TorrentFreak

The place where breaking news, BitTorrent and copyright collide

Movie Studios Compiled Scary Private Life Dossier On SurfTheChannel Owner

The Hollywood-backed Federation Against Copyright Theft was the driving force behind the four-year jail sentence handed down to former SurfTheChannel owner Anton Vickerman yesterday. The organization conducts its own investigations and then hands its findings to police and other authorities, but just how much can they discover about targets such as Vickerman? Internal FACT documents obtained by TorrentFreak show the anti-piracy group go to scary lengths to delve deep into people’s private lives.

Anton Vickerman, the owner of TV streaming links site SurfTheChannel, was sentenced to four years jail-time at Newcastle Crown Court yesterday after previously being found guilty of conspiracy to defraud for “facilitating” copyright infringement.

The background investigation into the case was carried out by the Hollywood-funded, MPA-affiliated, UK anti-piracy group Federation Against Copyright Theft. FACT has no official powers and is a limited company in the UK, but as this article will reveal it has a surprising level of influence when it comes to obtaining information.

Before being sentenced Vickerman arranged that for his side of the story to be posted on the SurfTheChannel website. In close to 20,000 words he describes the past five years as a “very British miscarriage of justice.” In addition to the story Vickerman also posted an archive containing evidence to back up his claims.

Among other things, the archive contains a FACT document headlined ‘Operation Stemp – Subject Profile: Anton Vickerman’, which is a dossier of information the FACT Intelligence Unit compiled on the SurfTheChannel admin, his family, and his associates.

The document begins by stating that Vickerman is believed to be the operator of two “torrent sites” – surfthechannel.com and snarf-it.org, both of which “sell copyrighted material”. It follows with Vickerman’s home address, notes that his wife lives with him, lists the make, model and license plate of her car, and indicates she was being watched as long ago as May 2008.

According to FACT, Vickerman worked on the famous Suprnova.org torrent site and used several aliases including FD, Shadow, Serious, Casper and Ben Vickerman. But from here things start to get more intimate.

In the next section of the profile FACT conduct a “Financial Analysis” of Vickerman, noting that he had previously defaulted on seven credit agreements.

And then, just when people in the UK might incorrectly presume that their finances are a private affair, FACT notes that Vickerman had two standing loans being paid back at the rate of £209 per month and goes on to describe the details of his mortgage, how much he pays each month, and the fact that he and his wife never missed a payment.

vickfinance

The data gathering continues to include the personal details of Anton Vickerman’s mother and father who are both pensioners.

Kelly Vickerman, Anton’s wife, was described as having two bank accounts and a credit card (with £1,025 outstanding) and an account with the comms provider BT. Initially FACT had considered that an account might have been held with comms provider BSKYB so wrote to the company asking for information – FACT apparently have “an agreement” with BSKYB to obtain information.

FACT2BSKYB

BSKYB responded back saying no accounts were held at the Vickerman’s address

BSKYB2FACT

As noted earlier, FACT incorrectly described streaming links site SurfTheChannel as a BitTorrent site, but they go even further when justifying the need to conduct surveillance on the Vickermans.

VickDVD

The documents go on to list the reports provided by FACT’s private investigators as they track Vickerman up and down the country during and after his meeting with a movie industry undercover operative in a London hotel. They also list requests to use covert filming techniques when an operative posed as a potential housebuyer. Part of the operative’s report and filming is shown below.

VICKCovert

The depth of the investigation and the amount of information obtained by FACT on the Vickermans is quite remarkable. The data and correspondence collated runs to dozens of pages but perhaps what is most noticeable is the manner in which everything is presented. The whole thing looks like a police operation yet it was not – it was an investigation being carried out by a UK company on behalf of other companies in the United States.

But for FACT and their Hollywood paymasters overseas, the effort will have been worth it. Four years in jail for Anton Vickerman is a very aggressive punishment and what could yet prove to be a significant deterrent to others looking to follow in his footsteps. The MPAA will be very pleased with their investment this morning, there can be little doubt about that.

Related Posts

Previous Post | Next Post

  • meowmix

    don’t we have laws here in england about invasion of privacy?

    • yello

      hey, im just glad to see that there are plenty of cold cases out there 
      at the sacrifice of resources for big, important cases like this.

      • http://twitter.com/CynthiaRBrown1 Cynthia R. Brown

        the law should be changed globaly so that a company cannot be classed at a citizen. if it cannot vote in a general election, it should not be classed as a person. http://Millionaire4Project.blogspot.com

    • Guest321

      Laws are only for ordinary citizens to follow.

      • Ah

         can’t said better

      • Guest

        Until Europe get to hear about it (right about now!) then the NuTory government will shit bricks.

    • http://twitter.com/Mathew30 Mathew Lisett

       data protection act 1988

      im still trying to figure out how the hell a ltd company was able to gain details when the only legal way to do so would be via the courts. and what proof apart from the letter bskyb had been sent was to show it was FACT they were in communication with.

      • Gae

        I was thinking the exact same, if I had sky as my ISP I would be asking questions right about now. That email does not seem to show them putting up any kind of resistance and actually seem quite happy to help.

