really quality mad and using a computer to watch you might as well go down the HD H.264 route on a DVDR rather than faffing about with some 800mb standard res stuff. Personally, I seem to be mainly watching silent films nowadays, they at least new how to act back in 1920 whatever and can tell a story a million times better than some CGI’d tosh.

By: GK

GK — Sun, 04 May 2008 08:52:15 +0000

Like someone said, it doesn’t matter right now if H.264 is better. Xvid is better supported and more wide-spread. Just like mp3 is actually inferior to several other audio formats, but it enjoys better support, and therefore, is more popular.

By: MPAA

MPAA — Sat, 03 May 2008 22:49:59 +0000

[quote comment="364974"][quote]::Xvid it is then.H264 might have to rise up just a bitâ€¦.[/quote]

how would h.264 have to rise up to beat xvid? ones a format, the others an encoder – still, videos encoded to h.264 are usually much better than videos encoded by xvid.[/quote]
pretty obvious where the post was going with this, xvid encodes in a format too. ignoring the obvious is pretty stupid.

xvid uses an implementation of mpeg-4 part2 with some bastardization for being in AVI
H.264 is obviously mpeg-4 part10 (otherwise known as AVC)

the comparison would obviously be between those two “formats”, though of course even if a format is technically superior it does no good if the implementation of it (the encoder) is inferior.

x264 > xvid

By: MPAA

MPAA — Sat, 03 May 2008 22:42:26 +0000

is it just me or are “horton hears a who” and “untraceable” still just r5dvdrips ?

By: ghost

ghost — Thu, 01 May 2008 19:14:39 +0000

[quote comment="363948"]The Bank Job was not all that good
Untraceable was decent, bu[quote comment="363948"]The Bank Job was not all that good
Untraceable was decent, but unrealistic.
Horton Hears a Who! was quite funny
Cloverfield really sucked if you asked me.[/quote]
t unrealistic.
Horton Hears a Who! was quite funny
Cloverfield really sucked if you asked me.[/quote]

you don’t know what u talking about , with normal bitrates Xvid gives better quality than x264.