Comments on: MPAA Executive Tampered With IFPI Evidence in Internet Piracy Case

By: Not wanting jokers to know

Not wanting jokers to know — Tue, 30 Jul 2013 21:09:00 +0000

Judges never run out of cocaine or whores.

By: Not wanting jokers to know

Not wanting jokers to know — Tue, 30 Jul 2013 21:08:00 +0000

Not business but certainly corporations look at the cases a uncountable list of violations. Corporations act as psychopathic synthetic entities.

By: tetridae

tetridae — Thu, 25 Jul 2013 17:56:00 +0000

Any business run by humans will at some point strive to protect their position from competitors and challengers. It’s in human nature.

By: Tom Hyberger

Tom Hyberger — Thu, 25 Jul 2013 16:35:00 +0000

Because theft is still theft. Theft was proven beyond a reasonable doubt.

By: Mike

Mike — Tue, 23 Jul 2013 19:47:00 +0000

i am not sure about international laws but isn’t tampering with evidence a federal offense in MOST countries.

By: Guest

Guest — Sat, 01 Jun 2013 10:52:00 +0000

Defines an anchor Defines bold text

Defines a long quotation

Defines a table caption Defines a citation Defines computer code text Defines italic text Defines a paragraph Defines preformatted text Defines sample computer code text Defines a section in a document Defines strikethrough text ~~Defines strikethrough text~~ Defines strong text Defines underlined text

By: Guest

Guest — Sat, 01 Jun 2013 10:46:00 +0000

This is a test post. Please feel free to delete it. Testing HTML coding parameters. BLUE RED

By: Wormlore

Wormlore — Tue, 07 May 2013 21:15:00 +0000

I’m amazed at the length “Alec” goes to justify the tampering with evidence. In what other criminal investigation is the victim allowed to change the evidence himself? Alone? It seems like, in this case, only a few textfiles were edited to remove then name of a “spy”. In other criminal investigations, names may be blanked out before being produced in court, but that’s the work of the official investigators, not a lobbyist.

So now, we have an alleged tampering of evidence for which we fortunately had traces. Can you prove there was no other tampering? Actual forging?

But the worst part is not that the lobbyist acted in this way. Company executives act (legally… well, mostly) to their own profit. That’s a given, that’s why you build and work in a company. Criminals act against the law in their own benefit. That’s also a given, that’s why they are criminals. (Guess where the lobbyist goes here. A hint: “both” is an acceptable answer.) No, the problem lies with the police acting on that kind of second-hand evidence (when even the first-hand evidence is unreliable).

You don’t need to forget about prosecuting criminals. You need to remember to do it legally. The system that sues criminals has to be, well, not perfect as it’s still a human system, but as clear and flawless as it can be. In this case, it clearly was not.

By: nankuai

nankuai — Sun, 05 May 2013 03:44:00 +0000

tinyurl.com/cnaff79

By: jack-torrentfreak

jack-torrentfreak — Fri, 03 May 2013 13:36:00 +0000

So sick and tired of this. Money makes the world go to hell.
Anyway, ther are lots of workarounds to those DMCA/MPAA/RIAA guys – VPNs, proxies, etc. Just use them and they will not get any evidence.
If setting up a VPN/proxy is to complex for you – use external download boxes. BTW: external download boxes guarantee that there will be no evidence of you downloading any torrents.
BTW, I can provide you with more details on this and access to my torrenbox located outside of DMCA/MPAA/RIAA jurisdiction. Send me a message to jack-torrentfreak at ukr dot net