      • Rekrul

         Don’t you know? The world revolves around copyright. All normal laws are suspended when copyright are at stake!

      • Anonymouse

        bskyb & FACT both owned by Murdoch need I say more.

    • Banana

      in any reasonable country such investigation would be severely punished

      • Banana

         Actually, here in Brazil such investigation is not only criminal but has no legal value. Can’t be used as proof of anything due to the non licit means the information was obtained.

        • Nope

          Until the MPAA / RIAA owned US of A comes a knocking for information and your government fucks it up like they did with the Megaupload case. 

        • http://profiles.google.com/zerianis10 Christopher Kidwell

          Nope, New Zealand vs. Brazil. New Zealand are the ones for the MegaUpload shenanigans.

    • JohnGaspardo

      It’s called corporate fascism. Corporations have more rights than people now. Corporations are “people” don’t you know ? If you stand in the way of profits then you are expendable. The Nazi gassed people in their final solution and made their skin into lamp shades, their hair into mattress stuffing, stole and melted down the gold from their fillings, took their cloths and belongings to be resold and made their bones and teeth into concrete and back fill. If you let them they will do the same to you because after all when power is allowed to concentrate it always results in crimes against humanity and history is the proof of it.  

      • meowmix

        we’re heading there fast. have you noticed the police uniform is paramilitary these days?

        the law should be changed globaly so that a company cannot be classed at a citizen. if it cannot vote in a general election, it should not be classed as a person.

        • JohnGaspardo

          don’t give them any ideas. giving them the vote is the last thing we need.

      • JohnGaspardo

        “First they came for the communists,and I didn’t speak out because I wasn’t a communist.Then they came for the trade unionists,and I didn’t speak out because I wasn’t a trade unionist.Then they came for the Jews,and I didn’t speak out because I wasn’t a Jew.Then they came for me and there was no one left to speak out for me.”

      • Guest
    • Guest

      Unless we start killing some of these corporate parasites they are not going to stop this crap.

      • meowmix

        it would be nice to see some corporate whores offed. now that is something i would pay to see online.

    • Daphne

       Mmm, I bet FACT’s email accounts hold lots of interesting information that they wouldn’t like to be made public.

      What’s good for the goose is good for the gander, right?

  • GUEST

    So if they had so much debt/outstanding and repaying a mortgage, you have to wonder where the 35,000 GBP they made a month from STC went… Oh I forgot – Maintaining servers and stuff is free of charge.

    • Water is cool

      Do you honestly think renting a few dedicated servers to handle traffic for a LINKING website costs £35k? If he was hosted in Belarus then yes, but the server was located in the UK which as you can see on redstation.co.uk (an example of a uk server provider) prices are nice and cheap. He didn’t need an extreme amount of bandwidth as his files were hosted on sites like megaupload – it was only static/dynamic few-kb files such as php, images, css, js.

      The money went into his Latvia bank account and to protect his identity and to provent his money being taxed in the UK he was limited to the amount he could take out.

      If, however, you still believe that he spent all £35k on the servers – please respond to me with your research which would suggest that this is true.

      If you’re trying to deny the fact that he earned £35k/mo please give evidence – my evidence to prove that he DID earn that much is located; http://www.surfthechannel.com/misc762.rar – password to open the rar is “miscarriage22″ without the quotes – alongside the basic maths of calculating an average per 1000 cost times by the amount of traffic divided by 1000 = over £30k.

      I’m all for piracy, I’m not all for profiting from someone elses work regardless of it being a link or actually hosting the file.

      • Water is cool

        But for the record – I hate IFPI/BPI/MPAA/FACT etc but I’m merely pointing out the evidence which FACT provided. 4 years in jail is completely unacceptable for owning such a site – I’d have thought a massive fine would have been the right amount of punishment – jail shouldn’t have even been mentioned :(

        I do feel sorry for him, but you cannot back him up and be in denial about the situation – he DID profit from it, fact (see what I did there?).

  • FangaDooo

    Wow thats jsut totally insane dude. Seriously.
    At-Anon.tk 

  • BSKYB ARE FUCKTARDS!!

    What about the data protection act?? This prevents companies handing out personal information to other companies. BSKYB are a bunch of fucking morons anyway so this just adds to their idiocy!

    Just adds to the reasons I would never get sky tv!

    • meowmix

      i was thinking about that. i seem to recal to get a lot of that information they have to go to court for court orders to get it.

    • Colin Carr

       It’s just what you’d expect from a company whose biggest shareholder is Murdoch’s News Corp.

  • Geoff2468

    i’ve had a look at the papers you refer to and they are sensational. Where to begin?

    Virgin Media and BSkyb dont look too reliable as regards their customers’ data security, giving it over to a private company without much hesitation because that is the way they work in close conjunction with that company.

    You say that the investigation was dressed up to mimic the police. But when you look, it appears that the police were providing reports and information on the Vickermans long before Fact Ltd approached Northumbria Police (arnt the 7 by 7 reports actually police property? Also there is some suggestion that Tansley who was on secondment to Fact for a year, actually used the confidential police sources and services to help the private company research and attack the vickermans.

