My SeedBox Provider

100Gb Storage, Terabytes of transfer with 1Gbit peaks Seedbox for JUST 9.95 euro per month!

@22 nubcakes/neo/reason: See #15, that’s a sensible and informative comment, take an example, maybe if you really had some intellect you would have something else todo but troll. Must be good to be paid to be blind to the inconvenient parts of any article and taking things out of context as usual. Trying to convince everyone that NZB itself is illegal ? Selectively forgotten there is a notice and take down policy which means ….(you can fill in the rest with you’re internet-IQ) ?

LOLOL

This has happened in Europe

If we (torrent users / site admins) remove MPA / RIAA materials from all torrent sites, shouldn’t their sales go down?

This solves two problems: The MAFIAA can’t sue everybody with a computer, and the lesser known, less advertised, competitors (indie, etc) will have a greater chance at success because they are the only ones with the opportunity to get their material on this widely popular distribution system.

I understand that people want to have the latest whatever that everyone is talking about for free… but if someone makes something cool and doesn’t want to share, fuck em I say.

You think this bribery will be going on in a way that you can easily point to? You think the only kind of bribery that exists is the “exchange of brown envelope under the table” kind? Or that if it hasn’t been proven yet it means it doesn’t exist?

As Pirate Dave said, don’t make me laugh.

duh, there is no reason to store logs that would be self incriminating or incriminate others. nuff said.

Why doesn’t newzbin use this method ?

Goddam your stupid – Newzbin does use this method.

@PirateDave: ” I was involved in a civil case once and had all the paper work on my side–the judge still decided in favour of the company (who had the moolah.)

They’re not bribed? Don’t make me laugh.”

Sorry don’t make me laugh – that is not evidence of bribery, that is you being butthurt about losing a civil case. There is no evidence of Judges being bribed in any case involving copyright infringment. If you had any evidence of this at all you would report it to the relevant authorities – I bet you did not of course because that would interfere in the butthurt victim mentality right?

Every court case involving copyright infringment earn the comments that bribery is going on. Despite no evidence of this occurring in any cases involving copyright infringment. The side that you wish to win not winning is not evidence.

Many of these court cases result in decisions against MPAA and Co. making the whole accusations of bribery laughable.

Nevertheless, clueless newb conspiracy theorists continue to assert that bribery is going on. Like many people of low to average intelligence and unwarranted self importance they find it hard to distinguish between what they imagine is happening and reality and go around claiming that their imagined events are real.

They also never ever look at the past – that would destroy the illusion they make for themselves that they are highly intelligent and can know of events by simply imagining them. If they looked at the past they would see that many cases they asserted had bribed judges presiding over came to decisions against MPAA & Co. and this would make their claims of bribery that thy imagined appear as deluded as they actually are.

So the buffoons will continue to imagine what’s happening and then claim the imagined events are in fact reality. This is what insecure and/or people of low intelligence do to avoid facing their own natures.