New York Piracy Law Smells Fishy Says Pirates
Written by Ben Jones on May 06, 2008A new anti-piracy law, proposed yesterday by New York State Attorney General Andrew Cuomo has been criticized as pointless pandering to lobby groups, and ‘cronyism’. Worse, the bill is based on date from the widely discredited LEK study of 2006.
The new law proposes to make the recording of films in a cinema a class A misdemeanor with penalties of up to a year in prison, and a $1,000 fine for a first offender. Repeat offenders would be charged with a felony, and correspondingly higher penalties.
Unusually, however, the bill is unnecessary, as the Family Entertainment and Copyright Act of 2005 (link) already criminalized this action, with much stronger penalties. The question then seems to be not what the act is about, but WHY?
Fortunately. The answer isn’t hard to guess at with some digging. Mr Cuomo, has, like the MPAA chairman Dan Glickman, strong ties to the Clintons. Cuomo was considering running for the US Senate in 2000, but allowed current presidential candidate Hillary Clinton to run for that seat instead.
At the time, he was a Cabinet Secretary in her husband Bill’s, White House, serving as ‘Secretary of Housing and Urban Development’, during the same period that current MPAA chairman Dan Glickman was serving as ‘Secretary of Agriculture’. To some, that seems more than coincidence.
It is little surprise then, that the announcements for the law contain data from the MPAA’s 2006 LEK study as their only supporting evidence. A study which has not only been widely ridiculed (including by me), but which the MPAA has themselves undermined earlier this year.
Speaking out against the bill has been the US Pirate Party, calling it “a disgusting act of cronyism”. Ray Jenson, the Party’s operations officer , commented on the bill saying, “There can be no justice in this country, if a lobby group can effectively ‘buy’ former colleagues to propose laws like these.” The Party also hinted that they would soon be releasing a study, showing a more realistic view of the damage caused by ‘cinema camming’.
Whilst the law hasn’t been passed yet, the support shows that at least some of the millions the MPAA has pumped into its lobbying efforts have not been in vain. Meanwhile the chairman of the US Pirate Party, Andrew Norton, had this comment to offer. “In the end, no amount of laws will save the horse-and-cart that is the Entertainment Industry right now, from technological progress in this automobile age.”
The NY Attorney General’s office had not replied to calls for comment at the time of publication.Previously: Most Popular DVDrips on BitTorrent (wk18)
Next: Test: Does Your ISP Slow Down BitTorrent Traffic?
32 Responses (Add yours or TrackBack)
Pages: « 1 [2] Show All
“Whilst the law hasn’t been passed yet, the support shows that at least some of the millions the MPAA has pumped into its lobbying efforts have not been in vain. Meanwhile the chairman of the US Pirate Party, Andrew Norton, had this comment to offer. “In the end, no amount of laws will save the horse-and-cart that is the Entertainment Industry right now, from technological progress in this automobile age.”” … a sentiment I agree with wholeheartedly — the MPAA and RIAA cannot seem to adapt to the digital age … eventually, such stubbornness will only lead to the downfall of their corporations …
If they want to stop piracy they can but they to gritty for that. Instead they keep spending money on a war they never ever will win unless they sit down and think.
One of the reason people are not going to the movies as much as before is because the entire U.S is going broke and with this said, a average family of 4 mother father and 2 child will spend a average of $10 + $10 + $6 +$6 entry fee = $32 + snacks of course you can’t bring not even a bottle of F water in so you have to buy everything in theaters.
A $1 soda will cost you 3x its value so does popcorn and the rest of they bull S***.
So it should add up to minimum of $55 to see one movie vs buying a $5 copy and order large pizza for the hole family $15 = $20. if they stop ripping people off would help.
Everyone knows they spend millions an advertising movies, and help sell piracy because that makes kids go crazy they can’t watch tv without seen the same movie preview 20 times a day, making the parents go crazy and without the money to go to the movies well he will by a $5 copy. So cut that huge budget a little bit buddy. STOP PUTTING BULL S*** IN MY CHILD’S HEAD STOP PROMOTING THE SAME CRAP 20 TIMES A DAY. See if you could make a family special example: parents and children group of 5 $20 + $3 per extra child and at least one free popcorn.
And $5 for person not only and Tuesday when people got to work.
And stop saying piracy is a bad thing or is hurting people or making Hollywood go bankrupt. Who do you really want me to feel sorry for the studios who made over 100 millions in one year instead of 200 millions. Or people or families who can’t afford to go to the movies because the crazy prices. Thanks to the pirates who sell then to families and make it affordable. thanks to the pirates who sell then to all these teens in the street and make them at least for that night to be off the street committing real crimes or getting shot.
And when the DVD hits the stores stop charging $20+ for it we all know it cost less than a stupid $1 to make plus you already made 3x or more of all the money invested in movie theaters Stop paying so much for a stupid actor I think one million should be enough Jesus Christ” ill do a movie for less than 100,000 all the ones you want. A good movie will sell no mare who is in it I didn’t know no one on the movie 300 and that’s my S***.
I can’t believe that this gritty people are trying to compare a Movie pirate with a (murderer) (rapist) (robbers who steal from people who don’t make 100,000 a year)
For real for real these is a war of the rich vs the poor and call them pirates all you want
To me they are ROBBIN HOODS
Jack Sparrow
5 references to this post
Pages: « 1 [2] Show All
Add your response