    Everyone should look at and copy the contents of the statement before the dirty tricks department of MPAA/Fact get on the case.

    The possible involvement of the Murdochs and their useful links to the good and the great are really tantalising. Lets hope others who are in the know a bit more start giving up their secrets to TF and others.

    And finally to point out that Fact are both bigging up and grossly misrepresenting the Vickerman conviction. Vickerman was convicted of conspiracy to defraud the movie industry through facilitating the  infringment of copyright. The trial judge actually withdrew from the jury the question of whether or not facilitating linking was illegal. He said “if you believe that Vickerman was linking to copyright infringing material whether knowingly or unknowingly, you MUST find him guilty”  No doubt this rather extreme misdirection will find its way into the Appeal application.

    Off to re-read. No doubt more will become clear.

    • LiveFreely

       ”if you believe that Vickerman was linking to copyright infringing
      material whether knowingly or unknowingly, you MUST find him guilty”

      That’s crazy. Teh Google and others both knowingly and unknowingly link to copyright infringing material. So when are they getting sentenced?

      • http://www.facebook.com/people/Don-Dilly/1624894683 Don Dilly

         Google might actually like to help fund this guy’s appeal if they were made aware of the Judge’s summing upand the implications to them.

        This case looks more a travesty of justice the deeper you look. God knows what Vickerman’s lawyer thought he was playing at. 

        • http://ilike1664.myopenid.com/ Disgusting “Justice”

          From reading Vickermans account of the trial and everything leading up to it, it sounds like his lawyers did everything they could. The judge was corrupt and as Vickerman points out most appeals have 1 or 2 ground for appeal, he has 24! Some of which are allowing illgeally gathered evidence that should never have been admissible, allowing a closed session (PII) between just him and the prosecution and no independent barrister ” …to make sure that nothing untoward happens to prejudice the defense.”, not KNOWING the law he was supposed to be presiding over “if you believe that Vickerman was linking to copyright infringing material whether knowingly or unknowingly, you MUST find him guilty” and “.. if I have got the law wrong then don´t worry ladies and gentlemen of the jury because a higher court than me will put that right.”! The list is very very long and I’m disgusted that this could happen in the UK.

          I’m giving VERY serious consideration to setting up my own version of SurftheChannel, but being completely open about links, the law and any money earned from the site. Nothing to hide no conspiracy to commit a legal act!

      • Water is cool

        Megaupload was an easy target – Googles not an easy target, they have extreme money, they employ many many people, they are based in the USA(so to raid them they’d have to follow USA laws, as Kim was offshore they didn’t have to follow USA laws – they’d serve no punishment for doing anything illegal from within another country).

        Also, Google was linking to the files not hosting and had a small percentage of links which were linking to file hosts – unlike MU which was used to share a lot of copyrighted content (sure, legal content as well but less than Google’s percentage).

        So as I said, MU is easy to murder – Google is too big.

        • Water is cool

          LOL, sorry, I commented on a surfthechannel article about MU not surfthechannel >_<

          ignore the comment and I'll rewrite it relevent to this article;

          Surfthechannel is an easy target – google isn't. google has fewer infringing percentage of links.

    • Eddy

       ”if you believe that Vickerman was linking to copyright infringing
      material whether knowingly or unknowingly, you MUST find him guilty”

      And this is why an appeal will be successful.

  • http://torrentfreak.com/ Rob8urcakes

    This info indicates a VERY serious breach of privacy by FACT and their US paymasters.

    It’s on brilliant articles such as this (thanks TF) that makes me wish I was a qualified and practising solicitor well read on not only UK law but also international law and Treaties pertaining to the rights of the individual to our privacy.

    This bunch of unauthorised and private individuals have broken so many laws by investigating this Vickerman guy so intensely I’m sure any firm of 2-bit lawyers could make a small fortune pursuing this.

    I was going to comment on where FACT made their mistake, but why bother educating them when Vickerman and family can simply sue them out of existence?

    TF have to do a follow-up story on this one – this is potentially brutal for FACT and their co-conspirators in the USA, therefore 100% fun with a decent dose of true justice thrown in for good measure.

    • meowmix

      with any luck, some tech savy solicitor (better yet a barrister) will fight for this guys rights which have been smashed.

    • Danny

      Reading the story on surfthechannel.com makes me feel sick.

      How the hell did ‘British justice’ get to this corrupt state.

  • PatternGuru714

    Can anyone point out any source that says FACT is funded by the USA? It’s a UK company serving to enforce UK laws,  not USA laws as far as I know. The UK has its own laws for copyright infringement, not every copyright offense is puppeted by the USA. Also, it’s worth noting that two of the largest music and film companies are owned by France and conglomerates from Asia, etc.

    • Colin Carr

       ”It’s a UK company serving to enforce UK laws.”
      Hang on a minute, I know the UK gov.t is trying to outsource everything, but last time I checked, enforcing UK criminal law was the job of the police, not some private company.

      • PatternGuru714

        Of course, the police and Interpol, agreed. And that’s what happened here. Anyone can investigate, collect information or request assistance from courts and police for investigative warrants (at least in the USA, I’m assuming similar in UK). I agree this case seems heavy-handed, but it appears in proper procedural order.

    • Geoff2468

      I can help patternguru714.

      Facts barrister David Groome and his ‘star witness Pascal Hetzscholdt, confirmed to the Newcastle court that Fact Ltd is wholly owned and funded by the MPAA. Indeed the MPAA refers to Fact though it usually does not include the ‘limited’ bit, as its UK enforcement arm. Also the MPAA annual budget is $75m for Fact and related organisations around the globe.

  • Anon

    How is that any different to the kind of shit that gets pulled up when Anon doxs on a company head they decide they don’t like?

    • Guest321

      Valid point mate. Lately several private documents and dossiers from the IFPI and MPAA roster have been leaked by Anon hackers. Those are a serious breach of privacy too. Yet everyone chose to ignore the ramifications.

      • LiveFreely

         The difference those documents leaked by hackers cannot be used as evidence in a court of law, nobody is going to jail based on those documents.

        Those documents would then have to be obtained legally to be used in a court.

        • Heisenberg7

          That’s their point. The information FACT obtained should be as illegal as the documents the hackers obtained and should be inadmissable in court.

  • Truth

    Look up a 2009 documentary called “Erasing.David”, keeping in mind that technology has moved on, way way on since this was made.

    Even Advertisers bid in millisecond duration auctions every time your browser visits a webpage based on profiled information (think facebook/email keywoards/google searches). 

  • Notinmybackyard

    Even if Hollywood’s FACT private investigators failed to dredge up (or entrap) enough dirt to convict Vickerman, such invasive covert infiltration operations into a person’s private life can easily be used to blackmail a person, or destroy a person’s life. 

    It’s not commonly reported in the press (for obvious reasons) but these kind of ‘deep cover’ spy operations are often used to silence political or corporate dissidents.

    I.E. — befriend the targeted person, set him up with a prostitute, film him using illegal drugs, etc. EVERYONE in the world has something they don’t want people to know about them, or can be coerced/entrapped into committing such an action.

    Also, there may have been other infiltration operations run on Vickerman for the purpose of encouraging him to do things that would set him up in a position for easy prosecution or blackmail.  

    In the 1960s, General Motors did this to critic Ralph Nader, got caught, got sued, and were forced to pay out a multi-million dollar settlement. 

    The Scientology cult has employed these kind of dirty-trick operations for decades against its critics and foes –including judges and heads of government agencies. (You can google Paulette Cooper) It’s been an extremely effective technique — many of the Scientology cult’s perceived enemies have ended up in jail one way or another. 

  • Geoff2468

    I can help patternguru714.

    Facts barrister David Groome and his ‘star witness Pascal Hetzscholdt, confirmed to the Newcastle court that Fact Ltd is wholly owned and funded by the MPAA. Indeed the MPAA refers to Fact though it usually does not include the ‘limited’ bit, as its UK enforcement arm. Also the MPAA annual budget is $75m for Fact and related organisations around the globe

    • PatternGuru714

      Thanks for the reply, do we have a link to that transcript anywhere? I don’t doubt any of it, ‘just like to collect actual first-tier docs and doc links.

  • cbgfnb

     http://commonprosperity.org/
    free shipping

    competitive price

    any size available

    accept the paypal

    jordan shoes $32

    nike shox $32

    Christan Audigier bikini $23

    Ed Hardy Bikini $23

    Smful short_t-shirt_woman $15

    ed hardy short_tank_woman $16

    Sandal $32

    christian louboutin $80

    Sunglass $15

    COACH_Necklace $27

    handbag $33

    AF tank woman $17

    puma slipper woman $30
    http://commonprosperity.org/
    commonprosperity.org@hotmail.com
    ?????????????????

    ?????????????????

    ?????????????????

    ?????????????????

    ?????????????????

    ???? ???????????

    ???????????????

    ???????????????

    ???????
          ? ??
         commonprosperity.org@hotmail.com
    ???????????????

    ??????????????

    ??????????????

    ???????????????

    ???????????????

  • Anon200

    So a company (FACT) has obtained data which should have been protected under the data protection act by deception?

    If the evidence was not presented then I guess there it would have no relation on the court case but that does not mean that FACT should not be charged with a crime themselves.

  • 12465

    So why did courts find Tv-links not guilty and SurfTheChannel guilty. Anton needs a better legal team.

    • Techanon

      the judge misguided the “dishonesty test”.

    • Geoff2468

      To 12465′s question “Why TVLinks not guilty and surfthechannel guilty?”

      Its because Fact/MPAA incorporated their lessons from TV Links. Justice Ticehurst held that the European Directive known as ‘mere conduit’ meant that as a simple information provider, TV Links were not breaking the law.

      So in the surfthechannel case the charges were specifically drawn up to avoid the application of the Ticehurst ruling even though the Vickerman’s lawyers believed and argued that it still did apply to surfthechannel. The FACT strategy was to ‘encourage’ a programmer who had worked for Vickerman to produce evidence that showed Vickerman had uploaded infringing material and linked to it. This deprived Vickerman of an effective application of the mere conduit rule.

      This ‘evidence’comprised of chat log records which the American programmer, one Brendan DeBeasi, had transferred to a CD from his computer several months after being arrested by the FBI. The chat log records’ accuracy were hotly disputed by Vickerman. Since DeBeasi had unfortunately destroyed his original hard disc on which the original chat log records were held after he made the CD for FACT, it was not possible to compare the two records of the chat logs to see who was lying. One further ingredient to help you decide who was lying. DeBeasi had entered into a ‘proffer agreement’ with the american authorities which linked his not being prosecuted in the USA with his success in convicting Vickerman in the UK. Take your pick on who might have been telling the truth.

      I know, Rob8urcakes, the courts should have not allowed it but the trial judge had been ‘prosecution minded’ to use a barrister euphamism throughout the whole trial and became more so as the trial continued.

      And why am I so pessimistic about the likelehood of a successful appeal against conviction. Well, the answer lies in the 20,000 word statement on the surfthechannel website, the bit that describes what happened in the Scopelight case. That seems to me to suggest that the powers of darkness may intervene again….

      • 12465

         Thank you to the both of you for taking time to reply :)

  • 123

    Fun Fact! In the US the company would be able to be sued. Take it to a jury trial and its game over for them. That is why they are trying so hard to keep DOTCOM out of the US….lol Our government in the US needs to keep its freaking hand out of other peoples affairs. From the US taxpayers to the world. We are sorry.. We are trying to fix it now!

    • Tampa

      As an internatinal voice,  i think i can safely say that some of us international’ers know there are US citizens who are as frustrated by our respective governments as we are,  we do not lay blame at those who feel as we do,  infact,  id go as far as to invite anyone who belives in liberty and freedom to my table,  honoured in fact,   an offer i would never extend to the so called number one reperesentative of a people,  Barrack Obama.

      Good luck to you, my american brethrens,  becuase in doing so,  you help change our side of the world aswell,  thankyou,  and goodluck

      Tampa Bay

      • Guest

         Guess what sweetheart, if we wind up with Romney, not likely, he would just spit in your face.

        • Guest

           Good reason to endorse ‘Legalise Freedom’ and say, “No Obromney!” by voting Libertarian, Green, or for Ron Paul. 

        • Jesus H. “Fucking” Christ

          There’s really not a difference. Romney and Obama are both political money whores who care fuck all for the American populace or anyone else besides their rich friends and their rich friends’ wallets.

          It really doesn’t matter which one makes office. Obama might say nicer things than Romney, but he did the same shit as Bush (despite blasting him throughout his campaign) when he got into office in 2008, and he’ll do the same shit if he’s elected again this year – as will Romney.

          Remember when Obama promised to legalize pot, shut down Guantanamo Bay, get American troops out of the Middle East, and institute a “transparent government”? Now he’s authorizing raids on medical dispensaries, putting more people in Guantanamo Bay, drone-striking the shit out of innocent Arabs, and allowing the government to get away with illegal shit like Megaupload and horrific invasions of citizens’ privacy.

      • theonlyone

         Getting a professional politician to the table is one thing. Getting an honest interaction would be like pulling teeth.

    • Anon

      Um, dude. They’re trying to bring dotcom INTO the us.

      That’s why they’re pushing so hard for extradition

      • Guest

        I read somewhere online that a lawyer has stated that it is highly unlikely that Dotcom will be extradited to the US because according to NZ law you cannot be extradited for criminal copyright infringement. We shall see if this holds true come March next year.

      • Guest

        Dotcom’s alleged crimes may not be extraditable under New Zealand’s treaty with
        the U.S., Fortune magazine writer Roger Parloff pointed out in a recent story on
        the case’s complexity — and they may not even be crimes.

  • TheyAreCorrupt

    Looks like the American INJustice system is making it’s way around the world.

  • Anonymous

    at a rough guess it would seem that FACT, like the rest of the entertainment industries and their associates, will lie, cheat and steal to achieve their aims and then only present what ‘evidence’ they deem beneficial to them in a way that is beneficial to them. this is extremely frightening considering no one else is allowed to do that. what is more frightening is that the courts seem to accept all this ‘evidence’ without question, whereas the accused is denied bringing into evidence things that are on his side. this is a follow up to TPB spectrial. the UK has fallen into bed with the US government and Hollywood and should be ashamed at what they have done. i dont know why this has happened. the US has absolutely nothing of interest or use to the UK and if they think we will be protected when attacked, think again. the US is using the UK just as they us everywhere else. once they have what they want, they will wash their hands and leave it in the shit!

    • Colin Carr

       Back in the darkest days of WW2, before Pearl Harbor, Churchill had a special personal relationship with FDR. This was vital for keeping the UK supplied with weapons to fight the Nazis. At the end of WW2, FDR died, Truman took over, Chuchill was thrown out of office in an election. The special personal relationship was over. The UK likes to hang on to the illusion that it still exists, possibly as a reminder that we were once ‘Top Nation’.

  • Geoff2468

    To 12465′s question “Why TVLinks not guilty and surfthechannel guilty?”

    Its because Fact/MPAA incorporated their lessons from TV Links. Justice Ticehurst held that the European Directive known as ‘mere conduit’ meant that as a simple information provider, TV Links were not breaking the law.

    So in the surfthechannel case the charges were specifically drawn up to avoid the application of the Ticehurst ruling even though the Vickerman’s lawyers believed and argued that it still did apply to surfthechannel. The FACT strategy was to ‘encourage’ a programmer who had worked for Vickerman to produce evidence that showed Vickerman had uploaded infringing material and linked to it. This deprived Vickerman of an effective application of the mere conduit rule.

    This ‘evidence’comprised of chat log records which the American programmer, one Brendan DeBeasi, had transferred to a CD from his computer several months after being arrested by the FBI. The chat log records’ accuracy were hotly disputed by Vickerman. Since DeBeasi had unfortunately destroyed his original hard disc on which the original chat log records were held after he made the CD for FACT, it was not possible to compare the two records of the chat logs to see who was lying. One further ingredient to help you decide who was lying. DeBeasi had entered into a ‘proffer agreement’ with the american authorities which linked his not being prosecuted in the USA with his success in convicting Vickerman in the UK. Take your pick on who might have been telling the truth.

    I know, Rob8urcakes, the courts should have not allowed it but the trial judge had been ‘prosecution minded’ to use a barrister euphamism throughout the whole trial and became more so as the trial continued.

    And why am I so pessimistic about the likelehood of a successful appeal against conviction. Well, the answer lies in the 20,000 word statement on the surfthechannel website, the bit that describes what happened in the Scopelight case. That seems to me to suggest that the powers of darkness may intervene again….

  • DoAsISayNotAsIDoParty

    Sounds to me like alot of that evidence should have been thrown out the window considering the “illegal” methods used to obtain them

    • Jezza

       That’s only applicable for murder and rape, not when multimillion human slavery corporations and governments are involved

    • MadAsASnake

       Not to mention the broken and / or non-existent chains of evidence.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Don-Dilly/1624894683 Don Dilly

    Ive taken the time plowing through the skullduggery in the STC rar file and one pdf was of particular interest and that was the email between STC and HBO regarding their contractor bayTSP and the  DMCA takedowns of (mostly fake) links claiming to be HBO material. What was of most interst given Dotcom’s current fight is that these links pointed not to streams but non existant files on megavideo.

    It is striking that the level of fakes posted outweighed legit human posted content by 4:1 and was being reposted as fast as they were taken down.

    Bearing in mind the partnershipsthe site had with legit program makers it strikes me that copyright protection bodies posting fakes and then generating takedowns smacks of creating evidence to stitch someone up.

    It also looks like it might well have been trying to kill 2 sites with the same fake evidence after what came of megavideo.

  • http://www.jgsbws.com/ Terry Smith

    Paging Anonymous…

  • Alan
    • http://twitter.com/Darrellyqi Darrellyqi

      ….
      goo.gl/zStpU

  • http://twitter.com/Darrellyqi Darrellyqi

     Leonard responded I’m in shock that people can make $7138 in four weeks on the network. did you look at this(Click on menu Home)

  • http://modmyi.com/forums/iphone-4-new-skins-themes-launches/740147-neurotech-hd.html#post5637502 Jay

    Anyone can apply for a Private Investigator’s license.

  • Alyssa Blindy

    Gees, that sounds like the type of operation that would be rightly started against a terrorist. It is wrong that this type of operation was done against someone who wasn’t a hard-core murderer or human or drug trafficker, and the operation wasn’t even done by a law enforcement agency. Scary.

  • Beecher

    These people are terrorists, based on them being a spy, that probally means they have no boundries, who knows, they might even kidnap

  • Vincent Giannell

    “The MPAA will be very pleased with their investment this morning, there can be little doubt about that.”

    We’ll see about that if we could get the sentences appealed.

    • Guest

      If the appeal is succesful and i hope it is then expect a nuclear fallout of a tantrum from the MPAA lol

  • Byte Master

    It’s amazing what private citizens like those people from FACT and MPAA can get done with a little social engineering… That means I can do the exact same thing… oh, wait.

  • Andrew Lee

    They’re wasting time it’s completely pointless to go after these sites.. If they want to stop the problem they need to go after the source.

    Not the problem:
          There are people who upload to let friends see it.
          There are people who upload to make a backup
          There are people who upload to let people in other countries see it instead of waiting many extra weeks,months,or even years.

    Problems:
        There are people who exploit copyrighted work for personal gain and even I agree that is not good.
         The business model they work with is meant for the 1980′s not the 2010′s
          No ease of access.
          Prices staying the same yet as we all know stuff gets cheaper to make over time.
          EX: my first sat tv bought by my grandma was around $5,500 and the programming was considerably higher.
          If I was going to pay $5,500 for a sat today it better come with a big fucking TV and a awesome surround sound system.
     
    I mean you’d think people that are giants when it comes to Corporate America would know better than anyone else you have to adapt to survive.

    • Water is cool

      Pointless? No. Haven’t you learnt? It’s for the money $$$ :D

      They ain’t gunna solve the problems because they love sueing people. If they take down cyberlockers/linking sites etc they can get people to use bittorrent and then monitor the traffic and gain enough evidence to sue them or atleast threaten them with a £1000 pay-or-else schemes.

  • Guest

    This is professional work.
    Why aren’t there a Federation Against Copyright backed Corruption ?
    A similar investigation on half the politicians or judges backing SOPA/ACTA type laws or imposing precedents that take away freedoms would surely show many shady  meetings and suspicious donations.
    Fighting corruption on the highest levels of the justice systems and democracy.

    • FreeBSD

      “Why aren’t there a Federation Against Copyright backed Corruption ?”
      b/c ppl r 2 lazy. they just want to dl free stuff & watch it.

  • tonyj

    It really is 1984 in England.

  • MadAsASnake

    Funny – they justify the actions saying he was offering large quantities of DVD’s for sale… hmmm… links were free and there were no DVD’s. Anything obtained with that lie should have been disallowed… they cannot not have known it was a complete lie.

    • Guest

      I wonder if the could be done with obtaining information under false pretense but I doubt it.

      • MadAsASnake

        I suspect that the appeal will succeed unless they nobble the appeal judge. Funny how all the recordings of key events seem to have been misplaced, and all the original hard drives were “unintentionally” wiped just after the data was gathered. I’m astounded that FACT are not being prosecuted for illegal surveillance!

  • Rekrul

    Groups like FACT need to be cut from society like the cancer that they are.

  • justlulz

    man, that`s the price if u live in that “free corporate democratic” world you fought so much for. sorry for ya`all, thank god  I live in a 3d world country where this sh`t is not even remotely acceptable. I admit, i will and maybe( surely _) be shot on sight if I speak against my gov. But for downloading stuff? of the internets?!? > even my total repressive and  hungry  for blood gov IS NOT that stupid. Congrats, gg, show us the way to democracy. Oh, wait.. you just failed.

  • Noname

     I think they forgot that uTorrent become so popular due to it’s lightweight design.

    • http://twitter.com/Tanishab4 Tanishab

      ….
      goo.gl/jGdX9

  • http://twitter.com/Tanishab4 Tanishab

    Michelle replied I am amazed that anyone can make $6043 in 1 month on the network. did you look this(Click on menu Home)

  • Guest

    MPAA and RIAA tell the future in movies and Programs 

    https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=bohemian+grove+presidents+talk&oq=bo&gs_l=youtube-reduced.1.0.35i39l2j0l2.46377.48084.0.49729.2.2.0.0.0.0.335.482.0j1j0j1.2.0…0.0…1ac.CmIFM6ZkftM

    aspartame sweet poison foods

    bohemian grove

    jesse ventura conspiracy bilderberg
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r_YqH7YwjQE

    The Lone Gunmen Pilot – 9/11 Predictive Programming

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hmgeA3dr2uY

    Knowing” movie and the Oil Rig Explosion in the Gulf of Mexico

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z3WW6eoLcLI

  • Bob Carolgees

    So am I right in thinking that FACT were stalking his wife? I thought there were laws against that kind of thing.

  • http://twitter.com/meekcritic Meek Critic

    The RIAA started this war when they shut down Napster and they later escalated it when they started suing file sharers.  Now they’re using private investigators and utilizing manipulative and unscrupulous tactics to obtain evidence for the purpose of putting people in jail. 

    This is a war.  If you haven’t done so already, stop buying CD’s & DVD’s whose copyright is owned by RIAA or MPAA members.  The only way to defeat them is to cut their revenue.

    I assume that if the most knowledgeable file sharers do this, then 3-5% of the **AA’s customer base will stop buying their products.  If this campaign can gain momentum then maybe this 3-5% will soon become 10-20%.  If the boycott reaches 40-50% we’ll win.

    • downunder

       ironically this is probably why they seen a drop in dvd sells.. not cos of pirating but the backlash they producing.. the hatred of govs law and god freaks with a control freak attitude

      cause and affect

      each year i hear a win to their victory in fighting fraud and crime

      but it hasnt stop it in china and asia

      take out one thing and new wave begins

      Fair enough as Mike moore said.. hes not worried about people pirating his stuff.. but only if they selling his stuff as his
      now thats different.. if someone is making money from others content thats wrong

      but most on p2p public sites are making money they just enjoying
      the content and pick what they like ad free.
      now if theres a legal way available to ALL not just the usa people
      and offer same day of airing and not months people will opted for that

      • downunder

         opp are not making money miss the NOT there

        but guess dont matter just falls on deaf ears anyhow

        tv news is controlled and full of propaganda anyhow
        take wikileads… most didnt even know the sex charge  or rape BS was about him refusing to wear a comdom with the girl his was dating or met . 2 of them at that with shame charge.. its laughable is it not.. they want to get hom on those charges so then the can get him on other charges… of embarrasing USA
        leaking documents

        what a load of crock

        one word corruption at all levels

  • theonlyone

    If anyone gave out information to a non legal authority without a court order I believe he should sue them.

  • Steh Segler

    So how is this different from what News of the World did in their phone hacking scandal?

  • Steh Segler

    Dear Music / Film industry,

    This could be solved so easily. Just give people what they want, when they want it and at a reasonable price and most of the piracy concerns will simply go away. There are people that will always consume pirated content but the majority of the population would go for convenience every time. iTunes has already proven that.

    You simply cannot sue your customers into the ground and expect to survive in the long run.

    As a starting point look at the top 10 pirated content web sites and see what people are paying. Then increase the price by 10% and make the content available to any and all platforms (iOS, Mac OS, Windows, Android, Playstation, Xbox etc, iTunes, Amazon…). There will be some pain in the short term but trust me. Once you have people hooked they will be happy to pay for the convenience of not having to search the web for content.

    Hulu to some extend has already shown that there is a market for this. Now imagine a place where you can get any TV show, movie, etc ever produced. Imagine it being available at the same time anywhere on the planet. Imagine it costing 8 cents per minute. Maybe 10 cents per minute for premium content. Is that really so hard to imagine?

    • Dark Future

      You don’t get the big picture here.  The music / film industry doesn’t know what to do, and even if told, they still will not do it.

      The traditional players are smaller than they used to be and that means that they have fewer employees.  It is like a revolution, so who are the first to go?  The bright, intelligent people who know what to do.  Good people are the first to leave a declining industry. 
      Many have likely gone into the fast growing tech industry.  So who does that leave in the legacy industry?  The people who do not know what to do.  They are bureaucrats who muck with the system instead of creating new value.  That is all that they know.

      Also, until copyright is reformed, you will never see old content.  It would compete with and reduce the sales of new content.

  • downunder

     never happen they too wrapped up in greed.. they wont allow non usa people to download it without first making a  killing selling it to over seas cable tv like sky or public tv broadcasting so itune is a fail plus its too expensive.. ondemand in my country still charges a $1 per episode.. way to much.. they need either offer a block monthly price all you can EAT like what happens with competition with isp and data. prices . its has to be cheap as most are paying through the nose for expensive and slow data from isps
    so selling an episode for cheap I cant see happening.
    some even feeling they paying hundreds in month for data
    they they have already paid when downloading content..
    perhaps isps should set aside a percentage of each person
    to pay media.. :) now wouldnt that be a nice idea never happen though

    but it seems to me its not about selling content by some of the producers…
    After all greedy toads like simon cowell wont sell his show to many countries cos he wont make enough money from it
    so right off actions like that cause a pirating effect
    take NZ.. has a high UKer immigration and many of their shows arent available there.. and its like 1 year behind and many shows not ever been shown there.

    how about the addiction to content they have caused.. people are addicted
    to TV shows… its like other addictions..

  • Aliena Ferox

    This is so wrong. :(

  • Uuhfhj

    All those details are just part of a credit search..

  • retaliate

    FACT have acted above the law, unlawfully retained equipment after a questionable seizure and in this case, are lying through their fucking teeth at multiple junctures.

    FACT deserve to be destroyed and their directors deserve to live in fear.

    • Anonymouse

      Their directors don’t deserve to live.

  • Anonymouse

    Are you really surprised FACT break the law at will they are sponsored by Murdoch

  • OccupyUK

    STC is down now, mirror at https://stc.occupyuk.co.uk

    Also copies of the files are on there.

  • Pingback: A national disgrace

  • Pingback: Nobody expects the spanish inquisition | Sagor från livbåten

  • fangbin818

    tinyurl.com/cyk9xz2

  • baofu422

    tinyurl.com/cyk9xz2

  • BTGuard - BitTorrent Anonymously

NewsBits

Even more news...

  • 404 Fail: Six Strikes’ Piracy Alternatives Go Missing

    After years of negotiating and planning the “six strikes” copyright alert system finally saw the light...

  • Google Doesn’t Believe Kim Dotcom is Real

    Those who enter Kim Dotcom into Google’s search box will get millions of results. Still, Google...

  • Nintendo’s Miyamoto: Piracy More Concerning Than Used Games Market

    In an interview with Computer and Video Games, Nintendo designer Shigeru Miyamoto says that his company...

  • Monitoring BitTorrent Activity on a Network Using WireShark

    As all readers should know by now, BitTorrent activity is public and can be easily logged...

  • The Pirate Bay Suffers Downtime

    The Pirate Bay is not responding at the moment and most proxies appear to be down...

MostDiscussed

Below are TorrentFreak's most discussed articles of the past month. Join the discussion if you like.

CopyQuote

Left Quote

“The Pirate Bay has been one of the most important movements in Sweden for freedom of speech, working against corruption and censorship.

Peter Sunde Left Quote

PopularArticles

A selection of some TorrentFreak's classics dug up from our archives.